Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
Health Insurance CEO "Wanted" posters in New York City
Further

Deny, Defend, Depose: They Eat Off Your Family Member's Grave

Exposing "the rotten core of American health care," the shooting of United Health's CEO/ mafia kingpin sparked a flash flood of long-simmering fury at the "legalized murder practiced by all the Brian Thompsons" of a universally despised system run by "heartless vampires" who routinely refuse care in exchange for bloody profit. The pitiless response by tens of millions of their victims: Wanted posters, judging the shooter "too hot to convict" and grimly declaring, "Thoughts and prayers are out of network."

Early last Wednesday, UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, 50, was en route to an investor conference at the Hilton Hotel in midtown Manhattan, reportedly to collect his massive Christmas bonus, when he was shot in the back and killed, allegedly by 26-year-old Luigi Mangione. The action, both shocking and deeply unsurprising, was widely met with "a morbid sense of inevitability" from a wrung-dry populace; Elizabeth Warren spoke for many when she asserted, "Violence is never the answer, but people can only be pushed so far.” Citing the brutality of a much-hated, for-profit system run by rapacious executives getting rich by denying (sometimes lifesaving) healthcare to sick people who often subsequently either die or go bankrupt trying not to, Maureen Tkacik of The American Prospect wryly noted, “Only about 50 million customers of America’s reigning medical monopoly might have a motive to exact revenge upon the UnitedHealthcare CEO.”

The numbers are telling. A recent Kaiser report found that Americans owe at least $220 billion in medical debt, which for about three million is over $10,000; in a poll asking who they blame for exorbitant health prices, 97% named insurance companies. Last year UnitedHealthcare, the world's eighth largest corporation, had the highest denial rate - 32%, double the industry average - while taking in $371.6 billion, $47.5 billion more than the year before; their net profit was$22 BILLION. CEO Thompson made almost $20 million, or almost $40K a day, mostly in non-taxable bonuses or stock options; unknown to shareholders, he had also allegedly dumped $15 million in stocks and faced a federal investigation. Almost 70,000 Americans needlessly die each year due to denied care; at United, that decision was often made by an AI robot found to make medically unsound decisions in 90% of its cases - which the company, and presumably Thompson, knew.

Among the world's 10 highly developed countries, the U.S., the only one without universal health care, ranks last. But despite ubiquitous, verifiable, deeply cruel evidence of the failings of a profiteering private system, idiotic self-serving Republicans continue to argue that health care, like any other aspect of governance subsumed by late-stage capitalism, "should be run like a business," apparently by the same morbidly rich oligarchs who not only have no interest in meeting citizens' needs but don't even want to pay their own friggin' taxes. In a "cosmic confirmation" of the hollowness of their argument, on the same day Thompson was shot, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield announced it would newly, insanely limit coverage on anesthesia during surgery. After an outcry, they retracted the change. Still, pundits noted of the attempted move, a corporate world so brazenly unshy about its own arrogance "is not one that incurs sympathy for a dead CEO."

Some did insist on sympathy: "A Man Was murdered (and) You're Laughing?" But the shooting often inspired tales of righteous rage at a ravenous company whose ghouls "eat off your family members grave." A mother was told an overnight hospital stay was "not medically necessary" after her 12-year-old's heart surgery. The families of two patients who died sued for using "a flawed AI model (in) place of real medical professionals to wrongfully deny care.” An oncologist raged - "Dear buttheads" - about the refusal to cover anti-nausea meds for a child during chemo: "No reason to be nauseated." "Obviously, you know better about the side effects of chemo than me, my peers, and the entire scientific community," he wrote. "You have saved your greedy, blood-sucking corporation a great deal of money I'm sure." "We mourn the death (of) Brian Thompson..." one wrote. "Wait, I'm sorry. We mourn the deaths of 68,000 Americans who needlessly die each year so that insurance executives (like) Thompson can become multimillionaires."

