GOP: Lose Your Home, Lose Your Vote
Senator John McCain was a foot soldier in the deregulation revolution, which triggered the current banking crisis and the wave of foreclosures. In Michigan, his party wants to deny the right to vote to victims of the GOP's misguided economic policies and the sleazy banking practices they encouraged.
James Carabelli, chairman of the Republican Party of Macomb County outside Detroit, said, "We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren't voting from those addresses," the Michigan Messenger.com reported September 10. Barack Obama's campaign and the Democratic Party quickly filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of three Michigan residents who lost their houses to foreclosure, to stop the Michigan GOP from carrying out what Democrats called an "ugly" and "horrific" plan. Michigan is a key swing state where a few thousand votes could determine who wins its seventeen Electoral College votes.
McCain, who owns ten houses, has long been a lackey of the banking industry and a strong supporter of the industry's efforts to weaken government safeguards against irresponsible lending. Since 1989, the financial services, insurance and real estate industries have contributed $23.8 million to McCain's campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. This sector far outspent any other industry in making donations to the Arizona senator. Topping the list of McCain donors are Merrill Lynch ($366,035), Citigroup ($317,751), Goldman Sachs ($305,015), Morgan Stanley ($253,871), JPMorgan Chase ($207,728), Credit Suisse Group ($178,825), UBS ($178,515), Pinnacle West Capital ($164,050), Bank of America ($160,625), Lehman Brothers ($128,550) and Wachovia Corp ($121,346).
McCain was one of the Keating Five, who were behind the 1980s scandal that epitomized Washington's culture of corruption. He and four other senators tried to intimidate federal bank regulators on behalf of McCain friend Charles Keating, an Arizona real estate developer and owner of Lincoln Savings and Loan, who had raised $1.3 million for the politicians. McCain, who received $112,000 from Keating and flew to the banker's home in the Bahamas on company planes, attended several meetings in 1987 with federal bank regulators who were investigating Keating for swindling investors. In addition, McCain's wife, Cindy, and her father, Jim Hensley, invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators. McCain's Senate colleagues censured him for his poor judgement.
McCain didn't just help one banker looking for a favor. In the 1980s he favored the deregulation of the Savings and Loan industry, which led to the industry's collapse and a taxpayers' bailout of more than $500 billion. The industry, like Keating's Lincoln Savings, had balked at constraints on the S&Ls' ability to compete with conventional banks engaged in commercial lending. They got Congress to change the rules, allowing S&Ls to begin a decade-long orgy of real-estate speculation, mismanagement, and fraud. Banks and S&Ls gobbled each other up and made loans to finance shopping malls, golf courses, office buildings and condo projects that had no logic other than a quick-buck profit. When the dust settled in the late 1980s, about a thousand S&Ls and banks (including Lincoln) had gone under, billions of dollars of commercial loans were rendered useless and the federal government was left to bail out the depositors whose money the speculators had looted.
In 1999, McCain supported the banking industry's top priority, the Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act, which, as consumer groups had predicted, has been a major disaster.
Orchestrated by then-Senator Phil Gramm of Texas, the bill further deregulated the banking and insurance industries and is directly responsible for the current wave of home foreclosures and bank failures. It tore down the last remaining legal barriers to combining commercial banking, investment banking and insurance under one corporate roof. By 2005, the ten largest banks controlled 60 percent of industry assets. Banks, insurance companies, credit-card firms and other money-lenders became part of a giant "financial services" industry. Washington walked away from its responsibility to protect consumers with regulations and enforcement. While federal regulators looked the other way, banks and private mortgage companies indulged in risky loans and speculative investments. They invented new "loan products"--such as subprime loans and adjustable rate mortgages--that put borrowers, and their own banks, at risk. Wall Street packaged these loans to investors without scrutinizing their risk. Deregulation encouraged the industry to create this house of cards. Every aspect of the financial industry was so short-sighted and greedy that they didn't see the train wreck coming around the corner. Now major Wall Street banks are imploding.
