Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Dirty Coal Has Left the Building
The great snow storm has passed. The clouds are parting. The sun is breaking through. Those tiny ripples of hope, that Robert Kennedy once invoked, are beginning to gather near Capitol Hill.
The Capitol Power Plant: It was built at the same time the first Ford Model T cars rolled onto the streets. A century later, the Capitol plant will finally end its use of coal in the age of the iPhone and Blackberry.
There's a new era in Washington, DC--a clean energy era. And with an Obama administration that wants to double our renewable energy production in three years, and has called for cap 'n trade legislation to limit carbon emissions, thousands of clean energy and coalfield activists are converging on the snow-swept streets of Washington, DC today to remind Capitol Hill that a growing and incredibly organized movement is ready to make this new clean energy era a reality.
The Capitol Climate Action today is more than a historic protest against coal, coal-fired plants and their role in climate change. It's a celebration of a road map to end our dependence on our nation's dirtiest fossil fuel.
For up-to-date information, see: capitolclimateaction.org
The denials of coal's dirty past are over: Thousands of citizens are prepared to engage in civil disobedience at the Capitol Power Plant today to make clear the sense of urgency in dealing with climate change legislation and policy in an effective and timely manner.
In anticipation of this first mass act of civil disobedience in our nation's history around climate change, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have asked the Acting Architect of the Capitol to end the use of coal at the Capitol plant as "an important demonstration of Congress' willingness to deal with the enormous challenges of global warming, energy independence and our inefficient use of finite fossil fuels."
That's one small step for Congress; one giant leap for the nation, if we continue to retire the oldest and dirtiest coal-fired plants at a similar pace.
In the meantime, at the other 635 coal-fired plants, over 40 percent of our nation's carbon dioxide emissions continue to erupt from electricity plant silos like as silent volcanoes of death.
The urgency of this movement rings with a new message: We all live in the coalfields now.
At the historic Powershift09 conference this weekend in Washington, DC, where over 12,000 students and clean energy activists gathered for a whirlwind of panels, workshops and speeches, scores of experts and community organizers in coal mining and coal-fired plant areas provided some dramatic backstory to the growing movement against climate destabilization.
Elisa Young, a farm resident from Meigs County, spoke about the spike in cancer and asthma in an area beset with five coal-fired plants in southern Ohio. According to one recent study, men in Meigs County have the lowest life expectancy rate in the state.
Judy Bonds, from the Coal River Mountain Watch in West Virginia, showed how near 500 mountains in central Appalachia have been toppled into the valleys, as part of mountaintop removal mining, wiping out 1,200 miles of streams, depopulating and ruining historic mountain hamlets and economies, and contaminating watersheds.
The human costs of mountaintop removal have emerged as the most egregious violation of human rights in the region in our lifetimes.
Chris Martin, a student from Tennessee, reminded the audience that the TVA coal ash leakages in his area last December brought out the fact that more than half of our nation's population and their water sources rest within a half hour drive of an unregulated coal ash pond and potential catastrophe.
According to the American Lung Association, 24,000 Americans die prematurely from coal-fired plant pollution each year. Another 550,000 asthma attacks, 38,000 heart attacks and 12,000 hospital admissions are also attributed to coal-fired plants.
In 1895, newspapers ran ads for smoke-free "clean coal" in Chicago, as the boom in coal-fired plant electricity was about to launch a new era.
Over a century later, those same "clean coal" ads are still running, and the dirty coal denials are taking place.
The convergence on the Capitol Power Plant in Washington, DC, marks a new era in confronting these denials.
While applauding President Barack Obama's commitment renewable energy, coalfield activists and clean energy advocates are directly addressing a president still beholden to the chimera of "clean coal," its devastating extraction counterparts and dirty coal's underlining role in the silent tsunami of climate destabilization.
For those suffering the consequence of dirty coal's legacy, the time has arrived to put an end to the "clean coal" scams of the coal lobby, which not only jeopardize any efforts to pass effective climate legislation before the world climate change conference in Copenhagen in December, but continue the devastation of coal mining in Appalachia, the Midwest and the West.
