

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As menacingly foretold, an addled, vengeful dolt has unleashed a deluge of mindless venom, rancor, racism, cruelty - and domestic terrorists - on a populace he just vowed "to serve and protect," banishing any vestige of fairness or mercy in the name of a re-whitened "blood-and-soil America (where) their worst self is their truest self." With a shiny new Gulf of America and soon-rotting crops on the vine, are eggs cheaper yet? Are we great now?
Thus has a tawdry, unmoored, insensate man-child who "represents everything this country flattered itself it was not" sought to create a "United States of Backlash" wherein "virtually all the social progress of the last half-century is reversed." Yes, it's that bad. Massive wrecking ball bad. Petulant, self-serving, weirdly shark-and-windmill-obsessed, with the bottomless animus of a sick middle-school bully, he has flung open the orange-makeup-encrusted floodgates of hell to prey on the most vulnerable among us and sulkily proclaim, "Nothing will stand in our way." In his first demented days of power, Trump has launched a torrent of executive orders that effectively "declare war on the American people," seeking to abrogate every denizen's rights, dreams and safety except those of his cadre of tech bros and billionaires. The result, writes Paul Waldman, is a "meaner, angrier place where there is no greater happiness than seeing those you hate suffer, and not only no shame but even a kind of nobility in being like Trump: rude, cruel, petty, greedy and small."
With only his wee brain, thin skin, squinty pig eyes and remnants of a $400-million-dollar faux silver spoon stuck up a grievance-filled ass at his disposal, Trump is nonetheless doggedly working to strip the basic rights of every queer, poor, trans, sick, female, migrant, mouthy or non-white "other" by any means necessary. If he was Taliban in Afghanistan, he could ban windows and the seductive sound of women's voices; here, he can only raise drug prices, kill environmental protections, end birthright citizenship, dismiss science, encourage pandemics, silence gun reform efforts, and categorically banish any and all rules that forbid or hamper discrimination, anywhere. As he ignores "virtually every important issue facing the working families of this country" - housing, health care, racial or economic equity - Bernie Sanders, who God love him almost alone refused to bow down or stand up for his oligarch-packed coronation, argues our job in the dark days ahead is "not to respond to every absurd statement" but to "stay focused on the issues, to do the right thing."
A prodigious if admirable ask, as Trump lurches on, terrifyingly powerful yet still incoherent, slurring, rambling, "declining right in front of us." In a vainglorious inauguration speech proclaiming "Liberation Day for America," he bleated that his "journey to reclaim our Republic has not been an easy one, that I can tell you," charging that evil libtards "who wish to stop our cause have tried to take my freedom and, indeed, to take my life." Still, he boasted from his fact-free universe, "The golden age of America begins right now. My recent election is a (fictional) mandate to completely and totally reverse a horrible betrayal. And all of these many betrayals that have taken place....I was saved by God to make America great again." It was a bit much for the usually eloquent Charlie Pierce, who "struggled for a way to memorialize the dawning of Hell's Encore" and its unending "festival of grievance." For help, he turned to Hunter Thompson's Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail at the woeful moment in 1972 when Richard Nixon beat George McGovern.
"This may be the year," Thompson wrote, "when we finally come face to face with ourselves; finally just lay back and say it - that we are really just a nation of 220 million used car salesmen with all the money we need to buy guns, and no qualms at all about killing anybody else in the world who tries to make us uncomfortable." Amidst the turmoil of civil rights unrest and the Vietnam War, the deeply decent McGovern, who lost in an ignoble landslide, was that "rare candidate who really understands what a fantastic monument to all the best instincts of the human race this country might have been," Thompson lamented, "if we could have kept it out of the hands of greedy little hustlers like Richard Nixon." Eerily prescient, he went on, "Jesus! Where will it end? How low do you have to stoop in this country to be President?" To which Pierce sadly adds that even the sage, caustic Thompson "didn’t have a clue that the answer would prove to be infinity."
What better image of a macabre inauguration day than that of gazillionaire nerd and Trump best buddy Elmo Musk shooting out a virulent arm, twice, in a Nazi salute to dubiously declare the election "no ordinary victory," but one that assured "the future of civilization" (for rich white men with bunkers.) Alas, complicit, gaslighting corporate media, ignoring Maya Angelou's "When someone shows you who they are, believe them," still declines to, instead preposterously pivoting to a “controversial gesture,” "an odd-looking salute...evocative of things we have seen through history,” "an exuberant speech" - also an exuberant Nazi salute - and, from the ostensibly anti-hate Anti-Defamation League, "an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm." "This is a delicate moment," they blathered. "So many are on edge. All sides should give one another a bit of grace." Grace with jackboots? Thrilled Nazis were "abuzz." They gleefully extolled their "White Power Moment,” shrieked, "Hail Trump!" and vowed, "The White Flame will rise again!" And it might.