Gramm, McCain's top economic advisor and campaign co-chair for most of his presidential campaign, was the chief architect of the deregulation laws. Like McCain, Gramm was a free-market fundamentalist and a puppet of the financial industry. He used his power as chair of the Senate banking committee to do the banking industry's bidding--and he enlisted McCain in that crusade. Gramm is now the vice chairman of UBS, the Swiss investment banking giant. Since leaving the Senate, he has used his political connections to lobby for further bank deregulation.
Gramm was considered to be a leading candidate to be Treasury Secretary in a McCain administration until he was forced to resign from his official campaign position in July for his intemperate remarks that the country had become "a nation of whiners" in a "mental recession."
Nevertheless, McCain has continued to parrot his mentor's economic views, arguing in favor of further deregulation of banks and business in general. "I have a long voting record in support of deregulation," McCain said in 2003. "I am a deregulator.... I believe in deregulation," he told CNN that same year. Earlier this year, as Wall Street was in meltdown and millions of Americans were at risk of losing their homes, McCain told PBS that "we need less government [and] less regulation" and that "I'm always for less regulation." This March, after the collapse of Bear Stearns, McCain continued to favor deregulating Wall Street.
Only in the last week has McCain changed his tune. He's endorsed the Bush plan to bail out Wall Street firms that engaged in risky, irresponsible behavior, instead of supporting government help for millions of troubled homeowners.
Many of those homeowners live in Michigan, where the economy is in free-fall--the direct result of Bush's misguided economic policies that McCain has consistently endorsed. In the last year, Michigan's jobless rate has jumped from 7.2 percent to 8.9 percent--the nation's highest. Michigan had the highest foreclosure rate in the the nation and economists expect it to get even worse as the state sheds more and more jobs. So far this year, 95,272 Michigan residents have received foreclosure notices--13,605 in August alone, according to RealtyTrac.
So, to rub salt in these wounds, the Michigan GOP hatched a plan to take away the votes of people who've lost their homes. As reported in the Michigan Messenger, Republicans intended to use foreclosure lists to challenge voters at the polls. In a conference call with reporters, Mark Brewer, chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, said that the McCain campaign "wants to add insult to injury by denying those residents their right to vote."
Bob Bauer, general counsel for the Obama campaign, called the GOP plan "a new and especially repellent version of caging." (Caging is a technique used to challenge voters by taking a list of addresses, mailing letters to them marked "do not forward" and then claiming that those voters whose letters were returned no longer live at the addresses at which they are registered and thus are ineligible to vote.)
Said Bauer: "It is an absolute attack on their right to vote," and a "completely false and completely illegal basis" to challenge votes. He explained that getting a foreclosure notice is not evidence that the person's address has changed. In Michigan, homeowners have the opportunity to redeem the foreclosure even after a sheriff's sale has occurred, permitting them to remain in the house for several months after a foreclosure notice has been sent. In addition, Michigan law allows people vote at their old precinct if they lost their home within sixty days of the election.
Bauer told the Wall Street Journal that the Michigan suit against the Republicans was meant to send a message to Democrats around the country to be on guard against voter-supression tactics. "This can't be just an isolated event," he said. Republicans use these tactics "where they expect the vote to go to the other side. They're not caging in Beverly Hills. By filing the suit, we are assuring people they can be allowed to vote."
Carol Guzman, director of ACORN's Financial Justice Center, said foreclosure lists would be unreliable indicators of who had been forced to leave their homes. Because state law allows a redemption period of up to a year after a foreclosed home has been sold, "you could still legitimately and legally be in your home and be challenged," she told the Lansing State Journal. But she believed that the GOP was trying to intimidate voters facing foreclosure from going to the polls in the first place. "I think they're hoping that there will be people who will just stay away," Guzman said.
David Lagstein, head organizer for Michigan ACORN, which has registered 200,000 new voters this election cycle, said, "You would think they would think, 'This is going to look too heartless.' " ACORN runs a foreclosure counseling program and has battled the Republican-led State Senate, which has opposed several anti-predatory lending and anti-foreclosure bills. "The Republicans won't protect homeowners from predatory lending but they try to prey on those who have fallen victim to foreclosure to suppress the vote," said Lagstein.
