EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
In Haiti, Sweatshops Open For Business
PORT-AU-PRINCE - "Haiti is open for business." That's what President Michel "Sweet Micky" Martelly said at a recent ceremony as he and former U.S. president Bill Clinton laid a cornerstone for a giant industrial zone being built in northern Haiti.
Workers arrive early in the morning at the One World Apparel factory in Port-au-Prince to assemble garments for export from Haiti. factory owners claim they can't pay more because of they did, their international clients – like Gildan Activewear, Hanes, Levis, GAP, Banana Republic, K-Mart and Wal-Mart – would pick up and move out. And so the Haitian government – with the full backing of the U.S. government, as recent Wikileaked cables revealed – remains the lowest wage in the hemisphere-wide "race to the bottom".(Credit:Ansel Herz/IPS) Across the country and abroad, Martelly, his government, and their advisors – like Clinton – have been pushing the island nation as a foreign investor's dream come true.
They have good reason to say Haiti is "open for business". With 15- year tax holidays and – in some cases – massive subsidies, there are deals to be had. Airplanes and hotels are full of foreign investors looking to get in on the ground floor of the post-earthquake reconstruction. Hundreds poured into the capital at the end of November for a two-day conference.
Apparel makers, especially, want to set up shop, according to factory owner Georges Sassine, head of the Association of Haitian Industries.
"I remember somebody saying a crisis is a terrible thing to waste," Sassine told National Public Radio in 2010. "It is true, the opportunity has been thrust upon us."
The crisis hasn't been wasted, at least not by clothing-makers.
The new government's showcase project is the Caracol Industrial Park, being built with 124 million dollars of U.S. taxpayer funds, and another 55 million dollars from the Inter-American Development Bank. [See story #2]
"This is the kind of change we want," Martelly said the Caracol ceremony last month. "This is what they call 'sustainable development.'"
But a new report from Haiti Grassroots Watch shows that the focus on assembly industries does not represent a big "change", nor will it necessarily deliver "sustainable development".
Despite the many pitfalls, disadvantages and risks, major Haitian and foreign media have been unanimously supportive of the new park and of Martelly's focus on foreign investment, using unqualified terms like "hope", "good news" and "progress", without even raising questions.
But there are definite winners and losers in the gambit.
In a new seven-part series, produced after four months of interviews and the review of dozens of studies, the investigative journalism partnership exposed the challenges, risks and arguably erroneous thinking behind the new park and the gamble of betting Haiti's development on five-dollar a day wages and "the race to the bottom".
"Sweatshop" wages by any standard
"I have a problem with my country, Haiti – I've been working in factories here for 25 years, and I still don't have my own house," Evelyne Pierre-Paul told HGW.
Pierre-Paul, 50, whose name was changed in order to protect her from reprisals at the hands of her boss, doesn't even rent a house. Before the Jan. 12, 2010, earthquake, she and her three children rented two rooms for 10,000 gourdes (about 250 dollars) a year.
But the building was destroyed in the earthquake and she hasn't been able to save up a year's rent yet. Twenty-three months after the catastrophe that killed hundreds of thousands, she and her children are still living under a tent in one of the capital's hundreds of squalid refugee camps.
Pierre-Paul's average daily take-home wage is actually more than Haiti's minimum factory wage of 150 gourdes, or 3.75 dollars, a day. She earns about 236 gourdes, or 5.90 dollars a day. But that doesn't cover even one-quarter of what would be considered a family's most basic expenses.
A study by HGW of assembly workers' expenses in the capital and at the Haiti-Dominican Republic border revealed that on an average day, workers spend more than 50 percent of an average day's wages just getting to work and back and eating their midday meal.
A recent study by the U.S.-based Solidarity Center, which is linked to the AFL-CIO trade union federation, determined that a "living wage" for a worker with two children is 749 dollars a month – almost five times the average monthly wage.
Pierre-Paul's wage – about 150 dollars a month – is far from "living". She can't afford to send all her children to school. She can't even afford to move out of the squalid camp.
"When payday comes, you pay all the little debts you accumulated, and you don't have anything left," she said.
Indeed, in buying power, Pierre-Paul earns less than workers did during the assembly factory boom in the 1980s. At that time, the daily wage was worth about three dollars. Today, measured in 1982 dollars, the minimum factory wage is worth 1.61 dollars. The average wage of 236 gourdes a day – as determined by the HGW study – is worth only 2.53 in 1982 dollars.
"The salary question is a veritable scandal," economist Camille Chalmers told HGW in an interview. "The salary has gotten lower and lower. (Workers) get paid in gourdes but in fact (because almost half of food eaten in Haiti is now imported), they consume in dollars."
"It's a big error to bet on the slave-wage labour, on breaking the backs of workers who are paid nothing while (foreign) companies get rich. It's not only an error, it's a crime," he continued.
Pierre-Paul's boss, One World Apparel owner Charles Baker, admits that he doesn't pay his workers enough.
"If a person is honest, it's clear that it's not enough," Baker, a two-time presidential candidate, told HGW. "If I could give a worker 1,000 gourdes a day, I'd pay that. But the conditions in Haiti don't permit us to pay 1,000 gourdes."
