Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
It's Not Hillary, It's The Policy Stupid!
The media obsession over who's in and who's out of consideration for the Obama Cabinet brings the admonition on the famous "War Room" wall of Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign to mind: "It's the Economy Stupid!" Those of us eagerly awaiting relief from the debacle called the Bush administration should avoid getting swept up the in DC parlor game of who is getting what position in the new administration and focus instead on the fundamental changes we need the Obama administration to start making. In short, "It's the Policy Stupid!"
President Obama will begin his presidency with enormous good will from the American people and great hope from the world at large. It is imperative that he seize this opportunity by quickly moving his campaign pledges into bold and decisive action despite the opposition that surely awaits him.
Step one: End the US military occupation of Iraq. Immediately begin withdrawing US combat forces within sixteen months, clearly delineating the number and role of any remaining troops to limited non-combat roles such as providing security to the US embassy and training Iraqi security forces. Even before taking office, President-elect Obama's message of change has made a security pact with Iraq much more likely by assuring Iraqis that the United States will respect their sovereignty and pull our forces out. It has weakened Iranian opposition by increasing their confidence that the US will not be occupying permanent military bases on their neighbor's soil as a staging ground for attack
Step two: Change course in Afghanistan. Responding to the Bush administration's failure in Afghanistan by initiating an escalation of US combat troops could be the next step into a quagmire that would be a catastrophe for the United States, Obama's presidency, and the region. Changing course should include support for the Afghan government's outreach to insurgent forces, including elements of the Taliban willing to negotiate an end to armed conflict; a robust diplomatic effort that reaches out to key regional nations, including Iran and Pakistan; and a serious and sustained commitment of humanitarian aid and development assistance that can bring relief and hope to the beleaguered people of Afghanistan. Continued military commitment should be limited and predicated on a clear exit strategy that is linked to this comprehensive approach.
Step three: Engage Iran. President Obama should declare that seeking regime change in Iran is no longer the policy of the U.S. and initiate diplomatic contacts with the Iranian government immediately without preconditions.
Step four: Make a just and lasting peace in the Middle East a top priority by seriously arbitrating a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and capitalizing on the common interests of states in the region to prevent an implosion of Iraq and to establish stability.
Step five: Replenish the strength of our weakened military by cutting the number of troops that are put into harms way and striking unnecessary and obsolete military weapons from the defense budget. President Obama should reject calls for an increase in military spending and combat forces. Troop levels should be set not by reacting to the demands of militarizing our foreign policy under George W. Bush, but by the requirements of a new national security strategy. Additional levels of combat troops will be necessary only if the United States intends to launch yet more counter-insurgency campaigns by invasions and military occupations. The alternative is a national security policy that buries the "Bush Doctrine," respects international law, and restores America's place in the world as a source of inspiration and hope, not outrage and fear.
None of these steps will be easy. Hawks will echo Senator McCain's attacks during the presidential campaign that President Obama will be snatching defeat from the jaws of victory by changing course in Iraq. They will clamor for more troops in Afghanistan without any semblance of an exit strategy while rejecting meaningful diplomatic engagement with key regional players like Iran. And, they will relentlessly pressure Members of Congress from both parties to continue the gravy train of wasteful defense spending on obsolete and unnecessary weapons and equipment. President Obama and Members of Congress need to demand that, from now on, defense spending will be based on the national security interests of our nation and no longer on the political self-interest of politicians and the insatiable appetite of defense contractors.
Undoing the incalculable damage done by the Bush administration will require a fundamental reassessment of how to achieve genuine national security and setting a profoundly different course for national defense and foreign policy. The election of Barack Obama opens an extraordinary opportunity for our nation and the world. The stakes are too high to squander it.
- Posted in



22 Comments so far
Show All....and Hillary will do these things. Hillary will be taken seriously, whereas Condy was a joke.
Recycling is good. Except in the case of Hillary and Bill. Time will show this was Obama's first big mistake. Hillary is a warmonger and a sociopath.
But, Obama has now officially made his bed. He'll soon find out that among the bedbugs he's picked to sleep with, they'll be a couple of nasty cooties in there too named Hill & Bill. Unfortunately for us, we'll all feel their nasty bites.
Here's a thought, let's let that catch praise die. James Carville and all his quaint notions should be left back in the 20th century.
Step 6. Let the UN do all of the above with our support.