?
The day's other big Nazi salute to civil order and decency came with Trump's decision to give a blanket pardon or clemency to all the Jan. 6 yahoos, because, literally, Fuck You. Weighing his options in sober Winston Churchill mode, an advisor reported, "He just said, 'Fuck it. Release ‘em all.'" Most of the 1,500 had done their time, but with his virtually unchecked pardon power, he freed the last, most violent 211 - who'd trashed the Capitol, called for lynching lawmakers, bludgeoned cops with fire extinguishers, flag poles, bear spray, broken furniture, stun guns, crutches, fists and feet. He freed the Oath Keepers' Stewart Rhodes, who assembled a heavily armed "quick reaction force" and got 18 years for seditious conspiracy. He freed the guys who dragged, beat, stun-gunned Mike Fanone, the guy who shit on Nancy Pelosi's desk, the horned, face-painted QAnon shaman Jacob Chansley, who later said, "I regret nothing." "THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!” he posted online. "NOW I AM GONNA BY (sic) SOME MOTHAFUCKIN GUNS!!! I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!!."
His blithe rebranding of the GOP as "the Jailbreak Party" was widely deemed "a slap in the face" to things they're supposed to represent - rule of law, back the blue - but clearly don't. Even the staid Wall Street Journal decried "setting free the cop beaters" as "another stain (on) Trump's legacy," a stain in and of itself. Even as police unions that endorsed him blasted the pardons, the media again did a tip-toeing, gaslighting, "What in the holy name of Both-Sides Jesus is this?" dodge, with the New York Times, describing "dueling pardons" and "an intensified fight over the meaning of Jan. 6."Given that most Americans, and even GOP lawmakers, had said they "obviously" opposed pardons for violent offenders, MAGA Mike had to get even slimier than usual.Then, he urged prosecution "to the fullest extent of the law" and called Biden's preemptive pardons for law-abiding relatives "shocking," "disgusting," "breathtaking." Now, he says, "We believe in second chances...We're looking forward." Still, Susan Collins was said to be leaning toward being "disturbed."
The pardons quickly boomeranged: One goon is back inside on a gun charge, another is terrified his newly released father will kill him as "a traitor," Stewart Rhodes strolled into the Capitol to greet appalled media, talk with a GOP rep and whine, "Why should I feel responsible?" and another raved "What did I do (that) caused the harm?” but said he regrets threatening to “fucking hang" then-Speaker Pelosi: "I was drunk and pissed off.” To bolster the denial, daft Michele Bachmann emerged to dreamily recall Jan. 6: "It was like a prayer meeting, people preaching the gospel...There was no discontent - the happiest people you'd ever see." Just one rioter, Pamela Hemphill, who did 60 days, declined the pardon because "we were wrong that day" and accepting it would "rewrite history." Several judges also slammed pardons based on "revisionist myth” that "cannot whitewash the blood, feces, and terror the mob left in its wake." In the end, noted one online sage, "the only country that opened (its) prisons and (sent) criminals to prey upon innocent Americans was us."
Still, the slapdash unleashing of a couple hundred hoodlums into our midst pales before the devastation wrought by Trump's barrage of over 80 rash, cruel, heedless "executive orders" rescinding literally decades of hard-won protections for millions of Americans - against discrimination, climate change, police violence, hunger, fear, disease, death; and for health care, immigration access, ethical governance, decent education, fair wages, affordable prescription drugs, reproductive freedom, voting rights, same-sex safeguards, racial and ethnic equity, a Constitution-pledged place at the table. His revocations by dumpster fire could gut medical insurance for over 20 million people, raise prescription costs for millions more, reduce workplace health and safety provisions, loosen rules on hiring discrimination, reverse longstanding civil rights provisions, remove protections against drilling, halt clean energy programs, end all federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and suspend foreign aid "to determine whether they are aligned with (our) policies."