Michigan Republican leaders insisted that they never had such a plan. Carabelli claimed that he was misquoted by the Michigan Messenger. Reporter Eartha Jane Melzer stood by her story. So did Jefferson Morley, editorial director for MichiganMessenger.com's parent organization, the Center for Independent Media. "The reporting is 100 percent accurate and there is no validity to the claim that statements attributed to Mr. Carabelli were fabricated," Morley said in a statement.
McCain's headquarters is located in a building owned by Trott & Trott, a law firm that specializes in foreclosures. ACORN's Lagstein called them "notorious and aggressive foreclosure lawyers" who are "hated by anyone who has faced foreclosure." On September 12, about twenty-five members of ACORN and Jobs for Justice protested outside McCain's Farmington Hills headquarters to demand that McCain fire Carabelli, the Macomb County GOP chairman. (See a video of the protest here.)
In their lawsuit, the Democrats accuse the Republicans of a "long history" of voter-suppression practices. Obama counsel Bauer said that "this is a standard operating procedure in the Republican Party." Michigan Democrats chair Brewer told the Detroit News, "Every two years for the last 20 years we've seen a Republican Party program to intimidate, harass and suppress voters." These charges are documented in a Project Vote report showing longstanding GOP efforts to intimidate voters, especially African-Americans, in many states, including Michigan.
Last week, thirteen senators petitioned Attorney General Michael Mukasey, asking the Justice Department to guarantee that voters are not harassed or intimidated at their polling places. "Foreclosures are devastating enough for affected families and neighborhoods without adding the outrage of disenfranchisement," wrote Michigan Democrats Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow along with Senators Barack Obama (D- IL), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Edward Kennedy (D- MA), Joseph Biden (D-DE), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Russell Feingold (D-WI), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Benjamin Cardin (D- MD), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH).
Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, called on McCain to "step forward now and halt the Republican Party's efforts to profit politically from the economic misery of others."
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
79 Comments so far
Show AllRemember the GOP bragging about "we are all about an ownership society." They probably had this crisis planned all the while. How beautiful was that? They get everybody a house and win an election. Then take everybody's house away and swipe all the money--blaming it all on the dems who control congress and want to raise taxes....
Hey McCain, where's our ownership society now, asshole?
The Republican Party in Michigan has long been slanderous, sleazy, and interested in suppressing the vote. I don't think that any commondreamers from Michigan are surprised at all about this latest plan for voter disenfranchisement.
Tying the article to McCain is a weak approach. Ideas are the important thing here, and careful attention to Republicans' antics in Michigan would be far more damaging. This goes beyond a party philosophy of deregulation for the benefit of the wealthy. At the local level, there have been tactics such as misleading mailings and fliers alleging a change of voting site. In the western part of the state, they've also put up "false flag" candidates, Republicans who get on the ballot as Democrats.
Macomb County in Michigan is a swing county in a swing state. While it is changing, it is replete with what used to be called "Reagan Democrats." People there are experiencing such hard times that they are starting to wonder whether it's worth it to turn away from socially reactionary candidates. Young people there by and large cannot afford auto insurance, which is problematic when you have to go to your job or school. Often these young adults need to do both, and yet they cannot afford to move out of their parents' home into the most modest of places. This group of first-time voters is less vulnerable to the socially reactionary message upon which Michigan Republicans depend.
Maybe we should ask ourselves how the Repubicans came to believe they'd get away with this level of ruthlessness. Any precedent that anyone can think of?
dmia: very well put and very frightening.
Do you immature arguing brats realize what is going to happen if you don't vote for Obama? You're going to have McCain and Palin running the country by making up their own rules as they go. No kidding - it's going to be very much like early Nazi Germany here in the USA. McCain/Palin will pull strings for their friends, tell us what we can and cannot read, attempt to convert us all to Palin's sickening form of Christianity, round up anyone who can't prove US citizenship (and some who can) and do God knows what to them.......... the list goes on. Obama is not a saint. But he isn't the Devil, and you know as well as I do that Palin is full of the darkest evil this country has seen in a long time.
