EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- 'Masters of Austerity' Targeted as Blockupy Activists Shut Down European Central Bank
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
Popular content
Today's Top News
GOP: Lose Your Home, Lose Your Vote
Senator John McCain was a foot soldier in the deregulation revolution, which triggered the current banking crisis and the wave of foreclosures. In Michigan, his party wants to deny the right to vote to victims of the GOP's misguided economic policies and the sleazy banking practices they encouraged.
James Carabelli, chairman of the Republican Party of Macomb County outside Detroit, said, "We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren't voting from those addresses," the Michigan Messenger.com reported September 10. Barack Obama's campaign and the Democratic Party quickly filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of three Michigan residents who lost their houses to foreclosure, to stop the Michigan GOP from carrying out what Democrats called an "ugly" and "horrific" plan. Michigan is a key swing state where a few thousand votes could determine who wins its seventeen Electoral College votes.
McCain, who owns ten houses, has long been a lackey of the banking industry and a strong supporter of the industry's efforts to weaken government safeguards against irresponsible lending. Since 1989, the financial services, insurance and real estate industries have contributed $23.8 million to McCain's campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. This sector far outspent any other industry in making donations to the Arizona senator. Topping the list of McCain donors are Merrill Lynch ($366,035), Citigroup ($317,751), Goldman Sachs ($305,015), Morgan Stanley ($253,871), JPMorgan Chase ($207,728), Credit Suisse Group ($178,825), UBS ($178,515), Pinnacle West Capital ($164,050), Bank of America ($160,625), Lehman Brothers ($128,550) and Wachovia Corp ($121,346).
McCain was one of the Keating Five, who were behind the 1980s scandal that epitomized Washington's culture of corruption. He and four other senators tried to intimidate federal bank regulators on behalf of McCain friend Charles Keating, an Arizona real estate developer and owner of Lincoln Savings and Loan, who had raised $1.3 million for the politicians. McCain, who received $112,000 from Keating and flew to the banker's home in the Bahamas on company planes, attended several meetings in 1987 with federal bank regulators who were investigating Keating for swindling investors. In addition, McCain's wife, Cindy, and her father, Jim Hensley, invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators. McCain's Senate colleagues censured him for his poor judgement.
McCain didn't just help one banker looking for a favor. In the 1980s he favored the deregulation of the Savings and Loan industry, which led to the industry's collapse and a taxpayers' bailout of more than $500 billion. The industry, like Keating's Lincoln Savings, had balked at constraints on the S&Ls' ability to compete with conventional banks engaged in commercial lending. They got Congress to change the rules, allowing S&Ls to begin a decade-long orgy of real-estate speculation, mismanagement, and fraud. Banks and S&Ls gobbled each other up and made loans to finance shopping malls, golf courses, office buildings and condo projects that had no logic other than a quick-buck profit. When the dust settled in the late 1980s, about a thousand S&Ls and banks (including Lincoln) had gone under, billions of dollars of commercial loans were rendered useless and the federal government was left to bail out the depositors whose money the speculators had looted.
In 1999, McCain supported the banking industry's top priority, the Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act, which, as consumer groups had predicted, has been a major disaster.
Orchestrated by then-Senator Phil Gramm of Texas, the bill further deregulated the banking and insurance industries and is directly responsible for the current wave of home foreclosures and bank failures. It tore down the last remaining legal barriers to combining commercial banking, investment banking and insurance under one corporate roof. By 2005, the ten largest banks controlled 60 percent of industry assets. Banks, insurance companies, credit-card firms and other money-lenders became part of a giant "financial services" industry. Washington walked away from its responsibility to protect consumers with regulations and enforcement. While federal regulators looked the other way, banks and private mortgage companies indulged in risky loans and speculative investments. They invented new "loan products"--such as subprime loans and adjustable rate mortgages--that put borrowers, and their own banks, at risk. Wall Street packaged these loans to investors without scrutinizing their risk. Deregulation encouraged the industry to create this house of cards. Every aspect of the financial industry was so short-sighted and greedy that they didn't see the train wreck coming around the corner. Now major Wall Street banks are imploding.
