Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
To Investigate CIA You Must Target Cheney
Vice President, High-Level Wrongdoing Must Be Focus of Inquiries
Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold, the chief critic of executive excess and wrongdoing in the Senate during recent Republican and Democratic administrations, wants Attorney General Eric Holder to appoint a prosecutor to investigate the CIA's harsh interrogation program.
But Feingold wants Holder to do it right.
The chair of the Constitution subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee is concerned that the appointment of a prosecutor by Holder -- which now seems increasingly likely -- come with a charge by the attorney general "to focus on holding accountable the architects of the CIA's interrogation program."
In a letter to Holder, Feingold, who also sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote:
Dear Attorney General Holder:Recent news stories indicate that you have reviewed the highly classified 2004 CIA Inspector General report on the CIA's interrogation program, and that as a result you are considering appointing a prosecutor to investigate individuals who may have gone beyond the legal authorization for that program provided by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) at the Department of Justice. I write to encourage you to do so, but also to urge you to focus on holding accountable the architects of the CIA's interrogation program. While allegations that individuals may have even gone beyond what was justified by those now-public OLC memos are extremely disturbing, we should not lose sight of the fact that the program itself –- as authorized –- was illegal, not to mention immoral and unwise.
As I said in a letter to President Obama in April, the OLC documents make clear that the details of this program were authorized at the highest levels of government, which is where the need for accountability is most acute. Those who developed, authorized and provided legal justification for the interrogations should be held responsible.
I understand this is a difficult decision for you, and I want to assure you that you will have my full support if you take this important step in furtherance of the rule of law.
This is an essential message, and an essential step in the process.
Official Washington does not like accountability.
Holder will be under pressure to organize a narrow inquiry that focuses on the misdeeds of underlings.
But this investigation needs to go where the real wrongdoing took place.
Former Vice President Dick Cheney was a principle proponent of harsh interrogation during the Bush-Cheney years, and has since emerged as the primary defender of the initiative.
When asked about the use of torture tactics late last year, Cheney told ABC News, "I was aware of the program, certainly, and involved in helping get the process cleared, as the agency, in effect, came in and wanted to know what they could and couldn't do. And they talked to me, as well as others, to explain what they wanted to do. And I supported it."
That is an invitation -- from Cheney himself -- to, as Feingold suggests, investigate the extent to which illegal activity was "authorized at the highest levels of government" and to "(hold) accountable the architects of the CIA's interrogation program."
Americans should tell the Attorney General to accept this invitation, and the Credo Action project of Working Assets is offering them an opportunity to do just that with a new campaign to "Tell Eric Holder to Start His Torture Investigation with Dick Cheney."


20 Comments so far
Show Allin other words, make him do it. wait, those words sound deceptively familiar. when the heat becomes too much, cheney will pull a ken lay.
then, laugh his sorry ass off, sitting on some island in the mediterranean, counting his good fortune$ as he enjoys his drink du jour.
"in other words, make him do it."
That's the same thing the Obamabots keep telling us every time we point out Obama's refusal to be progressive be it almost any issue. The madness never ends. :(
"make me" is the schoolyard bully's taunt.
Hmmm, that does seem to make sense now that I think about it. I can't remember one single coward who said "make me" who wasn't acting like a bully in my entire life. Sigh, replaced one bully with another on 1600 PA Avenue. :(
gives "detente" a whole new meaning.
I have a bad feeling about this.
And about AG Holder investigating the financial meltdown.
It appears that the scope of both these probes is to be as narrow as possible. The reasons should be obvious.
So Cheney green-lit the torture program---small potatoes.
HE LAUNCHED TWO WARS OF AGGRESSION BASED ON LIES. HE'S GUILTY OF WAR CRIMES. PROSECUTE HIM FOR THAT.
Knowing the details may be of interest to historians, but how will it help deter anybody from doing the same in the future?
No consequences, no deterrence.
Sioux Rose
Cheney's dead heart, battery-operated to the bane of the world to keep that monster's evil ticking, shamelessly almost brags about what was done to persons held in bondage, over-powered by a harsh and overwhelming military machine that needed victims/fall guys to lend some semblance of legitimacy to its campaign of violence rendered against a nation innocent of all accusations. And so a witchhunt was put into place and much like those that occured centuries ago, all form of just representation was disabled to allow a spectacle with only the remotest shadow of justice permitted to operate. This is the stuff of heroism? Can anyone picture anything more cowardly than incarcerating in some instances 14 year old boys to be USED at the sadistic pleasure of the sorts that sign up for these missions in faux patriotism? Ghastly. It deserves this ghoul's picture as signature for an era in which every truth strayed far from the moral compass equivalent of due north.
