Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Should Meet 'Rethink Afghanistan' Caucus
President Obama, who is under pressure from the Pentagon and defense contractors to surge 40,000 additional U.S. troops into occupied Afghanistan, will meet Tuesday with members of Congress to discuss the sorry state of the mission and its uncertain future.
That's the good news -- sort of.
At least the president is talking to the civilian leaders who, according to the U.S. Constitution, are supposed to be making decisions about whether to engage in and escalate wars.
The bad news is that the president and Vice President Joe Biden (who is reportedly skeptical about expanding the occupation force) are not planning to meet with members of Congress who have studied the conflict and determined that it is time to develop a flexible exit strategy.
Here is the list of House and Senate members who got the White House invite:
SENATORS * Harry Reid, Majority Leader, D-NV * Dick Durbin, Majority Whip, D-IL * Mitch McConnell, Republican Leader, R-KY * Jon Kyl, Republican Whip, R-AZ * Carl Levin, Armed Services Chair, D-MI * John McCain, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-AZ * Daniel Inouye, Appropriations Chair and Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-HI * Thad Cochran, Appropriations Ranking Member and Defense Subcommittee Ranking, R-MS * John Kerry, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-MA * Richard Lugar, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-IN * Patrick Leahy, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-VT * Judd Gregg, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-NH * Dianne Feinstein, Intelligence Committee Chair, D-CA * Kit Bond, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MOREPRESENTATIVES * Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA * Steny Hoyer, Majority Leader, D-MD * John Boehner, Republican Leader, R-OH * James Clyburn, Majority Whip, D-SC * Eric Cantor, Republican Whip, R-VA * Ike Skelton, Armed Services Chair, D-MO * Howard McKeon, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-CA * Howard Berman, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-CA * Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-FL * David Obey, Appropriations Chair, D-WI * Jerry Lewis, Appropriations Ranking Member, R-CA * Nita Lowey, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-NY * Kay Granger, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-TX * John Murtha, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-PA * Bill Young, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Ranking Member, R-FL * Silvestre Reyes, Intelligence Committee Chairman, D-TX * Peter Hoekstra, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MI
Readers will note that there are plenty of Republican hawks -- led by McCain -- on the list.
And, yes, there are some skeptics -- such as Durbin and Kerry.
But where are Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin, and Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, who have emerged as outspoken advocates for a rethink of the occupation and, in Feingold's case, a flexible exit strategy? Feingold, a member of the Intelligence Committee who has spent more time than most members in southern Asia, knows the territory well. And he would bring an alternative point of view to what is, after all, being billed as a frank and open discussions of strategy. (White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says: "The president has discussed wanting to hear from all of those that are involved in this, and certainly Congress plays a big role in this.")
Where is Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern's name on the list? McGovern has visited Afghanistan, met with troops and commanders, consulted with international security and development strategists, and come to share their conclusion that an escalation of U.S. forces would be a bad idea. The well-regarded vice chair of the Rules Committee is, as well, the sponsor of legislation demanding the development of an exit strategy. That legislation just attracted its 99th cosponsor in the House, meaning that with McGovern himself it now has 100 signed-on backers -- including a number of conservative Republicans.
McGovern and Congressman Walter Jones, R-North Carolina, recently circulated a letter opposing General Stanley McChrystal's bid to shift 40,000 additional troops to Afghanistan.
More than 50 House Democrats and Republicans signed the letter, which argues that "the last thing that our nation needs as it struggles with the pain of a severe economic crisis and a mountain of debt is another military quagmire. We believe that is why recent polls consistently show that a majority of Americans are opposed to a military escalation in Afghanistan."
The dissenting members are right about the polls.
They are right about the quagmire, a point brilliantly made by Robert Greenwald's just-released documentary "Rethink Afghanistan".
The president is right to consult Congress.
But he is wrong -- very wrong -- to consult only with supporters of the escalation and cautious critics. It reinforces a problem highlighted by Greenwald. "The echo chambers in Washington have long argued that Afghanistan is the war of necessity," the director explains. "This reasoning excluded any opposing viewpoints and has mired us in what is now perceived as the endless war."
The president should at least give a hearing to those members of the House and Senate who have had the wherewithal and the courage to challenge the convention wisdom that says the occupation of Afghanistan must continue -- and must continue to expand.
Instead of the defenders of the status quo, Obama should consult the "Rethink Afghanistan" caucus.


22 Comments so far
Show AllAgain with the "should". He and other high officials "should" do a lot of things but there is presently nothing to motivate them to do what they should.
Wonder if Nichols is going to be complaining about what Obama should do for the next 4 years without really holding Obama himself accountable?
Spot on Vern!!! Sick and tired of reading/listening to liberals like Nichols and Michael Moore giving this guy a pass. Obama is not what you think or want him to be. Liberals should have known this way before the election. Stop the charade!!!
"Stop the charade!!!"
They can't stop. They're committed to it.
They've got a lot of nerve, eh?
"You've got a lotta nerve
To say you got a helping hand to lend
You just want to be on
The side that's winning.
No, I do not feel that good
When I see the heartbreaks you embrace
If I was a master thief
Perhaps I'd rob them.
I wish that for just one time
You could stand inside my shoes
And just for that one moment
I could be you.
Yes, I wish that for just one time
You could stand inside my shoes
You'd know what a drag it is
To see you!"
