This is a dictatorship we aid every day – through our government, corporations, and choices at the till
Over the next three weeks, we will watch a slick propaganda parade of Chinese "sporting heroes". But we will not see China's true heroes in the glittering stadiums of Beijing - because they are in prison, or they have "disappeared." If you are indiscreet enough to ask after them, you will be instantly smeared as "anti-Chinese".
But what are these critics saying? Liu Shaokun is a young teacher in Sichuan Province. He watched his pupils die in the earthquake because their school was built using cheap substandard materials, by corrupt officials who pocketed the change. He took photographs to prove it and posted them on the internet. So he has been seized and indefinitely imprisoned without trial. Is he anti-Chinese?
Chen Guangcheng is a blind self-taught lawyer who exposed the government's policy of forcibly sterilising disabled Chinese women. So he has been jailed for four years. Is he anti-Chinese? Jiang Yanyong is a doctor who exposed the government's attempt to cover up the SARS outbreak, saving tens of thousands of Chinese lives. So he is under indefinite house arrest after a lengthy "re-education". Is he anti-Chinese?
Yet many of us want to believe we are being tolerant - and even anti-racist - by sticking our fingers in our ears when it comes to the conflict within China. Why? Because our silent societal taboo: we aid and abet the Chinese dictatorship every day. Through our government. Through our corporations. And - crucially - through our choices at the till. At some semiconscious level, we don't want the Chinese people to be allowed to speak and assemble and think freely - because it would mean we had to pay more.
Meet the young women crammed into damp dormitories in China's River Pearl Delta, and they will tell you why. These women - mostly teenagers, or in their early twenties - made most of the goods in your home. Like 200 million other young Chinese workers, they have made the epic journey from China's villages to its metastasising factory-towns, in search of a job. They live in their factories, sleeping on bunk-beds; they tell themselves they will do the job for a decade, then leave.
The China Labour Bulletin conducted a study of their lives. Ms Zhang, a 21-year-old woman who made artificial Christmas trees, was a typical interviewee. "We worked seven days a week, and we only had three days off a year," she says. "We worked overtime every night until 10 in the evening. The workshop was always filled with smoke. You couldn't see very far. When you entered the room, your eyes burned and watered, and you had difficulty breathing."
One night, Ms Zhang - exhausted and sore-eyed - was pushing plastic through an iron-roller when she felt terrible pain. Her hand was trapped. She was taken to hospital for extensive skin-grafts. Two weeks later the factory abruptly stopped paying for the medical treatment. They told her to get back to work. "I felt like jumping out of a window," she told the researchers. The skin on her hand is still peeling and painful.
"When you enter this factory," another young woman says, "you are under their control. If you get tired and want to stretch your neck or look around, you can't. They won't even allow you to look around!" If you do, you are docked the day's wages. To prevent workers from trying to seek out better factories, it's normal to pay two or three months in arrears. If you quit, do you get the backlog? Never.
The women were all worried that making our goods was wrecking their bodies. A 17-year-old explained: "We often come into contact with paint thinner. It stinks something awful, and you get pimples all over your face. We know it's bad for you to breathe in but what can we do?" She talked nervously about colleagues who had miscarried, and another who developed leukaemia. "I find it really hard to recover when I get sick these days. I've had a cold for a month now and it just won't go away. [One of my room-mates'] periods have stopped, and she's afraid it is because of the radiation from the electronic parts she has to handle."
Occasionally, inspectors from Western multinationals arrive - but the women are drilled to give false answers. Every month, 50,000 fingers are sliced off in Chinese factories; every year, 130,000 Chinese people die in them, while more than a million contract fatal diseases.
These women - and hundreds of millions like them - want to be able to band together and demand better conditions. But they are prevented, by law. Only one trade union is allowed in China - and it is controlled by the government and designed to suppress labour, not represent it.
If you try to organise independent of this bogus trade union in the workplace - to demand breathing masks, say - you are beaten, or put in prison. It is a strange hybrid: a Maoist police state, enforcing the most extreme model of capitalism.
Nonetheless, the Chinese people are kicking back: there are 87,000 workplace protests a year. Last year, there was a tumult in Chinese factories after a string of workers died of organ failure while doing 50-hour shifts. The panicked Chinese government was poised to make a major concession: they were going to allow the formation of elected trade unions in the factories.