McCain is far less religious than Obama. Obama wants to EXTEND Bush's faith based initiative crap and wants to spend $500 million to send kids to religious camps. I'm not aware of any such plans of McCain's.
Btw, don't worry about Palin. She's not going to be making any decisions ! She's just the Repubs' pathetically obvious attempt to get votes.
"Every two years for the last 20 years we've seen a Republican Party program to intimidate, harass and suppress voters."
I was reading this while tired and admittedly a bit tipsy, but I first read "program" as "pogrom."
While obviously an exaggeration maybe there's something to that subliminal suggestion? It's terrifying to think of who Sarah Palin might make 'disappear'...
1. We should have a mandatory public referendum on any government expenditure above a certain amount of money, and that includes on absolutely everything, including war and wall street bailouts, etc.
2. If this market was really "free" they would all have to bite the big one. But right now we have socialism for corporations and a general out and out hosing for the rest of us.
ps. no wonder they're all going bankrupt they spent their cash on buying candidates in both parties for all these years.
How about a real electoral reform?
Here it is:
You attempt to suppress voters, your party loses the same number of votes as you attempted to suppress in the election.
So, you falsely challenge voters who face home foreclosure, your party loses that many votes in the election.
You spread fliers reminding people to vote but giving the date as the day after election, your party loses as many votes as there are eligible voters in that neighborhood.
You call up people and warn them that they'll be arrested if they show up at the polls without having paid off outstanding parking tickets, your party loses that many votes.
You try to jam the phone lines of "get out the vote" drives, you lose as many votes as they tried to call.
What do you all think?
--
Dan Clore
My collected fiction: _The Unspeakable and Others_
http://tinyurl.com/2gcoqt
Lord Weÿrdgliffe & Necronomicon Page:
http://tinyurl.com/292yz9
News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo
Wait a minute! Dreier writes, "McCain, who owns ten houses, has long been a lackey of the banking industry and a strong supporter of the industry's efforts to weaken government safeguards against irresponsible lending."
And Biden is, what, a staunch opponent of the baking industry? The dem from Delaware, home of the banking/credit industry (I don't know if the industry's vacation homes are in South Dakota or if it's the other way around) shoved Phil Gramm's and Lawrence Summers' and Robert Rubin's FIRE (finance-insurance-real estate) sale de-regulation package right up our collective ass. He gave the banking industry their ability to charge usurious interest rates that, at one time, loan sharks were despised for charging. He took away (for all practical purposes) the individual's right to file for bankruptcy while making sure that corporations could continue to use the creditor-protection maneuver whenever they liked.
Yeah. Biden, along with Rubin (Clinton's 1st AND 2d term Treasury secretary, formerly CEO of Citigroup, making him different from Paulson HOW?). And let's not forget the chief corporate cheerleaders in the (D) party, the Clintons themselves. So, who does Obama choose as his running mate? Biden! Who does he have as his chief economic advisor? Rubin! And Gramm is McCain's chief economic advisor.
Tell me again what the difference is between McCain and Obama? Sorry, but the (D)s have provided the funds to maintain the illegal and immoral adventure in Iraq, will actually ramp up the occupation of Afghanistan, rubber-stamped America's foray into torture, padded the headsets for the NSA and their wiretaps while winking and nudging the telecomm giants who broke the law, ad nauseum. And they kept impeachment off the table to try and hide their complicity in all of Bush's crimes. The party has run away from EVERY core belief and principle that once defined a progressive party, and, personally, I'm more committed to justice, peace, and fairness than I am to the continued good fortunes of rich assholes like Feinstein, Pelosi, and Steny Hoyer.
Cynthia will get my vote this year.
"no gods, no masters" --m. sanger
kgarry sez: "Tell me again what the difference is between McCain and Obama?"
Coyote sez: "Is there a broken record in here?"
