Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Red Cross Described 'Torture' at CIA Jails
Secret Report Implies That U.S. Violated International Law
The International Committee of the Red Cross concluded in a secret report that the Bush administration's treatment of al-Qaeda captives "constituted torture," a finding that strongly implied that CIA interrogation methods violated international law, according to newly published excerpts from the long-concealed 2007 document.
In this photo reviewed by the US Military, a guard works at Guantanamo's Camp 6 detention center at the US Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, January 21, 2009. A secret Red Cross report from 2007 concluded that the treatment of al-Qaeda captives by CIA interrogators "constituted torture," the Washington Post reported Monday.
(AFP/POOL/File/Brennan Linsley) The report, an account alleging physical and psychological brutality inside CIA "black site" prisons, also states that some U.S. practices amounted to "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." Such maltreatment of detainees is expressly prohibited by the Geneva Conventions.
The findings were based on an investigation by ICRC officials, who were granted exclusive access to the CIA's "high-value" detainees after they were transferred in 2006 to the U.S. detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The 14 detainees, who had been kept in isolation in CIA prisons overseas, gave remarkably uniform accounts of abuse that included beatings, sleep deprivation, extreme temperatures and, in some cases, waterboarding, or simulating drowning.
At least five copies of the report were shared with the CIA and top White House officials in 2007 but barred from public release by ICRC guidelines intended to preserve the humanitarian group's strict policy of neutrality in conflicts. A copy of the report was obtained by Mark Danner, a journalism professor and author who published extensive excerpts in the April 9 edition of the New York Review of Books, released yesterday. He did not say how he obtained the report.
"The ill-treatment to which they were subjected while held in the CIA program, either singly or in combination, constituted torture," Danner quoted the report as saying.
Many of the details of alleged mistreatment at CIA prisons had been reported previously, but the ICRC report is the most authoritative account and the first to use the word "torture" in a legal context.
The CIA declined to comment. A U.S. official familiar with the report said, "It is important to bear in mind that the report lays out claims made by the terrorists themselves."
Often using the detainee's own words, the report offers a harrowing view of conditions at the secret prisons, where prisoners were told they were being taken "to the verge of death and back," according to one excerpt. During interrogations, the captives were routinely beaten, doused with cold water and slammed head-first into walls. Between sessions, they were stripped of clothing, bombarded with loud music, exposed to cold temperatures, and deprived of sleep and solid food for days on end. Some detainees described being forced to stand for days, with their arms shackled above them, wearing only diapers.
"On a daily basis . . . a collar was looped around my neck and then used to slam me against the walls of the interrogation room," the report quotes detainee Tawfiq bin Attash, also known as Walid Muhammad bin Attash, as saying. Later, he said, he was wrapped in a plastic sheet while cold water was "poured onto my body with buckets." He added: "I would be wrapped inside the sheet with cold water for several minutes. Then I would be taken for interrogation."
ICRC officials did not dispute the authenticity of the excerpts, but a spokesman expressed dismay over the leak of the material. "We regret information attributed to the ICRC report was made public in this manner," spokesman Bernard Barrett said.
"The ICRC has been visiting the detainees formerly held by the CIA," he added, "at Guantanamo since 2006. Any concerns or observations the ICRC had when visiting the detainees are part of a confidential dialogue."
President George W. Bush acknowledged the use of coercive interrogation tactics on senior al-Qaeda captives detained by the CIA in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but he insisted that the measures complied with U.S. and international law. Former CIA director Michael V. Hayden confirmed last year that the measures included the use of waterboarding on three captives before 2003.
President Obama outlawed such practices within hours of his inauguration in January. But Obama has expressed reluctance to conduct a legal inquiry into the CIA's policies.
The report gives a graphic account of the treatment of Zayn al-Abidin Muhammed Hussein, better known as Abu Zubaida, a Saudi-born Palestinian who was the first alleged senior al-Qaeda operative seized after Sept. 11 -- a characterization of his role that is disputed by his attorneys, who describe him as having a different philosophy of jihad than bin Laden.
Abu Zubaida was severely wounded during a shootout in March 2002 at a safe house he ran in Faisalabad, Pakistan, and survived thanks to CIA-arranged medical care, including multiple surgeries. After he recovered, Abu Zubaida describes being shackled to a chair at the feet and hands for two to three weeks in a cold room with "loud, shouting type music" blaring constantly, according to the ICRC report. He said that he was questioned two to three hours a day and that water was sprayed in his face if he fell asleep.
At some point -- the timing is unclear from the New York Review of Books report -- Abu Zubaida's treatment became harsher. In July 2002, administration lawyers approved more aggressive techniques.
Abu Zubaida said interrogators wrapped a towel around his neck and slammed him into a plywood wall mounted in his cell. He was also repeatedly slapped in the face, he said. After the beatings, he was placed in coffinlike wooden boxes in which he was forced to crouch, with no light and a restricted air supply, he said.
"The stress on my legs held in this position meant my wounds both in my leg and stomach became very painful," he told the ICRC.
