EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Mayors Tell Congress: Bring War Dollars Home
BALTIMORE, June 20 – Mayors from around the US met in Baltimore this week to set public policy for the millions of people living in big cities, depending on municipal services to stay safe. While Congress considered allocating another $118 billion to conduct wars next year – and President Obama absurdly maintained that the costly bombing of Libya is not an act of war, and thus not subject to Congressional oversight – mayors listened to the people.
Anti-war activists rallied in Austin, Texas earlier this year carrying the 'Bring Our War Dollars Home' message. Today, the US Conference of Mayors passed a resolution calling for the same. Following a lively debate about adding stronger language supporting troops and their families, and adding President Obama as a recipient, mayors voted in their June 20 plenary session to call on the federal government to stop funding wars, and bring the money home.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors' Resolution Number 59 was only a twinkle in the eye two years ago when a coalition of citizens alarmed at endless wars and catastrophic budget shortfalls coined the slogan “Bring Our War Dollars Home” at activist Sally Breen's kitchen table in Windham, Maine. That state's campaign took off on Martin Luther King Jr. Day in 2010, and soon spread nationally with adoption by the women-led peace group CODEPINK. Locations across Maine soon adopted war dollars home resolutions, including Deer Isle, Portland, and School Administrative District #74, followed by Northampton and Amherst, Massachusetts and, most recently, by Hartford, Connecticut.
Meanwhile, Congress continued to pass war funding supplemental bills, but without the support of Maine's two representatives in the House. Rep. Mike Michaud (D-2nd) and Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-1st) defied Democrat party leadership to repeatedly vote no on the measures. Pingree began speaking out in Congress and in the press about the need to listen to her constituents' demands to end the wars as Maine's economy unraveled, and local budgets for education, health care, housing and job training were slashed.
In March CODEPINK brought on board national campaign manager C.J. Minster, who wrote the text of the mayors' resolution at another kitchen table, that of co-founder Medea Benjamin. The idea to bring a resolution to the annual conference of mayors had been proposed to co-founder Jodie Evans by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, the incoming president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
The conference first convened in 1932, as big city mayors came together in Detroit to consider what could be done to pull their troubled cities out of the depths of the Great Depression. The New Deal incorporated many of their ideas, and mayors have met annually ever since.
"The United States Conference of Mayors calls on the U.S. Congress to bring these war dollars home to meet vital human needs, promote job creation, rebuild our infrastructure, aid municipal and state governments, and develop a new economy based upon renewable, sustainable energy," the resolution reads, citing the $126 billion a year cost of U.S. wars and the deaths of more than 6,000 troops.
Mayor Joanne Twomey of Biddeford, Maine spoke out about the current recession last April when her city council was forced to drastically reduce spending on K-12 education. At a rally at the State House in Augusta, Maine Public Radio reported: "As mayor of the city of Biddeford – we are cutting $1.6 million in our education budget, and last week I had had it – I'm starting to say it from the podium," said Twomey. "It's my responsibility as mayor of the city of Biddeford to start saying if our priorities were straight, if we could bring these war dollars home, I wouldn't have to be doing this, and neither would the Biddeford school board."
Kitty Piercy, Mayor of Eugene, Oregon, took the lead by introducing Resolution 59 stating: “Mayors call on our country to begin the journey of turning war dollars back into peace dollars, of bringing our loved ones home and of focusing our national resources on building security and prosperity here at home. Our children and families long for and call for a real investment in the future of America. It is past due.”
Piercy was joined in supporting the measure by mayors from Worcester, Hartford, Baltimore, and a score of other cities. States represented on the endorsement list included Virginia, Florida, Ohio, New York, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Wisconsin. The resolution flew through the Metro Economies Committee on the opening day of the mayors' conference, and the news was picked up by media outlets all over the world. On Sunday, June 19, Mayor Villaraigosa spoke in favor of the resolution on television current affairs program Meet The Press – and the rest is history.
As for who will enforce the non-binding resolution, that is up to the people. Grassroots pressure to end funding for wars eventually produced an end to U.S. military presence in Vietnam, presaged by the last time the mayors considered a war dollars home resolution in 1971. Mayors may very well be closer to the will of the people than are senators or presidents. The framers of our Constitution seemed to recognize this when they put the power of the purse in the hands of the branch of government supposed to be closest to the people, the House of Representatives.
Immense profits by weapons manufacturers – and the jobs that depend upon war funding – are compelling reasons for wars with vague goals and shifting targets to continue indefinitely. Corporations spend millions lobbying Congress while contriving to pay no income taxes. Many citizens are questioning who the federal government really represents.
