Agriculture and the Healthcare Debate: Inextricably Linked
My awakening to the connection between agriculture, social justice, and health came during a semester abroad in South Africa. There, during a stint in a public hospital in a small city surrounded by rural territories, I watched as HIV-positive mothers waited for hours each month—some having traveled two days in packed vans—to receive a free box of nutrient-dense foods from the government. Those mothers were, without exception, Black and poor. Few of them had access to land as their families did before apartheid, and thus their ability to provide good food for themselves and their families had been systematically stripped from them. Today, with the AIDS epidemic spreading like wildfire across the country, the poor’s labor force—and thus earned income—has fallen sharply, making it difficult to afford food at market. As malnutrition and acute hunger have become more common among poor populations in South Africa, HIV and tuberculosis spread faster and faster, as both diseases are easily passed to those with compromised immune systems from inadequate nutrition.
What does South Africa’s social and medical plight have anything do with with healthcare in America? We’re a first world country, after all. Indeed, and although our labor force may not be dwindling from HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis as South Africa’s is, we have our own epidemics to deal with, foremost among them obesity and all the diseases it brings with it such as Type II diabetes and severe heart problems. America’s children are strung out on high fructose corn syrup—concealed in nearly every food in our supermarkets—and thus cannot concentrate in school or develop properly, making it difficult for them to succeed academically and, subsequently, in the job market. According to study after study (or firsthand experience from spending an hour in any public emergency room), the groups most affected by diet-related health problems are the poor and non-white.
Eva Salber, one of the pioneers of the community health movement once wrote, “diseases resulting from societal inequities can’t be cured by medical care alone—no matter its excellence.” One of the most blaring inequities in our society today lies beyond lack of access to medical treatment in the inaccessibility of the means by which to prevent ill-health in the first place: good food.
The effects of our broken food system affect all of us, even the small percentage of Americans who choose—and can afford—to eat a healthy, safe diet. Treating chronic diseases is a major drain on our healthcare system an tax dollars, as is true in South Africa, and even equitable and accessible medical care for all will not provide a silver bullet fix to our population’s deteriorating health. If we are ever to enact lasting change on our health as a population, we all need healthy food to be accessible and affordable. Not the kind of healthy food that announces itself as such with a flashy label on a vacuum-packed wrapper, but the kind that comes from an ecologically and economically sound agricultural system, one that produces vegetables, fruits, grains, and animal products, not simply commodities to be processed into food products. We — individually and collectively — need real food to attain health.
America has watched, somewhat wide-eyed and dumbfounded, as a modern “back to the land” movement has emerged. Wealthy white college students, the ones have traditionally vied for summer internships in law, medicine, and finance — are increasingly swapping suits for dirty jeans and a spot on a farm crew for the summer. The number of farmers markets has exploded. And even among the most under-served communities in the country, the number of community gardens, community supported agriculture (CSA) operations, and community kitchens are growing faster than summer zucchini. But we can’t allow the movement towards systematic change in our food system to stop there. Without policy in place to support a new generation of farmers who have economic incentives to grow food for consumption rather than producing commodity crops (i.e. soy beans, corn, and wheat) for the corporate processing industry, and until we can make procuring farmland in rural areas and green space in densely populated communities less cost prohibitive, we will never be able to produce the amount of healthy food we need to support a healthy population.
We can argue until we’re blue in the face about the merits of publicly- versus privately-funded healthcare. We can ration medical services or not. The quality versus quantity debate as it relates to medical care can rage on for years. And we can calculate the potential cost of every permutation we come up with. But unless we begin to address root causes of ill health in this country — hunger, poverty, social injustice, and an agricultural system that feeds corporate greed rather than the citizens of this country — the costly burden on our health and thus our medical system will never diminish. President Obama and members of Congress, take a hint from the First Lady and her wildly popular garden and invite the farmers to the table. Our nation’s health depends on it.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
17 Comments so far
Show AllJennifer---
I have decades in support of farming hemp, even as I distinguish it from Pot. Wanna grow Pot; Keep it indoor and small cultivation. In the late 19th Century, hemp was Kentucky's biggest crop, exceeding tobacco. Today, Kentucky has Tobacco Mitch McConnell in the Congress, claiming that Corporations have Speech as Money, or Money as Speech.
Compare this model to what is happening globally as Monsanto GM corn is cross-pollinating with indigenous corn world-wide. Monsanto is destroying the capacity of Mexico, for example, to feed itself, without depending on Monsanto.
Where is the research on how rampant Round-Up-ready corn and bean crops effect bees? Really simple question.
Monsanto kills. Kill Monsanto.
If you manage to KILL a corporation, are you really guilty of "murder." I don't think so. Take corporate "personhood" and shove it up the Supreme Court's ass.
-30-
We could start out by supporting Ron Paul's Hemp Farming Act of 2009 (HR 1866). Plus, Paul strongly opposes corporate subsidization of Big Agri and strongly supports small farms. I think Nader and Kucinich share those views with Paul.
I'm glad this article touches on the biggest problem even if it is only a sentence or two. THE POOR DO NOT LACK MONEY FOR FOOD, THEY LACK ACCESS TO QUALITY LAND TO GROW THAT FOOD. That is the issue here, not one of money. What do poor people need? Not money. They need their land back. Land provides food, material, shelter, water. All the basic needs.
Bring back the peasants.
