Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Commission Gets Grim Report on Wartime Spending
A new commission examining waste and corruption in wartime contracts got a grim report from government watchdogs who say poor planning, weak oversight and greed combined to soak U.S. taxpayers and undermine American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Stuart Bowen, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, says the U.S. has committed nearly $51 billion for a wide array of projects in Iraq - from training the Iraqi army and police to rebuilding the country's oil, electric, justice, health and transportation sectors.
Some of these projects succeeded, Bowen told the Wartime Contracting Commission at its first public hearing Monday, but many did not. Violence in Iraq along with constant friction between U.S. officials in Washington and Baghdad were also major factors that undercut progress.
A 456-page study by Bowen's office, "Hard Lessons: The Iraq Reconstruction Experience," reviews the problems in an effort the Bush administration initially thought would cost $2.4 billion.
The U.S. government "was neither prepared for nor able to respond quickly to the ever-changing demands" of stabilizing Iraq and then rebuilding it, said Bowen, who has made 21 trips to Iraq since he was appointed in October 2004. "For the last six years we have been on a steep learning curve."
Unless the government greatly improves the way it handles relief and rebuilding programs, the same mistakes will be made in Afghanistan where more than $30 billion is U.S. money has been devoted to reconstruction.
"The next time is upon us. It's in Afghanistan," Bowen said.
Overall, the Pentagon, State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development have paid contractors more than $100 billion since 2003 for goods and services to support war operations and rebuilding projects in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Congress created the bipartisan panel a year ago over the objections of the Bush White House, which complained the Justice Department might be forced to disclose sensitive information about investigations.
There are 154 open criminal investigations into allegations of bribery, conflicts of interest, defective products, bid rigging and theft stemming from the wars, Thomas Gimble, the Pentagon's principal deputy inspector general, said in his written testimony.
Gimble, who is scheduled to testify before the panel later today, noted that contracting scandals have gone on since the late 1700s when vendors swindled George Washington's army.
"Today, instead of empty barrels of meat, contractors produced inadequate or unusable facilities that required extensive rework," Gimble says. "Like the Continental Forces who encountered fraud, the (Defense Department) also encounters fraud."
Gimble's office found that a small number of inexperienced civilian or military personnel "were assigned far-reaching responsibilities for an unreasonably large number of contracts."
He cites an account tapped frequently by U.S. military commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan to build schools, roads and hospitals. More than $3 billion was spent on these projects, which were not always properly managed.
"In some instances, there appeared to be scant, if any, oversight of the manner in which funds were expended," Gimble says. "Complicating matters further is the fact that payment of bribes and gratuities to government officials is a common business practice in some Southwest Asia nations."
In "Hard Lessons," Bowen says his office found fraud to be less of a problem than persistent inefficiencies and hefty contractor fees that "all contributed to a significant waste of taxpayer dollars."
Styled after the Truman Committee, which examined World War II spending six decades ago, the eight-member panel has broad authority to examine military support contracts, reconstruction projects and private security companies.
In addition to examining flawed contracting, the commission will also study whether battlefield jobs handled by contractors such as aircraft maintenance and motor pools should be reserved for military and government employees.
The panel has until August 2010 to produce a final report. It can refer to the Justice Department any violations of the law it finds.
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who pushed for formation of the commission, urged members to be aggressive and to hold people accountable.
"Harry Truman has been rolling in his grave for the last five years," said McCaskill, referring to the former Missouri senator (and later president) who led the Truman Committee. "A report is not going to be enough. You're going to need a two-by-four."

23 Comments so far
Show Allfree2bee
Reports, reports, reports.....when will those responsible for the "empty barrels" be held responsible?
Thumbs up for Sen. McCaskill!!
I hope that all Americans will remember when the troops come home to differentiate between the hard-sacrificing men and women who have seen unspeakable horrors and survived great losses from those greedy bastards who never got their hands dirty and made all of the profits.
I think it's something that many Americans forgot during the Vietnam war, and it was devastating to the returning troops.
The damaged psyche's of the ones who may have blood on their hands is really on the heads of the guys with the money stuffed in their pockets.
I doubt that many people have trouble distinguishing between the people who fight the war and the people who caused it and profited from it. I don't think many people forgot it during the Viet Nam war either. I hung around with some pretty radical people then and nobody I knew blamed the soldiers for it.
Bless you for your intelligence and your thought's.
This was something I was very happy to see. Even if none of the lost money can be reclaimed, at least the report will show how it was mismanaged, and why. Hopefully the current administration won't be so stupid as to make the same mistakes.
A thumbs up for Sen. McCaskill from me too!! We could do with a lot more like her.
What you said!
I see an opportunity in this economic crisis to reform the military. One of the weekend's commentators referred to the problem of growing the military during hard economic times and I had to wonder if it wouldn't be better to clean up the military and improve it by reducing waste (there seems to be no end of that in the military and defense dept) and demanding some efficiency and accountability.