Charging the Biden administration has "embedded deeply unpopular, illegal and radical practices" within the federal government, including "corrupting" DEI programs, the new regime seeks to "restore common sense" to government and "unleash the potential of the American citizen." Toward that hellscape, it "hereby revoked" membership in WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement, dozens of initiatives toward pay equity, multiple bans on oil or gas leases, calls for accountable policing, incarceration reform," "educational excellence," clean energy programs, economic, educational and racial equity for Native, Hispanic, Asian, underserved, queer, trans, refugee and asylum seeker populations, and the removal of Cuba as a "State Sponsor of Terrorism." To move along Trump's planned mass deportations, he wants to overturn the 14th Amendment's l00-years-long guarantee of birthright citizenship and force SCOTUS to give him that power, though we all know brown kids "aren't the reason we can't afford eggs or prescription drugs - billionaire CEOs are."
To kick off his promised purge of 1,000-plus Biden appointees to replace them with ill-equipped loyalists, he also fired Mark Milley for calling him "a total fascist,” Nobel Peace Prize-nominated chef and World Central Kitchen founder José Andrés for feeding people in disaster zones and criticizing Israel - already resigned, Andrés posted shrug/laugh emojis - and Coast Guard Commandant Admiral Linda Fagan for being the first woman to lead our armed forces and her "excessive" focus on fairness. He changed the name of Alaska's Mt. Denali back to McKinley for "a great president (who) made our country very rich," and on MLK Jr. Day, the racist pig who once demanded the execution of the now exonerated Central Park Five ended Biden's death penalty moratorium and urged expanding it because it deters "heinous crimes" - a claim rejected as "a false, dark fantasy." He also directed the DOJ to ditch SCOTUS-set limits on killings and "ensure sufficient supply" of their drugs, which one expert called "one of the most ghoulish things I've ever fucking read."
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Amidst the casual cruelty, career criminal Donny Shitweasel is still grifting. His latest tower of corruption will be in Serbia, where Jared Kushner, last seen salivating over waterfront property in ravaged Gaza, has raised millions from foreign governments including blood-spattered Saudi Arabia for his Affinity Partners to build the Trump Tower Belgrade and funnel a few to Trump, part of what Jamie Raskin calls "ongoing efforts to sell political influence to the highest bidder." The king of the long con has moved on from sneakers, cologne, $100,000 watches to a cash grab "shameless even by his standards" - hawking "digital magic beans," aka $TRUMP crypto tokens, volatile assets that briefly peaked at $50 billion but worth only what MAGA nitwits will pay. "My new official Trump Meme is HERE!" he shrieked. "Celebrate everything we stand for: WINNING!" The White House is again for sale, says Walter Schaub: "America voted for corruption, and that’s what Trump is delivering. The very idea of government ethics is now a smoldering crater."
When not peddling power, Trump is busy walking back campaign promises. It turns out lowering prices is "hard" - signs in stores: "Egg Supplies Limited" - and so is ending the Ukraine war "within 24 hours," which is all Biden's fault. He's still taking dodgy, often vicious actions. In the last three days, he pardoned Ross Ulbricht, serving life in prison, whose online Silk Road used cryptocurrency.to buy/sell $200 million in illegal, sometimes fatal drugs; removed the Office of Gun Violence Prevention from the White House website; revoked LBJ's 1965 equal employment order banning discrimination in hiring, thus rolling back 60 years of civil rights progress; threatened uppity state and local "actors" with prosecution for "resisting, obstructing and otherwise failing to comply with" racist immigration policies; effectively closed the Southern border to migrants or asylum seekers and directed his dystopian minions to "take all necessary action to immediately repel, repatriate, and remove (any) illegal alien involved in an invasion across (the) border."
En route, he's already getting pushback. At least 22 Dem-led states, along with D.C., San Francisco, the ACLU, other advocacy groups and one expectant mother, have sued to halt his effort to rescind the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship; a Reagan-appointed judge in Seattle temporarily blocked it, agreeing it was "blatantly unconstitutional" and telling Trump lawyers "it boggles my mind" they're trying to argue otherwise. Three lawsuits have been filed against the Department of Government Efficiency for violating transparency laws, though one could argue DOGE has already proven so efficient it's cut the number of billlionaires running it by half. As to his imperialist fever dream of taking over Greenland, which Denmark has owned for 800 years, a Danish lawmaker at the European Parliament re-iterated, "It is not for sale." When he added, “Let me put it in words you might understand: 'Mr. Trump, fuck off!'”, he was chastised for language "not OK in this house of democracy. Regardless of what we think of Mr. Trump."
