SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
This holiday season, writes John Pavlovitz, "it’s a Herculean task to let our hearts be light." Daily, we confront the afflictions of an impossibly dark time - the cruelties wrought by a vile assemblage of hacks, liars, racists, and sadists who delight in Christmas-decked thugs menacing brown people with, "YOU'RE GOING HO HO HOME." Instead, we celebrate the judges, artists, pastors, organizers, brave pols, and regular people, aka "Radical Left Scum," refusing to bow to fascism. Go towards the light, and fuck these people.
We started this on Boxing Day - a British holiday described as the day when either gifts were given to servants and the poor or when mythical, hung-over, Scottish haggis fight it out in boxing matches, either which we'll take - feeling grateful to be more or less still standing after almost a year of brute insanity enacted by "some of the worst human beings on Planet Earth." Alas, they're still here, led by "the small, bitter man" and hateful worst of the worst who spent his sour "Christmas" trashing we the scum, hailing the end of "transgender for everyone," and ripping "the many sleazebags who loved Jeffrey Epstein" like he did. In a 100-plus-post frenzy, he then attacked Somali immigrants, urged Ilhan Omar to be deported, and urged his opponents to be jailed, called Stephen Colbert a “dead man walking” who CBS should "put to sleep," and warned, "Enjoy what may be your last Merry Christmas." One response: "Sorry, Jesus, I know it's your birthday, but Jesus fucking Christ."
Ditto to everything else, he and his underlings - underthings? - are up to, which over at the "unbiased" News Nation were unfathomably praised by one gushing fan as best summarized with the blessed return of "dignity." Which in the real world means, having ensured millions of Americans' health insurance will soar after refusing to extend ACA benefits that cost a fraction of their tax breaks to the rich, Trump continues his rampage on rational governance. He's slashed funding for climate research, victims of human trafficking, wind energy projects - in that case, after the "Department of War" declared them a made-up national security threat. After plastering his obscene name on the Kennedy Center and Institute of Peace (JFC), he's now emulating a 1950s TV show by putting it on a new, faster, yuger "Trump-class" battleship - "Our adversaries will know...American victory at sea is inevitable," one prominent admiral calls, "exactly what we don’t need.”
His flunkies are equally, grotesquely feckless. Cringey, hollow, "cynical shapeshifter" JD, who not long ago called Trump "cultural heroin" - just this once, rightly - has been cosplaying as a paunchy Navy Seal, pretending to "train" with them and posting pictures that were swiftly, savagely mocked for their performative bullshit. "Cool," said one. "When you’re done cosplaying, can you and your boss do something about housing and grocery prices?" Also, "Holy propaganda," "GI Jello," and, "You should just keep running, and I don't mean for office." The FBI's Inept Keystone Kash, after a famous jacket fiasco, flubbing two high-profile shootings and using a $60 million government jet to visit his girlfriend, just bought a custom fleet of armored BMWs so he can stay safe from the AK-47s the DOJ now wants legal in D.C., because what could go wrong? But not to worry: FBI officials say the cool new rides will save taxpayers money, because "more efficient cost structures."
Meanwhile, the GOP is infested with fascists. Rabid Goebbels Miller raves Dems equal not just communism but "the worst kind, which is DEI communism...LITERALLY a recipe for national death: "We're going to import massive numbers of illiterate refugees, and give all your wealth to them." One comment: "Some people will commit human rights violations rather than go to therapy." Hitler/Stalin fan Nick Fuentes has evidently picked up Charlie Kirk's tiki torch and attacked both J.D. for his Indian wife and son Vivek - "I'm not a racist or something but do we really believe a guy like that is gonna support white identity?" - and Vivek Ramaswamy: "It is time for you to go home..This anchor baby cannot become governor of Ohio." And after ending reunification programs for thousands of relatives of brown migrants awaiting green cards, union-busting racist ghoul Kristi Noem brags it's "amazing" 2.5 million people have left our country"; she has apparently never heard of a brain drain, state terror or MAGA being translated into, "Making America God Awful."
Finally, continuing his famous goodwill toward (white) men, the Peace President (sic) chose Christmas Day to approve military strikes against alleged Islamic State targets - "ISIS terrorist scum" - in Nigeria, charging innocent Christians are being killed. As usual, experts say the situation is far more complex, and news reports say the strikes hit either empty fields, or a peaceful village that has “no known history" of terrorist groups there. That didn't stop Pete Drunktank from braying, "The (Pentagon) is always ready, so ISIS found out tonight. Merry Christmas!" MAGA fans were gleeful at "the killing of these barbarians," calling it "an amazing Christmas present!" "I can't think of a better way to celebrate Christmas," wrote Laura Loomer. "You’ve got to love it! Death to all Islamic terrorists!" At home, their bellicose spirit spread to Indiana state senator Chris Garten, who posted AI pics of himself beating the shit out of Santa Claus - because bureaucrats? - and then ripped critics who didn't see the hilarity of it: "Some of you clowns are just insufferable." Pot/kettle redux.

