Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Citizen Scientists' Notes Pinpoint Effects of Climate Change
WASHINGTON - It has to do with brown-headed cowbirds and clear-cut forests, lilacs and wildfires, vineyards in the Rhine Valley, marmots, dandelions, tadpoles, cherry trees around the Tidal Basin in Washington and musty old records stuffed in shoe boxes in people's closets and stacked on museum shelves.
Satellite photo composite: “Land surface phenologies across CONUS in 2000 revealed by hree AVHRR biweekly composites.” From USA National Phenology Network (USANPN)
As scientists track global warming, they're using sometimes
centuries-old data to assess its impact on plants, animals, insects,
fish, reptiles and amphibians. Increasingly, they're discovering that
it can take only one seemingly insignificant change to disrupt an
entire ecosystem.
"People talk about a 1- or 2-degree rise in temperature and it's inconsequential to us. Who cares?" said Greg Jones, an environmental studies professor at Southern Oregon University who's been studying wine grapes. "But in an ecosystem it can have dramatic effects."
As the study of phenology, or life cycles, attracts growing attention, researchers are turning more and more to citizen scientists for help.
Since 1954, more than 1,000 people nationwide have monitored lilacs, recording when they first develop leaves, buds and blossoms in a program that started in Montana and is now part of the National Phenology Network. The data now can be submitted online.
Another 3,500 or so people are monitoring 4,500 different plants as part of Project BudBurst, another online program. Eventually those involved in the project would like to have 40,000 people tracking plants, shrubs and trees from kinnikinick to chokecherry and wheat to Western columbine.
"The biggest hit has been dandelions," said Jake Weltzin, a scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey who's the executive director of the National Phenology Network. "Everyone cares about dandelions."
Besides scientists and professional land managers, kindergartners, master gardeners, farmers, fishermen and bird, frog and butterfly watchers have participated. Weltzin said that every time he spoke with a garden club, about one in every five people who attended had detailed records tucked away on their plants, trees and shrubs.
Next year, the phenology network is launching a program to monitor wildlife and track such things as bird, fish and mammal migration.
"It's easy to observe when the plants in your garden flower or when the birds arrive at the feeder in your yard," said Abraham Miller-Rushing of the Wildlife Society.
Stored in cabinets at the University of Washington's Burke Museum are 12,000 file cards dating to 1955. The cards, according to curator Sievert Rohwer, provide a gold mine of information on the birds of the Pacific Northwest. The museum receives hundreds of cards a year from people who are tracking more than 100 species of birds. The museum unsuccessfully sought a National Science Foundation grant to organize the information online.
"It's a critical database that is enormously valuable," Rohwer said.
For instance, Rohwer said the records showed that brown-headed cowbirds were somewhat rare in the Northwest in the 1960s and 1970s because the region was too forested. "But now they are everywhere," he said.
Technically, phenology is the study of the seasonal timing of plant and animal life cycles, including such things as animal and bird migrations, emergence from hibernation and blooming, leafing and flowering. Over the past 10 years it's increasingly become a mainstay in the study of climate change, as life cycles are thought to be among the most sensitive to global warming.
Using data from official and unofficial sources, scientists say that spring, on average, is arriving roughly a week earlier than it did 50 years ago. That's caused ripple effects in natural ecosystems. For instance, if plants bloom earlier, insects and birds must adjust. Some species may respond better than others. Those that don't could disappear.
"It's clear changes in phenology are an early warning sign of climate change," said Daniel Schindler, an associate professor at the University of Washington's School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences.
Using records dating to 1784, Southern Oregon University's Jones said that bud break for wine grapes in Europe's Rhine Valley was coming three weeks earlier than it did 50 years ago. Pests such as mites and aphids have to adjust to the new schedule, as do the ladybugs that eat them. Jones said the real problem, however, might be that the grapes were maturing earlier and had to be picked in the heat of late summer. That could affect quality. Wine grapes are best when they're harvested in fall temperatures.
Records for wine country in California, eastern Washington state and elsewhere in the United States are much sketchier. Even so, Jones said that the "same thing we are seeing in Europe we are seeing in the limited data here."
Perhaps the classic example of the impact of climate change on an ecological community is oak trees in the Netherlands, which are leafing out earlier. The winter moth caterpillars that feed on the leaves are coming out earlier. The pied flycatchers that eat winter moth caterpillars remain on the old schedule, however, as they migrate from central Africa to the Netherlands. In some areas, the populations of pied flycatchers have dropped 90 percent.
"There are similar stories everywhere," Miller-Rushing said.
The cherry trees in Washington, D.C., are flowering earlier, marmots in the Rocky Mountains are emerging earlier, butterflies are moving farther north and in some cases practically have become invasive species, and everything from prairie dogs to tadpoles and apples to peaches is being affected, Weltzin said.
Lilacs have been the star of the program so far, he said. They're a common plant, they grow almost everywhere and their life-cycle changes are easy to observe. As opposed to many plants, however, lilacs may be blooming later because of climate change. Weltzin said lilacs needed their winter sleep, and that the warmer and drier it was the later they woke up.