Still, America's newest hero, and the first truth-teller to confront Trump to his pasty orange face, is the Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, Episcopal bishop at D.C.'s National Cathedral, where Trump inexplicably attended a national prayer service with his dead-eyed family and minions. Engaging in "some next-level, Jesus-style calling out the powerful," Budde looked at Trump's rows of "hellbound souls" - smirking Tiffany, glaring Melania, eye-rolling Vance, scowling Trump - and deciding "no fucking way she's obeying in advance," Budde asked the foul Mob Boss of this vile crew to show mercy to the vulnerable, like, you know, Jesus did with, “Whatever you did for the least of these, you did for me," etc. "In the name of our God (the one who saved him, remember?), I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now," said Budde, citing migrant, gay, transgender, birthright children, fleeing wars, "some who fear for their lives." For them, improbably, she called on Trump to "find compassion and welcome here."
Nazis evidently hate it when faith leaders ask people in power to heed Jesus' teachings - in church, yet, clearly no place for calls of "compassion" and "welcome." Charlie Kirk raved Budde "disgraced herself," the Cathedral had "fallen into the hands of LGBT activists," it had "become a sanctuary of Satan." A Hannity railed this "lady bishop spewed hate" in a "woke tirade" of "fearmongering and division." Mike Collins snarled Budde should be "added to the deportation list." Back to her native New Jersey? Presumably by cattle car? Tommy No-Brains castigated "the radical left...It just absolutely amazes me how far these people will go." Indeed. Trump sat helplessly seething; afterwards, he told reporters the service was “not too exciting” and "they can do much better." In the middle of the night, he ranted online "the so-called Bishop was a Radical Left hard-line Trump hater. Very ungracious, nasty in tone, and not compelling or smart...She is not very good at her job! She and her church owe the public an apology!”
The next day, the malevolent man-child signed a directive empowering "the brave men and women" of ICE to conduct raids and "catch criminal aliens, including murderers and rapists who no longer will be able to hide," in formerly "sensitive locations" like churches, schools, hospitals. Sigh. He's been in office three days. From one suffering soul, "It's a lot. It's a fucking lot." Yet there are so many of us reeling, raging, mourning, fighting. The great Jasmine Crockett, who just became Vice Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee, vows they will keep "shining a light on every attack on our rights," and she's "not gonna play...Buckle up, buttercup." The band Rage Against the Machine, longtime supporters of native activist Leonard Peltier, honored his release after (too many) decades in prison with a video. Its message: Anger - not consuming but cleansing, righteous, propulsive enough to keep us upright, "is a gift." And the Rev. Budde, facing death threats, has stood firm: "I don't feel there's a need to apologize for a request for mercy."
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers (and sisters). - Samuel Jackson's Jules tweaking Ezekiel 25:17 in Pulp Fiction.
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
U.K. actuaries and University of Exeter climate scientists on Thursday warned that "the risk of planetary insolvency looms unless we act decisively" and urged policymakers to "implement realistic and effective approaches to global risk management."
Actuaries have developed techniques that "underpin the functioning of the global pension market with $55 trillion of assets, and the global insurance market, collecting $8 trillion of premiums annually, to help us manage risk," Tim Lenton, University of Exeter's climate change and Earth system science chair, noted in the foreword of a report released Thursday.
Planetary Solvency—Finding Our Balance With Nature is the fourth report for which the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) has collaborated with climate scientists. In financial terms, solvency is the ability of people or companies to pay their long-term debts. Co-authors of one of the previous publications coined the phrase planetary solvency, "setting out the idea that financial risk management techniques could be adapted to help society manage climate change and other risks."
Three IFoA leaders—Kalpana Shah, Paul Sweeting, and Kartina Tahir Thomson—explained in their introduction to the latest report how "planetary solvency applies these techniques to the Earth system," writing:
The essentials that support our society and economy all flow from the Earth system, commodities such as food, water, energy, and raw materials. The Earth system regulates the climate and provides a breathable atmosphere, it is the foundation that underpins our society and economy. Planetary solvency assesses the Earth system's ability to continue supporting us, informed by planetary boundaries, tipping points in the Earth system, and other scientific discoveries to assess risks to this foundation—and thus to our society and the economy.
Our illustrative assessment of planetary solvency in this report shows a more fundamental, policy-led change of direction is required. Our current market-led approach to mitigating climate and nature risks is not delivering. There is an increasing risk of severe societal disruption (planetary insolvency), as our economic system drives further global warming and nature degradation.
