Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Taking Us for a Ride on Health Care
If you get a thrill from taking a white-knuckle ride on a loop-the-loop, you don't have to wait for the state fair — just hop onto the right-wing express, which is plunging into ludicrous levels of loopiness in an effort to kill Barack Obama's health care reform plan.
You'll shriek with astonishment as alarmist right-wing pundits and politicos hurtle you past reality, past credulity and past sanity. Their wildest twist, so far, is that the demonic Obama has included "death panels" at the core of his insidious rewrite of our health care system. Yes, they cry, buried down deep in the bill at page 425 is a bone-chilling provision to create federal review panels empowered to decide whether the old, sick and disabled are allowed to live.
Impossible, you scoff? Well, none other than Sarah Palin says it's so, and we know she doesn't make stuff up. Citing her own elderly parents and her baby with Down syndrome, the ex-veep contender recently wailed that they "will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care."
In case you didn't grasp the horror of these governmental grim reapers, Palin added this punctuation: "Such a system is downright evil."
Indeed, it is. Which is one reason that Obama and the Congress have not even contemplated such a provision, much less included it in the bill. Section 1233, which Palin claims is the one containing the evil, merely allows doctors to hold voluntary consultations with their patients on such matters as a living will and other advance instructions on the care the patients choose to receive as their inevitable time of death approaches.
The section provides Medicare funding if you would like to have your doctor to help you consider such questions as whether you want to be kept alive in a permanent vegetative state.
Either Palin and her crack team of speech writers never bothered to read Section 1233, or they deliberately perverted its meaning for political purposes.
It would be one thing if this were just another of her goofy flights of fantasy, but the lie about hooded bureaucrats of death whacking grandpa has also been gleefully perpetuated by the likes of Newt Gingrich, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and a stampeding herd of anti-Obama other truth-stompers.
Rudy Giuliani even invented a new lie to keep the flim-flam going. Conceding that Section 1233 does not create death panels, he insisted that forced euthanasia was an inherent part of Obama's hellish plan. "It is natural," opined Guiliani last week, "that some people would believe, particularly since (the Democrats) have these provisions (in the bill) for end-of-life decision-making councils, that it is natural that people would suggest that one of the ways you would do that is to cut off care for the elderly."
Uh ... Rudy, there are no "end-of-life decision-making councils" anywhere in the legislation. And there's nothing natural about you asserting otherwise.
The loopiest part of the right wing's obsession with and distortion of Section 1233 is that the chief champion of putting it in the reform package was not Obama, nor even a Democrat. It was Johnny Isakson — a Republican, pro-life senator from Georgia. He has been advocating end-of-life planning for years.
"I believe it is every person's right and responsibility to make sure their loved ones are prepared to make decisions on their behalf by discussing and documenting their wishes," he said in 2005. That's what Section 1233 promotes. The claim by Palin, et al. that the section hides death panels within it is, as Isakson so succinctly puts it, "nuts."
Indeed, a similar provision for end-of-life discussions has already been included in Medicare law for some patients. Guess who added it? The 2003 Republican Congress, and the bill was signed by George W. So, in other words, Republicans were for Section 1233 before they were against it.
But such facts are inconvenient to those trying to kill heath care reform. When you get on board the right-wing loop-the-loop, reality is not permitted to interfere with a scary political ride.


17 Comments so far
Show AllIt's all a question of which a-hole yells the loudest. They're the ones that get the most MSM attention. Just like O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck. Not that there's much difference betwen the dems and repugs, but if the dems want to be heard, they have to learn to speak up AND carry a big stick. Telling a rabid dog to be nice does not cut it; offensive moves are necessary. Or just keep running as the dems have since 2006.
All true, but avoids mentioning Obama's recent recantation of a public option. This weekend he was backing away from it, until progressvie Dems told him otherwise; now it appears back in, but who can say for sure given the ever shifting flip flopping of the pond scum. Maybe Obama will grow a set of balls sometime soon.
Not to mention, Obama's and Congress's ongoing efforts to keep single payer completely off the radar.