The worst atrocities remain those committed at home by ICE and other federal agents: "The nightmare is happening here." The abuses are boundless. Due process and the rule of law routinely shredded. Innocent workers, parents, citizens, elderly, children, community leaders profiled, terrorized, dragged from cars, torn from families, tear-gassed, pepper-sprayed, beaten, slammed to the ground, cuffed, detained, held incommunicado, shipped to foreign concentration camps, and killed for fleeing in fear from mobs of masked, anonymous, bestial stormtroopers who see only their brown skin and feel free to do whatever the fuck they want to them. Of the tens of thousands abused, held, deported to date, the vast majority have no criminal convictions or even charges. They are roofers, landscapers, restaurant workers, teachers, kids with cancer, mothers and babies, decades-long, tax-paying residents, green-card-holders, and relatives of U.S. military, the wrong color caught in a gruesome historic moment.
Orchestrating these horrors is loathsome, soulless, cosplaying ICE Barbie, whose cruelties and transgressions moved not-a-fan Dem Rep. Bennie Thompson to practically beg her in a recent House hearing, "Do a real service to the country and just resign." "You have systematically dismantled the Department of Homeland Security," he said. "and you are making America less safe." Among other ills, he charged her with putting her own interests first, violating multiple laws, and handing friends "$220 million to follow you around the country with a camera" - in, he could have added, costumes that would make Bollywood blush. She's also spent over $50 million - out of an insane ICE budget of $76 billion, but no money for food stamps, sorry not sorry - on repulsive, often juvenile agit-prop videos aimed at bullying and terrifying immigrants into self-deporting, or unearthing enough worst-of-the-worst racist basement dwellers to take on the repugnant gig of rounding them up.
The ad campaign has been vile from the start - fake or "misleading videos of other places and people, "I love the smell of deportations in the morning" movie rip-offs, unauthorized Pokémon-inspired "Gotta catch 'em all" montages, a baffling, histrionic debacle featuring Bigfoot, Mel Gibson's Patriot, George Washington in a Chevy as "The Last Best Hope of Man on Earth," ad nauseum. Still, they pale before the depravities conjured up to rip off and suck dry the once-kindly spirit of Christmas. There were hard-sell pitches for "a fantastic gift this holiday season" - just leave already. "(DHS) announces the holiday deal of a lifetime for all illegal aliens! You will receive a free flight home for the holidays and a "$1,000 gift," later upped to $3,000, which has usually, reportedly failed to materialize. Color us shocked. There was The Deportation Express - Polar Express, get it? - it's dreamy kid looking up from a snow-covered scene with, "This holiday season, believe you can go home again."
There was foul video from Broadview, with Lana Del Rey music and protesters being attacked, with, "Womp womp, cry all you want." Thugs lined up in fatigues and Christmas gear, their tanks in lights, with, "YOU'RE GOING HO HO HOME." The Grinch, smirking and dangling handcuffs, with, "How The Illegals Stole Health Care." An obscene Trump "driving" Santa's sleigh while "dancing." An ICE Air jet taking off with, "Merry Christmas, America!" A "Message to criminal illegal aliens" offers Sinatra singing Jingle Bells with sounds of jangling handcuffs, videos of chained immigrants shuffling onto planes, and "Oh what fun it is to ride on a free flight out of our country" - this, from the official United States government social media account. Mehdi Hasan: "It’s like real-life Idiocracy." We have, indeed, come a long and sorrowful way from, "I was a stranger, and you welcomed me."
Still, hope glimmers. Many judges, even GOP-appointed, are holding the line on Kilmar Abrego Garcia, troops in our cities, gulags. Rebuking use of the Alien Enemies Act, stalwart U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled Venezuelans shipped to El Salvador’s CECOT torture camp can challenge their detentions even if they've returned to their country, and he's ordered the regime to facilitate their return to the US or give them the due process they were denied. Other judges have at least temporarily blocked ICE from arresting migrants at San Francisco courthouses; blocked Homeland Security funds being cut from blue states that oppose ICE abuses: "To hold hostage funding based on defendants’ political whims (is) unconscionable and, at least here, unlawful"; and ruled masks on goons only sow terror: “ICE goes masked for a single reason - to terrorize Americans into quiescence...Our national troops do not ordinarily wear masks...It is a matter of honor - and honor still matters.”
Even some Dem lawmakers, notably governors, are finding their spines, with over a dozen in Congress - Crockett, Padilla, Garcia, Raskin, Warren, Murphy etc - furiously speaking out. Dems have moved to unmask the goons with legislation, restored the rights of a million federal workers, and, in a memorable House hearing on Homeland Security, showed just how to destroy MAGA lies. First, Benny Thompson confronted a top FBI lackey who labeled antifa "the most immediate violent threat we’re facing." Where are their headquarters, he asked. Claptrap response: "We’re building out the infrastructure." Bennie: “What does that mean?” “Well, that’s very fluid...It’s ongoing for us to understand that." Bennie, on fire: “Sir, you wouldn’t come to this committee and say something you can’t prove, I know. But you did." Then came Rep. Seth Magaziner (R.I.) who ripped ICE Barbie a new one so effectively we were treated to the glorious spectacle of seeing her meekly, repeatedly made to grovel to her victims.