Gramm, McCain's top economic advisor and campaign co-chair for most of his presidential campaign, was the chief architect of the deregulation laws. Like McCain, Gramm was a free-market fundamentalist and a puppet of the financial industry. He used his power as chair of the Senate banking committee to do the banking industry's bidding--and he enlisted McCain in that crusade. Gramm is now the vice chairman of UBS, the Swiss investment banking giant. Since leaving the Senate, he has used his political connections to lobby for further bank deregulation.
Gramm was considered to be a leading candidate to be Treasury Secretary in a McCain administration until he was forced to resign from his official campaign position in July for his intemperate remarks that the country had become "a nation of whiners" in a "mental recession."
Nevertheless, McCain has continued to parrot his mentor's economic views, arguing in favor of further deregulation of banks and business in general. "I have a long voting record in support of deregulation," McCain said in 2003. "I am a deregulator.... I believe in deregulation," he told CNN that same year. Earlier this year, as Wall Street was in meltdown and millions of Americans were at risk of losing their homes, McCain told PBS that "we need less government [and] less regulation" and that "I'm always for less regulation." This March, after the collapse of Bear Stearns, McCain continued to favor deregulating Wall Street.
Only in the last week has McCain changed his tune. He's endorsed the Bush plan to bail out Wall Street firms that engaged in risky, irresponsible behavior, instead of supporting government help for millions of troubled homeowners.
Many of those homeowners live in Michigan, where the economy is in free-fall--the direct result of Bush's misguided economic policies that McCain has consistently endorsed. In the last year, Michigan's jobless rate has jumped from 7.2 percent to 8.9 percent--the nation's highest. Michigan had the highest foreclosure rate in the the nation and economists expect it to get even worse as the state sheds more and more jobs. So far this year, 95,272 Michigan residents have received foreclosure notices--13,605 in August alone, according to RealtyTrac.
So, to rub salt in these wounds, the Michigan GOP hatched a plan to take away the votes of people who've lost their homes. As reported in the Michigan Messenger, Republicans intended to use foreclosure lists to challenge voters at the polls. In a conference call with reporters, Mark Brewer, chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, said that the McCain campaign "wants to add insult to injury by denying those residents their right to vote."
Bob Bauer, general counsel for the Obama campaign, called the GOP plan "a new and especially repellent version of caging." (Caging is a technique used to challenge voters by taking a list of addresses, mailing letters to them marked "do not forward" and then claiming that those voters whose letters were returned no longer live at the addresses at which they are registered and thus are ineligible to vote.)
Said Bauer: "It is an absolute attack on their right to vote," and a "completely false and completely illegal basis" to challenge votes. He explained that getting a foreclosure notice is not evidence that the person's address has changed. In Michigan, homeowners have the opportunity to redeem the foreclosure even after a sheriff's sale has occurred, permitting them to remain in the house for several months after a foreclosure notice has been sent. In addition, Michigan law allows people vote at their old precinct if they lost their home within sixty days of the election.
Bauer told the Wall Street Journal that the Michigan suit against the Republicans was meant to send a message to Democrats around the country to be on guard against voter-supression tactics. "This can't be just an isolated event," he said. Republicans use these tactics "where they expect the vote to go to the other side. They're not caging in Beverly Hills. By filing the suit, we are assuring people they can be allowed to vote."
Carol Guzman, director of ACORN's Financial Justice Center, said foreclosure lists would be unreliable indicators of who had been forced to leave their homes. Because state law allows a redemption period of up to a year after a foreclosed home has been sold, "you could still legitimately and legally be in your home and be challenged," she told the Lansing State Journal. But she believed that the GOP was trying to intimidate voters facing foreclosure from going to the polls in the first place. "I think they're hoping that there will be people who will just stay away," Guzman said.
David Lagstein, head organizer for Michigan ACORN, which has registered 200,000 new voters this election cycle, said, "You would think they would think, 'This is going to look too heartless.' " ACORN runs a foreclosure counseling program and has battled the Republican-led State Senate, which has opposed several anti-predatory lending and anti-foreclosure bills. "The Republicans won't protect homeowners from predatory lending but they try to prey on those who have fallen victim to foreclosure to suppress the vote," said Lagstein.
