Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Swiss Ban on Minarets Causes Shockwaves
A campaign by the right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP) to initiate a referendum and formally gauge support for a proposed minaret in a small town north of Berne elicited the backlash, with 57 per cent of voters approving the ban.
A woman writes slogans on a symbolic minaret erected to protest against the results of a vote in Switzerland at the Place Neuve square in Geneva, Switzerland, Monday, Nov. 30, 2009. Slogan at top reads, 'Forgive them! We did not vote for the ban, long live tolerance'. (AP Photo/Keystone, Laurent Gillieron) ''My first reaction is one of surprise and disappointment,'' Babacar Ba, the Geneva ambassador of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, said.
''It is a bad answer to a bad question. I fear that this kind of thing is simply a gift to extremism and intolerance. I think we must be very vigilant in the face of the upsurge of Islamophobia.''
Sunday's vote will also be read as further evidence of Switzerland's resistance to more integration with Europe and integration with the European Union.
The use of direct democracy to bury the building application has severely embarrassed the Government, which did not expect the result.
Switzerland is a major exporter to the Muslim world.
Because the ban gained a majority of votes and passed in a majority of the cantons, it will be added to the constitution.
Switzerland has a system of direct democracy for single-issue political decisions, allowing its citizens a voice on important policy proposals.
The SVP, the biggest group in the Swiss Federal Parliament, used a graphic and inflammatory poster for its campaign, which included a picture of minarets in the shape of missiles on a Swiss flag and a woman in a burqa depicted standing in front of them.
Walter Wobmann, president of the committee that pushed for the referendum, said the group wanted to ''stop further Islamisation in Switzerland. We're enormously happy. It is a victory for this people, this Switzerland, this freedom and those who want a democratic society.''
The referendum was sparked by a development application by the Muslim community in the town of Langenthal seeking to add a 10-metre minaret to the local mosque. The issue began as one of architecture but soon exploded into a debate about Muslim communities and integration into Swiss culture.
The result is being widely read in Europe as the most recent expression of European voters' increasing hostility to Muslim immigrants and a rise in support for anti-immigration parties that has resulted in far-right groups in the Netherlands, Austria, France and Britain gaining electoral traction.
In their campaign, SVP supporters pointed to social problems in neighbouring European nations, arguing that Switzerland did not want to walk that path. The group argued that the vote had little to do with intolerance but simply sent a powerful expression of national sentiment about the imposition of Islamic cultures.
Switzerland's Muslim communities have grown during the past two decades to about 350,000 people - about 4 per cent of the population - in the wake of migration from the Balkans and Turkey.
Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf said the result of the referendum reflected fears among the Swiss of Islamic fundamentalist tendencies. ''But the Federal Council [government] takes the view that a ban on the construction of new minarets is not a feasible means of countering extremist tendencies.''
■ Australian Federation of Islamic Councils president Ikebal Adam Patel expressed deep concern at the ban. ''This is yet another example of Islamophobia,'' he said, adding that the ban would ''breach Switzerland's obligations towards upholding freedom of religion and equates to requiring churches not to display a cross or a synagogue not displaying the Star of David''. Mr Patel called on the Australian Government to ''put pressure on Switzerland to remove this ban''.



9 Comments so far
Show AllAs soon as Saudi Arabia legalizes steeples on Christian churches, I will support ending this ban.
Of course, that would first require Saudia Arabia to legalize Christian churches....
Musliims are bleeding hypocrites.
I see... The best way to protest intolerance is to be intolerant yourself...
It's nice to know that you want Switzerland to be compared to one of the most intolerant regimes in the world. It's revealing that you pick one of the most repressive Muslim countries in the world to compare Switzerland to.
Switzerland == Saudi Arabia.
The mask has come off: the truth is that the Swiss are hypocritical bigots, and have always been hypocritical bigots, for centuries. Hypocrites, bigots, war profiteers, parasites, for centuries.
I find it rather disturbing that Switzerland was doing business with the Nazis and safeguarding the Third Reich's fortunes while claiming to be a neutral country that wishes to remain out of politics.
Writing as former Swiss "gast arbeiter," I had the distinct non-pleasure to watch the SVP and FDU (the other actor in this sordid drama whom the piece did not mention) do their neo-fascist games in order to gin up votes. That they went for this is not surprising, as it panders to their hardcore supporters, whom comprise the Swiss German version of the Tea Party demographic: older, white, less educated. Just like the Tea Party types, the financial backers are corporate scum bags who use these parties to maintain profits. In Switzerland, the douche bag behind the curtain is one Christoph Blocher, who happens to be the country's largest car dealer. This was merely another exercise to keep their base active.
Maybe if they made the minarets out of chocolate?
. . . and sang "RICOLA!" from the top of it.
NPR did a story on this sometime over the weekend. It was the first one I heard when my clock radio alarm woke me up. I just laid there in utter astonishment before finally climbing out of bed.
Ridiculous.
A proposed idea:
Tolerance or intolerance goes with geography:
Countries whose geographical make up made survival hard, are intolerant: making a living was hard, and it was staunchly guarded against any change, any intruder.
Of course making a living is no longer viewed as hard in Switzerland in the eyes of an outsider. But ask the Swiss, who fret about everything. Even a pedestrian crossing the street on a red light may be viewed as the beginning of doom...
Yes, they are intolerant to change. Don't they have the right of self-determination?
All religiously defined communities are intolerant (Saudi Arabia, Tibet, Mt. Athos, Vatican). The Swiss are not a religiously defined community in the same sense, but religion was the main dividing line amongst different cantons for centuries - what unites those different doctrines is the cross of the Swiss flags.