"Impacts are already severe with unprecedented fires, floods, heatwaves, storms, and droughts," the document points out, emphasizing that human activity—particularly burning fossil fuels—drives climate change and biodiversity loss. "If unchecked they could become catastrophic, including loss of capacity to grow major staple crops, multimeter sea-level rise, altered climate patterns, and a further acceleration of global warming."
The report was released as wildfires ravage California and shortly after scientific bodies around the world concluded that 2024 was the hottest year on record and the first in which the average global temperature exceeded a key goal of the Paris agreement: 1.5°C above preindustrial levels. In the United States, experts identified 27 disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion.
"We risk triggering tipping points such as Greenland ice sheet melt, coral reef loss, Amazon forest dieback, and major ocean current disruption," the new publication warns, adding that "tipping points can trigger each other," and if multiple are triggered, "there may be a point of no return, after which it may be impossible to stabilize the climate."
Food system shocks and more frequent and devastating disasters increase the risk of mass mortality for humanity—including due to hunger and infectious diseases—along with mass migration and conflict, the report highlights.
"Climate change risk assessment methodologies understate economic impact, as they often exclude many of the most severe risks that are expected and do not recognize there is a risk of ruin," the document stresses. "They are precisely wrong, rather than being roughly right."
Specifically, lead author and IFoA council member Sandy Trust said in a statement, "widely used but deeply flawed assessments of the economic impact of climate change show a negligible impact" on gross domestic product (GDP).
However, Trust continued, "the risk-led methodology, set out in the report, shows a 50% GDP contraction between 2070 and 2090 unless an alternative course is chartered."
To mitigate the risk of planetary insolvency, the co-authors called on policymakers around the world to implement independent, annual assessments; set limits and thresholds that respect the planet's boundaries; enhance governance structures to support planetary solvency; and "enhance policymaker understanding of ecological interdependencies, tipping points, and systemic risks so they understand why these changes are needed."
They also underscored the need to limit global warming and avoid triggering tipping points with actions such as accelerating decarbonization, removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, restoring damaged ecosystems, and building resilience.
"You can't have an economy without a society, and a society needs somewhere to live," said Trust. "Nature is our foundation... Threats to the stability of this foundation are risks to future human prosperity which we must take action to avoid."
The U.S.Justice Department on Tuesday announced that it has added six landlords as defendants in an antitrust lawsuit that the agency initially filed against the real estate software company RealPage, which the DOJ accused of engaging in a price fixing scheme that allows reduced competition between landlords so they can increase rents.
At the center of the case is RealPage's "algorithmic pricing software," which generates rent price recommendations using software based on their and their rivals' "competitively sensitive information," which they submit to RealPage, according to an August statement from the Department of Justice regarding the initial complaint.
The new complaint alleges that the six companies—Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC; Blackstone's LivCor LLC; Camden Property Trust; Cushman & Wakefield Inc and Pinnacle Property Management Services LLC; Willow Bridge Property Company LLC; and Cortland Management LLC—"participated in an unlawful scheme to decrease competition among landlords in apartment pricing, harming millions of American renters," according to a Tuesday statement from the Department of Justice.
The landlords collectively operate more than 1.3 million units in 43 states and the District of Columbia, according to the agency.
The Department of Justice alleges that in addition to using RealPages's "anticompetitive pricing algorithms," the companies coordinated in a number of ways, including "communicating with competitors' senior managers about rents, occupancy, and other competitively sensitive topics" and participating in "user groups" hosted by RealPage, during which landlords would discuss, for example, how to modify the software's pricing methodology and the companies' own pricing strategies.
"While Americans across the country struggled to afford housing, the landlords named in today's lawsuit shared sensitive information about rental prices and used algorithms to coordinate to keep the price of rent high," said Doha Mekki, acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Antitrust Division, in the Tuesday statement.
Two states, Illinois and Massachusetts, have also joined the suit as plaintiffs.
The American Economic Liberties Project, a group that urges government to confront corporate concentration, touted the updates to the lawsuit, writing Tuesday, "If you mess with the price of rent, be prepared to meet the DOJ on the other side of that scheme!"
Tony Carrk, executive director of the watchdog Accountable.US, said in a Tuesday statement that "corporate landlords like Camden Property Trust, one of the landlord companies included in today's complaint, have reaped hundreds of millions in profits while using RealPage's algorithm, and that's just the tip of the iceberg."
According to the Tuesday release from the Department of Justice, pending a consent decree which must be approved by the court, the DOJ may resolve its claims against one of the landlords, Cortland, which would then cooperate with the Justice Department's investigation and litigation.