President Obama said while campaigning that he was not against all wars, just stupid wars. Bankrupting the country to maintain 800+ military bases abroad, and drop bombs costing $1 million apiece – the equivalent of 25 teachers' annual salaries – could be the definition of stupid in the 21st Century. Fellow Democrat Rep. John Garamedi of California warned this week, “If the president doesn’t move…he will face a revolution in Congress…It’s coming to that.”
If the President has forgotten that Afghanistan is called “the graveyard of empires,” the people have not. Their mayors now join the chorus calling on the federal government to end endless wars, and bring the war dollars home.
Lisa Savage is CODEPINK's Local Coordinator for Maine, and an active organizer with the Bring Our War $$ Home campaign. For more information www.wardollarshome.org.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

27 Comments so far
Show AllNow if only the left and right would realize they're being divided artificially by "social issues", congress would get scared.
A tad bit late wouldn't you say? Though better late than never!
deleted
Where is the final version of the #antiwar Resolution 59? usmayors.org only has proposed versions. And which video on usmayors.org has the "lively discussion" over the antiwar resolution? The monday video is over 3 hours long. At what point is the antiwar discussion?
I seem to understand, the US Council of Mayors is the largest and most active collaboration among cities in the U.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Conference_of_Mayors
See their website, and video of the just-concluded meeting.
http://usmayors.org/79thAnnualMeeting/
The only comparable size organization seems to be, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_League_of_Cities -- am I mistaken?
Full text of resolution as passed here: http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/06/20/mayors.conference/
Video of debate would start around 2 hours into today's coverage on usmayors.org
The Ron Pauls and the Dennis Kucinichs agree on this. Hope this results in ending our "World Policeman" role.
like everyone,i want all wars stopped,all bases closed,all troops home,and on&on,but the only time in my lifetime(born sept,1942) that our lying/corrupt non government has ever left a war zone(that was making millions for wallstreet&corporations) was the vietnam war,that took 15yrs of constant,intense protests,strikes,&civil disobeadience,something i haven't seen for the last 30 insane years in this country-- so what makes you thing these nazis/gov hacks. will ever change anything by the political process!!!!!!
Yeah, start bringing in the war booty, drug money, & basra oil, we are laying claim to!
Make the weapons corporations, GE pay taxes!
The rich are already singing, were in the money!
War profiteers they all appear to be.
With zero consciousness'.
Meanwhile back home, citizens are now civilians. Unincorporated with less rights that a Corporation. When will Congress and Mayors - represent we the people, the 100% not the 1%??
"Mayors from around the US met in Baltimore this week to set public policy for the millions of people living in big cities..."
Luckily, this is untrue.
The Conference will adopt policy resolutions for lobbying the Federal Congress and Government.
The quote makes it sound as if the actual cities' ordinances will be set like the Conference is the supreme governing body of cities!
Dependence on Federal $ is killing our States and Counties and Cities, large and small.
More details from David Swanson about this story, at:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/How-the-Mayors-Debated-and-by-David-Swanson-110620-822.html
Like what a bunch of mayors want matters in the big picture.
I really like the part about bring our dollars home. Every one of these ‘mayors’ can go pound sand, they do not care about peace or people, they care about shekels and dollars.
Gee have you ever tried to run a city with no money? You can't do it with bake sales.
you can not do it by holding a convention either:
this is just posturing its finiest
I am sure that some of those mayors travled by the most economic means necessary but for others?
Bake sale is not a bad idea, the fire fighters in most cities pass a boot because the People of the cities do not vote to found them. The police run around in rusted out cars.
fedieral war dollars have nothing to do with city funding and by even holding this vote, writing this article and frankly any one responding to it (including me) is a waist of time and resourses
The warmongers in Congress don't know how to work for peace. War is in their blood.
Memo to US Mayors:
When all those "war dollars' come home so will all those combat troops competing for a dwindling number of available jobs (think musical chairs). The war economy is the only true economic stimulus this culture has left to offer its working people and this has been so since the days of FDR.
Waldo, I am one of those Soldiers, one of those 'combat troops' and your statement is oen of the most asinine things I have Ever Read.
War does not stimulate the economy, especially when its fought to win, you know, when the Government really wants to win a war they invent taxes to pay for it and then they ration everything else.
Stimulus my (delete obscene words)
Precisely my point--Welcome to the fraternity of Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Iraq, Af-Pak, Arab Spring veterans who are risking their lives to make the world safe for the next quarterly p&l statements of war profiteers. There is a whole world of conflicts to supply with weapons and munitions (both sides of course--greater profits that way!). You and your colleagues have the honor to be the lubricant to facilitate capital appreciation for the merchants of death.