Michigan Republican leaders insisted that they never had such a plan. Carabelli claimed that he was misquoted by the Michigan Messenger. Reporter Eartha Jane Melzer stood by her story. So did Jefferson Morley, editorial director for MichiganMessenger.com's parent organization, the Center for Independent Media. "The reporting is 100 percent accurate and there is no validity to the claim that statements attributed to Mr. Carabelli were fabricated," Morley said in a statement.
McCain's headquarters is located in a building owned by Trott & Trott, a law firm that specializes in foreclosures. ACORN's Lagstein called them "notorious and aggressive foreclosure lawyers" who are "hated by anyone who has faced foreclosure." On September 12, about twenty-five members of ACORN and Jobs for Justice protested outside McCain's Farmington Hills headquarters to demand that McCain fire Carabelli, the Macomb County GOP chairman. (See a video of the protest here.)
In their lawsuit, the Democrats accuse the Republicans of a "long history" of voter-suppression practices. Obama counsel Bauer said that "this is a standard operating procedure in the Republican Party." Michigan Democrats chair Brewer told the Detroit News, "Every two years for the last 20 years we've seen a Republican Party program to intimidate, harass and suppress voters." These charges are documented in a Project Vote report showing longstanding GOP efforts to intimidate voters, especially African-Americans, in many states, including Michigan.
Last week, thirteen senators petitioned Attorney General Michael Mukasey, asking the Justice Department to guarantee that voters are not harassed or intimidated at their polling places. "Foreclosures are devastating enough for affected families and neighborhoods without adding the outrage of disenfranchisement," wrote Michigan Democrats Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow along with Senators Barack Obama (D- IL), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Edward Kennedy (D- MA), Joseph Biden (D-DE), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Russell Feingold (D-WI), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Benjamin Cardin (D- MD), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH).
Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, called on McCain to "step forward now and halt the Republican Party's efforts to profit politically from the economic misery of others."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


79 Comments so far
Show AllThey're doing something similar in Wisconsin.
Next up: the guy with the gun tells you which candidate to vote for.
What do you think of Bimbo Power? PBS Polin poll
http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html
Now is the time to hit the streets!
Has anyone heard of some trooops coming back from Iraq around the first of October, to be stationed here in the U.S.? There was no explanation why. Is it about controlling the riot mobs who will probably take to the streets because Republicans will steal yet another presidential election?
Yes, also to keep order when the draft is announced.
The troops should be stationed here since they're supposed to be defending this country. The only reason it sounds strange is because the military doesn't defend the country any more.
I guess it is alarming to consider that we might be treated like Iraqis.
free2bee Where is accountability? Instead of being in jail or at least impeached, he could be our next president! I think I'll buy a flag and run for an office.
Just imagine how you would feel if you stood in line for an hour or so to vote, and when you finally presented your credentials to the clerk to receive your ballot, a GOP poll challenger suddenly demanded proof that your home mortgage payments were current.
These greedy clowns have no shame whatsoever.
Bill from Saginaw
Well, here in NW Michigan it would result in what we like to call a Michigan Thrashing! I suspect it's much the same down your way.
But, seriously, I think it's so important that voters are informed of their rights. I hope that civil rights organizations will flood polling places with poll-challenger challengers, who can ensure that voters are not intimidated or harassed.
We shouldn't criticize McCain for "marrying up". Those homes are, technically, his wife's. What about Obama with his nifty $1.65 MILLION home in the posh Chicago neighborhood of Hyde Park ?
And let's list some Obama donors, shall we ?
Goldmann Sachs $691,930
Citigroup $448,599
Chase $442,919
UBS $404,750
Lehman $370,524
Morgan Stanley $318,070
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638
Looks like Obama's gotten more than McCain ! So tell me how McCain is worse, because I'm not seeing it.
atheist troll
fakedemocracy = obamabot
You have no idea what you're talking about. Obama and McCain are both going to start the draft. I'm not voting for that. You're a creep.
Hey, looks like we're actually in agreement ! Are you saying you aren't going to vote for either Obama or McCain ? Me too ! Did you mistake me for a McCain supporter ?
If you can dispute those numbers, or the source, please do. Otherwise, the name-calling is just rude. It only shows that you have no interest in facts, and that undermines your credibility.
