Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bolivia, A Beacon of Hope
The inspiring example of Evo Morales's Bolivian government
There's a game I've been playing recently. Any time I read the news and get depressed about the parlous state of our world, I type "Bolivia" into Google news and wait for the results. It's really all you need to brighten up your day.
In the last month things such as this have popped up: Bolivian women spearhead Morales revolution, which describes the decision by Bolivia's president, Evo Morales, to stock half his new cabinet with women, nearly half of them indigenous. More recently there was this: Bolivian president donates half pay to victims, which detailed Morales and his vice president Alvaro García's decision to donate half their March salaries to help the victims of the Haiti and Chile earthquakes.
What is happening in Bolivia now - and has been since MAS, or Movimiento al Socalismo, came to power in 2005 - is truly inspiring. There has been a lot of talk about how the left is dead and Francis Fukayama's "End of History" means we all have to accept that a global economic system that creates obscene inequalities and mass starvation is the highest stage of social and economic organisation our species can attain.
That might be true for an academic at Johns Hopkins, but for everyone else looking to the future and something to fight for, I ask them to kindly divert their gaze to Bolivia. It is the closest thing we have to real democratic socialism: a government, but more importantly a grassroots movement, committed to economic and gender equality, anti-racism, free speech and every other ideal the left should hold dear.
In December last year MAS won their second five-year term with 67% of the public vote, more than double the percentage won by their nearest opponent, Manfred Reyes Villa. The re-election of an incumbent was particularly exceptional in Bolivia. A country often dismissed by regional experts as "ungovernable" due to its bloody history of military coups and mass public protests, it has seen only a handful of presidents complete their terms in office. The FT now calls Morales "one of Latin America's most popular leaders".
Morales's landslide victory was a clear sign of public support for the present administration and the extensive social reforms they have implemented. On coming to power in 2005, Morales pledged to see through a "democratic revolution" in an attempt to alleviate poverty in Bolivia, the poorest country in South America. The democratic revolution had its genesis in 2000 in what were called the "water wars", centred in the city of Cochabamba. The water industry had just been privatised with the help of the neoliberal government and the IMF and was run now by the US corporation Bechtel.
Prices soared and police were even instructed to arrest people collecting rainwater to bypass the new prices. The indigenous community was up in arms and Bechtel was forced out by the local communities. The indigenous movement, which is based around small micro-democratic communities, went on to blockade La Paz. The government shot dead a score of protesters in 2005, before the presidential incumbent was forced out and fled to Miami.
When Morales was elected he became the country's first indigenous president and his party embarked on a programme of "decolonising the state". For Latin America, the election of an indigenous leader had the same poignancy as Barack Obama's election in the US.
Throughout his mandate Morales has determinedly pursued a programme of social change, including the part-nationalisation of the country's energy resources and a surge in social spending that has focused on conditional cash transfers (whereby payments have been made to poor families on the condition that they send their children to school.) These measures have seen Bolivia record a fiscal surplus for the first time in 30 years; the country has been predicted a higher growth rate this year than anywhere else in the Americas; and poverty levels have dropped continually since MAS came to power. Even the head of the IMF's western hemisphere countries unit has praised the Morales government for what he referred to as its "very responsible" macroeconomic policies.
The backbone of Morales's reform programme was the creation of a new Bolivian constitution, which was ratified by a public referendum in 2009. Morales has signalled that he will make the implementation of the new constitution his main legislative priority at the start of his second term. In a country that is often compared to apartheid South Africa, as the stark divisions of poverty and inequality are marked along racial lines, this constitution represents Bolivia's Freedom Charter.
The texture of the modern Bolivian revolution is different to that of Hugo Chávez's Venezuela. It is a much more bottom-up revolution, and Morales is kept on a tight leash by the democratic movement that was behind his rise to power in a way Chávez isn't. As you look to our election battle between a Labour government that has been in power for 13 years and allowed inequality to worsen and a Conservative cabinet full of reactionary Old Etonians, it's easy to despair. But when you do, look to Bolivia. The future lies in that small landlocked Latin American country of 9 million people.
- Posted in

21 Comments so far
Show AllViva Bolivia!
I was only (to my regret) partially aware of what Chávez has accomplished in a few years. It shows the power of participatory and socialist democracy in action. I love they now have a surplus. This must frustrate the hell out of the Friedmanites. And all those other ivory tower status quo academics.
We COULD follow Bolivia's lead -- wouldn't THAT be a hoot -- but we need to get more desperate yet I am afraid. Bolivians were at the end of their rope when they rebelled. Faced down troops at the cost of some lives.
Are we that brave? Not yet, not yet.
Gary
"America is a passionate idea or it is nothing. America is a human brotherhood or it is chaos."
-- Max Lerner, Actions and Passions (1949)
gdgoodman
You are still of the opinion that Chavez is doing well and the people of Argentina are benefitting from his rule? Have you checked whats going on there lately?
Have you been to Bloivia? (not rhetorical)
Just to set things straight, Chavez is from Venezuela. Morales is the president of Bolivia. Neither is from Argentina. Got that?
Damn Hamster, Its monday! A slip of the muddled mind. And I was last in Venezuela just a couple of years ago. The folks there would kick my butt!
My apologies!!!
gdgoodman: Chavez of is a dictator under the cover of a weak democracy and a phony propaganda campaign against U.S. imperialism. Don't confuse him with the great work of Evo Morales and Bolivia.