I pretty much blame the Democrats. Bush is a crook and traitor -- beyond any shadow of doubt -- but the Democrats have a chance to play the role of police. Instead, they'll be covering his ass and passing a bailout early next week. Quibbling over a few minor details and chump change. Marx was right about liberalism. Both parties agree on bailing out the wealthy, but one will try to attach some chump change to it (good cop/bad cop strategy). If they're guilty about this together, you know they can keep other secrets. Some that date to 9/11 and earlier I should imagine.
twelvepax sez: "I pretty much blame the Democrats."
Coyote sez: "Is there a broken record in here?"
"The financial industry has given $22.5 million in the current election cycle to Obama and $19.6 million to McCain, according to the Center for Responsive Politics."
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/09/22-3
Securities & Investment:
Obama, Barack $8,961,952 (Obama is #1 in all of Congress)
McCain, John $6,324,507
Banking:
Obama, Barack $1,884,358 (again, Obama is #1 in all of Congress)
McCain, John $1,703,678
Fannie and Freddie Mac PACS:
Obama, Barack $126,349 (Obama is #2 behind Dodd)
McCain, John $21,550
See also: http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/bundlers-for-mccain-obama-are.html
Notice how an article on Republican voter caging results in an anti-Obama post by atheist.
Atheist is a troll.
Check out these sites for the information on donations to Obama that atheist doesn't want you to see:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summary.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638
Do you know what "bundling" is ? I suggest you look it up ...
That's funny. It looks like you have a point but there is none.
Try being specific.
Thanks for setting the rules straight for me. Your comments are often disconcerting but sorry if I dared to respond to one out of the existing thread order.
You did it again. Please stop.
And I didn't call Hillary compassionate.
They are all politicians but at least Obama and Biden acknowledge the economic difficulties of average Americans.
Do you not understand how to reply to an existing thread ? You keep starting new ones. It's very disconcerting.
OR: The moral test of a society is how it treats the most vulnerable members.
How sad that one who shows humanity,empathy and compassion is an "egomaniacal pissy pants".
I didn't call Hillary an "egomaniacal pissy pants". >:-)
Sioux Rose
The data in this article easily equates McCain with Ebineezer Scrooge. Imagine, to own 10 homes but be all too ready to cast others out of a single one, shelter from the coming cold of winter, at that! The priorities on the part of this nation's leaders (90% of them, not all) are astounding for their utter lack of humanity. Spellbinding for their spiritual IGNORANCE. But remember, no person is immune to the LAW of karma. I can only imagine what these individuals will be facing when they have to explain why they made decisions that led to such unabashed misery for so many. Remember the St. Thomas admonition: To the One Much is given (power, financial comfort), much is expected." Or, "Whatsoever you DO to the LEAST of these is done unto me/holy spirit." Many might imagine the wealth of our congressional superstars, but few would want to own their karmic accounts...
The Republican Party makes the Mafia look law abiding.
The GOP has wrecked this country.
Attacked it.
But on Common Dreams it's the Democrats that are more reviled, more attacked more smeared. On CD the Dem's are Satanic, the Republicans left alone.
With a few exceptions.
Nice article clearly illustrating one more reason why the parties are NOT the same.
Obama or McCain.
oh translucent cry me a river. maybe a better handle for you would be obtuse. the freaking dems had nearly as much to do w/ deregulation as did the repugs. pull your head out of the sand. president clinton was a huge fan of deregulation and market "solutions". at least w/ the repugs you know what u r getting: avarice and a twisted social darwinism.
jejune1
One thing every one of you Obama haters have in common is this:
You instantly revert to personal insults.
Well, Christ said we know a person's heart by their tongue, and yours is tired and ugly.
When you spew ugliness, it defines you, it is a reflection of your essence. Not those you address.
And it's an attempt to bully people, push them around with words, with aggression.
Well, I politely say to you, feel free.
Spew some more ugliness; show me your heart.
"One thing every one of you Obama haters have in common is this: You instantly revert to personal insults."
Uh, I would say that's MORE true of the Obamabots. Just go take a look at the dailyObamaCircleJerk. Plenty of evidence there.
atheist; Thanks for making my point.
With your insulting, ugly post.