I understand Section 1233 was taken out of proposed legislation, thanks to Palin, Limbaugh, et al. True? If so, I say put it back in and post just that section everywhere the right-wingers hang out.
I think the ride we're being taken on is the one that pretends to be about reforming health care. Oh, the right wing is providing the foil of being the bad guy, bullying and lying and threatening, but they aren't pretending -- all of that is who and what they're all about. The real acting and fakery is on the part of the Democrats who are pretending to be trying to pass reform; and they're pretending that what they might eventually pass (the version with no public option) is reform. In the end, we'll all have been had. Sucker punched, again.
With the exception of an heroic few, the Dems are an ineffectual bunch of corrupt, cowardly, incompetent fools; and, lousy actors to boot.
You're absolutely right. What we are going to get is a law that could best be described as No Insurance Company Left Behind.
When are people going to open their eyes to the realization that the actual death panels are on the insurance corporations' payrolls? The people who deny those with serious medical conditions the care they need. And that's not just old folks. It's everyone.
HR676 A Healthy America is possible.
to anyone that blathers on about "death panels" -- the SIMPLE forceful response should be:
"There are ALREADY Death Panels -- they are called Corporations, Insurance Companies, and the Pharmaceutical Industry".
they Apply their Judgments through WELL-KNOWN things americans ALREADY understand (especially those with insurance that have actually experienced illness in the family):
"exorbitant, bankrupting premiums; Denial of Coverage; Customer representative Panels; Through the Roof Medicine prices, Treatment; Doctor-AMA-Assisted Price INcreases, RATIONED health care and many more shenanigans"
"HR676 A Healthy America is possible." ???
BREAKDOWN:
"HR676" - Not bloody likely.
"A Healthy America is possible." - Right. If we all move to Sweden or Finland or Canada or ....
BOTTOM LINE:
This is Corporate America. Healthy America is an oxymoron (for morons).
Just a simple Universal Medicare is what we need.
It is indeed! ...but keeping it simple has never been in the lexicon of government!
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
Obama, WE WANT SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE. Stop trying to patronize the dummies who yell 'socialism'. Stop trying to appease the Republicans.
Stop arguing with the people who need it most and would benefit most from it. Just do it.
Within one year you will be a national hero.
If corporations are people they can be killed --no?
CAPITALISM -- FREEDOM TO COMPETE FOR EXCESSIVE WEALTH
Capitalism being the reverse of equality, our for-profit healthcare system is the greatest tool for keeping a people vulnerable, insecure, fearful and in submission to authority the world has ever known.
Hey Jim !
"an effort to kill Barack Obama's health care reform plan."
I hate to break it to you but Obama doesn't have a health care plan ... never did ... all he had were his promises to Health Care Inc he made behind the back of The House of Representatives and the American People ...
Take a look in the mirror Jim ... still like what you see?
Keep talking Sarah, your the best ally the single payer plan ever had. The fact that you were selected as a vice president candidate and now are a spokesman for the party that opposes health reforms--despite your demonstrated ignorance of and outlandish comments--speaks for itself.
The "Daily Show"'s Jon Stewart interview of Betsy McCaughey is absolutely hysterical, and perfectly illustrates Jim's point.
i'm pasting this post in other similarly relevant article threads also:
=================
below is an excerpted paragraph from the NY Times article today. the salient point is the quote from that world-respected bastion of Capitalism...the ECONOMIST magazine..
when THE capitalist journal of the world gets to that point of a "stern editorial" against americans criticizing and misleading about what Britons OPENLY acknowledge as a SOCIALIST system and DEFEND it despite imperfections -- that means it's the USA and americans who are out of the loop!!
=================
Arguments against the health service by Republicans overlook the fact that while it costs half as much per person as the American system costs, “it delivers results which are on some plausible measures actually superior,” The Economist said in a stern editorial. “And it does this while avoiding the disgrace that so shames America, of leaving around 46 million people, some 15 percent of its population, without any form of health insurance.”