I think fakedemocracy believes that anti-Obama = pro-McCain. You and I know that's not true at all. Thanks for your posts.
Why leave out all the universities and Moveon.org?
Goldman Sachs $691,930
University of California $611,207
Citigroup Inc $448,599
JPMorgan Chase & Co $442,919
Harvard University $435,769
Google Inc $420,174
UBS AG $404,750
National Amusements Inc $389,140
Microsoft Corp $377,235
Lehman Brothers $370,524
Sidley Austin LLP $350,302
Moveon.org $347,463
Skadden, Arps et al $340,264
Time Warner $338,527
Wilmerhale Llp $335,398
Morgan Stanley $318,070
Latham & Watkins $297,400
Jones Day $289,476
University of Chicago $278,885
Stanford University $276,038
And if you really want to be fair, why not include McCain's list:
Merrill Lynch $298,413
Citigroup Inc $269,251
Morgan Stanley $233,272
Goldman Sachs $208,395
JPMorgan Chase & Co $179,975
AT&T Inc $174,487
Blank Rome LLP $150,426
Credit Suisse Group $150,025
Greenberg Traurig LLP $146,787
UBS AG $140,165
PricewaterhouseCoopers $140,120
US Government $137,617
Bank of America $129,475
Wachovia Corp $122,846
Lehman Brothers $117,500
FedEx Corp $113,453
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher $104,250
US Army $103,613
Bear Stearns $99,300
Pinnacle West Capital $97,700
No universities and look at the US Government and the US Army.
It's not always how much---it's also who...
A big part of the reason why Obama has gotten so much more than Mccain has to do with the intense primary battle between Hillary and Obama.
(All info except comments is from opensecrets.org)
Excellent!
What's the point of posting who the top contributors to Obama's campaign?
Are you implying he will be the puppet of who gives him the most money?
If that's the case, he got 20 times that in 1-100 dollar donations from the public. If your theory is correct he will be doing the bidding of the little guy that in total gave him the most money.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it and then misapplying the wrong remedies. " Groucho Marx
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people."
H. L. Mencken
Please notice this from another article on this site:
"The financial industry has given $22.5 million in the current election cycle to Obama and $19.6 million to McCain, according to the Center for Responsive Politics."
.
atheist, troll.
fakedemocracy = obamabot
LOL you ask a question and don't even give me 2 seconds to answer. I am not a Obama supporter you creep. Your rhetoric just stick's out like a 13 year old's first pimple. I am however a Biden supporter... undecided on how I will vote. But it's none of your republican troll business anyway.
I'm not a Republican. I WAS a Democrat until this pathetic egomaniacal pissy pants candidate was foisted upon me.
Awwwww, unhappy Hillary supporter. Poor baby.
In another forum, someone wrote to you "Well, I’m beginning to see your problem, too many assumptions, too little perspective."
I second that.
Don't expect your fairy god mother Palin to protect you!
I'm not a Palin supporter. And I don't believe in fairy god mothers, I'm an atheist. >:-)
fake progressive = atheist troll.
I love the way trolls give selective statistics and no links.
www.opensecrets.org is The Center for Responsive Politics.
Check it out.
When I changed my voter registration from Democrat to Green I didn't realize this would mean my voting credentials would be challenged. I have to wait for them to call city hall and confirm that I am a registered voter! I also happen to live in the lowest voting area (13% of eligible voters in PRESIDENTIAL elections; lower in other elections!) in my city. It's time for people to WAKE UP and say "NO!" to both McCain and Obama. I have no sympathy for Democrat apologists anymore.
Couldn't register as a troll?
As usual the Nation writer misses the more important point of this situation. As repulsive as what the Republicans are doing is it is perfectly legal under present registration laws in most areas.
The geater and more important point that this article illustates is the archaic nature of most registration rules and regulations. Most of these laws and the practices that sprang from them were placed in effect when people moved less often for whatever reason.
Given the current freefall of the American economy, this problem could most easily be solved by ammending the registration laws state by state to allow an amnesty of 12 months from the date of foreclosure or eviction or other loss of domicile (from a fire or hurricane for instance) before a voter would be required to reregister where they are currently located.