"Cheney's dead heart, battery-operated "
Blessed are the pacemakers.
Only the good die young
a new campaign to "Tell Eric Holder to Start His Torture Investigation with (waterbording) Dick Cheney."
The "cult of presonalities" that appears most predominant in the U.S. with its entertainment star culture seems to lead almost always toward responsibility assignments that seldom examine underlying systemic causes.
That's not to suggest that specific agencies like the CIA and individuals like Cheney shouldn't be investigated and brought to account for their transgressions. But, unless and until the system that led to and supported their abuses is examined and corrected fundmentally, you can be absolutely certain that it will keep on churning out the same results.
New faces are a dime a dozen, as is superfical restructuring and/or renaming of any agencies and programs they may administer now or in the future.
Yeah, Cheney's a bad guy. But Hitler wasn't the only nazi, so to speak.
The country needs to reexamine its intelligence infrastructure.
The spooks were already pretty scary but now they're even beyond psycho. Some of the stuff they've done recently makes Johny Wayne Gacy look normal.
The situation has gone beyond bad management and dirty tricks. It has imploded.
Between NATO, NSA, and CIA, and the FBI (and the cold-war) they've been in bed with mafia and terrorists, as well as banks, energy companies, and other nations' intel agencies (with god-only-knows HOW much dirt they have on each other) for so long that it is impossible to tell who wags who. One thing is for sure. Our alleged 'intel' agencies have been wagging the hell out of us for a long time. These assholes went partially underground in the late seventies, but came back into open power under Bush. Now there is no apparent seam between organized crime, terrorism, industry/finance, government, intelligence, and military. They have become immensely arrogant and seem not to care much for covering their crimes. It seems rather dangerous, especially if they have used all that illegal wiretapping to blackmail a majority within congress and the senate.
Sioux Rose
KOG: Elliot Ness is sending you an emphatic NOD from his grave.
VDB: Very clever!
TERRY: Thanks for the post. As usual, very informative.
George C. Brown - Amen!
The Republican party would like Cheney to gracefully disappear. His very public persona has been no asset. Dick was the nexus of the torture and all of it. With Bush complicit throughout. If the heat gets turned up, the investigation close enough that Bush is threatened.....well, Dick might find himself grabbed one night, and held down while a needle finds it's way home.
The Bush Crime Syndicate is very powerful. Cheney is expendable.
Targeting Cheney may be fitting, but evidently not if only him. The targeting would need to include plenty of "leaders" prior to the Bush Jr administration, and wherein "news" media and various "leftists", ... are writing about the so-called secrecy matter that Cheney is being faulted for having the CIA do, people should definitely read the following article.
"Dick Cheney's "Executive Assassination Ring".
Was British Weapons Expert Dr. David Kelly a Target ?",
by Tom Burghardt, July 17, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14423
Really make a point of reading this above article, which is importantly about the "mysterious" ... "suicide" of Dr David Kelly, but also importantly more; very critically important and dark ... matters of state projects of ... "beyond top secrecy" kind.
Yes, beyond top secrecy. So if it's of such secrecy, then how do we learn about these projects? Oh, well, it's just that some people who worked on some of these projects happened to begin to expose them, until ending up "mysteriously" dead, with a lot of these "mysterious" deaths "mysteriously" being suicides or very odd, rather incredible accidents; that is, governments declaring these as having been suicides or accidents. What governments? Oh, well, you know; the same ones that were also being exposed for their hellish, dark projects. Of course.
For some people, such events are [convenient]; also "of course".
It's "funny" how people working on exposing darkest of criminal activities of government end up "mysteriously" dying and while it's usually, often anyway, declared, by the suspect governments, to be suicides or accidents; very suspect or odd and sometimes incredible events. Quite convenient, too; for "special" people or people who consider themselves special, anyway. N'est-ce-pas?!