"Madame Secretary, how many US military veterans have you deported?” Magaziner began. Noem: "Sir, we have not deported US citizens or military veterans." Bingo. Cue aide with laptop. Magaziner: "We are joined on Zoom by a gentleman named Sae Joon Park," an Army combat veteran, Purple Heart recipient shot twice in Panama in 1989," and a green-card holder deported to South Korea, which he left when he was 7. And so it went. Calmly, Magaziner introduced others in the room. A Navy veteran in the Gulf War whose Irish wife came here legally 48 years ago, now detained for months. A Marine corporal whose landscaper father raised three Marine sons before he was tackled by ICE goons and detained. With each, he cuts her off mid-squawk, asks if she'll thank the good folks for their service, waits as she mumbles her thanks. "These people are not the worst of the worst," he says, before naming the biggest of the many problems with her leadership: "You don't seem to know the difference between the good guys and the bad guys." Soon after, Noem left the hearing early for another "meeting," which had been cancelled.
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Many more continue to step up. Thousands marching in frigid Minneapolis. Artists from South Park to Jesse Welles - Join ice! The L.A. jury, ensuring the DOJ loses again in court, found a tow-truck driver not guilty of "theft of government property" after he towed an ICE agent's rig. The Louisiana convenience store manager who locked out Greg Bovino and his Nazi goons, fresh from terrorizing New Orleans, when they tried to get in. "Whaddya want man, you want some chicken?" he asked through the door. "You ain't gettin' it here." He waved "bye-bye" with a middle finger. In Montreal, a gang of 40 Santas, joined by 40 elves, marched into a Metro supermarket, loaded their bags with about $3,000 of groceries, and fled into the night. The Robins des Ruelles, Robins of the Alleys, left some food under a Christmas tree at Place Valois and gave the rest to area food banks. On social media, they decried big companies "holding our basic needs hostage" as they make record profits. "For us, that's theft, and they are the real criminals," they wrote. "The hunger justifies the means."
Churches have spoken with their Nativity scenes, quoting Jesus: “Whatever you do to the least among us, you do to me." Outside Boston, a Catholic church has an empty manger, no Mary or Joseph. "ICE was here," reads a sign. "The Holy Family is safe in the Sanctuary. If you see ICE, please call LUCE." Their tradition is to "hold the mirror up to what’s happening," said Father Stephen Josoma, never mind officials' claims it's "sacrilegious." Illinois churches display Mary in a gas mask, report "Joseph didn't make it," explain, "Due to ICE activity, the Holy Family is in hiding,” offer baby Jesus wrapped in a reflective blanket, his small hands zip-tied. "More than any time in recent memory, we sit in the profound tension between the cultural cues and the condition of our hearts," writes John Pavlovitz of the season, and the need to make it "fiercely, steadfastly, unrepentantly anti-fascist." "The elemental heart of the story,“ of any righteous story, is to "defend those imperiled by the powerful." Today more than ever, "Resistance to the darkness (is) the entire point."
Eleven Democrats on Thursday voted with nearly all Republicans in the US House of Representatives to advance a permitting reform bill that climate and frontline organizations warn is a "disastrous" attack on a landmark environmental protection law.
Democratic Reps. Jim Costa (Calif.), Henry Cuellar (Texas), Don Davis (NC), Chris Deluzio (Pa.), Lizzie Fletcher (Texas), Jared Golden (Maine), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Adam Gray (Calif.), John Mannion (NY), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.), and Marc Veasey (Texas) voted with all Republicans present expect Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.) to pass the bill.
The Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act, spearheaded by Golden and House Committee on Natural Resources Chair Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.), would amend the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which "is often called the 'Magna Carta' of federal environmental laws."
In a statement after the vote, Food & Water Watch legal director Tarah Heinzen said that "for decades, NEPA has ensured logical decision-making and community involvement when the federal government considers projects that could harm people and the environment. The SPEED Act would eviscerate NEPA's protections."
The group detailed key ways in which the SPEED Act attacks NEPA:
"Today's absurd House vote is yet another handout to corporate polluters at the expense of everyday people who have to live with the real-world impacts of toxic pollution from dirty industries like fossil fuels and factory farms," Heinzen argued. "This nonsense must be dead on arrival in the Senate."
Other campaigners also looked to the upper chamber after the vote. Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, executive director of the Western Environmental Law Center, said that "renewable energy and climate advocates in the Senate must hold the line against the SPEED Act's evisceration of our bedrock environmental and community protection law."
Allie Rosenbluth, Oil Change International's US campaign manager, stressed that "our senators must stand up against the SPEED Act's attempts to undermine democratic decision-making, pollute our communities, and threaten our collective future."
For a Better Bayou's James Hiatt similarly said that "the SPEED Act protects corporate interests, not the public, and it should be rejected by any senator who claims to stand with the people."
Anthony Karefa Rogers-Wright, co-coordinator of Black Alliance for Peace's Climate, Environment, and Militarism Initiative, warned that the bill "represents yet another assault on the health of frontline, Black, Brown, Indigenous, and poor white communities that have been designated as sacrifice zones by big polluters who bribe lawmakers with big money to continue a culture of extract, slash, burn, and emit at the expense of oppressed and marginalized peoples."
"Rather than speeding up the approval of dirty projects, Congress should increase funding for federal agencies and grassroots organizations accountable to frontline communities to carry out legally defensible and accurate environmental analyses," he continued, pointing to the Environmental Justice for All Act, previously led by the late Democratic Congressmen Raúl Grijalva (Ariz.) and Donald McEachin (Va.).