Added to the rancor often bubbling under the surface as we rant and fret and watch bills pile up, there's a growing incidence of random political violence born of our polarization; a poll last year found almost 1 in 4 Americans agreed "patriots may have to resort to violence (to) save our country," though as usual "save our country" is open to wide and lunatic interpretation depending on who you are and who you kill. George Zimmerman, Kyle Rittenhouse, Daniel Penny and many, many cops have gotten away with (usually racist) murder. But none of them killed a rich, white, male, elite member of the master class. Thus does the killing of one of their own evince predictable pearl-clutching when someone eventually takes "lethal exception" to a grossly unfair system that has failed so many. "Corporate America is nervous," says one observer of the brutal "wake-up call" of Thompson's killing."The mood changed dramatically in a very short period of time.”

Despite the elite's fearful, phantasmic vision of a class war led by angry, unwashed, pitchfork-wielding Bolsheviks, alleged shooter Luigi Mangione not only doesn't fit the profile, but comes from their own gilded ranks. The scion of a prominent Baltimore real-estate consortium and valedictorian of his pricey prep school, he earned a B.A. and Master's at Ivy league Penn before he reportedly suffered a painful back injury and tough surgery, moved to Hawaii, and went AWOL from his famiiy in recent months. As for the manifesto and digital foot print he left behind: While law enforcement initially said he betrayed “some ill will towards corporate America" and idiotic Ted Cruz cited his concerns about capitalism and climate change to proclaim "leftism is a mental disease," Mangione's politics have been best described as "indecipherable," with "all-over-the-map," vaguely libertarian beliefs that don't fall neatly into either end of the political spectrum.

He read a lot, and reviewed or quoted "a mish-mash" of books about back pain, AI, self-help, Kurt Vonnegut, Peter Thiel, The Lorax, The New Jim Crow; like many others, he didn't finish David Foster Wallace's arcane Infinite Jest. Most famously, last year he posted a review of Unabomber Ted Kaczynski’s manifesto, which he declared too violent but "prescient on modern society." He called Kaczynski "an extreme political revolutionary" who "had the balls to recognize that peaceful protest has gotten us absolutely nowhere, and at the end of the day he's right...When all other forms of communication fail, violence is necessary to survive." Among his disparate stances, he focused his anger most clearly on a failed health system where predatory insurance companies "abuse our country for immense profit." Posing the question, "What do you do?" he replied, "You wack the CEO at the annual parasitic bean-counter convention. It’s targeted, precise, and doesn’t risk innocents."

After the shooter went missing, frantic police offered a reward and sought tips from a public they didn't know had quickly chosen sides in the new drama, and it wasn't theirs. Many bitter responses echoed the language of stonyhearted insurers: "This claim for sympathy has been denied," "We need prior authorization," "My insurance doesn't cover vision so I can't really see." A mock logo showed United in a scope's crosshairs; when the company posted the sad news of Thompson's death, it swiftly met with over 65,000 laughing emojis. A typical online response: "Thoughts and prayers to the family of a billionaire guy who got rich off hardworking Americans' insurance premiums, and then signed their death warrants." New Yorkers held a shooter lookalike contest, all hood and mask, in Washington Square. The McDonald's where he was later caught got 1-star review bombed: "Has rats in the kitchen that will make you sick, and your insurance won't cover it."

Faced with omnipresent images from surveillance cameras of the masked, bundled shooter at his hostel, Internet sleuths found the green jacket he was wearing and declared it Levi's $225 Sherpa Lined Two-Pocket Hooded Trucker Jacket. Once posted, it drew hundreds of thousands of views; at Macy's, where it was being offered for just $80 using the code "FRIEND," it began morbidly flying off the shelves, with over 700 quickly sold and the large sold out. "I already loved Macy's but wow," said one fan. Another: "Macy's saying 'Not our CEO.' I love it." Never mind the old when-the-revolution-comes mantra about putting the owners of the means of production up against the wall; many were dismayed by the macabre spectacle of the rush to consume and emulate, however triflingly. Wrote one, "It is as chilling as it is pitifully ironic to see blood lust for corporate moguls bubbling up on the website of Macy’s." Once they caught Mangione, though, it got way worse.

