Homelessness Surges as Funding Falters
Providers to the poor try to stretch meager resources to meet growing need
SEATTLE - As snowstorms blew into this Northwest city and the economy iced over in December, the occupants of a shelter nestled among industrial buildings on the north side prayed for divine intervention.
"We were hoping for the Christmas miracle," says Glen Dennis, 41, who was working his way through a residential drug-treatment program at the CityTeam Ministries shelter. Dennis and the other 11 guys in the long-term program -dubbed the "disciples" - also worked each day to prepare for some 50 to 60 overnight shelter guests, and dish up free hot meals to about 100 people. "We kept doing what we were doing, and hoped someone would come by and drop off a big check."
But the check did not come - even after a coalition of other shelters, nonprofits and local churches tried to pull together a rescue package to keep the shelter open. On Dec. 27, CityTeam Ministries, based in San Jose, Calif., closed the Seattle facility - leaving scores of people to seek food, shelter and sobriety elsewhere. For Dennis, who had been free of crack cocaine for nearly 11 months, the upheaval led to another painful relapse out on the streets.
"It's a real loss," says Herb Pfifner, executive director of the Union Gospel Mission shelter in downtown Seattle. "We're all scrambling to try to handle the growth of homelessness because of the economic situation ... and then the closing of another mission adds more pressure."
The CityTeam closure is a piece in the expanding problem of homelessness across the nation: Shelters and related services for the homeless are facing funding shortfalls as the downturn takes its toll on state budgets and corporate donations. And while individual donors in many cases are keeping up gifts - or even digging a little deeper for charities that help with urgent needs like food and shelter - the service providers say they are faced with a rapidly growing demand from people losing jobs and homes in the economic crisis.
"A downturn in (overall) funding in this case is accompanied by a surge in demand, so a homeless shelter, food pantry, or job-training program is going to feel it first," says Chuck Bean, executive director of Nonprofit Roundtable of Greater Washington, in the District of Columbia. "Even if they have 100 percent of their budget compared to last year, they now see a 50 percent surge in demand. Then (they) get into the tough decisions: Do you thin the soup, or shorten the line?"
Even as census-takers fan out in cities across the country this week in an attempt to count homeless populations, advocates and experts point to a bevy of evidence that homelessness is rising and will continue to, most notably among families with children.
Shelters across the country report that more people are seeking emergency shelter and more are being turned away. In a report published in December, 330 school districts identified the same number or more homeless students in the first few months of the school year than they identified in the entire previous year. Meantime, demand is sharply up at soup kitchens, an indication of deepening hardship and potential homelessness.
"Everything we are seeing is indicating an increase," says Laurel Weir, policy director at the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty. "And homelessness tends to lag the economy. So we're probably seeing the tip of the iceberg here."
In the foreclosure crisis, the people being displaced from homes won't likely be on the street immediately, explains Michael Stoops, director of National Coalition for the Homeless.
"The people who have lost homes or tenants in homes that were foreclosed ... have downsized, and if that doesn't work they will move in with family and friends," says Stoops. "After a while, they will move into their RV in a state campground. The next step is a car. And the worst nightmare for a working, middle-class person or even a wealthy person who has never experienced homelessness is knocking on a shelter door."
Services teeter on brink
As the case of Seattle's CityTeam shelter illustrates, many nonprofits serving the poor are working on a shoestring, even in better times. Seattle-area donations to the shelter had to be supplemented from general funds, said Jeff Cherniss, chief financial officer of CityTeam, which operates shelters and food programs in five other U.S. cities.
"We were hoping (the Seattle shelter) could become self-sustaining," says Cherniss. CityTeam Ministries, a Christian organization funded by donations from individuals, corporations and churches, kept the Seattle facility afloat with help from its general fund for most of a decade, but the 2008 crisis prompted them to retrench.
Every major source of funding is under pressure in the current environment: Charitable foundations - which rely on corporate profits for their seed money and investments to preserve and build those funds - have been forced to pull back grants after taking a massive hit as corporate earnings faltered and stocks plunged. The National Council of Foundations recently estimated that philanthropic foundation endowments have lost $200 billion in value during the economic crisis.
A few of the largest foundations have, despite losses, promised to maintain or give at higher levels in the face of the crisis. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation this week said it would increase its giving to 7 percent of its assets from 5 percent. And the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation announced three gifts totaling $34 million to help homeowners in Chicago avoid foreclosure and keep renters in homes.
Still, the casualties are mounting. Among them: Atlanta nonprofit Nicholas House, which closed a shelter for families in mid-January so it could safely keep other housing services open. Nearly all corporate donors gave to the organization at lower levels this year, says Dennis Bowman, executive director of the 26-year-old agency. The final straw came when a corporate donation ended, and was not renewed.