Mar Zepeda Salazar, legislative director at Climate Justice Alliance, also pointed to that alternative: "The SPEED Act fast-tracks harmful fossil fuel and polluting projects, not the community-led clean energy solutions families and Indigenous peoples across the country have long called for. Instead of pushing the SPEED Act—a bill that would strip away what few legal protections communities still have, weaken safeguards for clean air, land, and water near new industrial development, and sidestep meaningful consultation with federally recognized tribal nations—Congress should be advancing real, community-driven permitting reform."
"Examples include the Environmental Justice for All Act, which lays out meaningful public engagement, strong public health protections, respect for tribal sovereignty and consultation obligations, and serious investments in agencies and staff," she said.
Representatives from the Institute for Policy Studies, Sacred Places Institute for Indigenous Peoples, and Unitarian Universalists for Social Justice also spoke out against what David Watkins, director of government affairs for the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, condemned as "a sizable holiday gift basket for Big Oil and Gas." He, too, urged the Senate to "reject this retrograde legislation and stand up to the deep-pocketed, polluting industries lobbying for it."
Lauren Pagel, policy director at Earthworks, pointed out that passing the SPEED Act wasn't the only way in which the House on Thursday "chose corporate interests over people, Indigenous Peoples' rights, and our environment." It also passed the Mining Regulatory Clarity Act, which "will remove already-scarce protections for natural resources and sacred cultural sites in US mining law."
"Today's House votes are a step backwards for our nation, but we continue to stand firm for the rights of the people and places on the frontlines of oil, gas, and mining," Pagel said. "Communities and ecosystems shouldn't pay the price while corporations rush to profit off extraction—with a helping hand from our elected officials."
Along with those two pieces of legislation, Public Citizen pointed to the House's approval of the Power Plant Reliability Act and Reliable Power Act earlier this week. David Arkush, director of the consumer advocacy group's Climate Program, said that the bills advancing through Congress "under the guise of 'bipartisan permitting reform' are blatant handouts to the fossil fuel and mining industries."
"We need real action to lower energy bills for American families and combat the climate crisis," Arkush asserted, calling on congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump "to fast-track a buildout of renewable energy, storage, and transmission—an approach that would not just make energy more affordable and sustainable, but create US jobs and bolster competitiveness with China, which is rapidly outpacing the US on the energy technologies of the future."
US Rep. Ro Khanna defended California's proposed tax on extreme wealth Saturday after a pair of prominent Silicon Valley venture capitalists threatened to launch a primary bid for his California House seat.
The proposal, which advocates are gathering signatures to place on the ballot in 2026, would impose a one-time 5% tax on those with net worths over $1 billion to recoup about $90 billion in Medicaid funds stripped from the state by this year’s Republican budget law. The roughly 200 billionaires affected would have five years to pay the tax.
While higher taxes on the superrich are overwhelmingly popular with Americans, the proposal has rankled many of California’s wealthiest residents, as well as California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who said earlier this month that he’s “adamantly” against the measure.
On Friday, the New York Times reported that two of the valley's biggest powerbrokers—venture capitalist and top Trump administration ally Peter Thiel and Google co-founder Larry Page—were threatening to reduce their ties to California in response to the tax proposal.
This has been a common refrain from elites faced with proposed tax increases, though data suggests they rarely follow through on their threats to bail on cities and states, even when those hikes are implemented. Meanwhile, the American Prospect has pointed out that the one-time tax would still apply to those who moved out of the Golden State.
Khanna (D-Calif.), who is both a member of the House's progressive faction and a longtime darling of the tech sector, has increasingly sparred with industry leaders in recent years over their reactionary stances on labor rights, regulation, and taxation.
In a post on X, the congressman reacted with derision at the threats of billionaire flight: "Peter Thiel is leaving California if we pass a 1% tax on billionaires for five years to pay for healthcare for the working class facing steep Medicaid cuts. I echo what [former President Franklin D. Roosevelt] said with sarcasm of economic royalists when they threatened to leave, 'I will miss them very much.'"
Casado, who donated to Khanna’s 2024 reelection campaign according to OpenSecrets, complained that “Ro has done a speed run, alienating every moderate I know who has supported him, including myself.”
"Beyond being totally out of touch with [the moderate] faction of his base, he’s devolved into an obnoxious jerk," Casado continued. "At least that makes voting him the fuck out all the more gratifying."
Casado's post received a reply from another former Khanna donor, Garry Tan, the CEO of the tech startup accelerator Y Combinator.
"Time to primary him," Tan said of Khanna.
Tan, a self-described centrist Democrat, has never run for office before. But he is notorious for his social media tirades against local progressives in San Francisco and was one of the top financial backers of the corporate-led push to oust the city's liberal former district attorney, Chesa Boudin, in 2022.
Casado replied: "Count me in. Happy to be involved at any level."
Progressive commentator Krystal Ball marveled that “Tech oligarchs are now openly conspiring against Ro Khanna because he dared to back a modest wealth tax.”
So far, neither Casado nor Tan has hinted at any concrete plans to challenge Khanna in 2026. If they did, defeating him would likely be a tall order—since his sophomore election in 2018, a primary challenger has never come within 30 points of unseating him.
But Khanna still felt the need to respond to the brooding tech royals. He noted that he has "supported a modest wealth tax since the day I ran in 2016," which prompted another angry retort from Casado, who accused the congressman of "antagonizing the people who made your district the amazing place it is" with a tax on billionaires.
Khanna hit back at his critics with a lengthy defense of not just the wealth tax, but his conception of what he calls "pro-innovation progressivism."