Sensing the fervor for a righteous outlaw radicalized by the injustices of a skewered health system - the same system that hurt and infuriated us - officials worried Mangione could inspire other "grievance-driven malicious actors" to violence. Little did they know: When the flood of images began - handsome frat bro, six-pack gym bro, "appallingly glamorous" mugshot - the Internet swooned. Within hours, Mangione was "a hero," an icon, a sex symbol straight, gay or bi. There were video mashups, Biblical memes, gags about "the line for the Mangione conjugal visit," the fine Italian-American tradition of "taking matters into our own hands," the manhunt ending with police declaring "too hot to convict,'" the dating profile: "Loves to travel, leaves thoughtful notes, has hobbies (assassination)." Also, "He is setting unrealistic beauty standards for men - we can't all go kill someone...Who among us has not been radicalized by pack pain?...If he is fit, you must acquit...Today, we are all Italian." And online, companies are scrambling to remove Mangione merch and fundraisers where thousands of fans have donated.

Meanwhile, a nervous corporate America recoiled. As police warned of "a heightened risk environment," insurance companies increased armed security and began scrubbing names and photos from their websites; one security firm reported 70 calls a day from anxious insurers. Online, multiple posts warned of a secret "executive hit list" in the works, and said "CEOs should be afraid. They should act like they have a target on their back." This week, that target got closer as "Wanted" posters went up around New York City featuring the names, crimes and obscene salaries of eight insurance CEOS; some were also adorned with the Delay, Defend, Depose maxim of a now-best-selling exposé of insurance malfeasance. "Wanted. Denying medical care for corporate profit," one poster read. Another: "UnitedHealthcare killed everyday people for the sake of profit. As a result, Brian Thompson was denied his claim to life. Who will be denied next?"

Possibly nobody, at least in the ruling class. It could all end up as hyperbole, play-acting, the fever-dream of an aggrieved populace newly, painfully attuned to the wrongs done them by those who can, to date without accountability. Thompson is dead, Mangione's productive life is likely over, United is denying coverage to someone sick as you read this, and universal health care - as deeply moral as it is pragmatic - remains a chimera, nowhere in sight for at least four years; after that, Dems who've themselves supped at the trough of Big Pharma will have to do better. Grievously, for now we remain at the mercy of glorified, often criminal accountants who, playing God and doctor, make millions off the suffering of others. Only in America, says one sage, "You can be driven into homelessness by someone like Brian Thompson, then legally murdered by someone like Daniel Penny, while the money that could have saved you is spent on murdering children in Gaza."

In a leaked video to employees after the shooting, Andrew Witty, CEO of parent company UnitedHealth Group, vowed to continue preventing "unnecessary care" that would make the health system "too complex and ultimately unsustainable," aka would cut into profits. Witty, who last year was paid $23,534,936, mostly in non-taxable "bonuses," told staff to "tune out" criticism of their industry, which "does not reflect reality." Thousands responded with stories of their own reality: burst appendix care denied, delayed chemo until the cancer was terminal, declined back surgery so "25/8/366 AGONY," a father-in-law with colon cancer told he didn't need a colon scan, bladder treatment costing $250 in China and $13,200 in Texas, asthma meds denied: "BREATHING is apparently not necessary." Meanwhile Mangione, denied bail, is being held at Pennsylvania's SCI Huntingdon. This week, as media broadcast live outside, inmates yelled from their cells. "Conditions suck!" one shouted. From another, “Free Luigi!”

SEE ALL
Greenpeace activists board a Shell platform
News

'People Power Works': Shell Backs Down in Anti-Protest Lawsuit Against Greenpeace

The United Kingdom-based oil giant Shell agreed Tuesday to settle a major lawsuit the company brought against Greenpeace after activists from the group boarded and occupied a company oil platform last year to protest fossil fuel expansion.

Greenpeace said in a statement that as part of the settlement, it agreed to donate £300,000—roughly $382,000—to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, a charity that helps save lives at sea, but will pay nothing to Shell and accept no liability. The donation represents a fraction of the over $11 million in damages and legal costs defendants faced, the group said.