Baker and other factory owners claim they can't pay more because of they did, their international clients – like Gildan Activewear, Hanes, Levis, GAP, Banana Republic, K-Mart and Wal-Mart – would pick up and move out. And so the Haitian government – with the full backing of the U.S. government, as recent Wikileaked cables revealed – remains the lowest wage in the hemisphere-wide "race to the bottom".
But Baker insists the assembly industry phase of Haiti's development is just a "step".
"Yes, it's a race to the bottom… if you count on it!" Baker said.
Baker claims that low-wage, low-skilled assembly industries are temporary, and that they will be a big part of the Haitian economy for only about "10 or 15 years".
"It's a step. We're going up the stairs and it's one of the steps," he said.
Haiti has been on the same step for almost 30 years. [See story #4]
The "race to the bottom" pits Haitian workers against workers in the neighbouring Dominican Republic.
CODEVI, a free trade zone industrial park in Ouanaminthe, in the Northeast Department opened on the Dominican border about eight years ago, after salaries got "too high", CODEVI director Miguel Angel Torres told HGW.
"In the early 2000s, clients told Dominican companies that the salaries were too high. They said they couldn't pay. What happened? CODEVI appeared," Torres said, proudly. "The benefits in Haiti are better than in other countries… We can compete with any company in the Dominican Republic!"
In the meantime, Baker and other Haitian factory owners remain vehemently anti-union, according to workers like Pierre-Paul and according to a recent study by the United Nations-affiliated International Labor Association/Better Work programme.
In an April 2011, report, the Haiti branch of the agency noted, "very significant challenges related to the rights of workers to freely form, join, and participate in independent trade unions in this industry in Haiti."
Indeed, five months later, about a week after textile workers in the capital registered a union, all five union leaders suddenly lost their jobs. Better Work recently ruled the factories should reinstate all union officers but as of Dec. 12, most of the owners had not complied.
*This story is the first of a two-part series on the pitfalls, disadvantages and risks of a major new industrial park and the Martelly government's focus on luring foreign investors to Haiti. It was adapted from a longer investigative series by Haiti Grassroots Watch (HGW).
HGW is a partnership of AlterPresse, the Society of the Animation of Social Communication (SAKS), the Network of Women Community Radio Broadcasters (REFRAKA), the Journalism Laboratory at the State University of Haiti, and community radio stations from the Association of Haitian Community Media.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

14 Comments so far
Show AllIt is really easy to go and look for the cheapest of everything, but when we do, we are condemning ourselves to the same fate as the Hatians or whoever might be producing, we are simply effecting them first. If there is an un-hindered flow of capital to find the cheap labor then the jobs leave the US and we get *workers* that need to buy the cheapest they can get since they can't afford US made any more because their wages are under downward pressure from manufacturers who can get the job done more cheaply overseas. Vicious cycle.
I might add that this is the converse of the problem of unhindered flow of labor into the US which we must stop as surely as we need to stop the flow of jobs out of the US. When cheap labor comes into the US, manufacturers can spend less on wages because they have more willing to take the job for less money. If there were a tight supply of labor, then manufacturers would have to pay more to the people that could take the jobs or find automation to do the work which also employs people to build the automation in good manufacturing jobs.
Not buying goods from foreign producers who exploit their labor is one half of the equation the other half is stopping cheap labor from coming into the US.
" workers spend more than 50 percent of an average day's wages just getting to work and back and eating their midday meal"
Not surprising when you consider that the man who made Walmart a giant was put in charge of the reconstruction. Even worse when you consider that the reconstruction funds have been sat on for a year so that they can be doled out to these multinational corporations not the people of Haiti.
I am ashamed to be connected with this graft and collusion.
Well said. Clinton has sold his soul and so has his wife. These companies are parasites.
I knew the Haitians were in for double trouble the minute I saw MSM images of ghoulish Bill Clinton in the immediate wake of the cataclysmic earthquake. After the initial photo-ops depicting him handing out food, he got right to work on toxic trailers and slave wages for the benefit of his disaster capitalist cronies. See Bill Clinton: Haiti’s Neo-Colonial Overlord http://uhurunews.com/story?resource_name=bill-clinton-haiti-s-neocolonial-overlord
Strongly agree, rama.
According to BBC News, fundraising and spending in 2010 US mid-term election reached a new record of $2 billion. That translates into roughly $4 million for each seat. Who can afford that except the rich and powerful or those willing to take the money and "pay" it back later? Is it any wonder pols will do many things they are asked by this "constituency", including sending work into slave-like hell-holes? Is it then any wonder that they try to make the same conditions in their own places, places much more "tamed" as the result of their first sending the work away?
When these poor people from Haiti try to escape the hell they are in and move to the Countries that are stealing that labor so the "Hard Working (codespeak for white) Americans" can have Cheap goods at their Wal_marts we have the racists
and bigots come out of the woodwork and call them thieves and claim they are "illegal".
Everytime the Logitechs and the Bittymouses of the world goes into a Store to buy their Chocolate and shoes made in China and sweatshirts made in Haiti, they are STEALING off the labor of others. That banana on the grocery shelf is cheap because the Government of the United States of America and those that own it decided long ago that the peoples of The Honduras and Guatemaula had no right to a decent wage or to own their own resources.