(excerpts, Bob Dylan, "Positively 4th Street")
let's get real
we are in the mid-east to steal the oil and gas
who needs a caucus for that
obummer is a clown - obviously controlled by nwo kissinger and zbig - and he aint making any decisions at all
and he is in way over his head - seemingly unable to make any headway anywhere
his belly flop on the chicago olympics i think shows how much of an imbecile he is and how useless - all the pretty teleprompter reading aside
increasingly the world is moving away from both nazi states - the one is the us and the one in israel and no amount of media spin - corporate or otherwise - is gonna change that
pax americana and the american century is now doa - with the puppet/fool obama standing on the bridge of the titanic admiring all the pretty icebergs
we'll be lucky if we have the gas money to get our mercenary peasant killing army back to the home land when this is all said and done
increasingly it matters not what we do or say - the world is tired of us and with good reason
we are like a persistant case of the clap to them
they are going to sit back and watch the corporations put us all in the fema prisons - it will be the last "profit center" in the whole country
Why do all of the Obusha supporters get the idea that he just needs a little more information to make the right decision. When are they going to realize that he is doing exactly what he planned to do all along.
In America, war is good business, and Obama is a good businessman.
" Obama is a good businessman ". I disagree. OBOMBA may have some business acumen, but he is the consummate con man and having said that, we can dream that if he wanted to, he could con the MIC; although it would probably cost him his life.
Today's KKKorporate businessman IS a con man.
Amen to that brother! Afgan has been the plan all along and its path will lead us into another "essential" war.
If he doesn't get us out or consider leaving as an option then we have to mve Obama-- out of office.
Your broke it; you bought it.
enjoy!
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
Excluding the dissenters is inexcusable. I would like an explanation from Obama why he made that decision. He's building a long list of seriously flawed decisions and if he continues as he has the Democratic Party is finished.
Per Paranoid Pessimist, Nichols can beg and plead for Obama to do things he "should" do from now till doomsday, but that assumes the prez gives a damn what ANY progressive pundit thinks or advises. He ain't reading or hearing you, Nichols, or giving a shit what any of us thinks. He mainly cares what the far right thinks and how to bend to its demands (such as him jumping off the top storey of the nearest tall building), how to win his own little war by wasting as many lives and as much money as humanly possible, and how to bury healthcare reform forever, under the mountain of Insurance giveaways that define his fraudulent "plan."
Obama is as anti-progressive as Bush ever was, and it's well past time commentators like Nichols recognized and accepted it. Then maybe he can Move Forward into meaningful territory, like calling for his impeachment, favoring a third-party effort to unseat his worthless ass in 2012, or just shutting the fuck up.
Ephraim, as Smokey Robinson said, "I second that emotion"
Obama has collapsed like a cheap suitcase and has no guts (period).
He is nothing but a tool for the ruling-elite corporate/financial EMPIRE that funded his 'safe' campaign for the status quo.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
PS. don't blame me -- I voted the third time for Nader, the only candidate with the vision and guts to confront the corporatist EMPIRE -- or to confront 'Corporate Communism', as Dylan Ratigan calls it.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
I thought I was the only one who voted for Nader a third time. High five, bro.
Brian Wood
Buffalo, New York
Rethink Iraqiranistan, hell! RETREAT Afghanistan!!
yeah i know whacha mean- I have the same problem. "rethink" sounds so feeble. LEAVE AFGHANISTAN! GET OUT! after 8 years no more thought isrequired. the movie is good tho
This is one more demonstration that President Obama is not a Liberal, but is a Centrist.
When the Democratic candidates were campaigning for President in 2008, Obama was not my pick BECAUSE I knew that he was NOT particularly liberal (I felt the same about Hilary).
Though I am a white man, I very much liked the idea of our next President being Black and/or a woman. However, someone such as Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison or Senator Barbara Boxer are much more to my liking.
Dennis Kucinich was my pick for President.
Russ Feingold is another politician who has better viewpoints than President Obama.
Barack Obama is not nearly liberal enough for my taste, and the information in the above article reinforces my statement.
My guess is Al Qaeda returned to Florida and setup training camp there.
Why is it so difficult for Obama to just say, "OK. Things are not going as well as we expected so we've decided to pull all our troops out. Please, don't anyone worry, it's not the end of the world."
Has any leader ever done this? And if so, what were the results? Did the world end? Did the enemy triumph and conquer?
And, please, don't give me any of that Nazi crap. It is more than understood that if you face a foe who has the industrial capacity to take over the world you've got to put up resistance.
But the Taliban, and even those Al Qaeda animals, are not nearly remote to having any kind of an industrial base to build a formidable army that will go from country to country, stomp everyone out, and do as they wish.
In fact, one can argue that as far as Al Qaeda is concerned those SOBs can be taking care of with good ol' police work which is exactly what the entire continent of Europe did to take care of the terror groups in their midst.
As far as the Taliban is concerned the US should immidiately leave that country and let them rot in their own excrement.
Woman rights my butt. I've had it with sacrificing US soldiers for the sake of anyone else's rights.
Witness Iraq.
If those Taliban want to behave like a bunch of troglodytes let them be. As long as they can be contained in their own country we have nothing to worry about.
I have to say that it's simply amazing, out of this world, that someone like Richard Nixon was able to bring our sad involvement in Vietnam to an end but The Most Enligthened One Obama doesn't have enough brains to do so.
Afghan patriots and freedom fighters look forward to more redneck targets.
The Bush-Obama bailout of predatory capitalism shoulda wised folks up. Obama is a right-wing stooge.