"My district is $18 trillion, nearly one-third of the US stock market in a 50-mile radius. We have five companies with a market cap over $1 trillion," Khanna said. "If I can stand up for a billionaire tax, this is not a hard position for 434 other [House] members or 100 senators."
"The seminal innovation in tech is done by thousands, often with public funds," Khanna continued. "Yes, we need entrepreneurs to commercialize disruptive innovation... But the idea that they would not start companies to make billions, or take advantage of an innovation cluster, if there is a 1-2% tax on their staggering wealth defies common sense and economic theory."
"We cannot have a nation with extreme concentration of wealth in a few places, but where 70% of Americans believe the American dream is dead and healthcare, childcare, housing, education is unaffordable," he concluded. "What will stifle American innovation, what will make us fall behind China, is if we see further political dysfunction and social unrest, if we fail to cultivate the talent in every American and in every city and town... So, yes, a billionaire tax is good for American innovation, which depends on a strong and thriving American democracy."
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday endorsed an effort in California to impose a one-time tax on the wealth of the state's billionaires, a grassroots campaign that has drawn opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and powerful investors.
Sanders (I-Vt.) said the proposed ballot initiative, which is currently in the signature-gathering phase, "is a model that should be emulated throughout the country." The senator said he plans to introduce a proposal for a national wealth tax in the near future.
"In my view, in a democratic society, we cannot continue to tolerate a rigged economy in which 60% of our people live paycheck to paycheck—struggling to pay for housing, food, and healthcare while the top 1% now owns more wealth than the bottom 93%," Sanders said in a statement posted to social media. "We must not continue a trend in which, over the past 50 years, $79 trillion in wealth in our country has been redistributed from the bottom 90% to the top 1%."
Yes: We need a wealth tax on billionaires. pic.twitter.com/2OUwSos5De
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) December 30, 2025
If placed on the November 2026 ballot and approved by voters, the California Billionaire Tax Act would levy a single 5% tax on the wealth of the roughly 200 billionaires who reside in the state. Those subject to the tax would have the option of paying the amount owed all at once or over a period of five years.
Organizers say the measure would generate $100 billion in revenue, which the state could use to avert a looming healthcare crisis fueled by the unprecedented Medicaid cuts that US President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans enacted over the summer.
“California is facing massive federal healthcare cuts—$20 to $30 billion a year for the next five years," said Suzanne Jimenez, chief of staff of Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, a top supporter of the proposed ballot initiative.
"The billionaire tax would raise dollar-for-dollar emergency funding of $100 billion through a one-time 5% tax on the worldwide net worth of California’s billionaires," Jimenez added. "Any reductions in state income tax would be negligible in comparison to the billions that will be raised by the billionaire tax. And billionaires would still be taxed at lower rates than were in effect under President Reagan."
"We need a tax system that demands that the billionaire class finally pays their fair share of taxes."
Last week, California Attorney General Rob Bonta formally issued the title and summary of the proposed initiative as prominent billionaires—including Peter Thiel and Larry Page—threatened to leave the state over the measure, which would apply retroactively to those living in California as of January 1, 2026. Thiel is facing a potential $1.2 billion tax, while Page would have to pay roughly $12 billion.
The New York Times reported last week that Newsom, "who has been close with people like Mr. Page, is raising money for a committee to oppose the measure."
"The committee received a $100,000 donation from the venture capitalist Ron Conway in November, according to state campaign finance records," the Times added.
Other lawmakers from the state are supporting the measure, including US Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents Silicon Valley.
Sanders, in his Tuesday statement, applauded Khanna, saying he is "absolutely right to support this effort."
"From a moral, economic, and political perspective, our nation will not thrive when so few own so much while so many have so little," said Sanders. "We need a tax system that demands that the billionaire class finally pays their fair share of taxes."
After a US judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from detaining one of the European anti-disinformation advocates hit with a travel ban earlier this week, Imran Ahmed suggested that he is being targeted because artificial intelligence and social media companies "are increasingly under pressure as a result of organizations like mine."
Ahmed is the CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). The 47-year-old Brit lives in Washington, DC with his wife and infant daughter, who are both US citizens. While the Trump administration on Tuesday also singled out Clare Melford of the Global Disinformation Index, Josephine Ballon and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg of HateAid, and Thierry Breton, a former European commissioner who helped craft the Digital Services Act, Ahmed is reportedly the only one currently in the United States.
On Wednesday, Ahmed, who is a legal permanent resident, sued top Trump officials including US Attorney General Pam Bondi, Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting Director Todd Lyons, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
"Rather than disguise its retaliatory motive, the federal government was clear that Mr. Ahmed is being 'SANCTIONED' as punishment for the research and public reporting carried out by the nonprofit organization that Mr. Ahmed founded and runs," the complaint states. "In other words, Mr. Ahmed faces the imminent prospect of unconstitutional arrest, punitive detention, and expulsion for exercising his basic First Amendment rights."
"The government's actions are the latest in a string of escalating and unjustifiable assaults on the First Amendment and other rights, one that cannot stand basic legal scrutiny," the filing continues. "Simply put, immigration enforcement—here, immigration detention and threatened deportation—may not be used as a tool to punish noncitizen speakers who express views disfavored by the current administration."
Just a day later, Judge Vernon Broderick, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the administration from arresting or detaining Ahmed. The judge also scheduled a conference for Monday afternoon.