"It was directly because of the economy - the business has suffered in this economy, and so can't provide the funding, which was well over $100,000 a year," says Bowman.
The organization is scrambling to find other options for the 12 families - 45 people in all - who lived there, by squeezing them into other parts of its own programs or openings with other nonprofit programs.
Shaky foundations, difficult choices
Arguably, no single event in the economic crisis has caused a greater ripple of concern among advocates for the homeless than the government takeover of mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in September. In 2007 alone, charitable giving through the Freddie Mac Foundation and the Fannie Mae philanthropic division topped $47 million - the bulk of which goes to programs that shelter and feed homeless Americans, and establish affordable housing.
In Washington, D.C., where Fannie and Freddie had been the largest corporate donors, dozens of organizations were up in the air as government auditors reviewed the corporations' records, including their charity operations.
Linda Dunphy, executive director of Doorways for Women and Families, a shelter program that has been receiving funding from Freddie Mac since 1996, says the takeover of the mortgage company threw a promised $300,000 grant into limbo.
Meantime, Doorways watched other substantial corporate donations drain away - including some $50,000 that had been coming through an annual walkathon from financial companies Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch.
Fortunately, when the review of Fannie and Freddie's charitable operations ended in late December, the Freddie Mac grant came through for Doorways, averting the need to shut down a family shelter - for the next six months, at least. "But then we face a whole new fiscal year, and our concerns about what is going to happen at (Freddie Mac Foundation) and whether they can continue to keep giving at the level they have been giving," says Dunphy.
The Alternative House for homeless mothers in northern Virginia was not as lucky. Freddie Mac had been giving $35,000 to $60,000 a year to this nonprofit. The Freddie Mac money was spent on providing developmental assistance for the babies, who are often behind because of their chaotic beginnings. Last week, Judith Dittman, who runs the program, got word that the funding was cut.
States awash in red ink
Up to now, another major source of funding for nonprofits providing homeless services came from state budgets. But entering 2009, at least 45 states faced budget deficits, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which estimates combined state budget gaps for the remainder of this fiscal year and state fiscal years 2010 and 2011 at more than $350 billion. The trend bodes very badly for programs that benefit the poor and homeless. The leading example of state budget problems is California, which has eliminated funding for emergency housing assistance this year as it struggles to pare its $40 billion deficit.
In Ventura County just north of Los Angeles, the cut of about $60,000 delivered an immediate blow to three homeless operations. The largest, a winter shelter run by St. Vincent de Paul that provides beds for 100 people, was forced to cut 30 nights from its schedule.
"Because they operate on a shoestring, it's a significant hit to them," says Karen Schulkin, program coordinator for homeless services in the county. "The winter shelter at the National Guard Armory can only stay open for the number of days they have funding for."
Local government funding often provides seed money for nonprofits, who leverage it to drum up foundation money and other donations. So, according to Bean of the Nonprofit Roundtable of Greater Washington, the local deficit - about $1.5 billion in the case of D.C. and surrounding areas - could present an even bigger problem than the uncertainty over the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Foundation.
"This will put a huge strain on the ability to invest in the safety net. ...The challenge for a lot of nonprofits is that local government support will be down, foundations will be down," says Bean. "The question will be what happens with individual donations."
Shelter in Danville re-opens for business
To be sure, out of the crisis come tales of inspired giving as communities scramble to raise new funding. The town of Danville in southern Virginia rallied to reopen a shelter that closed at the end of December after 15 years in operation. A drive prompted a $20,000 anonymous gift, which was more than matched by dozens of other local contributions. By Jan. 22, the money and a new director were in place to reopen the 20-bed shelter-offering some reprieve, at least, in a town with an estimated 150 homeless.
"The people of Danville ... opened up their hearts and pocketbooks with $23,100 in matching funds," reports Pastor Donnie Anderson of the Riveroak Church of God, who spearheaded the fundraising. "We are so grateful! The shelter is open as House of Hope and is ready for any who may need a warm place to stay and hot meals to eat."
On Capitol Hill, as part of the $819 billion economic stimulus package, Congress included a boost in funding for emergency shelters. The $1.5 billion provision doubles the annual federal funding for alleviating homelessness. In addition, the bill includes $200 million to help people who are behind on mortgage or rent payments.
The bill, now being debated in the Senate, is "a good step forward," says Maria Foscarinis, executive director of National Law Center on Poverty and Homelessness. But the organization is also calling for the federal government to renew its commitment to affordable housing, which she says ended with large cuts for low-income housing in the 1980s. The NLCPH calls for Congress to make a large infusion of funding to the National Housing Trust Fund, tasked with building affordable housing.
