Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Palm Oil Deal 'A Threat to the Rainforest'
Hundreds of millions of tonnes of palm oil look set to be pumped into Britain's vehicles despite scientific evidence showing that chopping down rainforests to make way for plantations exacerbates climate change, according to a leaked report.
A rainforest is destroyed in Borneo. Indonesia and Malaysia are the biggest producers of palm oil in the world. Friends of the Earth's agri-fuels campaign coordinator Adrian Bebb said: "I know the Commission officials and they're trying to get palm oil in." Robert Palgrave of Biofuelswatch said: "If you expand the palm oil business for food, fuel or cosmetics, more forest will be destroyed." (Image: ALAMY)
The European Commission is planning to increase the amount of palm oil used in
cars and power stations under the Renewable Energy Directive (RED), which is
intended to reduce greenhouse gases, suggests the document.
A loophole in the draft communication from Brussels on implementation of the directive would allow almost all palm oil currently produced to be used in vehicles on British roads.
The development - which campaigners warned have would lead to fresh bouts of forest destruction in Asia to meet growing global demand for the oil - comes after an intense campaign of lobbying in Brussels by Malaysian producers who feared the EU would ban imports of palm oil for energy.
Britons use 50 billion litres of transport fuel a year, 2.7 per cent of which came from biofuels in 2008-09. Palm oil, which is primarily used in food and household products, already controversially forms part of that fuel mix.
The Government says it is keen to avoid use of environmentally damaging materials but admits there is insufficient data about the provenance of 42 per cent of transport biofuel used in the UK. Under the RED, passed last year, Britain and other EU states are required to source 10 per cent of petrol and diesel in road transport from renewable sources. Part of that will be accounted for by electrical vehicles but the majority is expected to come from plant-based fuels such as rapeseed, soy, palm and sugar cane.
The EC document ostensibly protects wildlife areas that could grow these plants by banning member states from sourcing fuel from greenhouse gas-sequestering grasslands, wetlands and forests. But, in a crucial exemption, the protection does not apply to habitats changed before January 2008, meaning the vast majority of palm oil produced may be used, even though much of it comes from plantations that have replaced forests in the past 15 years.
The policy is almost certain to increase demand for palm oil, which can only be grown in tropical climates in Malaysia, Indonesia and other Asian countries, West Africa and the Amazon in Brazil. Rainforests have strong carbon credentials; they suck carbon dioxide out of the air as they grow.
According to a study by Denmark's Nordic Agency for Development and Ecology, published in the journal Conservation Biology in 2008, it would take between 75 and 93 years for the benefits to the climate generated by switching to biofuels to outweigh the detrimental effects of converting rainforest to plantations.
Forests in the biggest palm oil-producing countries of Malaysia and Indonesia are rich in rare wildlife, including the orangutan and Sumatran tiger, but about 90 per cent of an area's flora and fauna are lost when the land is converted to monoculture plantations where the plants are grown in straight lines. Some palm oil producers have also been linked to human rights abuses.
According to a Department of Transport study, palm oil is forecast to account for 45 per cent of Europe's biodiesel by 2020. The EC declined to comment on the draft document.
Friends of the Earth's agri-fuels campaign coordinator Adrian Bebb said: "I know the Commission officials and they're trying to get palm oil in." Robert Palgrave of Biofuelswatch said: "If you expand the palm oil business for food, fuel or cosmetics, more forest will be destroyed."



7 Comments so far
Show AllMe thinks our species, collectively, will not be truly fully satisfied until we have destroyed "God's Garden of Eden", this "pale blue dot" once and for all by a wide spectrum of idiotic means whether destruction of natural habitats, lobbing nuclear weapons at each other for some arcane stupid and pathetic reason...etc. We have a ravenous appetite that listens only to its own insatiable hunger (future projections justify our need (want) for...name the resource). We cling to archaic beliefs and pray to the gods of science and technology to save our sorry asses on more time before our self-inflicted apocalypse catches up with us.
We perpetuate the disconnect by clinging desperately to our separation from all things natural as revealed by the refrain "we are not animals" (if not what in hell are we?). It gives us license to do what we damn well please now and screw future generations let them eat moldy cake against the backdrop of a barren unearthly landscape as we got ours while the gettin' was good mentality.
Wandering Wolverine, since I find it difficult to type a comment without using some profanity after reading this article, let me just say, I agree with your post.
Maybe I should tone down my criticism of the climate change deniers a bit. It's stupid moves like these that infuriate so many people - including those that might deny man-made climate change is taking place. I cannot describe the kind of contempt I feel over such mindless decisions.
I think, therefore, I am?
ha, what a damn bunch of spam
baby, i know I'm alive
when i stomp on the pedal and drive
I was born to drive
drive until I die
born to drive
drive until I die
keep it runnin' while I pump
another 10 or 15 stump
world is better without trees
blockin' my view and the breeze
I was born to drive
drive until I die
born to drive
drive until I die
palm oil is great
for driving and shit
but for 'oiling' my palm
I still prefer spit
I was born to drive
drive until I die
Read the labels -- don't buy anything, ANYTHING, with palm oil in it. (I don't.) At least we don't have to be individually complicit. (Palm oil isn't good for you to eat anyway, and I already knew about the rainforest problem. Now this makes it even more pressing.)
Agree with the comments I've read. Palm oil is a travesty. It got a lift when governments banned transfats, which led to the use of palm oil as a substitute.
Tropical rainforest only compromises 3% or so of the earth's surface yet constitutes up to 50% of all vegetation! Of course we know plants eat CO2, which is a cause of global warming (though not as much as water vapor/clouds).
I do think about the raw, unadulterated evil which appears to eating away at our earth. It's hard not to think of the constant degradation as willful, planned by some diabolical force. Mostly, the degradation is a product of 1) unrestrained greed 2) economic policies specifically designed to exploit natural resources and 3) wanton hyper-consumptionism.
These problems emerge from a lack of empowerment due to the primacy of monetary capital over social capitalism--the corporate interest over the public's, rich's over poor's, etc.. In the end the ignorance about our consumption contains the seeds of self-destruction. Maybe zero growth isn't that bad if it stops this wholesale destruction.
Ban palm oil now. Alternatives must be used.
RAN (RainForest Action Network) out of SF, Calif has been all over this for some time. You might want to check them out and support them. They seem to be on the cutting edge on this and many issues in regards to their ability to change corporates standard operating procedures.
And who is profiting from this money-making scheme??? And it won't stop until there is no clean water to drink, safe food to eat and pollution-free air to breathe. Don't we ever learn? Are we stupid, or what?