After he was removed from a small box, he said, he was strapped to what looked like a hospital bed and waterboarded. "A black cloth was then placed over my face and the interrogators used a mineral bottle to pour water on the cloth so that I could not breathe," Abu Zubaida said.
After breaks to allow him to recover, the waterboarding continued.
"I struggled against the straps, trying to breathe, but it was hopeless," he said. "I though I was going to die."
In a federal court filing, Abu Zubaida's attorneys said he "has suffered approximately 175 seizures that appear to be directly related to his extensive torture -- particularly damage to Petitioner's head that was the result of beatings sustained at the hands of CIA interrogators and exacerbated by his lengthy isolation."
Danner said the organization's use of the word "torture" has important legal implications.
"It could not be more important that the ICRC explicitly uses the words 'torture' and 'cruel and degrading,' " Danner said in a telephone interview. "The ICRC is the guardian of the Geneva Conventions, and when it uses those words, they have the force of law."
He discounted the possibility that the detainees fabricated or embellished their stories, noting that the accounts overlap "in minute detail," even though the detainees were kept in isolation at different locations.
Human rights groups echoed his assessment.
"These reports are from an impeccable source," said Geneve Mantri, a counterterrorism specialist at Amnesty International. "It's clear that senior officials were warned from the very beginning that the treatment that detainees were subjected to amounted to torture. This story goes even further and deeper than many us of suspected. The more details we find out, the more shocking this becomes."
- Posted in

19 Comments so far
Show AllWhere is a good war crimes commission when yoou need it?
Not here.
The man most responsible for this is Dick Cheney with Rumsfeld a close second. Cheney placed his whole black soul into this and conspired to hold all information and actions within a group of trusted ideologues. Many good people in Washington fought the good fight against this crazed monster but ultimately gave up either from exhaustion, fear, or timidity. The more publicity on this the better. Someday another virtual dictator like Cheney will be back. Understanding what happened may mitigate a future calamity.
Understanding? We need prosecution. Period!
Pull back the all the "tarp" that covers the smoldering sewage
that is at the heart of this "Democracy".
The repeal of habeas corpus>
Kidnapping & Torture of citizens and non citizens>
Wire Taps of all citizens>
War criminals allowed to walk as innocent men and celebrated men.
Tax payer money used to bailout 1% of 1% while
the 99% of us are thrown form our homes and lose our jobs and our future!!
We have no money for health care but
we have trillions for billionaires?!
We have no money for to educate our children but we have
billions to fund a illegal wars and weapons that don't work and are not needed?
We fear socialism but hand out money by the truck load to the billionaires?
We need to pull all the "TARP"s that cover our government and our corrupt politicians.
As we all know "Tarp"s are used to cover up things that are rotting.
Let the light of the sun rise and expose this putrescence and bacteria.
Time to up root and turn the soil to grow a new where now is death and decay!!!
Grab a shovel, gloves and boots and I will meet you at the first TARP!!
Agree with all you have said, but we'll need MORE than a shovel. ...........maybe they'll listen to a few MILLION shovels and some pots and pans as in Iceland, eh? What do you think is stopping us??
Obama tried to keep a campaign promise today. He tried to tax the richest 2% to pay for his initiatives. After they told him to fuck off he announced he was going to tax employees on what employers contribute to their health care.
Come on Mr. President, you gotta do better than that.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand this. Thank God for whistle blowers!
The Red Cross investigates black holes full of torture and other obscenities, makes a full report calling a spade a spade, gives the report to the torturers and takes a vow of silence so the rest of the world will not know?
What the hell good is it?
That is just like Obama's latest, that the officers that tortured and did other reprehensible things should be protected from prosecution because then officers might be reluctant to break international law and torture again under orders, for fear of litigation!
Doesn't anybody remember or study Nuremberg anymore? Those whose defense was that they just obeyed orders were tried and many were hanged right along with those who gave the orders because obeying an illegal order is no excuse.
I don't even understand "Mr. Change." Give them immunity from prosecution because they might look twice at being ordered to torture and mistreat again?
As Cindy said, "We've been immersed in bullshit and horseshit for so long we no longer notice the taste and smell.
An international body investigating torture and cruelty should be making every detail of what they find public, just as they should bitch publicly if they are not allowed in to investigate. Only then, perhaps, some of this stuff will come to a halt. But not if it is confined to a confidential report to the torturers.
Minitrue, the Red Cross gets access to prisoners held by states that torture and hold prisoners indefinitely and in secret, only on condition that they not disclose what they learn. The reason being that then at least the RC can give a minimum of assistance to those held under such conditions. There are other organizations whose function it is to be more outspoken about these hellholes.
In other words, I get to go into your stinking dungeons and report on the filth and atrocities that I find, to you who authorized it and so know about it already and in return for that, I have the privilege of putting bandaids on the wounds of the prisoners being tortured.
As Cindy said, "We've been immersed in bullshit and horseshit for so long we no longer notice the taste and smell.
"If the Nuremburg Laws were to be applied, every post-war president would have been hanged." Interview w/Noam Chomsky 1990.