U.S. President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Office of Management and Budget told lawmakers Wednesday that he's "proud" of the impacts of Clinton-era welfare reform, a Republican-backed legislative change that doubled extreme poverty by stripping government support from some of the nation's most vulnerable people—including children with disabilities.
Pressed on his record of advocating work requirements for Medicaid recipients, Project 2025 architect Russ Vought told members of the Senate Budget Committee that "one of the major legislations that our side has been very proud of since the 1990s was the impact of welfare reform" and suggested it should be a model for the Trump administration to apply to other federal programs going forward.
"It led to caseload reductions, people getting off of welfare, going back into the workforce," Vought said of the 1996 reform, neglecting to mention research showing that the law resulted in an explosion of extreme poverty as people were often unable to find jobs after losing benefits.
In response to Vought's remarks, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) noted that Arkansas' temporary imposition of work requirements on Medicaid recipients—with a green light from the first Trump administration—was a "failed experiment," with thousands losing health coverage without any significant increase in employment.
Watch the exchange:
At @SenateBudget confirmation hearing, Russell Vought says he's "very proud" of his plans to take Medicaid away from people who can't work.@SenJeffMerkley tells Vought this would trap Americans in poverty: "The way that people are able to work is when they're healthy". pic.twitter.com/3GmaVwmnVo
— Social Security Works (@SSWorks) January 22, 2025
Later in Wednesday's hearing, Vought—a longtime supporter of Medicaid cuts—said that "we need to go after the mandatory programs," a category that includes Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Republicans in Congress have reportedly discussed cutting trillions of dollars from Medicaid to help pay for another round of tax cuts that would disproportionately benefit the wealthiest Americans.
During his time questioning Vought on Wednesday, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said that "the distillation of the Trump economic program is to give tax breaks to all the people at the top, and it's gonna be paid for by" cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance.
"We would not characterize our economic program that way," Vought replied.
As President Donald Trump triumphantly returned to the White House thanks in part to a tsunami of campaign cash from oligarchs and corporate interests, democracy defenders on Tuesday marked the 15th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that unleashed such spending by urging action to overturn the decision.
In a nation where corporations and moneyed interests already wielded disproportionate power and influence over elections, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commissionreversed campaign finance restrictions dating back to the era of Gilded Age robber barons. The ruling affirmed that political spending by corporations, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other groups is a form of free speech protected by the 1st Amendment that government cannot restrict. The decision ushered in the era of super PACs—which can raise unlimited amounts of money to spend on campaigns—and secret spending on elections with so-called "dark money."
In his Citizens Uniteddissent, Justice John Paul Stevens asserted that "in a functioning democracy the public must have faith that its representatives owe their positions to the people, not to the corporations with the deepest pockets," and warned that the ruling "will undoubtedly cripple the ability of ordinary citizens, Congress, and the states to adopt even limited measures to protect against corporate domination of the electoral process."
"Over the last 15 years, the American people have watched with disgust as both parties welcomed the unfettered sale of our democracy and elections to the highest bidders."
Since then, nearly $20 billion has been spent on U.S. presidential elections and more than $53 billion on congressional races, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets. Spending on 2024 congressional races was double 2010 levels, while presidential campaign contributions were more than 50% higher in 2024 than in 2008, the last election before Citizens United.
Ultrawealthy megadonors played a critical role in Trump's 2024 victory. Some of them have been rewarded with Cabinet nominations and key appointments in "an administration dominated by billionaires and corporate interests," as Americans for Tax Fairness executive director David Kass described it.
"Fifteen years ago today, the Supreme Court gave billionaires and special interests unprecedented power to rig our democracy with its disastrous Citizens United decision. Yesterday, Donald Trump was sworn in, ushering in the wealthiest administration in American history," Tiffany Muller, president of the advocacy group End Citizens United, said on social media Tuesday. "Citizens United paved the way for Trump II."
Alexandra Rojas, executive director of the progressive political action committee Justice Democrats, said in a statement that "over the last 15 years, the American people have watched with disgust as both parties welcomed the unfettered sale of our democracy and elections to the highest bidders."
"Citizens United legalized economic inequality as a political tool for the wealthy to exploit," Rojas added. "A decade-and-a-half later, working-class people cannot afford to run for office and everyday voters' voices are drowned out by billionaire-funded super PACs. As long as Citizens United remains the law of the land, our democracy will remain broken."
