Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Frustrated House Panel Threatens to Subpoena FDA

by Reuters staff

WASHINGTON - A Congressional committee on Thursday threatened to subpoena the Food and Drug Administration unless the agency responds to lawmakers’ requests for documents about U.S. drug and food safety.

Rep. John Dingell, the Democratic chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, accused the FDA of dragging its feet in responding to his panel’s oversight subcommittee. 0525 04 1

If the FDA does not comply by June 1, Dingell said the panel would issue subpoenas to obtain the information.

The FDA said it was cooperating with lawmakers.

“FDA has been as responsive as possible to document requests from Chairman Dingell and other members of Congress,” an FDA spokeswoman said. “We continue to focus our efforts on producing responsive material to our Oversight committee’s requests as expeditiously as possible.”

Since January, the committee has asked the FDA to provide documents about generic drug approvals, an outbreak of salmonella in peanut butter, post-market surveillance of the antibiotic Ketek, contamination of pet food with ingredients imported from China, and antibiotic resistance linked to wide use of drugs in farm animals.

“The delays and the quality of responses to the committee’s requests concerning FDA are unacceptable,” Dingell said in a letter to Secretary of Health and Human Services Michael Leavitt. Leavitt’s department oversees the FDA.

Dingell also complained that in some instances, the FDA turned over redacted records to the committee without any prior consultations about the redactions.

Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

16 Comments so far

  1. RuthK May 25th, 2007 1:04 pm

    At the same time, they are taking away the rights of individual states to control food safety. The new farm bill will have federal standards only. This means that states cannot control planting of GM crops. They may also be unable to recall contaminated food. It’s all up to the federal government. Who trusts them?

    See:

    http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_5369.cfm

  2. David B May 25th, 2007 1:52 pm

    What exactly is holding them up? Not enough temps manning the photocopier? Simple incompetence? Or something more sinister?

  3. Nietzsche May 25th, 2007 4:37 pm

    As long as agribusiness runs the FDA what do you expect?

  4. shakker May 25th, 2007 5:00 pm

    I have a vegetable garden. We eat better, cheaper and with no pesticides. Any food we get from the garden dilutes the bad effects in the rest of the food supply.

  5. destiny1 May 25th, 2007 5:09 pm

    There are three basic problems facing the FDA and the combination of the three renders them, at best, a symbol of food/medication safety. The first is that in many of the areas where they’re supposed to ensure safety they have little or no authority to really do anything other than maybe finger point and say “bad, bad, company”. The second is that there’s little emphasis on or requirement for the FDA’s officers or researchers having proper independence of the sort that guarantees no conflict of interest. Finally, they’re vastly underfunded - even if they had employees free of conflict of interest and the authority to do what we expect them to do, they don’t have a budget that would allow them to even begin to do their work or to hire enough employees.

    I just wish that while they’re at it, the Congressional oversight committee would also do some asking as to why we’ve had so many medications - and even classes of medications - making it onto the market only to find out as long as years later the medications had major, potentially deadly side effects. Medications shouldn’t be worse than the illness they treat or cause new illnesses. Neurological, psychiatric, metabolic and cardiovascular side effects should be known BEFORE products hit the market and unless freakishly rare they should cause the product to carry serious warnings.

  6. feduphoosier May 25th, 2007 5:46 pm

    “What exactly is holding them up? Not enough temps manning the photocopier? Simple incompetence?”

    Um… corruption? Just a guess. :)

  7. kathyodat May 25th, 2007 6:31 pm

    How possible is it to be responsive when you have so much to hide? When I read how the FDA and the AMA colluded to destroy Royal Raymond Rife, I was through with these guys.

  8. dcgood1 May 25th, 2007 7:15 pm

    The Menu Foods scandal involved the fraudulent (not accidental) dumping of industrial waste into vegetable proteins, at concentrations exceeding 5% in some cases. Toxic sludge is good for you, and good for Fido too. The opacity of the feed industry precluded anyone finding out, before this happened, that almost all pet-food brands (more than 100) originated from the same source. If anyone out there thinks that the food industry is any more decentralized, responsible, or well-regulated than the feed industry, then you are basing personal health decisions on unexamined assumptions. Living in a fool’s paradise.

