EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama in Mexico: More Rhetoric for Change
MEXICO CITY - Reiterated promises of cooperation and respect marked U.S. President Barack Obama's visit to Mexico Thursday. But activists and analysts from both countries told IPS that there have been enough words and that it is time for concrete action from Washington.
US President Barack Obama at a press conference in Mexico City on April 16, 2009. Obama has backed Mexico's war on its violent drug cartels in a first stop on a four-day trip to Latin America, calling for a crackdown on weapons trafficking and admitting shared responsibility (AFP/File/Luis Acosta) In his first visit as president to a Latin American country, Obama said the two countries are united by common opportunities and challenges in trade, the environment and development of border areas, and urged the media not to just focus on drugs and immigration in the U.S.-Mexico relationship.
The leaders met with the press after the welcome ceremony offered by host President Felipe Calderón at the presidential palace in Mexico City and a private meeting between the two of them.
Obama said he would push for immigration reform this year to legalize the estimated 12 million undocumented workers in the United States, seven million of whom are Mexicans - a longstanding Mexican demand.
He also said that for now, because of the economic crisis, he did not believe it was prudent to review the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) - one of his campaign pledges.
Obama's visit crowned a period of growing closeness between the two countries that had not been seen in decades. Calderón was the first foreign president to meet with Obama in Washington after the U.S. president-elect's victory.
And in March, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton visited Mexico, before U.S. Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano and Attorney General Eric Holder did in early April, to discuss cross-border cooperation on organized crime.
Obama repeated his congratulations to Calderón for his "heroic job" in dealing with drug trafficking.
The U.S. leader heads Friday to Trinidad and Tobago, to take part in the Fifth Summit of the Americas this weekend.
Responding to a reporter's question on Cuba - the only country in the hemisphere that is not included in the summits because it was kicked out of the Organization of American States in 1962 - Obama said his recent decision to lift restrictions on travel and remittances to Cuba by Cuban-Americans was aimed at pushing for changes on democracy and human rights in that country.
With respect to the fight against the drug cartels, Obama said "I will not pretend that this is Mexico's responsibility alone. Demand for these drugs in the United States is what's helping keep these cartels in business...More than 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States, many of them from gun shops that line our shared border."
He promised that his government would do much more to clamp down on the flow of weapons into Mexico, money laundering and domestic drug consumption.
But political scientist Daniel Blanco at the National Autonomous University of Mexico said "we have heard so many words, new diplomatic stances and promises from Washington in the difficult, asymmetrical relationship with Mexico, although there have still been few concrete developments."
"Obama's government is still young, but I think we have already heard enough; action is required now," the analyst told IPS.
One of the concrete steps announced by the U.S. government was the naming of a special "border czar" to head its stepped-up efforts to crack down on drug-related violence along the 3,200-km shared border between the two countries.
But the construction of the fence along the border - which Obama supported as senator - continues apace, as do immigration raids.
"It's true that Obama has a different discourse, but so far it's only words," Jennifer Allen, director of the Border Action Network, a Tucson, Arizona-based immigrant advocacy group, told IPS.
"In Obama's speeches and statements, we see clear changes with respect to his predecessor (George W.) Bush, especially on migration, which is our issue. But we are still waiting for concrete accomplishments," said Allen.
Enrique Morones, founder of Border Angels, a humanitarian group whose aim is to reduce the number of heat- and cold-related deaths along the border, told IPS by telephone from San Diego, California that Obama deserves his utmost confidence.
"We are giving him a year to demonstrate with actions what are now just words," said the activist.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported more than 349,000 undocumented immigrants during fiscal year 2008, which ended Sept. 30 - a 20 percent increase on the previous year.
Arturo López, head of the office of care for migrants in the city of Ecatepec, in the state of Mexico near the capital, said he saw no difference between Bush and Obama's migration policies.
"The discourse is similar," he told IPS. "Bush reinforced the borders under the pretext of terrorism; Obama is doing so because of drug and weapons trafficking. Nothing has changed - immigrants are still the scapegoats."
Hugo Rosell, spokesman for the Center for Labor Research and Trade Union Consulting (CILAS), said his organization is still waiting, but without much hope, for Obama to review NAFTA as he promised during his campaign.
For many activists, trade unionists and political leaders, NAFTA, which brings together Canada, Mexico and the United States, has failed to become the engine of development and growth that it was promised to be when it went into force in 1994.
The Calderón administration is opposed to a renegotiation of the free trade treaty.
