Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Congress Considers Broadening Justice Department Inquiry

by Greg Gordon / Margaret Talev

WASHINGTON - Congressional investigators are beginning to focus on accusations that a top civil rights official at the Justice Department illegally hired lawyers based on their political affiliations, especially for sensitive voting rights jobs.

Two former department lawyers told McClatchy Newspapers that Bradley Schlozman, a senior civil rights official, told them in early 2005, after spotting mention of their Republican affiliations on their job applications, to delete those references and resubmit their resumes. Both attorneys were hired.

One of them, Ty Clevenger, said: “He wanted to make it look like it was apolitical.”

Schlozman did not respond to phone calls to his home Sunday. But he denied the allegations in an earlier phone interview with McClatchy Newspapers and through a department spokesman. In the interview he said he “tried to de-politicize the hiring process” and filled jobs with applicants from “across the political spectrum.”

Attention is turning to Schlozman after the announcement last week that the Justice Department opened an internal investigation to determine whether Monica Goodling, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ White House liaison, illegally took party affiliation into account in hiring entry-level prosecutors. The department’s inspector general and its Office of Professional Responsibility are conducting that inquiry jointly.

Federal law and Justice Department policies bar the consideration of political affiliation in hiring of personnel for non-political, career jobs.

A congressional aide, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that the House and Senate Judiciary Committees want to look beyond Goodling to see whether other department officials may have skewed recruiting and hiring to favor Republican applicants. Investigators have heard allegations that Schlozman showed a political bias in hiring and hope the department will permit him to be interviewed voluntarily, the aide said.

Sen. Claire McCaskell, D-Mo., told National Public Radio last week that she wants to hear testimony from Schlozman because “more answers under oath need to be given.”

One of the former Justice Department employees, Clevenger, is pursuing a whistleblower suit alleging he was wrongly fired for exposing mistreatment of employees by his Special Litigation Section chief.

Clevenger and the other lawyer recounted Schlozman’s odd handling of their job applications in the spring of 2005. Clevenger said his resume stated that he was a member of the conservative Federalist Society and the Texas chapter of the Republican National Lawyers Association. The other applicant’s resume cited work on President Bush’s 2000 campaign, said the attorney, who insisted upon anonymity for fear of retaliation.

They said Schlozman directed them to drop the political references and resubmit the resumes in what they believed were an effort to hide those conservative affiliations.

Clevenger also recalled once passing on to Schlozman the name of a friend from Stanford as a possible hire.

“Schlozman called me up and asked me something to the effect of, `Is he one of us?’” Clevenger said. “He wanted to know what the guy’s partisan credentials were.”

Schlozman, who recently completed more than a year’s service as interim U.S. attorney in Kansas City that was marked with controversy, has drawn harsh criticism over his conduct as the top deputy in the Civil Rights Division starting in 2003 and a term of roughly seven months as its acting chief beginning in the spring of 2005.

Several former department lawyers assailed his treatment of senior employees and his rollback of longstanding policies aimed at protecting African-American voting rights. They blame him for driving veteran attorneys, including section chief Joseph Rich, to resign from their posts.

Rich recently told Congress that 15 of the 35 attorneys in the voting rights section have resigned since 2005. Former employees of the Voting Rights Section told McClatchy of at least eight hires since then of employees with conservative political connections.

The Boston Globe, which obtained resumes of civil rights hires under the Freedom of Information Act, reported Sunday that seven of 14 career lawyers hired under Schlozman were members of either the Federalist Society or the Republican National Lawyers Association.

Rich, who left the agency on April 30, 2005, and now works for the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, told McClatchy Newspapers that Schlozman was “central to implementation of the politicization of the Civil Rights Division” and said he treated career lawyers with “disdain” and “vindictiveness.”

His former deputy, Robert Kengle, told McClatchy that “Schlozman was never wrong and to even raise that possibility was asking for retribution.”

Schlozman’s hiring favored lawyers “with one primary characteristic - links to the Republican Party and right-wing groups,” said David Becker, who left the section the same day as Rich.