The Greenpeace defendants have also "agreed to avoid protesting for a period at four Shell sites in the northern North Sea."

"Shell thought suing us for millions over a peaceful protest would intimidate us, but this case became a PR millstone tied around its neck," said Areeba Hamid, co-executive director of Greenpeace U.K. "The public backlash against its bullying tactics made it back down and settle out of court."

"This settlement shows that people power works. Thousands of ordinary people across the country backed our fight against Shell and their support means we stay independent and can keep holding Big Oil to account," Hamid added. "This legal battle might be over, but Big Oil's dirty tricks aren't going away. With Greenpeace facing further legal battles around the world, we won't stop campaigning until the fossil fuel industry stops drilling and starts paying for the damage it is causing to people and planet."

"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat."

Shell brought the case, which Greenpeace characterized as a "textbook" strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), in February 2023 and sought $1 million in damages from activists who boarded a Shell-contracted ship carrying equipment to drill for oil in the North Sea.

"When the protest ended, the only damage Shell could find was a padlock which, they alleged, our activists broke. That's it," Greenpeace U.K. said Tuesday. "Yet they came after us with a million-dollar lawsuit, which they justified for their spending on safety."

The group, which warned that the case had dire implications for the right to protest, credited a "sustained, year-long campaign against the suit" for forcing the oil behemoth to back down. The campaign, according to Greenpeace, "turned the legal move into a PR embarrassment for Shell."

"The case was dubbed the 'Cousin Greg' lawsuit by Forbes after a scene in the Emmy-awarded drama Succession, in which the hapless character threatens to sue Greenpeace to universal dismay," the environmental group noted Tuesday.


Greenpeace is currently facing several other SLAPP suits, including one brought by Energy Transfer, majority-owner of the Dakota Access pipeline. The group said Tuesday that the Energy Transfer suit "threatens the very existence of Greenpeace in the U.S."

"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat. It could stop Greenpeace being able to make a real difference on the things that matter most," the organization said Tuesday. "It's part of a growing trend by powerful corporations and governments to crush peaceful protest—using draconian laws or intimidation lawsuits like this."

"It seeks to silence the people most impacted by the climate crisis. This threatens the global fight for climate justice," the group added. "We won't give up. This is Shell versus all of us."

SEE ALL
FTC Chair Lina Khan
News

With Defeat of Megamerger, Sanders Thanks Khan for Taking On 'Corporate Greed'

Praise for Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan continued to pour in on Wednesday after a pair of judges blocked the merger of grocery chains Kroger and Albertsons following challenges by the FTC and state attorneys general.

"The proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger would have led to higher prices at the grocery store and harmed workers," said U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders. "Let me thank FTC Chair Lina Khan for successfully fighting this merger and standing up to corporate greed."

Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) also welcomed the rulings and sent "a big thank you to Lina Khan and her team at the FTC."

Their comments on Wednesday followed similar applause from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal as well as groups including the American Economic Liberties Project (AELP) and Groundwork Collaborative.

Khan addressed the win during a Tuesday stream with political commentator Hasan Piker, noting that "this is the first time that the FTC has ever sought to block a merger not just because it's gonna be bad for consumers, but also because it's gonna be bad for workers."

Khan, an appointee of outgoing Democratic President Joe Biden, has won praise from progressives for taking on not only grocery giants and other companies trying to build monopolies but also Big Pharma and Big Tech.

Sanders recently called her "the best FTC chair in modern history" and AELP earlier this year published a document detailing how, under Khan's leadership, the agency "has entered a new era of more effective, modern, and democratic enforcement to better protect consumers, workers, and independent businesses."

Examples included in the AELP roundup include Khan's "crackdown on deceptive 'junk fees,'" a ban on noncompete clauses that's being challenged in court, a historic lawsuit against Amazon.com, and a "click-to-cancel" rule that requires sellers to "make it as easy for consumers to cancel their enrollment as it was to sign up."

However, the new era of the FTC is set to soon come to an end. Since President-elect Donald Trump's victory last month, speculation has been building that he would replace Khan with someone who would do the bidding of big business. Amid celebrations of the rulings against the Kroger-Albertsons merger on Tuesday, the Republican announced Andrew Ferguson as his pick for chair.