It was startling: independent political organisations? Elected? In China? But it didn't happen - because there was panic from rich-world investors. Organised workers can ask for more safety measures, and better wages. Microsoft, Nike, Ford, Dell and others - acting through the American Chamber of Commerce - swiftly announced the laws were "unaffordable" and "dangerous", and muttered they might look elsewhere. European and American governments parroted the corporate line. Far from lobbying for freedom, they enthusiastically lobbied against it. So the Chinese dictatorship watered down the proposals, and the girls of the Pearl Delta factories are stuck. This isn't Chinese "culture" - it's our corporate culture's wet dream, forced on them.
Does this system work well for us in the rich world? If we can silence our consciences, yes, we get cheaper goods; communist suppression knocks pounds off your weekly shopping bill. But there is another price tag. All over the world, wages are artificially depressed because you are competing with a workforce that is prevented by a police state from asking for more.
And in the long term, there is a darker price still. The great true cliché of our age is that China is rising. (Cue the famous Napoleon quote, and on and on.) Do you want all that power in the hands of a sober government that is becoming steadily more accountable to its people - or a dictatorship that will look hungrily for foreign enemies to distract its people? Today - as we snuffle for the cheapest possible Chinese goods, and politely ignore the vanished Chinese defenders of human rights - we are all lobbying for the dictators to prevail.
--Johann Hari
©independent.co.uk
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
28 Comments so far
Show AllChina has become a major world power and supplies the US with most of its goods. Seems like we had better take care of our diminishing returns before going on about the Chinese who are used to being oppressed. Watching our backs now should be a major concern before we too become the next oppressed by this present government that ignores our laws and tramples our Constitution. The Chinese will have to clean up their own mess as we should get busy with ours.
"Let's fix our own problems before we deal with other countries problems."
As I said above.....
"In my opinion till we stop the abuses in our own system, till we restore a job base that has been sold overseas, till we restore social justice to our own workers, I believe we better stop talking about what other countries are doing.
If we allow child labor here how can you go to China or India and lecture them on it? If we allow slave wages here, if we allow workers to be denied any benefits here, if we allow our own unions to betray their own membership, I feel we had better stop lecturing others about their "abuses"
I think we are in agreement. I don't blame anyone but us for our problems. Nor do I fault any other country for doing whats best for their citizens, thats their job.
"Simple, the USA claims to be a democracy with excellent labor laws. If you're is going to brag then live up to the standard you set."
Our labor laws are being subverted at the moment, hopefully we can restore them. Without our laws we are nothing.
A large share of the blame for the sweatshops rests with Western consumers and their need for cheap goods.
Buyng right is a noble idea but, unfortunately, it's also expensive.
Why don't we do something about the sweatshops and slave labor in the Northern Mariana Islands (a US Territory)? It's so much easier to talk smack about another country. Why do I chew out the USA and give China the pass?
Simple, the USA claims to be a democracy with excellent labor laws. If you're is going to brag then live up to the standard you set.
Let's fix our own problems before we deal with other countries problems.
Mandi Locke August 9th, 2008 1:34 pm
I certainly understand your thinking. We are trying not to buy Chinese either, but it's a bit difficult as we have sent so much of our manufacturing over there.
We intend to watch none of the Olympics. Maybe as someone posted, the advertisers will get the message.
Anything we let in thats harmful is most assuredly our fault.
Big business did a great job of selling us all a bill of goods.
Thomas Moore- For me, it is not only about the rights of workers here or there. It is also about supporting a controlled society, allowing goods that are laced with poisons and lead paint make it to the hands and mouths of our children. It is about borrowing money from an unethical country and allowing that country to control our own economy. It is about women and wages and Tibet and pollution. It is about so many things.
I don't think we have the right to point fingers either, but I do believe we have the personal obligation to boycott as many Chinese goods as individually possible.
I am shocked and disapointed that China was given the Olympics this year. It is all about keeping up appearances in that country. I have chosen to boycott the games as well. It is a personal choice for me and one I made easily.
tmberry August 9th, 2008 11:24 am
Gotcha!
I was referring to the consumerist answer to better working conditions: fair trade. To get fair trade status the business has many conditions to meet.
Hollow point August 9th, 2008 7:08 am
Its amazing how our very highly paid CEO's forgot Henry Fords $5.00 lesson. If your own employees can't buy your product who can. And if your employees job has been shipped overseas they can't buy iit at all.
I try never to shop at Walmart. A good idea gone bad and perverted by self interests. At least you won't have to get your healthcare there!
Mandi Locke August 9th, 2008 9:20 am
You can take as firm a line as you want, but I suspect the Chinese will tell you the same thing they just told Georgie after his "human rights" speech...stick it!
China is an autocratic form of capitalism which many seem to be missing. It's not a democratic form like ours. Makes a fair amount of difference.