“The lawyers hired by Schlozman, in virtually every case, had very little litigation experience, lesser academic credentials and, if they had any civil rights experience, it was in opposing the enforcement of civil rights laws,” Becker told McClatchy.

One of those hired, Joshua Rogers, had been a law clerk for Mississippi federal Judge Charles Pickering, whom President Bush nominated for an appeals court judgeship over objections from civil rights groups.

Shortly after assuming his new job, Rogers was the lone dissenter in a staff recommendation that the department oppose a new Georgia law requiring every voter to produce a photo identification card - a law later found unconstitutional by a federal judge.

Schlozman said in the interview that staff “were only treated professionally” while he was in the Civil Rights Division and that in hiring, “I didn’t care what your ideological perspective was.”

He pointed to the recruitment of Mark Kappelhoff, a former counsel for the liberal American Civil Liberties Union, to head the division’s Criminal Section, and to the promotion of Chris Coates, a former ACLU voting counsel, to serve as the top deputy chief of the voting section.

Rich and other lawyers said politics had little or no bearing on Kappelhoff’s job - overseeing prosecution of human trafficking and police misconduct. They said Coates seemed to grow more conservative after his superiors passed him over for a promotion in favor of an African-American woman, and he filed a reverse-discrimination suit

© 2007 McClatchy Washington Bureau and wire service sources.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

5 Comments so far

  1. stepfour May 7th, 2007 1:36 pm

    We shouldn’t have to wait for Congress to act. Interfering with the prosecutorial function is a federal crime, and crimes are prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys. It’s time for responsible and professional government lawyers to start putting their bosses in jail.

  2. moonraven May 7th, 2007 3:09 pm

    You betcha!

  3. BCCM May 7th, 2007 10:08 pm

    Here is a message I posted on SCIFRAUD relating to the DoJ attorneys.

    Personal message to fired and dismissed DoJ Prosecutors.

    You cry babies. Quit complaining. It was perfectly OK for you frauds to construct fake excuses and draft fake documents to dismiss our civil rights complaint. You followed the administration appointee advice and directions on our valid complaint, why not go through with all of the fraudulent directives these nuts are putting on your plate? Is it getting scary and bizarre in the white house? You assisted the administration in violating statutory law, breach of fiduciary duty, and basically trampled on the Constitution. Did you forget you may need these same protections some day?
    Our record keeping was very meticulous and we noted how you delayed time and again sending us “your results” until after “the science President” assembled a press conference to announce a mission to the Moon and to Mars. In fact, you went to great lengths to delay your response, because you kept losing the record. You asked us to, “send it again, which we did”. Three months later you asked us to fax it because you lost it again. Then 45-60 days later you asked us to email it because yet again it was lost. I think you requested we send it an additional 3 or 4 times even though there was no material response to the initial filing. Is that a record time for a civil rights complaint? But seriously, between the time we filed the initial complaint and your fake results almost two years went by. Don’t tell me it took the administration and their industry insiders that long to come up with a comprehensive fake Moon-Mars program, while simultaneously keeping our complaint hidden from the record and public view? This fake announcement was in part implemented to cement existing relationships and prevent a mass academic exodus arising from prosecution.

    Cordially,
    S. Ray DeRusse
    www.bccmeteorites.com

  4. jungleboy May 8th, 2007 3:27 am

    Personally, I think our honorable politicians have all been dead some time and it might take some time to find just one for tomorrow. The Tibetans have it right. Breed and train one for honor!
    I wonder whats the statistics on honorable people in government positions. 1/100,000? The news paints a bad picture!

  5. kathyodat May 8th, 2007 11:26 am

    jungleboy, we do have one honorable politician stll living. The MSM are doing their best to keep his name a secret but I will share that secret with you. Dennis Kucinich. Maybe I’m being unfair to the MSM and they’re just trying to protect his life, since honorable politicians have a notoriously short life expectancy. Considering how much I admire him, I would advise him to stay away from private planes should his name become public knowledge.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org