The US Department of State said Thursday that "the Supreme Court and Congress have repeatedly made clear: The United States is under no obligation to allow foreign aliens to come to our country or reside here."
Ahmed's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said that "the federal government can't deport a green-card holder like Imran Ahmed, with a wife and young child who are American, simply because it doesn't like what he has to say."
In the complaint and interviews published Friday, Ahmed pointed to his group's interactions with Elon Musk, a former member of the Trump and administration and the richest person on Earth. He also controls the social media platform X, which sued CCDH in 2023.
"We were sued by Elon Musk a couple of years ago, unsuccessfully; a court found that he was trying to impinge on our First Amendment rights to free speech by using law to try and silence our accountability work," Ahmed told the BBC.
Months after a federal judge in California threw out that case last year, Musk publicly declared "war" on the watchdog.
CCDH's work is being targeted by the U.S. State Department trying to sanction and deport our CEO, Imran Ahmed. This is an unconstitutional attempt to silence anyone who dares to criticize social media giants. But a federal judge has temporarily blocked his detention.More in BBC ⤵️
[image or embed]
— Center for Countering Digital Hate (@counterhate.com) December 26, 2025 at 4:05 PM
"What it has been about is companies that simply do not want to be held accountable and, because of the influence of big money in Washington, are corrupting the system and trying to bend it to their will, and their will is to be unable to be held accountable," Ahmed told the Guardian. "There is no other industry, that acts with such arrogance, indifference, and a lack of humility and sociopathic greed at the expense of people."
Ahmed explained that he spent Christmas away from his wife and daughter because of the Trump administration's track record of quickly sending targeted green-card holders far away from their families. He said: "I chose to take on the biggest companies in the world, to hold them accountable, to speak truth to power. There is a cost attached to that. My family understands that."
The British newspaper noted that when asked whether he thought UK politicians should use X, the former Labour Party adviser told the Press Association, "Politicians have to make decisions for themselves, but every time they post on X, they are putting a buck in Mr. Musk's pocket and I think they need to question their own consciences and ask themselves whether or not they think they can carry on doing that."
Ahmed also said that it was "telling that Mr. Musk was one of the first and most vociferous in celebrating the press release" about the sanctions against him and the others.
"He said it was great, and it is great, but not for the reasons that he thinks," the campaigner said. "Because what it has actually done is give a chance for the system to show that the advocacy that we do is both important and protected by the First Amendment."
President Donald Trump—who has bombed more countries than any US leader in history—once again lamented what he considers his snub for the Nobel Peace Prize during a Monday meeting with fugitive Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
In an apparent hot mic moment, Trump, seemingly unaware that there were reporters in the room, speaks to Netanyahu and other Israeli and US officials gathered at the president's Mar-a-Lago club in Florida about the "35 years of fighting" between two unspecified countries that he "stopped."
"Do I get credit for it? No," Trump says, adding before being interrupted by Netanyahu, "They gave the Nob..."
As something of a consolation prize, Netanyahu said Monday that he's awarding Trump with the Israel Prize, that nation's highest cultural honor. Trump will be the first foreign leader to receive the award.
Football's global governing body also gave Trump its inaugural—and widely derided—FIFA Peace Prize earlier this month in recognition of the administration's role in brokering an end to international conflicts.
"I did eight of them," Trump said during the hot mic—likely referring to the number of wars he falsely claims to have ended—before seeming to notice the journalists and changing the subject.
Trump ranting to Netanyahu on a hot mic: "Do I get credit for it? No. They gave the Nob-- I did 8 of them. How about India and Pakistan? So I did 8 of them. And then I'll tell you the rest of it."
[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) December 29, 2025 at 10:57 AM
Trump did nine of them—as in the number of countries he's bombed, breaking former President Barack Obama's record of seven. Over the course of his two terms, Trump has ordered the bombing of Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen, as well as boats allegedly transporting drugs in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean.
Thousands of civilians have been killed or wounded during these campaigns, according to experts.
Trump has recently deployed warships and thousands of US troops near Venezuela, which could become the next country attacked by a the self-described "the most anti-war president in history."
The US president has also backed Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, which has left more than 250,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million others forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened. Israel's conduct in the war is the subject of an ongoing International Court of Justice genocide case filed by South Africa.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu and his former defense minister Yoav Gallant are wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, including murder and forced starvation.
“He is a wartime prime minister. He’s done a phenomenal job," Trump said while standing with Netanyahu later on Monday. "He’s taken Israel through a very dangerous period of trauma."
He is also accused of prolonging the Gaza war to forestall a reckoning in his domestic corruption trial, in which Trump has intervened by requesting a pardon.
“Israel, with other people, might not exist right now," Trump added. "If you had the wrong prime minister, Israel right now would not exist.”
“This is truly the honor and privilege of a lifetime," the new mayor said.
Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani was sworn in as New York City's mayor early Thursday inside an abandoned subway station, capping off the rise to power of a former state assembly member whose laser focus on affordability, willingness to challenge establishment corruption, and adept use of social media inspired the electorate—including many previous nonvoters.
Mamdani's choice of location for the swearing-in ceremony, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, symbolized his commitment to restoring a city "that dared to be both beautiful and build great things that would transform working people’s lives," the mayor said in a statement.