As "fashionable" as it is on this site to live in the fantasy that the UN is anything but a corrupt, pathetic, toothless disaster, giving ANY task to the UN has proved a recipe for failure.
Maybe if the US paid their UN dues and did not corrupt most of the Security Council's decisions, the UN would not be a pathetic toothless disaster. The UN has kept the peace in places like the Balkans and some African countries in spite of it all.
Exactly. I'm so tired of Americans saying the UN is useless while stabbing it in the back. You don't GET to criticize something's efficacy when you're actively engaged in trying to kill it.
UN Peacekeepers are certainly effective at sexual assaulting the local women and refusing to fight to defend them (see Rwanda).
It will be interesting to see how long Hillary Clinton tows the Obama line whenever it conflicts with her agenda.
www.wunderman-comics.com
Isn't branding a sociopath the women who wrote a book named "It Takes a Village to Raise a Child" a little over the top? I think Hillary comes across better than that characterization. She is flawed like all humans, but perhaps not that badly. Maybe a bit of a hawk, but that may have been the woman as commander in chief must be a little ruthless in appearance to get elected. Sorry but the American electorate is flawed in that respect. Just look at our bloated defense budget and our history.
he is bought off, or he would be dead as Dr. King,. Lennon and Kennedy,
you stupid USA 'sheeples'
that Bilderburg bitch needs to come clean on Mena, AK and the over 130 people dead from their coke trafficking,
bet she goes sees Uribe first, wanna bet
I am blessed, I get to go back to paradise and leave the old folks here
at least I am in the food business, but to EU, where they are more educated with what THEY eat
you folks can eat cake, Monsanto genetically screwed up cake
maybe the mexicans now know of what they have done to their corn and take matters like cartel style
and like remembering 1847, taught to all 2nd graders in Mexican schools
bilarybush-cheney,
many has Slobamanos really pissed of Latinolandia
Viva El Frente
Its a "toss up" between Condi & Hilary for the all time diplomatic "jive talk" medal.
It was Hilary's support of hubby "Wild Bill" in his bomb bomb bomb Iraq 1998 "Desert Fox" campaign that set her War agenda in stone. Remember her support of Challabi & her claim that she was briefed on the 2003 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iraq even though no one on her staff was authorized to read the report, it’s unclear who could have actually briefed her --- Is there no one out there to ask the questions ???
AIPAC was watching & listening & was well pleased when Clinton was the only Democratic senator to categorically accept the Bush administration’s claims regarding Iraq’s alleged chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs, Iraq’s alleged long-range missile capabilities, and alleged ties to al-Qaeda.
This & more all are parts of the Clinton contribution to the over 20 year Holocaust brought to Iraq by the USA on behalf of Israel.
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4802
http://www.bollyn.info/home/arti...foreign-policy/
"This leaves enough wiggle-room to drive a truck through."
I completely disagree! It leaves enough wiggle-room to drive a TANK through.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Don't worrying, the MIC is doing of splendid job of weakening itself. The more it tries to maintain control, the further into oblivion it will slip.
All that you say may be true. But Obama is not even president yet.
I would like to cling to some HOPE in th meantime, until it proves
HOPEless.
If Obama did the things in this article, I would rejoice! and hold
America high once again.
Well said, let's wait for O. to act in January and not worry that he will forget his pledges to us.
A question... I think I read that Hillary insisted on choosing her staff at State. What is typical? Does the President choose key appointments in a cabinet. Who gets to appoint ambassadors etc and reap the power from these appointments? I remember Janet Reno from the Clinton years. She seemed but a mouthpiece and I always thought that Clinton had key people right under Reno who steered her as directed by the President. Has Hillary been afforded privileges that aren't typical?
When they make those numbered lists -- there always seem to be about six items -- I skip them. No point in even reading that hot air.
Undoing the incalculable damage done by the Bush administration will require a fundamental reassessment of how to achieve genuine national security . . .
Perhaps it cannot be undone. Perhaps George Wanker Bush was the tornado that destroyed the trailer park of the United States, then doubled back to wipe out what was left. Yes, Obama hasn't done anything yet. Soon, however, he will be Chief Honcho and in my lifetime ACTUALLY BEING Chief Honcho does nasty things to people. His "team" makes it appear he will be using the well-worn rule book all Chief Honchos have used since the end of World War II. But history, vis a vis this nation, doesn't play by those rules anymore.