  9. ezeflyer May 25th, 2007 9:30 pm

    In America, conventional wisdom that has mass acceptance is usually contrived: somebody paid for it. Examples:

    * Pharmaceuticals restore health
    * Vaccination brings immunity
    * The cure for cancer is just around the corner
    * When a child is sick, he needs immediate antibiotics
    * When a child has a fever he needs Tylenol
    * Hospitals are safe and clean.
    * America has the best health care in the world.
    * And many many more

    This is a list of illusions, that have cost billions and billions to conjure up. Did you ever wonder why you never see the President speaking publicly unless he is reading? Or why most people in this country think generally the same about most of the above issues?

    http://www.mercola.com/2001/aug/15/perception.htm

  10. evelyna May 26th, 2007 1:05 am

    Plenty of time to harass people who want to use vitamins to keep themselves healthy.
    The hold up is they have no paperwork. Heaven forbid if someone in a government agency can be accountible for anything unless it is their latest pay raise or obtaining employment for their friends and family.
    The government started this increased productivity crape and now that they are expected to produce they cannot cut it.
    Just what is an allowable limit? A little bit of any chemical can do harm.

  11. tiredofitall May 26th, 2007 2:13 am

    They are all crooks.

  12. Opinionated May 26th, 2007 8:47 am

    If you think food safety is bad now, read back to what it was like before there was an FDA. They need clean up, power, and funding — not to be wiped from existence. I would rather not take all the checks off food producers who are sloppy even under regulated conditions.

  13. green1 May 26th, 2007 11:19 am

    *BREAKING NEWS: FDA Contacts Citizens for Health Executive Director,
    Announces Re-opening of Comment Period for CAM Guidance*

    *For Release May 23rd, 2007*

    *CONTACT: Frank Herd, Jr, 612.879.7583*
    *Washington, DC & Minneapolis, Minnesota* – Citizens for Health

    following is the comment I submitted. Anyone who would
    like to fashion their comments in a similar manner
    have my permission.

    Many Americans use dietary supplements to improve
    their quality of life. These supplements are often
    more effective than drug therapy, less expensive, and
    have far fewer and less consequential side-effects.
    When people are looking for a natural remedy, they
    often make inquiries to professionals who are learned
    in the field of natural cures and remedies. To make it
    illegal for citizens to seek and recieve natural cures
    and the help of professionals trained in this field is
    unconstitutional. This is a ploy to force everyone to
    use the drugs provided by big Pharma. This idea should
    be abandoned immediately.

    Executive
    Director, Frank Herd, Jr, reports that he received a call today from
    the FDA
    assuring him that they have reopened the comment period on their
    “Guidance
    for Industry on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Products and
    Their
    Regulation by the Food and Drug Administration. As stated in a notice
    in
    the *Federal Register*, they will accept comments through May 29th “due
    to
    confusion as to the closing date for comments on the draft guidance.”
    (Read
    the notice
    here).
    This means that the agency is honoring the deadline they posted in
    April,
    but later retracted, citing it had been posted due to an employee
    error.

    *To send your comments, click
    here
    .*

    “The FDA’s main contact on the proposed guidance, Philip Chao, called
    to let
    us know the moment the comment period was re-opened and the amended
    deadline
    was posted on their site,” Mr. Herd said. “We immediately verified
    this,
    and now encourage anyone in the natural health community that is
    concerned
    about the potential implications of the proposed guidance to take this
    opportunity to ensure your voice is heard – there are only a few days
    left!”

    *Click
    hereto
    send your comments now!
    *

    “The FDA had already received more than 125,000 comments on this
    proposed
    guidance, mostly negative, when I spoke with Mr. Chao 3 weeks ago.
    Since
    then, more than 8000 Citizens for Health members responded to our call
    for
    emails to the FDA urging them to honor the May 29th deadline,” Mr. Herd
    added. “This is clearly a grassroots victory for Citizens for Health,
    its
    constituents, and the natural health movement as a whole.”

    The deadline is only a few days away – send your comments now!**

  14. green1 May 26th, 2007 11:24 am

    http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c= AITiU0KeWVuOoD%2F9NLddfIM1ek%2FKNpSc

    The link to send comments- I’m not sure why it didn’t show up in previous post

  15. green1 May 26th, 2007 11:31 am
  16. judi May 26th, 2007 12:51 pm

    Do you read the labels? Why must most stores sell Garlic from China? And the list goes on. Makes one wonder just what is good food anymore. As for garlic, aren’t Americans quite capable of producing garlic for instance that is safe and free from chemicals without resorting to buying garlic from China. I don’t want any food that comes from China for me or my pets, but then I guess I will have to grow all of my food. Can you believe, garlic.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org