Gary, as Hamster rightfully took me to task for, I obviously meant to say Venezuela! Not ARGENTINA. Mea Culpa! Please adjust the question accordingly. Its Monday.
Those of us who are older need to be in the front lines taking the bullets. We've had long lives and plenty of time to stop all that has happened but yet we have not! We sit at our keyboards and complain complain complain but we take little action. Oh, sure. Sometimes we "march". Lot of good it does. When the fecal matter hits the fan the results will not be evenly distributed. It is time we put our money, actually our bodies, where our mouths are. (I am sixty years old and I get more pissed off by the day. Anger rises. And rises.)
For years, I have paid close attention to the democratic progress in Bolivia, and have used the country, and the activism of the people in Bolivia as inspiration to motivate some of my friends to action. However, I'm NOT certain that I succeeded in my efforts. They always seemed dazed by the facts!
I still recall when Bolivians kicked out the oil companies, and then, Bechtel, and finally, overturned the government and forced a REAL democratic election, ultimately, naming Evo Morales President.
There is actually a good documentary on the behind-the-scenes campaign of presidential candidate Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, and the men who were hired to run his campaign. BTW, Lozada represented the status quo in Bolivia and ran against Evo Morales for the presidency. The 2005 documentary is titled, Our Brand Is Crisis, and is directed by Rachel Boynton.
Who were the men who were hired to run Lozada's campaign? None other than James Carville and Jeremy Rosner, among others who worked for the status quo in Bolivia. So, ask yourself, who worked against Democracy in action? The DLC -- that's who!
The Zapatistas are still holding their ground in Mexico- at least for the moment.
The reality is that if the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela was snuffed out early on, none of these advances and possibilities would have been realized. If Chavez had not survived and was murdered in 2002, the onward march of Latin America's social movements would have faced much harsher crackdowns and the electoral victories opening up the peaceful road would have been likewise reversed. Indeed, the need to destroy Chavez and his reputation globally is a top priority for global capitalism, lest the revolution spread beyond Latin America.
We need to remember always that an unexpected thing happened in Venezuela in 1998. Venezuela was perhaps the last place in Latin America one would expected a revolution, but it happened, opening the constitutional road for others. The Chavez administration has had to struggle with a low level of social mobilization and has had to build the revolutionary movement from a marginal presence to the dominant force it is today. Bolivia on the other hand, has had a rich history of social movements that finally coalesced (not without difficulty) into the electoral programme of MAS and Evo Morales. This was aided by the example set by Venezuela as well as moral and economic support, and it also has had more chance to breathe in the four years MAS has been in power.
As such the entire process needs to be understood organically -- you can't just carve out a utopian morale booster without appreciating what it took to get there. To do so is to do all these interconnected movements a grave disservice that also sets oneself up for disappointment when one's heroes come up short.
Some very good points Ceti -- it took a long time for Morales to unravel the maze of secret international agreements after first getting elected. Venezuela helped tide over that hard early period.
Thanks for putting things in perspective
The water industry had just been privatised with the help of the neoliberal government and the IMF and was run now by the US corporation Bechtel.
Prices soared and police were even instructed to arrest people collecting rainwater to bypass the new prices.
...the presidential incumbent was forced out and fled to Miami.
------------------------
These 3 sentences pretty much give the dots which, when connected, show why America's wealth is the flipside of other countries poverty.
For help in connecting the dots, see:
http://www.filestube.com/dd68ae71ac6bee3003ea,g/John-Perkins-Confessions-of-an-Economic-Hitman.html
A 12 MB PDF of the famous book.
For some video interviews of John Perkins, see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTbdnNgqfs8
My username here is because of my three heroes, Hugo, Evo and Rafael! Truly the hope for the future, if we are going to have a future for the human race.
And I am not sure why ceti said, "Venezuela was perhaps the last place in Latin America one would [have] expected a revolution..." Let's not forget that Venezuela was the birthplace of Simon Bolivar, certainly the Venezuelans haven't.
Whether or not Chavez has become a bit to much of a Power usurper: Please consider this. And I have to trust a lot of Left leaning news article to have any opinion at all.
Why the left news stories? Answer - the right leaning stories are written by the cohorts of
corrupting clandestine organizations who are working for about 1% of the population only:
Thereby I have a understanding that the CIA:
And other Amerikan sponsored undercover organizations are meddling in other countries sovereign political business.
WHY - because it serves the interests of THE POWER ELITE!
AND that makes ALL THE DIFFERENCE.
KUDOS to Chavez and Evo Morales.
WHY - Because they are taking care of 99% of the people!
And how do I know that for sure? Answer - I don't. So why do I have a opinion if I am not 100% sure?
Answer - Because I am stuck in that precarious human condition, whereby after considering hopefully enough information;
I can therefore make a CHOICE. Kinda like choosing to believe that Jesus was I good guy with a very good heart who really cared about the people.
You know what I mean jelly bean? Jesus could have been just a nice GAY PERSON who really just loved men only, that the CHURCH decided to make look like a man who loved ALL the PEOPLE.
Power to those that have COMPASSION FOR ALL LIVING THINGS!
Bolivia's people are poor - not the country, which is very rich in natural resources which is something the thieving northern/western corporations have been exploiting for too many years.