Personally I'd like to see the military budget cut by about 90% but I know that's not going to happen. So instead, let's "un-bloat" the military and still keep all those boots on the ground that so many seem to think the world needs.
Isn't it amazing how sticker shock works?
With $300 billion in initial Wall Street bailout funds already spent with virtually no public accountability, and hundreds of billions more to be dispersed in phase two of TARP plus the stimulus package already in the Congressional pipeline, that mere $100 billion misspent in Iraq war/occupation funding suddenly looks like fairly small potatoes.
Bill from Saginaw
"In addition to examining flawed contracting, the commission will also study whether battlefield jobs handled by contractors such as aircraft maintenance and motor pools should be reserved for military and government employees."
This should be a no brainer for anyone except those that want to profit from a war. There really shouldn't be civilian personel in a war zone. There really shouldn't be any incentive to shortchange those in danger by those who sit safely in their Corporate office.....which the contract system surely does.
From a different viewpoint than some have stated here, this is indeed a great opportunity to reform our military and cut the military budget while producing a better more efficient military.
And training young men and women in useful occupations they can bring home with them. That would be a great gift in return for service.
Joe
Amen!
My Nephew is doing his second tour in Iraq and T. More you are absolutely correct when you say there should be no civilians in a war zone; especially when they are getting paid outrageous sums compared to our brave soldiers. This demoralizes the troops, but they never talk about it, just like when they complained to Rumsfeld about their protective armor and to quote: " YOU FIGHT WITH THE ARMY YOU HAVE BEEN GIVEN"! Too bad we couldn't have put him over there with the same armor!
I pray for his safe return as I do all of these kids.
I know the troops don't want Blackwater and their like there. They have no respect for the, mostly contempt and the word I've gotten is they cause trouble with the Iraqi wtih their arrogance.
And I've been told they aren't too happy guarding a convoy thats driven by guys making more in a month than they do in a year.
I'd love to have put Rumsfeld out there on the streets when he said that. But he and the rest of the cowards that so lightly sent your Nephew and others over there never served a day in combat. Not one of them. The cowards.
Can you Imagine the Army core of Engineers Privatized in WW11.
We need to cross this river sir and the Germans hold the only bridges!
Can we flank them and cross lower downstream by building a bridge ?
I will get halliburtun on the phone sir.
Sir halliburtun wont build the bridge unless we pay them an extra 20 million. They also will not guarantee it will be sufficient to carry our Shermans. Further they want an exclusive contract to provide our rations for a 6 month period. We can only land our reinforcemnts on halliburtun provided Ports back in Normandy and they will not fulfill the contract to expand those ports for two years sir unless we pay them a Bonus.
Doggone it, thats 4 out of 5 this last week! Isn't it the truth!
While I believe that the fraud and corruption from the Iraq war should be investigated...
This "report" sounds like another whitewashed commission stacked with stooges...
In "Iraq for sale", it is documented the fraud and waste & problems created by private contractors...
And often endangering the lives of the troops...
What about the trillions $$$ that went missing from the pentagon before 9-11?
What about the crates of cash that went missing in Iraq?
Every last scrap of meat should be scraped off the bones of those who perpetrated fraud in the course of this war. There is no more blatant betrayal of our nation and its grunts than has been perpetrated by these people.
GEE, YOU MEAN BUSH WASN'T HONEST WITH THE PUBLIC, AGAIN(!) AND HIS TOTAL LACK OF UNDERSTANDING ON HOW TO RUN A WAR (SUCH AS HAVING PLANS FOR ITS ENDING) OR HOW HIS METHODS DEMORALIZED TROOPS IS A SURPRISE? WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM SOMEONE WHOSE MILITARY SERVICE TIME WAS SPENT USING ALCOHOL AND COCAINE AND PARTYING! YOU DON'T GET GROUNDED AND LOSE YOUR FLYING PRIVLEDGES UNLESS YOU WORK AT IT AND HE WAS EXCELLENT AT WORKING AT IT.
That's the way the current Republican Party operates. It's part of their party creed. Everyone needs to familiarize themselves with it and get used to it. Privatize everything and allow big business to rape the taxpayer wholesale. It's always the end result when big business is involved. One more reason I will not vote Republican. Even the best of them have the same big business/plunder mentality.
There has to be something terribly wrong with our whole Government Contracting process if we consistently end up with failed results! Obviously, absolutely no vetting in terms of contractor capability or contractor trustworthiness took place with regard to any of them.
Still, I have yet to read anywhere that these processes will be studied, evaluated, corrected, and the individuals responsible for the major screw-ups that occurred under every contract held accountable.
This is what should make all Americans as well as all of our Military stand up and scream: "N-O M-O-R-E!!!!!!!!
Whenever you trust greedy idiots to carry out life and death services in a war zone, can you really be surprised by the results reported here???
If for nothing else, members of the Bush Administration who participated in this rape of America should be charged with TREASON!!!
Yes.
Hang 'em high
OK!