Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Guidelines On Genetically Modified Animals To Be Released By FDA
Washington, D.C. - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is slated to release on Thursday guidelines for genetic engineering of animals for food, drugs or medical purposes.
The guidelines, long overdue and the result of years of discussion, could open the door for the commercial production and sale of rapid-growing fish, environment-friendly swine, cattle resistant to mad cow disease and animals with meat that have healthier contents.
A small number of biotechnology companies and scientists have already bred genetically modified animals but the lack of clear regulatory guidelines prevents businesses from investing in the area.
The FDA conference call, confirmed by FDA spokeswoman Judy Leon, is expected to pronounce that genetically engineered animals will be regulated by the same laws used on animal drugs. Stricter regulation on genetically modified animals is expected compared to cloned animals which have no added genes. Last year the FDA had ruled that meat and milk from cloned animals are safe for consumption and would require almost no regulation.
For genetically engineered animals, each type of modified specie would need a separate approval from the FDA, which will test the effect of the animal meat or milk on human health, animal health and the environment.
Biotechnology firms are happy with the issue of the guidelines. Barbara Glenn, managing director of animal biotechnology for the Biotechnology Industry Organization, told the New York Times, "We feel this will enhance investor confidence in this technology... A strong regulatory process translates ultimately into public confidence."
Critics wait for the guidelines to be published. A skeptical Margaret Mellon of the Union of Concerned Scientists told Washington Post, "The first time that the public will learn about a genetically engineered animal will be the first day it is approved... This requires that you completely trust the FDA to do this right, and I don't think folks trust FDA that much."
- Posted in



3 Comments so far
Show AllIt's over for us. There are no guidelines for labeling food as genetically modified and GMO should never be consumed. The FDA staff took a survey in 2006 and over 60% of staff felt the FDA was corrupt. Don't trust the FDA they get paid to approve dangerous products.
Science and human arrogance run amuck.
What about the moral arguments--i.e torturing members of other species for human use?
This is just another ground for the vivisection industry to do immense amounts of torture and death and claim its for benefits--just as they have been trying to cure cancer with rats since the 1850s and we still have it.
Animal researchers are not experts at preventing pain and death-they are however, experts at causing it.
The FDA, USDA, and other "A's" can't protect us now from all sorts of problems with the food global food supply because the Corporate Agriculture interests have supported those who have gutted the inspections process and deregulated anything that served the common interest of consumers. So why trust them on GM animals? In addition to that very practical human safety concern, there is also the humane and ethical concern raised by others here on the inhumane treatment of animals.
I'd go farther though. I suggest looking in the mirror at your teeth and then compare them to a cat or dog's teeth. Why? We humans are genetically wired/designed to be predominately grain and veggie eaters - cats and dogs meat eaters.
Meat eating is unhealthy for us, as well as being inhumane and environmentally dumb. Change isn't easy but it's easier than suffering from overdosing on animal based food and suffering the many consequences of ill health and deforestation globally to grow cereal to feed to animals that we then eat.