"The growing gap between wages and housing costs has long been hard for low-income people," says Foscarinis. "Now we're seeing people who are middle-income who are being squeezed."
While that debate continues, local churches and homeless activists are still trying to revive the CityTeam shelter, though hope for a breakthrough is dwindling.
Glen Dennis was lucky. His former CityTeam friends dusted him off after his relapse and helped him get into a rehab program at Bread of Life Ministry in downtown Seattle. He is starting over again.
Charles Capizano, who lives with three other graduates of the rehab program in a house secured for them by Bread of Life, is cautiously planning his future, but worries about the many people who scattered when the shelter closed.
"Once you lose everything, it's very hard to get back to the surface again," he says. "You get a good lead on a job and you think, 'how am I going to get there, how can I dress for work?' Not having a place to cycle out of that is really tough."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
32 Comments so far
Show AllShelters and related services for the homeless are facing funding shortfalls as the downturn takes its toll on state budgets and corporate donations. And while individual donors in many cases are keeping up gifts - or even digging a little deeper for charities that help with urgent needs like food and shelter - the service providers say they are faced with a rapidly growing demand from people losing jobs and homes in the economic crisis. Everyone needs emergency funds at times. Emergency funds come in handy when you have a situation that pops up out of the blue – like they always do – and during emergencies it seems like you don't have many options. An emergency credit option is a payday loan, otherwise known as a short-term loan. It's a small loan that you pay back on your next payday, or in installments over a short period, a month or so. If you don't want to use credit cards or don't want to get an exorbitant bank loan, you can get a payday loan for emergency funds.
All that talk about Welfare Queens driving Cadillacs. Here's what, if you want help now, your car may only be worth - $500.- to qualify for modern-day welfare.
Once we get health and education, everything else will fall into place.
I lived in Seattle. I knew most of the homeless people in the district I lived in at that time as well as quite a few of the homeless in the downtown area. I liked spending time with them as they were good company, interesting stories to tell, chip in on what they needed to buy to get themselves through their day. Once they trusted me they would give me money they begged to go to the store for them as the store owners did not want them in their stores.
I actually got a bit terse with a store owner who started belitting one of my friends who came a bit into the store as I was making a purchase for him. I tended to get a bit terse with anyone belitting the homeless in my presence.
And Jesus said they will come to him saying, but Lord when did we see you naked? When did we see you hungry? When did we know that you were in jail? Jesus said for as you have done unto the least of these so you have done unto me.
In the story of the rich man & the begger Lazarus it was the rich man who ended up in the fires begging for water while the begger Lazarus ended up in the bossom of Abram that is symbolic of the Kingdom of God.
Thomas and Penelope,
I would find it difficult to enjoy a play or a musical corral if my stomach was empty, had no roof over my head, worrying about my carbon print on the world would not even enter my mind if I was freezing to death.
The answer is not money being thrown to the "arts", nor is the concern for some of the other "stimulus" benefits that is being bandied about. We need to start over again and find what really is important. Healthcare, food, housing, these are the measuring sticks for a society. If people do not have access to be healthy then the ability to earn money to buy the other two necesseities of food and housing become moot points. At the core of this economic crisis, is the need to recognize our mutual humanity, if people would care more for "the other", a community develops which is based on respect, caring and concern that would be matched by everyone in that community.
Big is not always better. That need of being bigger and richer is at its core one of the chief reasons we are in the mess that we are in. Denial of others so only to enrich ourselves is a reason why our society has gotten so polorized and fragmented, its one of the reasons why "everybody" is standing around watching Rome burn not knowing or perhaps caring how to stop the flames from spreading. We need to rekindle the capacity to go out of ourselves to help others, in so doing, we will find ourselves and save ourselves and our country.
tommytoons
While I'd agree with the tone of your post, I believe that what people need are jobs, jobs that will allow them the freedom to choose. And I believe before the year is out, jobs will be a much more prevelent need.
"If people do not have access to be healthy then the ability to earn money to buy the other two necesseities of food and housing become moot points. At the core of this economic crisis, is the need to recognize our mutual humanity"
Absolutely correct. No job....no access
"I would find it difficult to enjoy a play or a musical corral if my stomach was empty, had no roof over my head, worrying about my carbon print on the world would not even enter my mind if I was freezing to death."
The the stark truth.
Of course people need these basics, that is a given.
Speaking personally, now- I am unemployed, my cupboard is bare (peanut butter and crackers, some cheese) and yet, doing, looking, at art keeps me going, makes me want to get out of bed in the morning.