"It's very counterintuitive," he said.
In general, Weltzin said, if lilacs in the West bloom after May 20, it's going to be a major forest fire season.
"We need to know how all these organisms respond to climate change," Weltzin said. "We call it the pulse of our planet, or timing is everything."
ON THE WEB
MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
Global warming blamed for tree death in West
Regulators ban fishing in Arctic as warming changes ocean ecosystem
Obama tells EPA to review rejection of state emissions standards
- Posted in

17 Comments so far
Show AllI have one question:
1. When has the climate of our planet been stagnant?
In allllll of my reading I can find nary a period of stagnant temperatures. This tells me that climate on our planet is always changing. Is it time to stop trying to project that climate has never changed and get on with conservation?????
Climate has always fluctuated, but never changed like it is now. David Attenborough said: "I have waited until proof was conclusive that it was humanity changing the climate. The thing that really convinced me was the graphs connecting the increase of carbon dioxide in the environment and the rise in temperature with the growth in human population and industrialisation. The coincidence of the curves made it perfectly clear we have left the period of natural climatic oscillation behind and have begun on a steep curve, in terms of temperature rise, beyond anything in terms of increase that we have seen over many thousands of years."
Over geologic time, it has, on rare occasions changed with the sort of rapidity of human-induces climate change, and the consequence have been enormous mass extinctions.
When I hear argument like the above it is unclear if they are arguing that potentially catastrophic climate change it isn't human caused, or from a more nihilistic perspective where it doesn't matter if human technology is causing it, because humans and their technology are a natural phenomenon so if we cause all this suffering and maybe our extinction big deal it's perfectly natural.
So, along the same lines, nuclear war isn't a big deal either; it's as natural as a big asteroid impact, so why do anything to prevent it?
---USAn---
Your question is an idiot. Who is arguing that "climate has never changed"? NO ONE.
"Your question is an idiot."
English must not be your first language.
No, i just enjoy to make funny with words.
By your reasoning, cars are supposed to be in motion, so taking one's foot off the gas pedal before applying the brakes doesn't make sense. Never mind the oncoming wall.
Indeed, we should get on with conservation, but wouldn't it help if we recognized the fact that it is our foot that is on the gas pedal before anything else?
You are in a shrinking minority, to the point of being irrelevant. I'm certainly not listening to you.
A part of climate change.
http://users.telenet.be/j.janssens/SC24Clilverd.pdf
"Citizen Scientists' Notes Pinpoint Affects of Climate Change"
___________________________________________________________
It ought to be "Effects", not "Affects".
Just doing my bit to clean up toxic grammar pollution!
· Yr Obd't Servant
Yes - VERY aggravating - especially considering such mistakes cannot be attributed to typing errors, but represent a clear confusion about what written English words mean.
How much do you want to bet the person who composed the headline is under 30? My favorite from this age group is stuff like: "We held a protest at the construction sight".
---USAn---
Maybe they were blind before they went to hold their protest?
When it comes to climate change, my affect is generally worried.
Joe
If I check 'affect' in the OED, the contrast with 'effect' is that the latter means result. In general the word 'affect' seems to used in reference to pretence, false appearance, disposition; of animals and plants: To frequent naturally or habitually, inhabit, etc.
That the National Science Foundation has not provided a grant to organize over 50 years of information could be considered an 'affect' of that organ. The recording of natural patterns not made in a laboratory, by lay people who observe and record is a measure by which the institution sets lay persons and lab coats apart. The openeness of funding a cataloguing of the 50 years of records might be more an 'affect' of the Oregon Library and Museum Association.
Might these be affects born of a perspective that man is not part of nature? That nature is virtually passive in the shadow of a society that has for hundreds of years failed ontologiccally to recognize specific natural dynamics and as such has been profoundly irresponsible and destructive?
Part of it might be an institutionalized 'religion' of, as was coined in another article today, 'homoeconomicus'. If the leg thinks it is an eye, the foot might find its way to the mouth. Unfortunately, the bellybutton that thinks it is an ear might miss the message.
Ted:
And I will post to you as I think your post was addressed to me.
From the last poll that I read concering AGW, the people perpetuating that idea are losing face to the general public.
With that in mind, something that everyone can understand is conservation, there is no arguement about the effects of conservation is there?
There are valid scientific papers on both sides of the AGW theory. Why go forth with that then? AS it only enhances disagreement? Why not go forward with conservation.....as there can be no disagreement about the effects of that?
Proponents of directly addressing human-introduced atmospheric carbon ARE proponents of conservation - conservation of the atmospheric balance of elements that has produced the climate stability in which humans have flourished.
webwalk:
Of course proponents of AGW are conservationists.
But you are missing my whole arguement. Climate science is not perfected.
Conservation is perfected and very easy to understand.
Rather than argue about climate, argue conservation. You will win the conservation arguement every time. The climate arguement will be lost within another 10 years as we cool. Fight for conservation with gusto.
It only makes 100% sense to do so.
Altho:
I would have to say Mr. Gore is not a conservationist. But most are.