During his campaign, Mamdani pledged to pursue a number of ambitious changes that he and his team will now begin the work of trying to implement, from fast and free buses to a $30 minimum wage to universal childcare—an agenda that would be funded by higher taxes on large corporations and the wealthiest 1% of New Yorkers.
“Happy New Year to New Yorkers both inside this tunnel and above,” Mamdani said in brief remarks at the ceremony. “This is truly the honor and privilege of a lifetime.”
This is now the official account of Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Welcome to a new era for NYC. pic.twitter.com/sDyiGWUVeb
— Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@NYCMayor) January 1, 2026
Much of Mamdani's agenda would require action from the city legislature. But in the weeks leading up to his swearing-in, members of Mamdani's team scoured city statutes looking for ways Mamdani could use his mayoral authority to lower prices quickly.
In an interview with Vox earlier this week, Mamdani said that enacting his agenda is "not just critically important because you’re fulfilling what animated so many to engage with the campaign, to support the campaign, but also because of the impact it can have on New Yorkers’ lives."
"There’s a lot of politics where it feels like it’s a contest around narrative, that when you win something, it’s just for the story that you can tell of what you won, but so many working people can’t feel that victory in their lives," he said. "The point of a rent freeze is you feel it every first of the month. The point of a fast and free bus is you feel it every day when you’re waiting for a bus that sometimes never comes. The point of universal child care is so that you don’t have to pay $22,500 a year for a single toddler."
Prior to Thursday's ceremony, former Democratic Mayor Eric Adams spent his final hours on a veto spree, blocking 19 bills including worker-protection legislation.
City & State reported that "among the 19 pieces of legislation that received a last-minute veto was a bill that would expand a cap on street vending licenses, a bill that aims to protect ride-hailing drivers from unjust deactivations from their apps, a bill that would prohibit federal immigration authorities from keeping an office at Rikers Island, and a bill that would grant the Civilian Complaint Review Board direct access to police body-cam footage."
Bhairavi Desai, executive director of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, said in a statement that "Mayor Adams' last stand to steal protections from workers can’t dampen our hope for a better New York City under the leadership of Zohran Mamdani... and his pro-worker appointees, including Julie Su."
One Fair Wage noted that "tipped workers can still legally be paid as little as $2.13 an hour, a system advocates describe as a direct legacy of slavery."
Over a third of US states are set to raise their minimum hourly wage in 2026, but worker advocates including Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday decried a federal minimum wage that's remained at $7.25 since 2009—and just $2.13 an hour for tipped workers for over three decades.
Minimum wage hikes are set to go into effect in 19 states on Thursday: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.
Increases range from 28 cents in Minnesota to $2 in Hawaii, with an average hike of 67 cents across all 19 states. More than 8.3 million workers will benefit from the increases, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). The mean minimum wage in those 19 states will rise to $14.57 in 2026, up from $13.90 this year.
Three more states—Alaska, Florida, and Oregon—plus Washington, DC are scheduled to raise their minimum wages later in 2026.
In addition to the state hikes, nearly 50 counties and municipalities plan to raise their minimum wages in the coming year, according to the National Employment Law Project (NELP). These include San Diego, California—where the minimum wage for hospitality workers is set to rise to $25 an hour by 2030—and Portland, Maine, where all workers will earn at least $19 by 2028.
However, the federal minimum wage remains at $7.25, and the subminimum rate for tipped workers is $2.13, where it's been since 1991—and has lost more than half its purchasing power since then.
The federal minimum wage has stayed at $7.25 since 2009. In 2026, workers in 19 states and 49 cities and counties an increase. Alabama’s rate will stay at $7.25. 🔗 https://t.co/mrGfPAKba3 pic.twitter.com/EsokVIc6KP
— AL.com (@aldotcom) December 31, 2025
"Tipped workers can still legally be paid as little as $2.13 an hour, a system advocates describe as a direct legacy of slavery," the advocacy group One Fair Wage (OFW) said in a statement Tuesday.
Sanders (I-Vt.) said on social media on the eve of the hikes: "Congratulations to the 19 states raising the minimum wage in 2026. But let’s be clear: A $7.25 federal minimum wage is a national disgrace. No one who works full time should live in poverty. We must keep fighting to guarantee all workers a living wage—not starvation wages."
Yannet Lathrop, NELP's senior researcher and policy analyst, said earlier this month that "the upcoming minimum wage increases are incremental and won’t magically turn severely underpaid jobs into living-wage jobs, but they do offer a bit of relief at a time when every dollar matters for people."
“The bigger picture is that raising the minimum wage is just one piece of a much larger fight for a good jobs economy rooted in living wages and good benefits for every working person," Lathrop added. "That’s where we need to get to."
Numerous experts note that neither $7.25, nor even $15 an hour, is a livable wage anywhere in the United States.
"The gap between wages and real living costs is stark," OFW said. "According to the MIT Living Wage Calculator, there is no county in the United States where a worker can afford to meet basic needs on less than $25 an hour. Even in the nation’s least expensive counties, a worker with one child would need at least $33 an hour to cover essentials like rent, food, childcare, and transportation."
"Advocates argue that policies like President [Donald] Trump’s 'no tax on tips' proposal fail to address the underlying problem of poverty wages," OFW continued. "While the policy has drawn attention, they say it is a headline rather than a solution, particularly since nearly two-thirds of tipped workers do not earn enough to owe federal income taxes."
