EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Europe Sowing the Seeds of Hunger
LEIPZIG, Germany - Europe is facing a hungry future unless it changes agricultural policies and makes farmers the main participants in agriculture research, a new report has found. And there is little hope of meeting Europe's recently announced goal of reducing the loss of biodiversity in ten years without making those changes.
"The kind of farming that makes most money in the shortest time is absolutely at odds with the kind of farming that could feed us, and that could continue to feed us," writes biologist and author Colin Tudge. (photo via Flickr user Andrew Stawarz) France is suffering a severe drought but Europe's seed laws prevent farmers from using a wider variety of seeds that could help them cope, says Michel Pimbert of the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), non-profit research institute based in London.
"Our seed laws enforce uniformity. France can only plant approved seeds and those new varieties need a lot of water," Pimbert, the author of the report told IPS.
"Farmers’ freedom to choose the seeds they plant and to use them to develop improved crop varieties and biodiversity-rich farming will be key to Europe’s response to climate change," says Pimbert.
"Europe’s agriculture policies are preventing us from adapting to climate change. They are also bad for biodiversity since they force farmers to use an increasingly narrow range of seeds and animal breeds," he says.
Farmers are handcuffed by a system of seed laws that enforce uniformity and protect patents and intellectual property. In practice this means only the most advanced varieties can be sold on the market. But under intellectual property laws this means farmers must pay for the right to use patented genes and proprietary technologies, mostly owned by large corporations.
Scientists are in the same trap and unable to utilise the full range of seed diversity, says Pimbert.
The net result is dramatic reduction in genetic diversity across a wide variety of crops, finds the Farm Seed Opportunities report released earlier this month. The report is based on findings of the EU-funded Farm Seed Opportunities project which includes public-sector research institutes, peasant networks and organic farmers’ associations from six European countries.
Experts agree that diversity can build resilience in a food production system that will be hard hit by climate change. A diverse combination of plants, trees and animals doubled the yields in 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa in the last ten years according to a recent report by Olivier De Schutter, U.N. Special Rapporteur on the right to food. De Schutter calls this form of agriculture ‘agroecology’. Not only does agroecology produce more food at lower cost, it improves the health of the soil and also dramatically lowers farming's carbon footprint.
"It is fair to say that between 45 and 50 percent of all human emissions of global warming gases come from the current form of food production," De Shutter said in a previous IPS interview.
The current global food production system is "threatening to kill us all," writes biologist and author Colin Tudge, in the report’s foreword. "The kind of farming that makes most money in the shortest time is absolutely at odds with the kind of farming that could feed us, and that could continue to feed us," Tudge writes.
Agroecological farming works the way nature works, with a wide variety of living things acting synergistically. There is much evidence demonstrating that such methods produce more food and are more sustainable, he says.
Europe's Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) is a success but only in terms of making money for large agri-business corporations and producing large quantities of food at the cost of enormous carbon emissions, pollution, degradation of farmland, dramatic cuts in the numbers of farmers and dumping cheap food onto poor countries, undercutting their farmers says Pimbert. The average age of a farmer in the UK is over 60. "There is a fraction of the number of farmers in western Europe, they all been replaced by machines and captial."
The Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) is the European Union’s system of agricultural subsidies and programmes and is to be reformed in 2013. Currently the CAP is driven by neo-liberal economic policies and that has been a failure, says Carlo Petrini, president of Slow Food International.
"Every community should have the right to choose what to produce without being subjected to external influences dictated by international markets," Petrini said in a statement.
Strengthening support for local farmers must be part of the new CAP, says José Bové, French farmer, activist and vice-president of the European Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. "If rural communities do not have the chance to take hold of their destiny, then the situation cannot improve," Bové said in a statement.
The new CAP needs to shift research and policy priorities from a near exclusive focus on monocultures to whole farm agroecological approaches and to safeguard the biological diversity upon which our food supplies depend, says Pimbert. "Scientists are not trained to deal with complex systems, so that's a challenge." Farmers also need to be central in that effort with the freedom to exchange seeds and utilise diversity he says.
As it stands today Europe is ill-prepared to cope with climate change. "So far we've been buffered from significant impacts but what is coming is beyond our experience," concludes Pimbert.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show All>>Experts agree that diversity can build resilience in a food production system that will be hard hit by climate change. A diverse combination of plants, trees and animals doubled the yields in 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa in the last ten years according to a recent report by Olivier De Schutter, U.N. Special Rapporteur on the right to food
I get tired of a world that waits around for these "Experts" to make their profound conclusions which have been known by the small farmers that grow the food for the past thousand years and more.