There are those of us who need art as much as we need air to breathe.
Art programs with Viet Nam & Iraq war veterans, prisoners and yes, homeless people and youth (not just school children) help all of these participants to cope with the hard realities of their lives, as well as bring their lives to attention and sharp focus for those of us who are better off.
Sometimes, to do these worthy programs means that the artist/coordinator must be paid (artists deserve to eat, too) or that supplies must be purchased.
I still believe that the arts belong in an economic stimulus package!!
HUD has directed local organizations to diligently count their homeless to determine allocations of future grants.Hope they're serious,quite different from the farce years ago[wasn't it during Pappy's regime?]where they ordered the federal employees to avoid going to places they might find the homeless.
What Madoff alone stole would be far more than was spent on low income housing during 8 years of the Wanker's misrule.
If this depression isn't halted soon,we'll have as many as 10 million people homeless within a year.Should it get that bad,would these multi-billionaires who claim to be Christians help? Or would all the anguish around them just be to much to bear and they flee the country?
What does it take to provide a roof over every head and a chicken in every pot?
Uncle Scam's looting of our treasury?
The price of an illegal oil war?
A few Wall Street bonuses?
Madoff's plunder?
Bank bailouts?
I suspect any of the above would do it.
Jeevee
Why, "...a chicken in every pot"? If you're serious, don't you know that factory farms and their ilk are responsible for the misery of so many humans: dangerous deterioration of the environment, exponential population growth, rapid increase of diseases, etc., etc.?
Screw the corporate donations. Tax the corporate elites properly and let the government provide proper housing for the homeless. The corporations probably write-off their "donations" from the little taxes they presently pay, so as always, it's the working class that ends up paying to look after their brothers and sisters.
-----------------------------------------
Remember the butchery in Gaza by the IDF.
Mainstream churches, the kind that cover whole blocks in downtown, were built and are maintained by these upper class Christians who would tell those guys in the picture to get off their asses and get a job.
The religious rich believe they are entitled to their position of wealth and privilege because God is pleased with them. Not a new idea, but one that has allowed them with a clear conscience to strive for a second billion as proof of their superiority rather than try to provide the necessities of life to everyone---a true entitlement.
The rich are not like the rest of us not only because they have more money but because they feel no responsibility to share any significant portion of their wealth. They get their names on hospital wings by throwing what to them are pennies to conspicuous charities.
Most of them are Republicans who have never read the OT prophet Amos or the sermon on the mount. What they care about is gaining complete control over the poor: No to abortion, birth control, welfare (except the corporate kind), education, health care, mental health programs,...
Nobody in this society should have to try living on minimum wage, and the richer they are the harder they fight any increase.
I have attended two churches in which inspiring ministers who preach against the grain have been booted by the board. One was for civil rights in the early sixties and one preached sharing wealth to an upscale congregation.
Joe
Nietzsche --------- Quite a few generalisations. I understand the frustration of living in this insane predatory society but saying wealthy -- bad heart; poor --- good heart is not describing reality. Many wealthy people openly say they are quite willing to be taxed at a higher rate. There are all sorts of wealthy people and all sorts of poor people. Morality does not reside in wealth or lack of wealth. One positive purpose of society is to make everyone prosperous (which one might easily consider the same as wealthy).
The taxrate should go back to 90% for the most wealthy, and coporations should, always pay taxes on profits, lose personhood and not be allowed to lobby. There should be birth to death free healthcare, education,for all and child care and housing as needed.
I don't care if the rich are nice guys. It's the fact that their obscene wealth denies others---maybe not as nice as they are, but sentient beings nevertheless--- food, shelter, and health care.
Nobody needs to tell me how coarse and common, even vicious a person can be who is raised in poverty and works his heart out living in a shack to make his boss rich.
High class or low class people without exception are desperately poor; they lack compassion, self respect, respect for anyone or anything. But in general the poor are willing to share what little they have. They can more easily put themselves in the place of someone in need
I don't know why the peasants aren't storming the castle, or capitol, with pitchforks and torches.
I do. Our new improved militarized PIGS aided by Blackwater, Wackenhut, the US Army and whatever other Nazi groups would KILL us!!! Welcome to AmeriKKKa!!!
diablorojo-The peasants will storm the castle when within their lifetimes, their own memories, a majority see their standard of living plummet-before their very eyes.
When enough homes, cars, retirements, savings and access to health care slip away for enough people, a critical mass will develop and the gates will be knocked down by commandeered Waste Management trucks, which will be filled with the elite scum that ripped us off- the will then be compacted and dumped with other waste.