A U.S. official familiar with the report said, "It is important to bear in mind that the report lays out claims made by the terrorists themselves."
When he uses the word 'terrorits' is he refering to A. the CIA interrogation agents, or B. their vice commander in chief (aka "Darth Vader"), or C. all of the above?
Even as the Dark Lord (rhymes with Cheney) is given TV face time to say that Obama will be responsible (hint hint) for the "next terraist" attack on the holy sacred homeland, the torture (probably) goes on (and on).
The Red Cross does what it can as it always has done -- it is only their reputation which gives them to what, of course, is minimal access to the shit that goes on.
Please don't put down the people who are lighting a candle (however small) in the gathering darkness...
_______________
There's a glory in the morning because the earth turns 'round and a promise in the evening when the sun goes down
The NEO terrorist in our country, as the likes of Bush,Sr. his old CIA buddies, along with his old regime, as Chaney, Rice, and Rumfeld, and incorperated themselves into Bush Jr.'s regime, are the ones who stirred up, conflicts in the Middle East. Add Britain, and Israel, and it makes the Axis of evil, they protrayed others to be. Didn't Bush Sr. help the Taliban with weapons at one time, as president? As long as we have the Neo conservatives playing their negative war games, we will not have peace. I wonder if the GOP have Limbaugh in mind, for their next president?
Any prosecutors out there?
America, the state, has not ratified the ICC and does not abide by The Nuremberg Principles nor does America, the state, adhere to The Nuremberg Code. The USA, the Federal State, never ratified the Nuremberg Principles into USA Law.
America, the state, has placed itself above International Law.
The 2003 invasion of Iraq was illegal as was the constant bombing and blockade of Iraq post 1991.
The Governments of the states of Australia, the UK, Canada, USA and all other institutions who took part are legally liable to be prosecuted under The Kellog-Briand Pact, the Nuremberg Principles, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, (in countries where The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, has been ratified the legal system must investigate and prosecute war criminals)
Over 200 people have reported war crimes to police stations around the UK. On at least 2 occassions, those reporting the war crimes have been acknowledged, given official crime numbers, and have submitted evidence to the War Crimes Unit of the London Metropolitan War Crimes Unit.
This means that the London Metropolitan Police must investigate and review the evidence submitted.
Ever so slowly....
These investigations are stalled......
One wonders why?
One last thing : anyone who, by whatever means, enables a state that is committing war crimes to continue to do so, is guilty of 'conduct ancillary to the comission of a war crime' under The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, in those countries that have ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and formalised that ratification by enactment of Law in those countries.
Thus in those countries that have ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,, citizens have both a legal right and a legal duty, one that supercedes all other local or national legislation, to withdraw all means of support from such State Institutions that are involved in the comission of war crimes, including all taxation paid to the a liable central government.
These are some of the countries whose governments have ratified The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court : Australia, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom, France, Norway, Peru, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, Colombia, Republic of Congo, Serbia, Montenegro
Both the US and Israel signed before full ratification was met, and unsigned prior to formal ratification completion. They broke the contract, so to speak, an illegal act in and of itself.
The citizens of the above countries need to be informed as to the Laws of War and be urged most strongly to demand that their own police forces and public prosecutors uphold those Laws, and arraign those who are accused of war crimes, if there is evidence presented top them, so as to relieve them of their legal liablity with regard to their obligation to withdraw any and all material support for those people and institutions that are liable under The Laws of War.
A national strike and other such action would is deemed legal under the Laws of War cited herein, under other international treaties.
Kindest regards
Corneilius
do what you love, it's your gift to universe
Shame on the RC for not exposing this sooner! And they are the protectors of the Geneva Conventions? Some protection. The next time those fucks come calling for a donation, I'm going to hand them this article.
-----------------------------------------
What Is Marxism? - a short primer on a subject the working class needs to know.
http://www.marxist.com/Theory/what_is_marxism.html
The reason the report even exists, is because of the people you call "those fucks".
And no they aren't the "protectors of the Geneva Conventions".
OK, I misquoted. The article says: ""The ICRC is the guardian of the Geneva Conventions, and when it uses those words, they have the force of law.""
I used "protectors" when it should have been "guardian". Same thing, as far as I can tell.
The fact that the report exists and wasn't made public by the RC, is why I call them "those fucks". Don't get it? Too bad.
-----------------------------------------
What Is Marxism? - a short primer on a subject the working class needs to know.
http://www.marxist.com/Theory/what_is_marxism.html
Sandy
If you read Our Endangered Values by Jimmy Carter, on page 119 the ICRC reported 800-900 Pakistani BOYS age 13-15 in custody of the USA. The Pentagon, Amnesty Int'l and ICRC gathered the testimony of the tortured kids, confirmed by soldiers participating in or witnessing it. General Karpinski visited an 11 year old in his cell at Abu Graib. A description of participation in torture by medics, Drs and the good ol' American Psyhological Association...lots belong in prison for life. Most will just keep their filthy little secrets til suicide, madness or the depleted uranium finishes them off. The first Gulf War killed 148 US soldiers, more than 15,000 that returned home are now dead.