Opponents of the free trade deal say NAFTA has merely accentuated Mexico's heavy dependence on the United States.
In 1993, when Mexico's exports totaled 51.8 billion dollars and imports amounted to 65.4 billion, the United States represented 82 percent of exports and 69 percent of imports.
In 2008, 14 years after NAFTA went into effect, Mexico's exports have climbed to 292.6 billion dollars and imports to 310.1 billion, with 80 percent of exports going to the United States and 49 percent of imports coming from that country.
"Obama will bring about changes at the local and international levels - the special attention given to Mexico is an example of that - but we have to wait, we have to give him time," said Morones.
"Security is important in the relationship with Mexico, because of the violence that reigns there now," said the activist. "What we are hoping, and will fight for, is for that not to overshadow the other issues, especially immigration reform in the United States, which we expect this year."
Blanco, the political scientist, said that "from here on in, Mexicans don't want any more flattery and affectionate words from Obama, but actions and solutions; and the clock is ticking."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

17 Comments so far
Show AllApparently Raoul Castro has proposed that the Obama Administration and the Cuban Government get together and try to establish a new, less stressed relationship. Castro indicated that issues such as civil liberties could be included in the talks.
This is a daring gamble on the part of Castro. If Obama says no, or yes with a long laundry list of preconditions Obama will stand before the world as a prevaricator if not liar (we should talk with our adversaries, right?).
If Obama agrees to talks without any preconditions he risks the ire not only of many Cuban-Americans but of much of the conservative-reactionary community. If the talks fail to reach an agreement they will shout: "we told you that he was inexperienced".
For Castro it is a win-win. For Obama? An iffy-iffy.
civil liberties - like Torture and Habius Corpus - in GITMO?
It was Castro who offered to talk about civil liberties, not our President who seemingly does not understand that his refusal to let me, an American citizen, travel freely to Cuba continues to be a violation of the equal protection clause of our Constitution. Why are the so-called Cuban-Americans to be trusted more than me, a so-called Dutch-American? Are they more "patriotic" than me? So much bullshit by Obama.
His much vaunted "improvement" for the travel etc. of so-called Cuban-Americans has nothing to do with democracy in Cuba but is a form of "play-for-pay", namely the brown-nosing of a powerful voting group of Florida.
A cacophony will ensue if every American is hyphenated with regards to his/her national origin. This nonsense must stop and that includes African-Americans.
Apparently its business as usual, anyone that opposes illegal immigrartion and the theft of American jobs and citizenship is scapegoating the illegal immigrants...oh excuse me "immigrants" lets not use honest language. The dishonesty of these people is wearing on me.
And NAFTA is a betrayal of the American and Mexican workers. Nothing more.
I agree with your comment about NAFTA(only).
BOHICA, friends.
End the WOD. Problem solved.
So, he's warning Mexico about the CFR's American Union, the Super Corridor, and the Rothschild's "Amero"?
Pfeh.
Aloha, salud, lechiem,
- Tobias
http://www.youtube.com/user/tobiasaurusrex
This is big change throughout the Americas. Our closest neighbor, Mexico can be a close friend to the U.S., with so many U.S. natural born citizens' origins from this motherland.
I would love to read all about the Mexican take on our beloved President Obama, and I believe the best source would be La Jornada Newspaper. But where in the world can we get it here in the U.S.? I do hope that Common Dreams can be a source for articles from that newspaper.
Good information source on Latin America
http://americas.irc-online.org/am/6008?utm_source=streamsend&utm_medium=email&utm_content=3713342&utm_campaign=%5BAmericas%20Updater%5D%2050%20Years%20of%20the%20IDB%3B%20On-Site%20Analysis%20in%20El%20Salvador%3B%20Biodiversity%20Report%3B%20Mexico%27s%20Community%20Radios
What a sick joke, more BS on the drug cartels that reak havoic in Mexico. Have you ever been to Mexico? The police have a history of being corrupt there and have been for many years now. If you value you car, you will not park it on a street. It will become police property, bank on it. America is the biggest drug importer in the world, how can anyone believe they are serious about stemming the tide of illegal drugs unless of course to eliminate competition from rival gangs and that is all America is these days, a gang to be feared. We have the power and the weapons to bring as many drugs to the streets to kill the population off and float the failing stock market in return. This country stinks to high heaven!
It is the position of Mexico that the only long term solution to the drug cartels is legalization of marijuana in the U.S. The U.S. will not consider this solution. It is the position of the U.S. that Mexico should de-nationalize its oil industry. Mexico will not consider this position.