Justice Democrats noted: "Yesterday, Donald Trump was inaugurated as president in what was maybe one of the most openly corporate-sponsored inaugurations in American history. In just one row seated in front of Trump's Cabinet members, four men had the combined wealth of just under $1 trillion."
"Billionaires and corporations are paying their way to gain influence in the Trump administration and they can expect a massive return on their investment, at the expense of everyday people," the group added.
It's no surprise, say critics, that corporate profits and plutocrat wealth have soared to new heights during the Citizens United era.
"Citizens United allowed corporations to buy candidates and elections. Citizens United legalized political bribery. Citizens United let wealth dominate our elections," the consumer watchdog Public Citizen said Tuesday. "Overturn Citizens United."
Positing that "Citizens United turned our democracy into an auction," Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) wrote on social media Tuesday that "our government is supposed to be of the people, by the people, and for the people—not corporations and billionaire elites. We must #EndCitizensUnited and put the American people back in charge."
Democratic lawmakers have introduced numerous bills, including proposed constitutional amendments, to reverse Citizens United. While Congress has not been able or willing to address the issue, 22 states and the District of Columbia, as well as more than 800 local governments across the country, have passed measures calling for a constitutional amendment to overturn the ruling, according to Public Citizen.
"This is a moment to
usher in a new era in the Democratic Party that rejects the growing oligarchy in this country by rejecting the unprecedented level of billionaire and corporate spending that has a stranglehold over both parties," Justice Democrats said on Tuesday. "Now is the moment to tirelessly center working people and expose the big money corruption that Citizens United has brought onto both parties. By rejecting their influence, working-class people may finally have the promise of a party that actually serves them."
Israeli forces killed at least 19 Palestinians across the Gaza Strip on Sunday morning during a three-hour delay in implementing a cease-fire and hostage-release deal that Israel's Cabinet finally approved the previous day.
After over 15 months of a U.S.-backed military assault for which Israel faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) strikes on Gaza were set to stop at 8:30 am local time, due to a three-phase agreement negotiated by Egypt, Qatar, and the outgoing Biden and incoming Trump administrations.
They did not, with deadly results. Mahmoud Basal, a spokesperson for Gaza's Civil Defense, said Sunday that at least 19 people were killed and over 36 were injured from 8:30 am to 11:30 am. That's on top of the tens of thousands of people the Israeli assault and restrictions on humanitarian aid have killed since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel.
As of midnight Saturday, the Gaza Ministry of Health put the official death toll in the besieged Palestinian enclave at 46,913, with another 110,750 people injured and over 10,000 others missing in the rubble of former homes, hospitals, schools, and mosques, though experts warn the number of deaths is likely far higher.
At 9:17 am on Sunday, the IDF said that it was "continuing to operate and strike terrorist targets in Gaza," adding: "A short while ago, IDF artillery and aircraft struck a number of terrorist targets in northern and central Gaza. The IDF remains ready in offense and defense and will not allow any harm to the citizens of Israel."
Muhammad Shehada, a Gazan writer, called the delay a "last-minute trick" by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and explained on social media that it was "under the pretext that Hamas hasn't submitted the list of three captives it'll release today."
As Shehada detailed:
Israel also reneged on the arrangement needed for Hamas to be able to submit such list; suspending surveillance drones and bombardment in the hours preceding the cease-fire so that it becomes logistically possible for Hamas' members on the ground and abroad to contact each other and figure out which hostages are alive and where without compromising their whereabouts and risking being bombed or raided by the IDF.
Hamas was forced to submit the list under fire and spy drones, which meant Israel exploited this to try to locate and snatch some captives last minute. Israel now succeeded in reaching the body of the soldier Oron Shaul, whom Hamas had been holding captive since 2014.
Ultimately, Hamas submitted the list and the pause in fighting took effect—at least for now—enabling displaced Palestinians to start returning to what is left of their communities and the process of releasing captives to begin with three Israelis and 90 Palestinians. During the deal's first 42-day phase, there are plans to free 33 Israelis taken hostage by Palestinian militants, 737 Palestinians imprisoned in Israel, and 1,167 Palestinians detained by Israeli forces in Gaza.
The three Israeli hostages—Emily Damari, Romi Gonen, and Doron Steinbrecher—were transfered to the International Committee of the Red Cross at a square in central Gaza City. The IDF confirmed that the Red Cross was bringing the women to Israeli troops.
