EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Electronics Firms Urged to Boycott 'Blood Minerals'
WASHINGTON - The world's mass consumption of cell phones, laptops and other electronics fuels widespread sexual violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), according to a new study released Wednesday by the non-profit Enough Project that echoes what many human rights activists and humanitarian workers have been saying for years.
The paper, "Can You Hear Congo Now? Cell Phones, Conflict Minerals, and the Worst Sexual Violence in the World," details how "conflict minerals" that are mined in the war-torn DRC are sold by rebel groups to purchase arms, and serve as a direct cause of widespread sexual violence in the war-torn country.
"The conflict in eastern DRC - the deadliest since World War II - is fuelled in significant part by a multi-million-dollar trade in minerals," the report states. "Armed groups generate an estimated 144 million dollars each year by trading four main minerals: the ores that produce the metals tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold."
Working with other non-governmental organisations, the Enough Project has spent the last year researching the supply chains that link these conflict minerals to many of the world's most demanded electronics, including cell phones, portable music players and computers.
DRC has suffered from violence brought on by the "resource curse" for well over a century. Over the past decade, various militias and military units that have dominated conflict-ridden areas of the country have vied for control of mineral-rich areas and their inhabitants in part by using sexual violence.
According to the study, 1,100 rape cases are reported each month, the world's highest rate of sexual violence against women and girls.
"Women from communities that are being displaced are sometimes so traumatized by the sexual violence that they will never return to their home areas," wrote John Prendergast, co-founder of Enough, in a recent editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle. "These crimes destroy families, decimate communities, and lethally spread HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases."
Years of unrest have plagued the region. Following the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, in which some 800,000 ethnic Tutsis and moderate Hutus were slaughtered by government forces and government-backed militias, hundreds of thousands of Hutus associated with the regime fled across the border into the DRC, as the Tutsi-led Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) conquered the country.
While many have since returned to Rwanda, the continued presence of "genocidaires" in eastern Congo has been cited by Kigali as justification for repeated incursion by its forces over the past 12 years into the region.
Indeed, the new study was released as Oxfam reported Wednesday that some 250,000 people in the DRC have been displaced following an unprecedented joint operation by Rwanda and the DRC's own army against the remnants of the Hutu forces earlier this year.
While the operation was hailed as a success by the two countries, the withdrawal of Rwandan forces over the past several weeks has enabled the Hutu militias to return to the region where they have carried out a campaign of looting and terror against the local population. Oxfam said that Congolese soldiers have also engaged in the violence.
"There is widespread looting, burning of villages and an unacceptable peak of sexual violence," Marcel Stoessel, Oxfam's country director in DR Congo, told the BBC.
According to the Enough study, the three main armed groups responsible for the violence and who also control much of the mineral trade are the National Congress for the Defense of the People (CNDP), the Democratic Liberation Forces of Rwanda (FDLR) and renegade units of the Congolese army (FARDC).
These armed groups profit from the mineral trade by forcibly controlling the mines and exacting bribes, or taxes, from transporters, local and international buyers and border controls.
The conflict minerals - tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold - are moved from Congo to countries in East Asia where they are processed into valuable metals needed for the manufacture of a wide range of electronics products.
The biggest use of tin worldwide is in electronic products, as a solder on circuit boards. Congolese armed groups earn approximately 85 million dollars a year from trade in tin, according to the paper.
Trade in tantalum, which is used to store electricity in capacitors in iPods, digital cameras, and cell phones earns the armed groups an estimated 8 million dollars annually. Tungsten, used to make cell phones vibrate, earns approximately 2 million dollars a year; and gold, used in jewelry and as a component in electronics, provides from 44 million dollars to 88 million dollars a year.
Enough called for electronics companies to endorse a pledge - similar to that made by the diamond and jewelry industry seven years ago regarding so-called "blood diamonds" - that they will manufacture their products without conflict minerals and make their supply chains subject to a transparent audit to back up the pledge.
According to the report, companies such as Apple, Nokia, Hewlett Packard, and Nintendo should "change their procurement practices and demand that their suppliers provide proof of where their minerals are sourced from."
Enough also urged consumers around the world to use their purchasing power by demanding that companies examine their business practices and become accountable for the sources of minerals used in many of their products
"We're asking consumers to endorse the conflict minerals pledge and contact the 21 leading electronics companies through our Raise Hope for Congo website to build pressure on these companies to make their products conflict-free," said Prendergast.
The paper also asks that U.S. President Barack Obama and Congress take concrete steps to ensure the end of violence in the DRC by combating its causes.
"President Obama must make a clean break with past policy toward Congo, which has too often been designed to half-heartedly manage the symptoms of the crisis through humanitarian aid, erratic diplomacy, and peacekeeping assistance," according to Prendergast.
He called for Obama to name a high-level special envoy with a team that can work in co-ordination with others on the local, national, and regional sources of instability; provide all necessary support to the International Criminal Court as it attempts to investigate and prosecute war crimes in the DRC, and press for making rape as a weapon of war a primary focus of criminal investigations in the eastern part of the country.
Enough also urged Congress to introduce legislation "that requires companies to disclose where their minerals are sourced, and creates penalties for those who continue purchasing conflict minerals."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

9 Comments so far
Show AllInteresting that this story never makes it to the mainstream news.
This article describes yet another problem exacerbated by corporate control of our media.
q
Corporate control - turn off your TV. That's how I control corporate media.