We do NOT live in real democracies, but under imperialist, colonialist, corporatist, ... rule, and we better grow up and understand what this means, because it means a hellish lot of ... hellish ... crap. We can refer to history, when we can find truthful information about it, and we get an important amount of that with the documentary film, "The Money Masters", which I've already mentioned many times here at CD over the past couple of weeks or so, but while it only tells about one important aspect of history. Otoh, it is history that is also related to imperialism, etc., too.
and so - it has begun -- the Blowback on the USA's "proud" application of "no rules" - torturing, indefinite detention, etc. etc. etc. -----
as the Taliban capture an American Soldier:
================================
Truthout Original
Worst Case Scenario
Tuesday 21 July 2009
by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Columnist
Frame grab of captive US soldier.
This screen grab from a video shows Private Bowe R. Bergdahl, who is being held captive by Taliban militants. (Photo: AFP / Getty Images)
The coward wretch whose hand and heart
Can bear to torture aught below,
Is ever first to quail and start
From the slightest pain or equal foe.
- Bertrand Russell
The torture debate in America got real three weeks ago.
Oh, the debate has been around for years now, of course, ever since the photos of what happened in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq came to light. Men covered in feces, bent double and lashed to bedframes, their faith humiliated by the menstrual blood smeared on their faces, their bodies savaged by dogs, and worse, reports of the rape of women and children.
Yes, the torture debate has been around for a while now, recently revisited by President Obama, who condemned and discontinued the practice, and by enablers of torture like Dick Cheney and John Yoo, who have labored mightily to defend it. It's been quite the hot topic among the chattering classes of American political discourse, a dialogue in three parts: one group condemning the practice, another group championing it, and a third group - the media professionals - taking no position and trying not to offend anyone, so they can get the big names back on the set for the Sunday shows.
Three weeks ago, however, the whole nature of the torture debate changed irrevocably when an American soldier from Idaho named Bowe Bergdahl somehow fell into the hands of the Taliban in Afghanistan. They have him now, and God help him, because it was the United States government under the administration of George W. Bush that set the terms for how anyone captured can and should be treated.
If the Taliban decide Bergdahl has information they want, they can waterboard him until he talks. They can compress his body and cover him with insects, they can rob him of sleep and deny him food, they can beat him and slather his body with his own waste, they can shove sticks into his rectum, they can rape him, and they can murder him. They can hand him over to representatives of another government and have him whisked away to some far-flung dungeon where "enhanced interrogation" has an even darker and more savage definition. For sure, they can deny him due process of any kind and never, ever, ever, ever let him go home again.
They could do this whether or not the United States had engaged in similar practices, but because we did these things, they can do these things and still claim the moral high ground. Why not? It was the United States government under the administration of George W. Bush who plowed that high ground into the gutter. Everyone stands the same height when they're face-down in the sewer.
One thing the Taliban apparently cannot do, however, is videotape their prisoner. Several days ago, a tape of Bergdahl, with his head shaved, pleading to be sent home to his parents, was released by his captors. "I am scared," said Bergdahl in the video. "I'm scared I won't be able to go home. It is very unnerving to be a prisoner. I have my girlfriend who is hoping to marry. I have my grandma and grandpas. I have a very, very good family that I love back home in America. And I miss them every day that I'm gone. I miss them and I'm afraid that I might never see them again and that I'll never be able to tell them that I love them again. I'll never be able to hug them."
The US government reacted swiftly to the video of Bergdahl. "We condemn the use of this video and the public humiliation of prisoners," said US military spokesman Col. Greg Julian. "It is against international law. We are doing everything we can to return this soldier to safety."
How hard it must have been for the US military to release a statement like that without feeling sick at heart and scared to death. The terrible irony and hypocrisy of the statement they released about the Bergdahl video must have been searing; we have set the table in such a way that torture is a positive action that saves lives, but videotapes are right out? No, that doesn't scan, and we know it, and the Taliban know it, and dollars to donuts Bergdahl knows it, too. Is he waiting in terror for the torture to begin? Has it already started?
The torture debate in America got real three weeks ago, and every American so-called Christian who has defended the practice can appreciate the lesson: we reap what we sow.
Pray Bowe Bergdahl doesn't reap it for us.
»
William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence." His newest book, "House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's Ravaged Reputation," is now available from PoliPointPress.
Comments
Targeting Cheney would expose Democrats like Pelosi, Reid, Obama and Clinton as co-conspirators, aiders and abettors, so it's not going to happen.
Obama and Hillary have been committing the same exact torture and war crimes since they took office on Jan 20, 2009, so they too should be targeted under the same rule. Not going to happen either.
So target Cheney! If it exposes anyone else....GOOD!