This is where things stand. This is the reality. Even guys like Diego won't consider it. All the rest is just "fluff and bluff".
Privatize the oil industry? All privatized energy markets were taken over by
Bush Apostles, like Enron and Ken Ray and Halliburton if you will.As was the
electric producing market in New England by the ISO. and bought off by that
Company in Spain. We are paying the highest electric rates in the country,
because of Privatization. We have been doublecrossed by Bubba and Daddy Bush.
How many people remember Ross Perot who tried to explain to us that Mexico had
nothing to offer us. They couldn't afford to buy our goods and most people were
living in Card Board Boxes. Open the Hood and look at the engine he said..
Hillary should be made to live on the outskirts of any Mexican city she chooses.
Now they tell us, 11 million illegals in this country. If social scurity is
broke as they tell us, where will the money come from to support all those illegals? Social Secrity money has been thrown in the pile, into the General Fund.
SS has been used to finance the Iraq War and all the other trips into fantasy land that the Clintons and the Bush Family were involved in..
Obama is a slave of the Money markets and he is disguised as a Democrat.
Time for a wake up call, who will tell the people.
The article's first paragraph says, "But activists and analysts from both countries told IPS that there have been enough words and that it is time for concrete action from Washington".
I definitely agree, but not only with respect to U.S.-Mexico relations, which are certainly and very important to correct. For one among other important examples, and while this one is about Haiti, see the following very important and relatively short piece by Stephen Lendman. He, btw, provides very important and damning information on big time criminal Bill Clinton and his sidekick criminal for the ruling financial elites, ..., imperialists, corporatists, etcetera, former UN Sec. Gen. Kofi Annan. The article is much enough about that criminal pair and people of the USA, Canada, France, and the rest of the world, i.e., Earth, definitely must know about the doings of this criminal duo in Haiti this year; them, and the real and top ruling elites thereby represented.
"Electoral Sham in Haiti", by Stephen Lendman, Apr 16 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13209
I don't expect more than [rhetoric] from Obama on critical issues concerning humanity, or, actually, anything really and very important. Instead, I expect more of his [usual] BS; his suave, smooth, sophisticated, ... lying, [again] (and again, and again, ...). BUT, what I expect and what humanity must demand are two different matters; the more what we should expect and receive, but won't get without a very serious fight and by therefore more strongly demanding, well, we simply need to more strongly, firmly and unrelentingly place the demands up front and keep them there, right in the faces of the ruling elites running the government (behind closed doors, of course).
Stop treating Obama as if he's intelligent and honourable; he's evidently neither, and wherein people claim he's intelligent, it's not that he is that, it's that he fools fools, which is no serious feat to accomplish.
Obama's guilty as hell as it is, so how much more guilty does he want to be before he decides to convert to humanity's side, if he ever does, which doesn't seem particularly likely, currently anyway?! I guess he won't convert, for he's evidently a bought-and-paid-for soul, if he has a soul anyway (?); but The People of the USA must shake the foundations of the government of the USA and make Obama truthfully apply himself to one of two choices, which are that he must either "shape up, or ship out"! If he reneges on making this choice and truthfully following through on whichever of the two he must be required to choose from, then The People just have to add more energy to getting rid of him and ... next time, stop choosing what only and at first appears to be a lesser of two evils. Stop electing evils once and for all; and stop trying to come up with all sorts of infantile excuses for voting for evils. Shape up, or ship out.
Senator John McCain, and I don't like calling him or most other politicians by their titles, for they're clearly and certainly not deserved, well, deserved or not for title, Sen. McCain could not have made a more criminal or worse president than Obama's been demonstrating about himself for all of humanity to watch.
The People of the USA must not sheepishly act again; real and firm action must be taken and maintained until the required corrections are obtained; and many they are. And all of humanity needs to support such a movement in the USA, only the movement must first be formed and the actions commenced.
Will this happen, or will we be watching or witnessing, from near and far, another sheepish nightmare episode in the USA and lasting for years; many years?
"Obama said he would push for immigration reform this year to legalize the estimated 12 million undocumented workers in the United States, seven million of whom are Mexicans - a longstanding Mexican demand."
Isn't that rich--it's a DEMAND that the U.S. legalize those who've entered the country without documents, without permission. Unreal. Sure, c'mon get those 20 million green cards ready. And 300 million duncecaps for the gringos while you're at it. And I thought we were arrogant!!
Cuban Americans really should be called Batista Cubans. They left Cuba because they along with the mafia couldn't pillage Cuba anymore.