Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Justice Dept Wants Surveillance Methods Extended
WASHINGTON - The Obama administration has asked the U.S. Congress to extend three surveillance techniques for intelligence agencies tracking suspected militants that expire this year, according to a letter to lawmakers.
Approved after the September 11 attacks in 2001 at the request of the Bush administration, techniques such as roving wiretaps and accessing all kinds of personal records drew criticism from civil liberties groups and some lawmakers who said they were unconstitutional and violated privacy rights.
In the letter released on Tuesday, a Justice Department official asked that three of the techniques expiring on December 31 be renewed and said the Obama administration was open to lawmakers' plans to add more privacy protections.
"The administration is willing to consider such ideas, provided that they do not undermine the effectiveness of these important authorities," Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich said in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and the ranking Republican senator, Jeff Sessions.
The committee will hold a hearing next week to discuss the administration's request.
"I am pleased that the Justice Department has signaled its willingness to work with Congress in addressing the expiring provisions," Leahy said. "It is important that Congress and the executive branch work together to ensure that we protect both our national security and our civil liberties."
The Justice Department specifically asked that Congress reauthorize the use of roving wiretaps, permitting authorities to track multiple communications devices owned by an individual since people can switch devices frequently and quickly.
The administration also asked that one particularly controversial intelligence gathering method be reauthorized -- accessing personal records.
That was a point of contention because some feared that even library and bookstore records could be accessed, prompting Congress to try to limit it.
"CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC"
"Many of these instances will be mundane," Weich said, suggesting that requests often are for driver's license records protected by state privacy laws. But he acknowledged others would be more complex and tracking their business activities.
The administration also asked to continue being able to track suspected foreign militants who may be working individually rather than as part of a larger group, much like Zacarias Moussaoui who is serving a life sentence for conspiring with the September 11 hijackers.
While extending controversial Bush policies could annoy President Barack Obama's more liberal backers, the American Civil Liberties Union said the willingness of his administration to enhance privacy protections was a good first step but would depend on the outcome.
"We're cautiously optimistic. There are still changes we'd like to see to these three provisions to protect Americans' privacy," said Michelle Richardson, a legislative counsel for the ACLU.
She said other government surveillance activities that did not expire this year also needed fixing, especially so-called national security letters which were essentially subpoenas for personal records.
The FBI has been roundly criticized for abusing them.
Democratic Senators Richard Durbin and Russ Feingold urged Congress to take up that issue now as well.
"We must take this opportunity to get it right, once and for all," they said in a statement.
(Editing by John O'Callaghan)

10 Comments so far
Show All"The administration is willing to consider such ideas (about privacy protections), provided that they do not undermine the effectiveness of these important authorities."
Well, isn't that precious? Justice will move to protect privacy if it doesn't "undermine" their IMPORTANT authority. Now what's a regulation about anything supposed to be about unless it undermines some agency's authority? It's tantamount to saying to Congress: you can go commit an anatomically impossible act and we'll do what we deem is necessary for us to be "effective." (We have IMPORTANT responsibilities for the national security, you know.) And Senator Leahy says we're happy to work with Justice on this.
Is it possible to go from bad to worse to worser yet?Tony
"Congress to extend three surveillance techniques for intelligence agencies tracking suspected militants that expire this year, according to a letter to lawmakers."
"Suspected militants" as defined herein shall be anyone with a computer, a cell phone, a brain, a mouth and the ability to use them all, together or separately.
God bless the USA and the assholes who run it, it gets better and better every day!
Trailing Begonia,
You either read my mind or you are my soulmate!
DEFINE THE TERM - MILITANTS! Also keep in mind that many of us learned history when the PREAMBLE to constitution was the first page in our fifth-grade US History book.
And don't forget the FIRST AMENDMENT: "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
since when is authority more important then the constitution?
obama is just another corporate tool from the university of
chicago, the mother of all fascist activity in america!
we will not have justice in america until we MAKE justiCE
IN AMERICA! that simple! lets get off our asses and get busy
restoring our rights! habeus corpus anyone?
The increasing degree of surveillance and control is the perfect indicator for an increasingly fascist and totalitarian system.
The Land of the Free...what a joke. Yeah, we are free. We are free lunch for the parasitic EMPIRE.
THE EMPIRE OF "THE CITY":
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4675077383139148549
And for once there is a REMEDY:
http://www.themoneymasters.com/synopsis.htm
WE ARE FUCKED!
Only this time, Big Bro is looking at the other end of the political spectrum.
Mark me down as between, "I have nothing to hide", and "There's nothing about me somebody doesn't already know".
Meanwhile, I am free to drive around and (wish I could) buy stuff.
There's no privacy in the War on Drugs. "They" have taken our bodily fluids against our will.
There is no privacy in the War OF Terror. "They" have scooped up enough digital traffic already to have a file on everybody.
And who are "They"? They have been identified and named at davedubya.com
Having "slept on" the matter after my imitial comment, I've re-read this Reuters piece and paid more attention to the characterization of the ACLU's attitude toward this civil rights travesty. An official is quoted as "cautiously optimistic," saying only these and other regulations need to be "fixed" for better protection of human rights. What better signal could there be to the Justice Department that the ACLU will play pussy cat to the Obama administration? This after the ACLU removed itself from any vetting of Sonia Sotomayor on constitutional issues; and its having taken the side of the corporations' "free speech rights" in the Clinton case. Some "civil liberties" performance!