[War does not stimulate the economy]
You are very very wrong with that idea. War is the thing the economy is based upon. That's been the case with wars since the first tribe of humans decided that it was better to go kill their neighbours rather than hunt for themselves.
I'm not aware of any nation ever fighting any war in order to lose it. If you wish to correct me, please provide a reference to the nation that did try to 'accomplish' that feat.
For every dollar spent on war, a very small proportion gets into the hands of the average person. Too much goes to the contractors, and an unusual percentage gets wasted or literally blown up. And especially in these invasions, a LOT is stolen. Then there are the costs of caring for the wounded. I could go on.
If a dollar were spent on green energy or education, or infrastructure for example, the type of jobs generated would replace a much higher proportion of each dollar into the public's pocket and then into circulation, creating more jobs.
I agree totally. However, it's not you or me that gets to determine how the money gets spent. Moreover, every economic disaster that we humans get into usually ends when another big war comes down the pipe.
Unfortunately for us.
But the rich will make out like bandits. And Gawd luvs them rich folk, all the tv preachers say so.
"Moreover, every economic disaster that we humans get into usually ends when another big war comes down the pipe. " That is only if you check out the stock market figures, and even then the results are uneven and fleeting. The disasters remain and are intensified for most people in the world, especially the poor, those whose lands are devastated and those whose professions are productive or caring.
But you are right in that in this country the weekly paychecks of many are tied to the war industry or the prison industry. Those jobs need to be converted, and in the meantime it would not be a waste of money to provide interim paychecks. Even for people working in those industries, they still face the erosion of education, health care, the environment, the food supply and housing that comes from siphoning off so much from what should be our national wealth into the industry of contracts and killing. There may be a paycheck, but it pays for life in a poorer and poorer environment, both in a practical sense and in terms of happiness.
I guess that you have been told off but your comment is too lame to pass un answered. I cannot suport your implyed premise that armed conflict and the cost of both human life enviornmental catistrophic damage and national treasure is balanced by even full employment. War is the most wastful and costly endevor in which man has ever engaged. If we had shown up in Afghanistan and given everyone in the country a holiday on the Riviera we would be much better off on so many levels.
You're told that there is no money for road repair, national health care, decent education or other things; yet there is always money for another war. Why do you think that is?
He certainly could have presented the argument better, but that doesn't mean that he's got it wrong.
Its getting closer and closer to the times when Nations beat swords into plowshares by building infrastructure about what we can produce from hemp;which is paper, plastics, cloths and Bio-fuel: Fords first Model T was built out of hemp plastics. http://youtu.be/f36yUldk2MI
A hard to believe story is in this link. Someday this truth is going to help fix things. It means nothing at all, to this 53 year old child of the 60s-70s Rock and Roll, if it can't help. http://www.opednews.com/articles/Evolution-Number-Nine-by-Michael-Dewey-110215-430.html
Public opinion helped end the war folly in Vietnam in the early 70s. Perhaps public opinion will end our STUPID wars in 2011?
Republicans remind me of Peter Pan:
The big Republican deception since the Laugher curve and Jack Kemp (I am glad idiots like him finally die) proposed their supply side theory--even Bush 2 quoted it--is that for every 100 dollars of tax cuts you get 100 dollars in revenue. What his father called voodoo economics. All the presidential morons are running on that same fabrication.
OK. So cut taxes to zero. Then you will get over a trillion in revenue. Magic revenue. Such are the absurd lies of the INSANE REPUGS! In reality you will get zero revenue. Gravity has a way of being real except in Peter Pan movies...
It appears that only the mayors are living in a Newtonian world of cause and effect. The Republicans in Washington are all living in Wonder land! They are killing people with their insane ideological delusions. Real flesh and blood citizens.
RIP
My*Heart
Sears with the pain and suffering of mankind's utterly senseless, confrontational follies,
A determined rancor, of petty uselessness, dividing community, relative, family, sibling, spirit and soul,
Stumbling, perpetually falling, upon the dull, repetitive, serrated edge of it's bloody, abusive, egocentric dogma,
My*Heart weeps, silent desperation, for knowing... peace...
***************
12*Minutes + 13*Months = Global Peace Initiative 2*Billion Jobs Global Economic Recovery Mass Poverty Reduction Global Ceasefire Environmental & Abuse Healing Security Unity Tis a Brave New World & so Time to globalize - NOT- Government nor Religion but Humanity.. Unite the C.H.A.O.S. - Share the L.O.V.E. - 12*Minutes + 13*Months = World4Peace