Darn, this is funny-well, I'm not a robot, and I'm not part of a "circle-jerk,"
that is dirty.
Our tongues reflect our souls, not those we address.
Watch your mouth.
translucent
Hang in there. After Nov. 2 these trolls will all mysteriously disappear.
I've probably been here longer than you have, and I suspect I'll remain here longer than you do, too.
ctrl-z: Hi, I've wondered.
On the other hand if Palin and what's his name steal the election, as the plundering, raping and global assault recommences under a new name, Democrats will be blamed for allowing it to happen. Ironic, people working against Obama will blame the Dem's if he loses!....not congratulate their Nader voting, Dem slamming selves in this pivotal year when unity is needed.
And if Obama wins any good thing he does will be assailed, scoffed at and spit upon.
I just laugh; they want to say Obama and McCain are the same. Nonsense.
Like Gore and Bush are the same.
Let's see, criminal gangster murdering scum, OR, winner of the Nobel Prize for his work on global warming.
I'm gonna do some rips on my vaporizor for you ctrl-z, I'm hanging in here; I won't be bullied by their insults-mostly they crack me up.
"I'm hanging in here; I won't be bullied by their insults-mostly they crack me up."
Good for you!
I read somewhere that Clinton came into office expecting to do grand, progressive things & they sat him down and showed him how the money wasn't there to do it. I don't like some of the things Clinton did (NAFTA for example) but he left the first budget surplus in ages.
After 8 years of Bush the economy is worse than ever. The money going into our overseas occupations and to 'bail-out' the wealthy is the money that could have gone into social programs.
If Obama is elected (and the Repubs don't steal the election for a third time) I think he'll be faced with the biggest deficit ever. It will take a lot of creativity to move forward on any progressive social programs. It may not be possible.
Still, he'll be able to put decent people on the Supreme Court and get the foxes out of positions where they're supposed to be enforcing government regulations on the industries they were in before Bush put them in charge of the henhouse.
What gets me about the anti-Obamaites on CD are how they just keep repeating the same mindless blather over and over.
It doesn't matter if you prove them wrong about something on one thread (like misleading donor statistics), they just blithely repeat it on another thread.
They'll type the same nonsense in a thread about Iraq as they put into a thread about the economy. Then they'll line up in a little row to congratulate each other on how well they made their bogus points.
And if you call someone for whom all roads lead to an anti-Obama message a troll, they scream bloody murder.
If McSame is elected (which fortunately is looking increasingly unlikely) the trolls will be happy but the true-believers who sound like trolls will do exactly as you say. They'll blame the Dems.
It's like a knee-jerk reaction with them.
Me, I'm looking forward to November 3rd.
Your fear that your candidate is going to lose is evident in your posts. >:-)
Four more years of Bush policies? You bet I'm scared.
Hell, the free speech zones will be down to the size of postage stamps.
Obama is a liberal in centrists clothes (words)
McCain is a fascist in centrists clothes (words)
The Democrats are equally willing to use unethical and illegal means to disenfranchise voters and destroy their legitimate political competitors. They even used taxpayer money to fund their efforts! Read this for all the ugly details:
DEMOCRATIC PARTY SUED FOR ANTI-DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN TO ILLEGALLY REMOVE THIRD PARTIES FROM BALLOT.
http://newjerseyuntouchables.blogspot.com/2007/10/democratic-party-sued-for-anti.html
Of course the parties are not the same. They just agree on almost everything: Iraq, Iran, AIPAC, increasing the military budget, the "war on terror," the death penalty, corporate personhood, making it harder for individuals to declare bankruptcy while making it easier for corporations, FISA, the drug war, nuclear power, the Federal Reserve, opposing single-payer health care, NAFTA/WTO, increasing the national debt, and the the PATRIOT Act, to name just a few. And of course, the same corporate interests that contribute to the Republicans also give money to the Democrats, so they also agree that money equals speech and bribery is not a crime if you call it "campaign contributions."