In my opinion till we stop the abuses in our own system, till we restore a job base that has been sold overseas, till we restore social justice to our own workers, I believe we better stop talking about what other countries are doing.
If we allow child labor here how can you go to China or India and lecture them on it? If we allow slave wages here, if we allow workers to be denied any benefits here, if we allow our own unions to betray their own membership, I feel we had better stop lecturing others about their "abuses"
Remember, over 80 percent of Chinese are happy with the direction of their country and their own situation.
We need to restore our own ethics first. Clean house in Congress and business. We had a perfect example of how its done last year.
It astounds me how many have bought in to big business's story line and actually support the abuses.
tmberry August 9th, 2008 9:53 am
You make some very, very good points about comparisons in living standards.
The toliet example was great. The local toliet may be better for where they are. I always remember a movie called Sayanora in which a Japanese had his house returned to him after it was occupied by an American General and he remarked that they had added 3 bathrooms and a lot of closets. He didn't see the need.
But we don't have "Fair Trade", we have "Free Trade."
I always cringe when I hear living conditions being used to decry a system. Sure, they're considered horrible to an upper-class American. Is sleeping in a bunk bed in a dorm really that debasing? Who says people have to have private rooms?
That's one of the failings of fair trade in my mind. Conditions have to be met in order to get the trade and often it is to bring living conditions up to American standards (as if that were the pinnacle of standards). Of course, American business men shouldn't have to use a local toilet when they visit their trade partners, how degrading (tongue in cheek).
The students that revolted wore pajamas to visit with the government leaders/elders as a sign of disrespect for what those leaders had done to their great country. China had been the center of the world, to Chinese. With greater access to the western world they realized they weren't such a great country after all.
Everyone in the US was so proud that we had been able to bring one of the leaders of the student uprising here. I finally understood what the uprising was about when at the end of the student's speech he chanted in Chinese "China is number 1! China is number 1!"
China is a wonderful country with many abuses. The people learn to live with it or deal with it as we do here in the US. How to fight the abuses, globally, I have no idea.
Thomas More - The plight of workers in our own country can be directly related to our relationship with China. By taking a firmer stance with China, we are in turn supporting workers in this country who have been left behind.
And what ever happened to ethics? Even if it did not affect workers in this country, doesn't the ethics of doing so much business with a country void of serious social justice, have anything to do with it?
Thomas M
But I want cheap running shoes and jeans if all the workers get proper living and working conditions I will have to pay more!!!!
The US economy is in the tank and places like Wal Mart love it when people values and standards of living force them into their stores to buy their crap. Myself I do my best to do as little shopping in WM as I can. Funny in WM if the cheap made by slave labour doesn't get to you the McDonalds will.
While I agree that Bush has no right to criticize China's human rights policy, I do have that right and exercise it. As for the CHinese workers, it's worth noting that left wing Huffington Post isn't allowed in CHina while Right wing Murdoch and his FOX News is.
Americans have lost many jobs due to outsourcing, much of it to China and its abused workers. Yet the neocons tell us that this is good for both the US and China. Good for who, not the workers, but the fat cats of both countries.
I firmly believe that all here should be far more concerned with the problems of American workers than the Chinese.
Our workers have been betrayed by almost everyone. And it seems that there aren't many that care.
Till American workers plight is solved anyone that spends time worrying about some other countries workers should reexamine their priorities.
Chamber of Commerce = Dungeon of Destruction
leftk said "there is very little dissent in China– this is a sign of an authoritarian regime."
Wherever did you get the idea that there is very little dissent in China? There is a whole lot of dissent, protests, strikes and clashes against local government by the people in China. It happens frequently and is reported on the news here in Hong Kong. You might want to re-examine your sources.
Leftk said "So you think this is all the work of Brzezinski?"
Brzezinski has certainly been behind much of our foreign policy over the last 30 years, especially when the dems are in power."
"I would never base my opinion on that imperialist clown."
You would be foolish to ignore him. I disagree with him on pretty much everything, as he is the ultra Globalist, and co-founder of the TLC that has destroyed America.
"China bashing can't be off the table. The fact is China is a huge player in our economy. I feel that there are many reasons to be wary of a Wal-Mart type state– especially for those who are trying to stop the Wal-Marts in the US and improve the lives of American workers."
As someone who was livid at Bill Clinton and George HW Bush for allowing them to grow into the huge player they have become, and who lived in the region since before the Tiananmen massacre, I would say it's a bit late.