Enough people at 40 yrs seeing that what they once had at 30 yrs is now gone, disappeared-as Gulfstreams fly over their heads. That will do it.
Ain't been a revolution in a capitalist-industrial country yet......the question is when though. azjoe.
It's a combination of ignorance, social control, fear, and apathy. Activism has been equated with hippyism and drug culture by the popular media, which has undermined legitimate causes by associating them with begging for welfare and irresponsibility.
They are powerless, discouraged, downtrodden and beaten by a culture that has told them if they don't have everything they want, it's no one's fault but their own. They are also divided and amotivated. "Why bother? Nothing will change">
They storm only when it comes to social hot button issues and then they only butcher people in their own class instead of the elites. As Thomas Frank calls it, a French Revolution in reverse.
They're too busy watching TV.
Jeevee
Our great Indian guru rightly causes TV, "Telepoison". Is that the reason we have so many dults (so-called "adults") among us, not to mention the astronomical crime rate? And the overwhelming urge to go "faster, Faster, FASTER..."?
Greed is an endless forest fire, that burns up everything in its path.
The money Congress is apparently getting ready to spend has little to help ordinary people.
Money to study "climate change", money for the "arts"....just another pork laden, spending bill filled with special interest goodies. The Democrats lack any kind of leadership and President Obama could lose his good will quickly if it goes forward.
Our food pantry is struggling again and so is our local Family Assistance group that provides clothing, help with utilities in an emergency, etc. People are giving more than last year but we can't keep up, the demand is rising all the time. Our shelves at the Food Pantry are half filled this morning and the weekend is coming up.
Texas is in better shape than most other states so God only knows how bad it is other places. But if you can, please give anything you can out of your pantry you may not use. Check the dates on cans, etc to see if they are almost out of date and if you think you may not use them in time, please take them to your local Food Pantry.
The idea that executives are drawing bonus money from bailout dollars is obscene. Just reading the column about my beloved Molly Ivins, I could tell you what she'd say, but it would burn your monitor up.
Ouch!! Thomas, I have to take exception to your dig at the "arts".
It is well known now (the research has proven) that the arts (music, dance, visual art) contribute heavily to whether children will succeed academically and in life.
Not to mention that artists provide enrichment, meaning and life's joys and (OK) even sheer entertainment to the entire community.
in 2009, funding the NEA (National Endowment of the Arts) at a decent level, as Obama's stimulus plan proposed to do, would only bring back a small smidgen of what the right wing has taken away in the last twenty years.
The U.S. has a terible record of supporting the arts, particularly in comparison to Canada and Europe.
In no way can the arts- an enormous section of our economy- be defined as "pork"!!
Penelope
Not a dig at the arts at all. But the funding for NEA does not under any circumstances belong in an economic stimulas package, any more than money for an anti smoking campaign or 75 million for a school lunch program worthwhile as they might be.
As you point out the Arts are a very important part of life, especially for children, especially in the early grades. I remember to this day a 4th grade trip to SMU to listen to the Dallas Symphony Orchestra practice and the same for the 5th grade to the Margo Jones Theater to watch a play rehersal. Remember that like it was yesterday and I believe accounts for my love of classical music (especially Mozart)
Except for the "dig remark" I wouldn't disagree with a single thing you said.
But these should stand in their own bills or an appropriate group bill. By putting every piece of special interest funding in this bill, it simply becomes what the Republicans have been doing. And adding something inappropriate to a bill that doesn't belong there just to get it passed, I would argue could be called pork. No matter how worthy the funding.
So...not guilty your honor! Not throwing rocks at the arts, but at business as usual on the hill.
But hey no worries, the Wall Street thugs got their (US taxpayer funded) bonuses on time.
Obama says he's outraged at WS for getting obscene bonuses but somehow I doubt he'll even touch the issue with a 100 ft pole when push comes to shove.
If he doesn't start doing something he is going to lose his support. Talk is cheap, patience is short.
This is just another indicator of the failing economy. How deep this recession will cut is anyone's guess, but it's sad that the most vulnerable in our society are the one's affected first. That the fed gov't is bailing out banks and auto companies instead of people who really need help is a travesty. Heads should roll. When are people going to wake up and take action?
If I won the lottery today does that mean I should be killed tommorrow? If I got paid big bucks for inventing a new battery after thirty years of hard research should I be executed when I cash the check? If my parents leave me money should I be hung?
It is the system that is rotten not the people!
The answer to your questions is obviously no, but do you really think that the people responsible for running the economy into the ditch should be rewarded like they are? To say that it's something abstractive like the system, is a cop out. Gross human malignant negligence shouldn't be excused. Sorry, but call me old fashioned.