At least the Republicans are an enemy we can know and trust to be as bad an enemy as they can be. The Democrats are fake friends who will say all the things we progressives want to hear and then turn on us and sell us down the river when we least expect it. That's the REAL difference.
Then let the Democrats prove that they are worth voting for by flatly and strongly rejecting the Republican bailout proposal and instead take as much time as needed to develop a strong economic program that put's people first for a change. If they cave I will not only not vote for the Dem's I will curse them from coast to coast.
Stone, Hello: They are dogs. Let me start there. Acknowledged.
The MSM is largely Republican owned. If the Democrats fight this like they should, they will, in this world of absurdities, be blamed for the ensuing chaos when these corrupt financial institutions go under.
The primarily GOP owned MSM will crucify them for the ills the GOP has caused, havoc will be created, Hello Palin/McCain.
In spite of the Dem's being dog's they are not the vicious anti-American scum the GOP is.
Obama. Then work for change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7QlwaVaW8A
"Crack open a cynic and you will find an angry idealist!"
Mc Cain, ONE of The Keating FIVE!
Haven't we had enough years of cheating liars?!
Yah, that's why I'm not voting this fall.
Not old enough?
Wow, that'll learn 'em!
I'm allowing an inmate to vote for me (i.e., to select candidates on the ballot, I'll do the actual voting). He doesn't like Obama either, but I told him that if he decides in the end to vote for Obama I won't change his vote.
As usual the Nation writer misses the more important point of this situation. As repulsive as what the Republicans are doing is it is perfectly legal under present registration laws in most areas.
The geater and more important point that this article illustates is the archaic nature of most registration rules and regulations. Most of these laws and the practices that sprang from them were placed in effect when people moved less often for whatever reason.
Given the current freefall of the American economy, this problem could most easily be solved by ammending the registration laws state by state to allow an amnesty of 12 months from the date of foreclosure or eviction or other loss of domicile (from a fire or hurricane for instance) before a voter would be required to reregister where they are currently located.
The voter should be requiired to show some proof of foreclosure, eviction or other loss of domicile, proof of current address, and by affadvait affirm that they are not registered in any other jurisdiction (under penalty of law if not true)so that people who merely move don't end up voting more than once. This way there are no more "October surprises" on election day.
Poet
who will be an election poll worker on 11/04/08
When I changed my voter registration from Democrat to Green I didn't realize this would mean my voting credentials would be challenged. I have to wait for them to call city hall and confirm that I am a registered voter! I also happen to live in the lowest voting area (13% of eligible voters in PRESIDENTIAL elections; lower in other elections!) in my city. It's time for people to WAKE UP and say "NO!" to both McCain and Obama. I have no sympathy for Democrat apologists anymore.
Couldn't register as a troll?
Please notice this from another article on this site:
"The financial industry has given $22.5 million in the current election cycle to Obama and $19.6 million to McCain, according to the Center for Responsive Politics."
I love the way trolls give selective statistics and no links.
www.opensecrets.org is The Center for Responsive Politics.
Check it out.
atheist, troll.
fakedemocracy = obamabot
LOL you ask a question and don't even give me 2 seconds to answer. I am not a Obama supporter you creep. Your rhetoric just stick's out like a 13 year old's first pimple. I am however a Biden supporter... undecided on how I will vote. But it's none of your republican troll business anyway.
I'm not a Republican. I WAS a Democrat until this pathetic egomaniacal pissy pants candidate was foisted upon me.
fake progressive = atheist troll.
Don't expect your fairy god mother Palin to protect you!
I'm not a Palin supporter. And I don't believe in fairy god mothers, I'm an atheist. >:-)
Awwwww, unhappy Hillary supporter. Poor baby.
In another forum, someone wrote to you "Well, I’m beginning to see your problem, too many assumptions, too little perspective."
I second that.
.
We shouldn't criticize McCain for "marrying up". Those homes are, technically, his wife's. What about Obama with his nifty $1.65 MILLION home in the posh Chicago neighborhood of Hyde Park ?
And let's list some Obama donors, shall we ?