This like Christopher Columbus "Discovering" The Americas.
It seems to me relying on these experts all the time is part and parcel of the problem as the Mosanto side or the Exxon side will drag out their own experts who will state the complete opposite and nothing will be done as that debate goes on.
This is Gulliver's travels and the war started over which end of the egg should be broken first.
Preserving biological diversity is common sense and the need for it should be apparent to every person on this Earth. That they need to debate it only happens because there that one small group ONCE again more interested in the profits that flow to the Corporations.
This "problem" (if it is a problem) is far more complex than most people can imagine. To massively change our current agricultural system would first take a HUGE groundswell of citizens clamoring for a few acres each to farm. This will not happen. We should all at least work to make things difficult for farms to grow ever larger.
Modern agriculture exists to feed growing urban populations. Concrete theme parks with their cutsy manicured parks and other cultural diversions. What exactly do people do in cities that is neccessary to life on planet Earth? Very little, in my opinion. Take a walk thru your grocery store. Most of the items on the shelves have negative nutritional value and their production is environmentally toxic. Alas.
>>philiphoko: "What exactly do people do in cities that is neccessary to life on planet Earth?"<<
You know, philiphoko, I asked a very similar question during an argument with someone, some 20 years ago . At that time, my exact question was about the relative contributions of people who are paid vastly different amounts for their labor. This person tried to tell me about market value, knowledge-base and some other phony talking points and I just let it go.
Europe is killing the little farmer !!!
To late, much to late. Famine is headed to Eastern Europe first, then Africa (again) and then Western Europe and the U.S. about the same time. The only are to escape is the lower part of South America. Australia is a gonner too, already. Cutthroat capitalism has killed most of the population of the world. Water wars, food wars,poverty, climate change, deathly sickness, etc. is already here pretty much world wide. The wealthiest country in the world, the U.S. has about 20% of it's population on the edge of hunger already. Nothing will change until a real revolution removes those supplying the arms for the wars and controlling the world-wide economy.
Bravo - you said it succinctly - why do you think south South America will escape?
Don't forget how dependent Europeans are on the destruction of the rainforest to provide soy beans to feed their animals. The biodiversity of the Earth would be enhanced by eating less meat.
I know European citizens have fought hard to keep Monsanto's toxic agenda away from their food. People in Europe are far more aware and educated about the need for quality, labelled food than in the ignorant US.
These wretched seed laws must have been bought by BigAg and imposed on everyone by politicians.
The personal is political and politics is more and more intrusive.
Support local organic farmers and eat less meat.
"The laws of every civilized country have this in common: Any person who influences another to commit murder, any person who provides the weapon for the purpose of committing murder, any person who aids another in committing murder is guilty of murder"---Spencer Tracy in "Judgement at Nuremberg"
Depriving whole populations of food is murder. World leaders who require farming practices to be followed, practices which cannot but lead to eventual famine are guilty of murder. Congressmen who advocate the abolition of Medicaid are guilty of murder. Policy makers who make emergency food aid contingent on political considerations are guilty of murder.
As the world's population continues to increase, policies which only a few decades ago were merely ill-advised or mean spirited have become genocidal.
"They cry Peace Peace when there is no Peace."
There are no houses on the land. The tractor driver plows 1000 times more per hour than hand labor, houses are just in the way. Agroecological indigenous techniques can produce twice as much per acre, and the countryside is dotted with villages and farms. Which is more efficient? Twice per acre or a thousand times more per hour. In a world homeless and underemployed extra labor we decide to save on labor and go for a chemical and mechanical assault on corporate owned land? More of what has almost destroyed the planet and democracy?
Yes, but have you ever spent day after day, all day long, hoeing weeds or picking rocks, or one of so many other back-breaking, finger wounding,... lovely days working in the sunshine (or unbelievable heat)?
Yes I have. Can't say I cared much for it. Subsistence farming would be the only way to live if the system were not rigged to force twice the labor from farm hands, and for half wages.
The tractor was the beginning of the end for the family farm, and you know that's true.
I too have spent days with a hoe under the hot sun. Such work is not for everyone and there is no way to know what the proper percent of citizens is for agriculture. The corporate agricultural system mines the soil, pollutes the environment and depends on semi-slave migrant labor. Though food prices would be higher if people were earning a decent wage that attracted industrious effort, the increase in a family food budget would probably be less than the money spent on prisons for unemployed youth without a future.