Frustrated by the long-unchanged $7.25 federal minimum wage, numerous states in recent years have let voters give themselves raises via ballot initiatives. Such measures have been successful even in some red states, including Missouri and Nebraska.
Rising minimum wages are a legacy of the union-backed #FightFor15 movement that began among striking fast-food workers in 2012. At least 20 states now have minimum wages of $15 or higher.
However, back then, "the buying power of a $15 minimum wage was substantially higher than it is today," EPI noted. "In 2025, a $15 minimum wage does not achieve economic security for working people in most of the country. This is particularly true in the highest cost-of-living cities."
In April, US senators voted down an amendment that would have raised the federal minimum wage to $17 an hour. Every Democratic and Independent upper chamber lawmaker voted in favor of the measure, while all Republicans except Sen. Josh Hawley (Mo.) rejected it.
As Trump administration and Republican policies and practices—such as passing healthcare legislation that does not include an extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits, which are set to expire on Wednesday and send premiums soaring—coupled with persistently high living costs squeeze workers, advocates say a living wage is more important than ever.
The issue is underscored by glaring income and wealth inequality in the US, as well as a roughly 285:1 CEO to worker pay gap among S&P 500 companies last year.
"Minimum wage doesn't cover the cost of living," Janae van De Kerk, an organizer with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Airport Workers union and Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport employee, said in a video posted Tuesday on social media.
"Minimum wage doesn't cover the cost of living. Many of my co-workers have to choose between food on the table or health insurance" Janae, Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport service worker No one should have to make that choice.
[image or embed]
— Airport Workers United (@goodairports.bsky.social) December 30, 2025 at 10:34 AM
"Many of my co-workers have to choose between food on the table or health insurance, or the choice between having food and paying the electric bill," van De Kerk—who advocates a $25 hourly minimum wage—continued.
"We shouldn't have to worry about those things," she added. "We shouldn't have to stress about those things. We're willing to work and we wanna work, and we should be paid for our work."
Accusing "a president desperate to be king" of using troops "as political pawns," California's attorney general noted the announcement followed "a stinging rebuke by the Supreme Court."
After a series of losses in court, President Donald Trump ended 2025 with an announcement that he is pulling the plug on legally contested National Guard deployments in three major US cities—but he also pledged that troops will return in the new year.
Trump initially sent thousands of California National Guard members to Los Angeles in June amid protests against his violent immigration operations. The remaining troops left the city earlier this month in response to a pair of orders from a district judge and the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
The president also tried to deploy National Guard members to the streets of two other Democrat-led cities—Portland, Oregon, and Chicago, Illinois—but those moves were blocked by lawsuits, including one that produced a US Supreme Court decision last week.
Throughout the president's push to deploy troops to these and other cities, he has circulated lies about crime rates. He did so again in the Wednesday announcement on his Truth Social platform, writing, "We are removing the National Guard from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland, despite the fact that CRIME has been greatly reduced by having these great Patriots in those cities, and ONLY by that fact."
"Portland, Los Angeles, and Chicago were GONE if it weren’t for the Federal Government stepping in," Trump claimed. "We will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again - Only a question of time! It is hard to believe that these Democrat Mayors and Governors, all of whom are greatly incompetent, would want us to leave, especially considering the great progress that has been made???"
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat expected to run for president in 2028, said on social media Wednesday that it is "about time Donald Trump admitted defeat. We've said it from day one: The federal takeover of California's National Guard is illegal."
Newsom and the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, challenged the LA deployment. In that case, the US Department of Justice on Tuesday filed a brief with the 9th Circuit withdrawing its motion to keep the California troops under federal control.
"For six months, CA National Guard troops have been used as political pawns by a president desperate to be king," Bonta said Wednesday. "Now, in the face of a stinging rebuke by the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is backing away from its effort to federalize and deploy CA National Guard troops."
Although that Supreme Court decision was not directly about California, the justices' rejection of the Trump administration's request to strike down a temporary restraining order that barred the Illinois deployment was expected to inform other cases.
Trump federalized Illinois and Texas national guard troops to patrol in Chicago, but Illinois quickly sued and won a court ruling keeping them out of the city. The troops did training exercises instead. Today, Trump claims that the guard "greatly reduced" crime in Chicago. Did they do it remotely?
[image or embed]
— Mark Jacob (@markjacob.bsky.social) December 31, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, another Democrat who may run for the Oval Office in the next cycle, also pointed to the recent ruling in his response to the president on Wednesday: "Donald Trump's lying again. He lost in court when Illinois stood up against his attempt to militarize American cities with the National Guard. Now Trump is forced to stand down."
"Illinois and Chicago have reduced crime with smart investments in police and community violence reduction programs," he continued. "Meanwhile, Trump cut federal support for both. No matter how many lies he tells, we will keep standing up for truth and against his abuse of power."
Ahead of Trump's announcement, the New Republic's Greg Sargent said that the president and his deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, "are actually failing in crucial ways. Deportations are lagging behind their goals, courts are mostly functioning, and their fascist, ethnonationalist cruelties have unleashed a countermobilization of unexpected scope and power."
After the new Truth Social post, Sargent added: "Trump just announced that he's pulling the National Guard out of Chicago, LA, and Portland while pretending he won some kind of big victory. Here's the reality: Their authoritarian designs have faced massive civil and popular resistance."