I wonder how the Democratic Republic of the Congo would have progressed had GOP
President Dwight Eisenhower not sanctioned the assassination of Patrice Lumumba.
Millions and millions of lives would have been saved. Huge portions of Africa would have had a good chance at democracy and benefitting from their own rich natural resources. Congo has mineral riches that could have allowed them to provide for their people like certain oil or gas rich countries do. They might have developed to places that could afford education and health, a decent way of life.
The assassination of Lumumba and the overthrow of Mossadegh, the installation of kleptocratic brutes and many similar activities in Latin America and Asia were horrible crimes against the poor and ordinary people, all committed so big companies could get or keep control of STUFF.
Joe
I almost feel a little guilty typing up a response to this on my computer.
To second quickstepper's notion, THIS side of the story doesn't make it to the mainstream news . . . and thus, Americans never see or understand what large role they always play in many of the areas of human-rights abuses around the world. They remain woefully - and happily - ignorant, which is exactly how the corporate ruling elite want them.
This issue is exactly why I have not procured an iPod yet. I know I could find a good one for very cheap that would suit my "needs". Yes, I have a computer and a cell phone (bought before I became aware of this side of the issue, though I admit I would probably still buy them because of their utility to my life). But I haven't bought an iPod yet and won't, until I know they are made under different circumstances. I think there comes a time when we simply need to stop consuming some of this crap. And I know that's hard. I readily admit it is hard for me, and I struggle with it every day, he who loves his large collection of music . . . I'm actually a bit surprised I have remained as steadfast on the iPod issue as I have.
I think more importantly we need to keep passing this stuff on to others. Email these stories, print them out and distribute them, post them on your blogs, whatever. But get them circulating. Whenever I do it, I am careful not to come from a place of anger or condescension. I try to tell my friends I am not wanting to force them to feel guilty or to throw away all their gadgets they like so much. I tell them I just think they need to become aware. And reflect. And consider every consumerist action you take. And for goodness sake, tell your kids!!
We won't touch everyone, that's for sure. Most Americans have about as much self-reflection as a piece of coal. But we can certainly build a strong momentum from the bottom up.
Peace.
I often hear these arguments with respect to resource use. Guilt or shame prevents us from making choices we otherwise would make. An important resource is purchased with the profits or benefits accrued to those who commit crimes. The response is guilt and a commitment to contrition or not using the product in the hopes in some way it will help. It's an individual decision and it would be out of place for me to dismiss it or pass judgement on it. I would prefer to make the choice to not purchase something out of compassion or solidarity. If guilt works for you than I can't be crtical of that.
However, the same can be said for almost everything we use or consume. The most basic thing we consume is food. The amount of food we consume is staggering and except in a few cases it is produced using nitrogen fertilizer which came from a chemical process invented by the German chemist Fritz Haber. Haber's process used ammonia and nitrogen pulled from the air to formulate ammonium-nitrate based fertilizer. This is where chemical fertilizer comes from. In reality it is a bit more complicated then that but that is the process in its essence. Without fertilizer we would not be able to feed the number of people we feed today and sustain this level of population.
But this process is also used to make Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oxidizer (ANFO) explosives used in the mining of coal and for the military munitions and poison gasses that were used in World War I. The devestating bombing of the Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma by Timothy McVeigh used fertilizer and diesel fuel. The companies that produced poison gas in World War I to horrific effect in World War I are the friendly faces who advertize lawn and garden fertilizer on TV.
So if you boycott a product based on the harm it does to society you would probably be boycotting everything. So what is the answer? I don't know really. If a personal committment to boycott a product is what you want to do than that's a start. Personally I don't boycott anything unless there is a organized campaign against it. That is not to say I will use or consume something even if there is a cost to others just because there is no organized opposition to it yet. Some things are easier to boycott than others though. Boycotting electronics in many cases may be relatively easy. You can buy slightly used electronics and that way you are not rewarding blood minerals. I think many of us on this site would boycott the more basic essential products if they could. I personally would like to stop using gasoline because of the harm it does to people and the planet but I can neither move my family close to where I work nor can I use mass transit with the crushing 3 hour commute each way. I won't give up trying though.
Good to see this article from Enough Project . . . but the writer should have followed through and included two actions that can be taken (created by Enough), ones that help create / demonstrate a consituency for proper sourcing and labeling for the industry of these minerals:
1. Personal pledge:
http://www2.americanprogress.org/t/1647/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=135
2. Tell CEO of the 21 largest electronics companies to make conflict-free products:
http://www2.americanprogress.org/t/1659/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=6265
For sure spread awareness to friends, but let's build a constituency that the companies can't ignore.
No money to be made, no gov't interest.
We don't fight black people. We fight Middle Easterners.
This entire mess and the genocide, ethnic cleansing and poverty are a very clear example of policies implemented by the USA including the Murder of Patrice Lamumba. The US has been instrumental in all aspects of the entire continent of Africa. They hope for the deaths by natural causes, starvation disease etc and wars of if possible the total population, especially the black population, They would even commit troops and if needs be Atomic weapons. However it's done they believe that they are entitled to all the Natural Resources and they will kill everybody to get them!
surya
Many thanks for this revealing article. While there has been enough consciousness about gold with www.nodirtygold.org doing considerable good work, the same is not the case with the other trio: tin, tantalum and tungsten.
Suggest your carrying this article in your section for women too.