Your jobs have already been moved there. I helped move a few thousand myself. Under the current economic system, the US now must borrow money from China. Our manufacturing base has been moved to China, and if we ever needed to mobilize as we did in WW II, we could not. Parts and materials for computers and weapons systems come from China. This China bashing, at this time, signals to me a very dangerous turn.
Check out this video:
SANTA'S WORKSHOP - Inside China's Slave Labor Toy Factories. See it here-
http://liberationvideo.blogspot.com/2008/06/santas-workshop-inside-china...
"First off , the PEW Research Center is tainted with questionable left wing intellectual motivations."
Left-wing motivations? Hahahaha! Here is what another left-wing motivator, The New Republic, said of China around the same time the Pew research came out, "our ultimate solidarity" should lie not with the "odious government" in Beijing but "the billion long-suffering men and women of the world's largest dictatorship."
So the left wing Pew says 86% of the Chinese support their government. And the left wing New Republic believes the 'one billion are long suffering' and, by implication couldn't possibly support their government. Ummm, uhhh
Obviously the left hand doesn't know what left hand is doing...ho hum, yawwnnnn..
thank you, bane!
First off , the PEW Research Center is tainted with questionable left wing intellectual motivations. The hell with them, in other words, they should try to be more of an obnoxious think tank that they really are. I'm sure huge numbers of rural Chinese aren't orgasming at the thought of a capitalist explosion. The country has huge class differences as we do in the states, and this divide is just as easily suffocated by the beligerance of the 4th Estate as it is here. Environmental catastrophe, lead, asbestos, a significant portion of the population scratching by on slave labor. Corporations roar with approval, workers can be beaten, free reign. Forget about all the negatives, it's time for sports in the Greek tradition. (Vomit)
MiMi,
So you think this is all the work of Brzezinski?
I would never base my opinion on that imperialist clown.
China bashing can't be off the table. The fact is China is a huge player in our economy. I feel that there are many reasons to be wary of a Wal-Mart type state-- especially for those who are trying to stop the Wal-Marts in the US and improve the lives of American workers.
I've read that many Chinese manufacturing businesses are already outsourcing production to SE Asia: Vietnam and Cambodia especially.
As a result, whole regions in China have become homes to abandoned factories and who-knows-what toxic pollutants buried in the soil.
Having lived in China I can tell you the people I knew were as nationalistic and supportive of their government as any I had seen. There certainly is an issue with the workers treatment in some factories, though. This year China has established a new labour law which supposedly will be enforced, which should drive your cheap import prices up.
The China bashing from progressive sites show the hidden hand of Obamas adviser Brzezinski. His main goal is Russia, but he also wants to split China, extract the Muslim territories in the West, and get back Tibet so as to control the regions water before taking them on. Burma is also important for it's geostrategic location, then you have Sudan (water) and of course Zimbabwe, both of who are backed by China and provide resources to them, and you can see very clearly we are going to be going toe to toe with China and Russia. I would be surprised if the next month passed without some significant events in Tibet, Burma, and China.
But hare-brained author wants us to vote for Barack HUSSEIN O-BOMB-UH ! He's no different from McPAIN ! America will continue to borrow from China for "cheap" shit till the last drop and blindly "support" Communist China no matter what. CASE CLOSED !
If 86% of the American people supported George Bush, I'd be concerned.
Likewise, that kind of approval is scarry--there is very little dissent in China-- this is a sign of an authoritarian regime.
I'm not saying the Chinese are brainwashed, but they aren't used to thinking critically about their government. The Chinese have manufactured some powerful consent.
I've spoken to a number of leftists who say that too much concern about China's crimes lets America off the hook for what it's done and continues to do in Central America, SW Asia and the Mid-east.
And I agree to target China for its responsibility for Darfur is probably not the best use of our time, when we are currently occupying Iraq and at war with the Iraqi people.
Still, China is an authoritarian capitalist state. China's system is a threat to labor all over the world and to human rights
Umm, errr, the Pew Research Center released the findings of its 2008 Global Attitudes Survey just recently. Of the 24 countries surveyed, the Chinese people expressed the highest level of support for the direction in which their country was heading, 86 percent. Nearly two out of three said that the Beijing government was doing a good job on issues that mattered to them. The survey questioned more than 3,212 Chinese, face to face, in 16 dialects across the country....
ummm, errr, I guess these 86% don't count because it's a dictatorship and these 86% were obviously brainwashed and handcuffed and had guns pointed to their heads as they answered the poll... Ho hum, yawnnnnn!
Oh, I remember now that this writer wanted the Olympics boycotted. Now that it isn't he's on to something else...
He'll probably be the writer blaming China for obesity in the west...