They have been driven off their land by big ag, aka Monsanto and their GMO programs,
and government complicity. Read William Endahl's "Seeds of Destruction" for a detailed expose' of this spreading evil.
Interesting how the gun toters article has generated 175 comments and counting, and this issue gets only a handful. When the food gets scarce, priorities will shift,
unless of course you plan to use your gun to obtain and protect the food you may have. Food, health, firearms and quality of life are all interconnected. It is about the choices we make.
well said
Assuming preventive health care includes dietary advice, unless they're prevented from doing so like they are prevented from giving family planning advice on contraception and abortion.
High-fructose corn syrup should be declared a metabolic poison and banned from ALL foodstuffs, period. It has no redeeming nutritional value whatever.
As for the author's general argument about the relationship between nutrition and health, as the "health care reform" debate has been unfolding in the media over the past few weeks, more and more I have seen the nutrition issue as paramount. Unless you have money to eat in good restaurants or have the time to shop carefully and cook at home, most of what is available is crap.
Meanwhile, another huge issue is food labelling. I just looked at the "ingredients" list on a can of mushroom soup on my kitchen shelves. One "ingredient" is "color," whatever that is! So nice to know I'll be eating "color."
Finally, the nutrition issue is without question one of social equity and disparate incomes. I live in a small midwestern town with two carryouts catering overpriced snack foods, a liquor store, and TWO group medical practices. The nearest grocery store where one can buy any produce at all is 12 miles round trip, while most of the produce is probably imported from countries where pesticide and herbicide controls are lax at best (and, gain, unlabelled...). Obesity in children is a HUGE issue here.
-30-
"Finally, the nutrition issue is without question one of social equity and disparate incomes."
While this statement is true, we cannot ignore the nutritional disinformation perpetrated by the corporate media which exacerbates the issue as you have framed it.
For example, watch this video about nutritional advice from a major broadcaster. The so-called "expert" advises viewers that processed cereal (you know, Cheerios, Wheaties, etc.) is a good source of antioxidants. While the raw grains from which these products are made may be good nutritional sources, the shit in those boxes isn't worth eating.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1et-s5uQQt0&feature=fvhl
q
I do not think there is a huge difference between corn syrup and sugar from beets or cane. I would also argue that artificial sweeteners also have their drawbacks. If you could somehow ban sweeteners, then, I guarantee you public riots.
Oh contrare....there is a big difference. Do the research....don't take my word for it. The main similarity is that they are both slow poison.
http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/highfructose.html
Produce grown in the U.S. today on corporate farms contains 40% less nutrition than produce grown here in the 1950s. This is because corporate farming techniques deplete the soil 13 times faster than it can be replaced.
It's also because the crops have been cross-bred and hybridized to fit handling and transportation needs.
A good example of this kind of depleted nutrition can be found in what are still being called tomatos. Developed to be picked by machine and picked too early to meet transnational shipping schedules, what you buy in Kroger and Safeway is nothing like the real thing.
q
Ha! I just (two days ago) had my first taste of a tomato from our brand-new-this-year home garden, and, man, can I attest to what you just said! I had almost forgotten how delicious a real tomato is, or how much better foods that have tomatoes in them taste when you use a real one, fresh off the vine...
like going from black-and-white to color...
Here in S MN we've had multiple varieties of delicious tomatoes for 2 weeks and one variety (Sungold: small, orange) we've been enjoying for 6 weeks! Some stores also have some quite good tomatoes in the off-season. I assume most are hydroponic.
Thank you, Sara, for pointing out the 300 lb gorilla.....
it is entirely possible that a population nurished by whole foods, and healthy lifestyles can eliminate the "need" for health insurance in the first place. This then would make
single payer not only cost effective, but morally and ethically appropriate. Big Ag, Big Pharma, Big oil......the "Big Three" and their lies and a complicit government, as well as a sugar-addicted population all add up to a pandemic of poverty and despair. Just as India rejected the British imported cloth and started spinning, weaving and wearing "homespun", we can make make a huge difference locally and globally with "homegrown". Try it.
You'll be glad you did.
Somehow, I suspect that "farmers" are not the source of the problem which the author describes quite well.
The problem is the industrialization of food. Corporate profits have take priority over nutritional quality for at least a century.
As with all major issues discussed on this board, this one comes back to the corporate media, limiting coverage of basic information about health and nutrition to serve advertiser interests and to pander to viewer ignorance.
q
This article reaffirms the unholistic approach politicians and the media take when addressing nearly every issue.
While the convoluted US healthcare system is the hub of a myriad of problems (in addition to agriculture) confronting the US (many affect other nations as well), politicians and the media don't even attempt to "connect the dots".
Other examples include:
1) GLOBAL BUSINESS COMPETITIVENESS; businesses from Ford Motor Company to your local mom and pop machine shop have vocalized concern that they are can't successfully compete with businesses in nations that have single-payer medical insurance and that will affect the duration and severity of the current economic downturn.
2) UNEMPLOYMENT; millions of 50 and 60 somethings are delaying retirement 5, 10 or 15 years solely for the purpose of maintaining employer-sponsored medical insurance, thereby making their jobs unavailable to young workers.
Single-payer medical insurance would solve these and other problems in a matter of months. The NO INSURANCE COMPANY LEFT BEHIND program Obama and Congress are concocting (disguised as health care reform)will stifle the US economy for generations.