As Common Dreamsreported earlier Wednesday, Basel Musharbash, principal attorney at Antimonopoly Counsel, said that elevating Ferguson, who already sits on the FTC, to chair, "is an affront to the antitrust laws and a gift to the oligarchs and monopolies bleeding this country dry."

Although the agency is expected to be friendlier to mergers under the next Trump administration, Albertsons responded to the Tuesday rulings by bailing on the $24.6 billion deal and suing Kroger for billions of dollars on Wednesday, rather than appealing or moving to in-house FTC hearings.

That move could reflect industry fears of U.S. courts that are willing to block major mergers, as The American Prospect executive editor David Dayen pointed out after the federal court decision on Tuesday.

"The important thing here is not that Biden's enforcers blocked a merger... it's that courts are increasingly comfortable with merger enforcement," he said. "States can sue under the Sherman Act, and they will. The real change to track is in the judiciary. Wall Street, take note."

SEE ALL
Donald Trump shakes hands with Harmeet Dhillon
News

Trump Taps Anti-Trans Lawyer Harmeet Dhillon for Key Civil Rights Post

LGBTQ+ and voting rights defenders were among those who sounded the alarm Tuesday over Republican President-elect Donald Trump's selection of a San Francisco attorney known for fighting against transgender rights and for leading a right-wing lawyers' group that took part in Trump's effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election to oversee the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division.

On Monday, Trump announced his nomination of Harmeet Dhillon to head the key civil rights office, claiming on his Truth Social network that the former California Republican Party vice-chair "has stood up consistently to protect our cherished Civil Liberties, including taking on Big Tech for censoring our Free Speech, representing Christians who were prevented from praying together during COVID, and suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers."

"In her new role at the DOJ, Harmeet will be a tireless defender of our Constitutional Rights, and will enforce our Civil Rights and Election Laws FAIRLY and FIRMLY," Trump added.

However, prominent trans activist Erin Reed warned on her Substack that Dhillon's nomination—which requires Senate confirmation—"signals an alarming shift that could make life increasingly difficult for transgender people nationwide, including those who have sought refuge in blue states to escape anti-trans legislation."

Trump has picked Harmeet Dhillon as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. She has stated that it must be "made unsafe" for hospitals to provide trans care, and frequently shares Libs of TikTok posts. She intends to target trans people in blue states. Subscribe to support my journalism.

[image or embed]
— Erin Reed (@erininthemorning.com) December 10, 2024 at 8:14 AM

Reed continued:

Dhillon's most prominent work includes founding the Center for American Liberty, a legal organization that focuses heavily on anti-transgender cases in blue states. The organization's "featured cases" section highlights several lawsuits, such as Chloe Cole's case against Kaiser Permanente; a lawsuit challenging a Colorado school's use of a transgender student's preferred name; a case against a California school district seeking to implement policies that would forcibly out transgender students; and a lawsuit against Vermont for denying a foster care license to a family unwilling to comply with nondiscrimination policies regarding transgender youth.

Reed also highlighted Dhillon's attacks on state laws protecting transgender people, as well as her expression of "extreme anti-trans views" on social media—including calling gender-affirming healthcare for trans children "child abuse."

Last year, The Guardian's Jason Wilson reported that the Center for American Liberty made a six-figure payment to a public relations firm that represented Dhillion in both "her capacity as head of her own for-profit law firm and Republican activist."

Writing for the voting rights platform Democracy Docket, Matt Cohen on Tuesday accused Dhillon of being "one of the leading legal figures working to roll back voting rights across the country."

"In the past few years, Dhillon—or an attorney from her law firm—has been involved in more than a dozen different lawsuits in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Maine, Michigan, North Carolina, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. challenging voting rights laws, redistricting, election processes, or Trump's efforts to appear on the ballot in the 2024 election," Cohen noted.

As Maya Wiley, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a statement Tuesday, "The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division has the critical responsibility of enforcing our nation's federal civil rights laws and ensuring equal justice under the law on behalf of all of our communities."