"What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future," Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the UN's International Panel on Climate Change, has declared.
It's time for dirty coal to leave the building.
- Posted in


9 Comments so far
Show AllIf you haven't seen the Cohen brothers spoof tv ad about clean coal, enjoy it here....
http://www.rushprnews.com/2009/02/27/coen-brothers-play-hardball-with-clean-coal-coalition/
Shutting down coal burnign in Washington, D.C. is only the beginning. A lot more work remains ahead in order to close the over 600 remaining coal plants in the US, and beyond that, thousands more in the rest of the world.
Some say we need to switch to "safe nuclear". Sound familiar? The reason is that nuclear can not be safe any more than coal can be clean. It is intrinsically dangerout because radiation is "always" dangerout by damaging DNA.
Read about it in ACE Hoffman's newsletters at http://animatedsoftware.com
Meanwhile, there is a technology which is emerging that has the capacity to replace ALL the coal and nuclear generating capacity in the US (and elsewhere). It uses non-carbon heat sources that are effectively "free" and the coldest parts of the troposphere to complete the thermal energy cycle.
Read about it at http://vortexengine.ca and send a message to your congresman to support it.
"The denials of coal's dirty past are over"
This is why clean coal is the future.
"Clean Coal" technology is supposed to capture carbon emissions and "sequester" it in the ground. Fact is, the concept was thought up a few years ago but virtually none such large-scale sequestration has yet to take place.
Since this dubious Clean Coal alternative came about, I always asked myself why would we support and help fund it when we have truly RENEWABLE sources of energy in which to invest. Think about it. When the automobile first came about did anybody fight it because they preferred scooping up after horses and dumping (sequestering) mountains of horses--t!
And speaking of cars: we can eventually eliminate their pollution by going with plug-in vehicles using energy produced by solar and wind power. The technology already exists...
http://freesolaradvice.blogspot.com
The Coal Companies would have you believe that it is necessary to first build plants that consume coal to generate electricity, with the additional CO2 capture equipment either on standby, or being used in pilot projects to demonstrate sequestration which would be implemented, say a decade from now.
Of course, there are only a very limited number of places (if any) where CO2 could actually be sequestered, so the results would be meaningless, even if accomplished to some moderate degree.
The truth is that if it were truly feasible, CO2 sequestration could be started NOW, using the plentiful and concentrated CO2 produced in hydrogen or ethanol plants.
Hmm, I wonder why we're not seeing any Coal Companies recommending that we get started doing this?
cap and trade is short-sighted policy and is too easy to manipulate
"The denials of coal's dirty past are over..."
It makes you wonder what parallel universe this author is living in? During the State of the Union, Obama acknowledged "clean coal." Since clean coal does not exist and since Obama is married to it, what exactly is this Cat's point?
Obama further acknowledged during the campaign that "there will always be a place for coal."
And since sustainable sources of energy represent 3.8% of the energy grid hardly a revelation that Obama is seeking to double it. Either way, it will hardly make a dent in energy expenditures to a sustainable future.
Wake up people! Coal is here to stay thanks to Obama.
One word:
Exelon
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Exelon
www.oldelmtree.com
genaman
Wasn't it president Jimmy Carter who was the first to install solar panels on the White House? In fact President carter had a solar power reveiwing stand at his Ignagrual
President Obama could reinstall the solar panels on The hite House.(Takin down by Reagan)
President Obama could also order the same for the VP's mansion and Camp DAvid most likely without Congressional approval.
he could also install cistern to recycle rainwater
Camp David most likely could have a few wind turbunes very quickly.
If he would do all this it would same Congress into getting rid og their old coal fire power plant much faster.
You know Congress with their what do they call them ? Them personal monitary grants that mange to go to someplace in each congressperson home districts/ Ah EARMARKS!
What a great Earmark to get rid of that dirty coal fired plant that keep the lights on in Congress.
WEll I guess I have something to write about to my Congressman Shuster Republican Pa.
How about your Congress people?
genaman