Goldmann Sachs $691,930
Citigroup $448,599
Chase $442,919
UBS $404,750
Lehman $370,524
Morgan Stanley $318,070
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638
Looks like Obama's gotten more than McCain ! So tell me how McCain is worse, because I'm not seeing it.
What's the point of posting who the top contributors to Obama's campaign?
Are you implying he will be the puppet of who gives him the most money?
If that's the case, he got 20 times that in 1-100 dollar donations from the public. If your theory is correct he will be doing the bidding of the little guy that in total gave him the most money.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it and then misapplying the wrong remedies. " Groucho Marx
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people."
H. L. Mencken
Why leave out all the universities and Moveon.org?
Goldman Sachs $691,930
University of California $611,207
Citigroup Inc $448,599
JPMorgan Chase & Co $442,919
Harvard University $435,769
Google Inc $420,174
UBS AG $404,750
National Amusements Inc $389,140
Microsoft Corp $377,235
Lehman Brothers $370,524
Sidley Austin LLP $350,302
Moveon.org $347,463
Skadden, Arps et al $340,264
Time Warner $338,527
Wilmerhale Llp $335,398
Morgan Stanley $318,070
Latham & Watkins $297,400
Jones Day $289,476
University of Chicago $278,885
Stanford University $276,038
And if you really want to be fair, why not include McCain's list:
Merrill Lynch $298,413
Citigroup Inc $269,251
Morgan Stanley $233,272
Goldman Sachs $208,395
JPMorgan Chase & Co $179,975
AT&T Inc $174,487
Blank Rome LLP $150,426
Credit Suisse Group $150,025
Greenberg Traurig LLP $146,787
UBS AG $140,165
PricewaterhouseCoopers $140,120
US Government $137,617
Bank of America $129,475
Wachovia Corp $122,846
Lehman Brothers $117,500
FedEx Corp $113,453
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher $104,250
US Army $103,613
Bear Stearns $99,300
Pinnacle West Capital $97,700
No universities and look at the US Government and the US Army.
It's not always how much---it's also who...
A big part of the reason why Obama has gotten so much more than Mccain has to do with the intense primary battle between Hillary and Obama.
(All info except comments is from opensecrets.org)
Excellent!
atheist troll
If you can dispute those numbers, or the source, please do. Otherwise, the name-calling is just rude. It only shows that you have no interest in facts, and that undermines your credibility.
I think fakedemocracy believes that anti-Obama = pro-McCain. You and I know that's not true at all. Thanks for your posts.
fakedemocracy = obamabot
You have no idea what you're talking about. Obama and McCain are both going to start the draft. I'm not voting for that. You're a creep.
Hey, looks like we're actually in agreement ! Are you saying you aren't going to vote for either Obama or McCain ? Me too ! Did you mistake me for a McCain supporter ?
Just imagine how you would feel if you stood in line for an hour or so to vote, and when you finally presented your credentials to the clerk to receive your ballot, a GOP poll challenger suddenly demanded proof that your home mortgage payments were current.
These greedy clowns have no shame whatsoever.
Bill from Saginaw
Well, here in NW Michigan it would result in what we like to call a Michigan Thrashing! I suspect it's much the same down your way.
But, seriously, I think it's so important that voters are informed of their rights. I hope that civil rights organizations will flood polling places with poll-challenger challengers, who can ensure that voters are not intimidated or harassed.
free2bee Where is accountability? Instead of being in jail or at least impeached, he could be our next president! I think I'll buy a flag and run for an office.
Has anyone heard of some trooops coming back from Iraq around the first of October, to be stationed here in the U.S.? There was no explanation why. Is it about controlling the riot mobs who will probably take to the streets because Republicans will steal yet another presidential election?
The troops should be stationed here since they're supposed to be defending this country. The only reason it sounds strange is because the military doesn't defend the country any more.
I guess it is alarming to consider that we might be treated like Iraqis.
Yes, also to keep order when the draft is announced.
Now is the time to hit the streets!
What do you think of Bimbo Power? PBS Polin poll
http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html
Next up: the guy with the gun tells you which candidate to vote for.
They're doing something similar in Wisconsin.