"That means investigating police departments that have a pattern of police abuse, protecting the right to vote, and ensuring schools don't discriminate against children based on who they are," Wiley noted. "The nomination of Harmeet Dhillon to lead this critical civil rights office is yet another clear sign that this administration seeks to advance ideological viewpoints over the rights and protections that protect every person in this country."

"Dhillon has focused her career on diminishing civil rights, rather than enforcing or protecting them," she asserted. "Rather than fighting to expand voting access, she has worked to restrict it."

A staunch Trump loyalist, Dhillon has also embraced conspiracy theories including the former president's "Big Lie" that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, and has accused Democrats of "conspiring to commit the biggest election interference fraud in world history."

She was co-chair of the Republican National Lawyers Association when it launched Lawyers for Trump, a group that urged the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene on behalf of the former president after he lost the 2020 election.

Cohen also highlighted Dhillon's ties to right-wing legal activist and Federalist Society co-chair Leonard Leo, described by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) as a "lawless con man and crook" for his refusal to comply with a Senate subpoena and his organization of lavish gifts to conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices.

"We need a leader at the Civil Rights Division who understands that civil rights protections are not partisan or political positions open to the ideological whims of those who seek to elevate a single religion or to protect political allies or particular groups over others," Wiley stressed. "We need a leader who will vigorously enforce our civil rights laws and work to protect the rights of all of our communities—including in voting, education, employment, housing, and public accommodations—without fear or favor."

SEE ALL
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump sits in the Salon Jaune room
News

'Completely Un-American': Progressives Slam Trump Plan to End Birthright Citizenship

Progressives in Congress and other migrant rights advocates sharply criticized U.S. President-elect Donald Trump for his comments on immigration during a Sunday interview, including on his hopes to end birthright citizenship.

During a 76-minute interview with NBC News' Kristen Welker, Trump said he "absolutely" intends to end birthright citizenship, potentially through executive order, despite the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Among many lies the Republican told, he also falsely claimed that the United States is the only country to offer citizenship by birth; in fact, there are dozens.

In response, outgoing Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said on social media Monday: "This is completely un-American. The 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. Trump cannot unilaterally end it, and any attempt to do so would be both unconstitutional and immoral."

Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) similarly stressed that "birthright citizenship is enshrined in the Constitution as a cornerstone of American ideals. It reflects our belief that America is the land of opportunity. Sadly, this is just another in the long line of Trump's assault on the U.S. Constitution."

Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), the daughter of Guatemalan immigrants, said in a statement: "'Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.' It is important to remember who we are, where many of us came from, and why many of our families traveled here to be greeted by the Mother of Exiles, the Statue of Liberty."

Ramirez argued that "the story of our nation wouldn't be complete without the sweat, tears, joy, dreams, and hopes of so many children of immigrants who are citizens by birthright and pride themselves on being AMERICANS. It is the story of so many IL-03 communities, strengthened by the immigration of people from Poland, Ukraine, Italy, Mexico, and Guatemala, among others. It is the story of many members of Congress who can point to the citizenship of their forebears and ancestors because of immigration and birthright."

"Let's be clear: Trump is posing the question of who gets to be an American to our nation. And given that today's migrants are from Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, and Latin and Central America, it is clear he is questioning who are the 'right' people to benefit from birthright citizenship," she continued. "Questioning birthright citizenship is anti-American, and eliminating it through executive action is unconstitutional. Donald Trump knows that."

"But emboldened by a Supreme Court that would use its power to uphold white supremacy rather than the Constitution of our nation, Trump is on a mission to weaken the very soul of our nation," she warned. "I—like many sons and daughters of immigrants and first-generation Americans—believe in and fight for a land of freedom, opportunities, and equality. To live into that promise, we must stand against white nationalism—especially when it is espoused at the highest levels of government."

Although Republicans are set to control both the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives next year, amending the Constitution requires support from two-thirds of both chambers of Congress and three-fourths of the state legislatures, meaning that process is unlikely to be attempted for this policy.

Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.) highlighted the difficulties of passing constitutional amendments while discussing Trump in a Monday appearance on CNN. The incoming chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus was born in the Dominican Republic and is the first formerly undocumented immigrant elected to Congress.

As Mother Jones reporter Isabela Dias detailed Monday:

Critics of ending birthright citizenship for the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants argue it would not only constitute bad policy, but also a betrayal of American values and, as one scholar put it to me, a "prelude" to mass deportation.

"It's really 100 years of accepted interpretation," Hiroshi Motomura, a scholar of immigration and citizenship at UCLA's law school, told me of birthright citizenship. Ending birthright citizenship would cut at the core of the hard-fought assurance of equal treatment under the law, he said, "basically drawing a line between two kinds of American citizens."

Trump's NBC interview also addressed his long-promised mass deportations. The president-elect—whose first administration was globally condemned for separating migrant families at the southern border and second administration is already filling up with hard-liners—suggested Sunday that he would deport children who are U.S. citizens with undocumented parents.

"I don't want to be breaking up families, so the only way you don't break up the family is you keep them together and you have to send them all back," Trump told Welker.

Responding in a Monday statement, America's Voice executive director Vanessa Cárdenas said, "There's a growing consensus that the Trump mass deportation agenda will hit American consumers and industries hard, but the scope of what Trump and his team are proposing goes well beyond the economic impact."

"Trump and allies are making clear their mass deportation agenda will include deporting U.S. citizens, including children, while aiming to gut a century and a half of legal and moral precedent on birthright citizenship," she added. "In total, their attacks go well beyond the narrow lens of immigration to the fundamental question of who gets to be an American."

SEE ALL
U.S. Ambassador To The United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield Holds Press Briefing
News

US Ambassador to UN Slammed Over 'Right to Food' Rhetoric as Israel Starves Gaza

The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations is facing backlash after delivering a speech earlier this week touting the universal "right to food" as the Israeli military—armed to the teeth with American weaponry—fuels widespread and increasingly deadly hunger in the Gaza Strip.

In remarks Monday at a gathering of U.N. and civil society leaders focused on global food insecurity, Thomas-Greenfield called hunger, starvation, and famine "man-made tragedies" that "can be stopped by us."

"Let me be clear: Every human being, everywhere, has the right to food," she continued. "For the United States, this is a moral issue. And it's an economic and national security issue."

Thomas-Greenfield's speech sparked derision given the Biden administration's continued military support for an Israeli government that has been accused of wielding starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza, where—according to the latest U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization assessment—food aid has reached an all-time low under Israel's suffocating blockade.

"Hunger is a man-made tragedy that you helped make in Gaza."

Oxfam and other human rights groups have said that by arming the Israeli military as it obstructs humanitarian aid, the Biden administration is complicit in the starvation of Palestinians in Gaza and Israel's repeated attacks on aid workers attempting to feed the enclave's hungry.

"She is on a shamelessness tour in her final weeks as U.S. ambassador to the U.N.," journalist Jeremy Scahill wrote Wednesday in response to Thomas-Greenfield's speech. "She presided over numerous cease-fire vetoes as part of an administration that facilitated Israel's starvation policy against the Palestinians of Gaza. Listen to her remarks on 'hunger' in that context."

Middle East scholar and analyst Assal Rad, wrote that Thomas-Greenfield's vetoes at the U.N. "have helped Israel continue its genocide and deliberately starving people."

"Hunger is a man-made tragedy that you helped make in Gaza," Rad added.

Despite Thomas-Greenfield's insistence that addressing global food insecurity has long been a priority for the world's wealthiest and most powerful nation, the U.S. and Israel were the only two countries to vote against a U.N. committee draft on the right to food in 2021.

On Tuesday, the Biden administration welcomed to the White House former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who—along with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—is facing an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for "the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare," among other crimes.

"Today is Human Rights Day—a date chosen to honor the UN’s adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948," the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project wrote Tuesday. "Biden's White House is dishonoring this day by hosting a confirmed war criminal who conducted a genocide, and starved and targeted Palestinian civilians."

SEE ALL