The Slave Labor in Haiti is sponsored by the Governments of Canada and the USA and of France that supported the coup against Aristide and work actively today to ensure no Government representing the people of Haiti comes to power.
"That banana on the grocery shelf is cheap because" :-
It always amazed me and pained me to see that the price of food has nearly doubled during the last 5 years. Vegetables, Fruit, Rice, Wheat, Corn, Peanuts, . . . you name it - everything went up (as opposed to the stagnant wage epidemic that blanketed all of USA). What is more amazing is that the price of banana, a nutrition rich tasty fruit imported from either Panama, Honduras, Guatemala or Mexico has stayed fixed at 59 cents per pound. Apples that grow abundantly everywhere in the USA were jacked up to a minimum of $1.29 a pound during the harvest season, with some varieties going as high as $2.00 a pound. Back when I lived in East coast during the early 90's, it was not uncommon to buy corn (which is too abundant in the US) at10c a piece during summer - minimum price now is 60 cents a piece. Have learnt that the price of peanuts was jacked up 60% during the last 2 months that went by - citing a 10-15% shortfall in production! Methinks something awfully sinistrous is happening in the Chicago Board of Commodities. After the Dotcom bust, housing bubble bust and perhaps the stagnation of gold price, those with stinking wealth needed new places to grow. This time, it seems to be food on the tables of Americans. While pegging those poor Banana farmers and workers in South America to below subsistence wages.
Whoever who wears those brand names tattooed on their clothes from those glitzy malls in America should wake up and be ashamed of themselves.
Before the earthquake ex-President Clinton was busy selling Haiti as America's sweatshop.
I don't want to exonerate any participant from complicity here, but you can check the tags in the stuff you buy. Remember the good old days when Sam Walton swore to be a bastion Merchant of American goods? In case you haven't noticed, Sam's dead, his heirs are filthy stinkin rich and keep comin back for more. So if you take them your money, buy Haitian labeled goods, then complain about conditions there,are you part of the problem, or part of the solution?
Just prior to the earthquake, 55% of the Haitian population was involved in small farm agriculture, providing limited surpluses to feed the 45% of Haitians living in Port au Prince and other urban areas. At the time of the earthquake, limited surpluses, including seed for the upcoming planting season, were used to feed the desperate quake survivors. Responsible relief organisations target resources towards guaranteeing the next planting. The US Government used this a a means to destroy the local economy through provision of food aid. The peasant economy has been destroyed, the Haitians are dependent on food aid and the US can demand low wages in sweat shops of Haiti. This is yet another variation of the shock doctrine, perpetuated by imperialists like the Clintons.
Or a modern variation of the English land enclosure acts, which were intended to uproot the rural peasants and force them into factory work in the city. The solution is obvious. That 55% small farmers need viable seed and assistance in getting re-established back in their home towns. But that does not work for the garment bosses or the US State Dept's goals of bringing the Haitians to their knees so they will work for nothing.
I had the pleasure of knowing several Jewish, Italian and Puerto Rican women who worked in the shmatta trade. They were funny, and aggressive about their rights. Is there a union that would take on the job of organizing garment workers in Haiti?
Winnie-the-Poo tees sold at Apcot Center (Disneyland) Florida sell for $26,00 each. They are made in Haiti where the 'sweat shops' pay the 'slaves' some $0.13 cents per finished tee - The average woman there makes avout 200 tees on a 10/hr shift. (No pee breaks and only 1/2 hour for lunch or dinner). After the cataclysmic earthquake in 2009 Clinton and the rest of the international 'mafia' made a promise to the Haitian people of 'bringing jobs to Haiti' and this is the result of the 'humanitatrian West's attempt to keep the Haitian people living in eternal servitude for yet another millennium. Haiti's president Aristide, who was making head-way in stabilizing the country and eliminating corruption during his interrupted tenure was sent into exile to South Africa by the US because they were 'losing control.' The people of Haitii have been screwed over for 200 years - the predator French sucked out its natural resources and raped their people into eternal servitude and then ramsomed their freedom for millions the Haitian people couldn't afford - but did somehow. If the US was Russia and Haiti was its slave within its sphere-of-influence, the US would be sending the CIA's 'lead incitement goons' of the NED (National Endowment for Democracy) there to raise hell - the USAID (Another US CIA front group' that specialize in creating wars and revolutions and a market for US corporations to take over small latent economies) natural resources and cheap labor pools that make the people 'poorer yet' would be right behind, paying bribes and initiating revoluation much as they have done in Venezuela, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador and other tiny impotent nations only known to God. (Like Paraguay, Uruguay, Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, et. al.) and we wonder why democracy does not appreal to many of these lackluster countries when they have been exploited and made slaves of under this 'fraud' thing called 'democracy.'
Hate to sound ungrateful but Bill Clinton hasn't seen a sweatshop he doesn't like. It's not progress Mr. Clinton to encourage exploitive companies into a country where people have been exploited for generations. But I suppose that's progress, right Mr. Clinton? And you wonder why OWS persists...