The voter should be requiired to show some proof of foreclosure, eviction or other loss of domicile, proof of current address, and by affadvait affirm that they are not registered in any other jurisdiction (under penalty of law if not true)so that people who merely move don't end up voting more than once. This way there are no more "October surprises" on election day.
Poet
who will be an election poll worker on 11/04/08
Mc Cain, ONE of The Keating FIVE!
Haven't we had enough years of cheating liars?!
Yah, that's why I'm not voting this fall.
Wow, that'll learn 'em!
I'm allowing an inmate to vote for me (i.e., to select candidates on the ballot, I'll do the actual voting). He doesn't like Obama either, but I told him that if he decides in the end to vote for Obama I won't change his vote.
Not old enough?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7QlwaVaW8A
"Crack open a cynic and you will find an angry idealist!"
The Republican Party makes the Mafia look law abiding.
The GOP has wrecked this country.
Attacked it.
But on Common Dreams it's the Democrats that are more reviled, more attacked more smeared. On CD the Dem's are Satanic, the Republicans left alone.
With a few exceptions.
Nice article clearly illustrating one more reason why the parties are NOT the same.
Obama or McCain.
Then let the Democrats prove that they are worth voting for by flatly and strongly rejecting the Republican bailout proposal and instead take as much time as needed to develop a strong economic program that put's people first for a change. If they cave I will not only not vote for the Dem's I will curse them from coast to coast.
Stone, Hello: They are dogs. Let me start there. Acknowledged.
The MSM is largely Republican owned. If the Democrats fight this like they should, they will, in this world of absurdities, be blamed for the ensuing chaos when these corrupt financial institutions go under.
The primarily GOP owned MSM will crucify them for the ills the GOP has caused, havoc will be created, Hello Palin/McCain.
In spite of the Dem's being dog's they are not the vicious anti-American scum the GOP is.
Obama. Then work for change.
The Democrats are equally willing to use unethical and illegal means to disenfranchise voters and destroy their legitimate political competitors. They even used taxpayer money to fund their efforts! Read this for all the ugly details:
DEMOCRATIC PARTY SUED FOR ANTI-DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN TO ILLEGALLY REMOVE THIRD PARTIES FROM BALLOT.
http://newjerseyuntouchables.blogspot.com/2007/10/democratic-party-sued-for-anti.html
Of course the parties are not the same. They just agree on almost everything: Iraq, Iran, AIPAC, increasing the military budget, the "war on terror," the death penalty, corporate personhood, making it harder for individuals to declare bankruptcy while making it easier for corporations, FISA, the drug war, nuclear power, the Federal Reserve, opposing single-payer health care, NAFTA/WTO, increasing the national debt, and the the PATRIOT Act, to name just a few. And of course, the same corporate interests that contribute to the Republicans also give money to the Democrats, so they also agree that money equals speech and bribery is not a crime if you call it "campaign contributions."
At least the Republicans are an enemy we can know and trust to be as bad an enemy as they can be. The Democrats are fake friends who will say all the things we progressives want to hear and then turn on us and sell us down the river when we least expect it. That's the REAL difference.
oh translucent cry me a river. maybe a better handle for you would be obtuse. the freaking dems had nearly as much to do w/ deregulation as did the repugs. pull your head out of the sand. president clinton was a huge fan of deregulation and market "solutions". at least w/ the repugs you know what u r getting: avarice and a twisted social darwinism.
jejune1
One thing every one of you Obama haters have in common is this:
You instantly revert to personal insults.
Well, Christ said we know a person's heart by their tongue, and yours is tired and ugly.
When you spew ugliness, it defines you, it is a reflection of your essence. Not those you address.
And it's an attempt to bully people, push them around with words, with aggression.
Well, I politely say to you, feel free.
Spew some more ugliness; show me your heart.
"One thing every one of you Obama haters have in common is this: You instantly revert to personal insults."
Uh, I would say that's MORE true of the Obamabots. Just go take a look at the dailyObamaCircleJerk. Plenty of evidence there.
atheist; Thanks for making my point.
With your insulting, ugly post.
Darn, this is funny-well, I'm not a robot, and I'm not part of a "circle-jerk,"
that is dirty.
Our tongues reflect our souls, not those we address.
Watch your mouth.
translucent
Hang in there. After Nov. 2 these trolls will all mysteriously disappear.