The Associated Press on Sunday obtained from Hamas a list of the first 90 Palestinian prisoners set to be freed. They included 15-year-old Mahmoud Aliowat; 53-year-old Dalal Khaseeb, the sister of former Hamas second-in-command Saleh Arouri; 62-year-old Khalida Jarrar, a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine leader; and 68-year-old Abla Abdelrasoul, the wife of detained PFLP leader Ahmad Saadat.
"It's laughable that the party that once prided themselves on being champions of state and local government are now trampling state and local authority," said Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.).
The top Democrat on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee issued a statement Thursday condemning the Trump administration's threat that state and local officials could be criminally prosecuted for refusing to cooperate with the president's planned immigration crackdown, which is already drawing legal action and vows of opposition from advocacy groups and communities across the country.
"This policy will lead to chaos, division, and protracted litigation that will unnecessarily cost both state and federal taxpayers huge amounts of money that could be used to keep America safe," wrote Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who also argued that the "federal government doesn't own the states."
Raskin's comments were in response to a Tuesday memo from Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove to Justice Department employees that was obtained by The Washington Post.
"Federal law prohibits state and local actors from resisting, obstructing, and otherwise failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands," wrote Bove, who stated that the supremacy clause of the Constitution and other legal authorities "require state and local actors to comply with the executive branch's immigration enforcement initiatives."
The memo also makes mention of a "Sanctuary Cities Enforcement Working Group" which will identify state and local policies and laws that are inconsistent with White House immigration initiatives.
On Monday, his first day in office, Trump announced sweeping changes to U.S. immigration enforcement via executive actions, including attempting to end birthright citizenship, reinstating his "Remain in Mexico" policy, suspending refugee resettlement, and moving to restrict federal funds to so-called sanctuary cities.
In response to the memo, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said that the move is a "scare tactic," according to The Los Angeles Times. Bonta said that his team is reviewing the memo and will be "prepared to take legal action if the Trump administration's vague threats turn to illegal action."
Raskin challenged the memo for its "failure to cite any authority for this proposition."
"The Constitution and Supreme Court precedents make clear that the 10th Amendment and constitutional federalism protect state and local government and their officials from being 'commandeered' by the federal government as instrumentalities to carry out its policies," he wrote.
"It's laughable that the party that once prided themselves on being champions of state and local government are now trampling state and local authority by commandeering state and local governments to serve a federal agenda," he added.
"The future of Illinois manufacturing depends on the power of our workforce," said Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.)
The automaker Stellantis announced Wednesday that it will build the next generation Dodge Durango at its Detroit Assembly Complex and will reopen the Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois—two issues that the United Auto Workers union said the firm had agreed to in a 2023 union contract, but then had tried to walk back.
According to the announcement, the reopening of the Belvidere plant will return some 1,500 UAW-represented employees back to work there, and the plant will also be used to produce a new mid-sized pick up truck.
Democratic lawmakers and the UAW leadership cheered the development. In a letter released Wednesday, UAW president Shawn Fain and UAW Stellantis Department director Kevin Gotinsky wrote that the "victory is a testament to workers standing together."
On X, Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) wrote: "The future of Illinois manufacturing depends on the power of our workforce. Proud to see Stellantis honor their historic deal with UAW—bringing 1,500+ jobs back to their Belvidere Assembly Plant. Incredible win for Illinois." The AFL-CIO posted on X, cheering the development, as did Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.).
The United Auto Workers represents unionized workers at Stellantis (formerly Chrysler), as well as General Motors and Ford. UAW-represented workers ratified a contract with the three automakers, collectively known as "the Big Three," that yielded worker wage gains in 2023.
According to the union, Stellantis agreed in the 2023 contract to reopen the Belvidere plant and to manufacture the next generation Dodge Durango in Detroit, but the company's old leadership had failed to uphold those commitments.
Former CEO Carlos Tavares, who spearheaded aggressive targets for sales and cost cuts and tangled with both the board and the union, according to Reuters, resigned in December. The letter from Fain and Gotinsky credited the union members with his exit.
"Thank you to the thousands of members and leaders who rallied, marched, filed grievances, and talked to coworkers. Your solidarity forced Carlos Tavares out as CEO of this company, and it's been a game-changer. Since Antonio Filosa has taken over as North American COO at Stellantis, we have been meeting with their team, and the difference is clear," according to the letter from Fain and Gotinsky.
The union had filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board accusing the automaker of unlawfully refusing to release information about plans to move Dodge Durango production from a Detroit factory to one outside of the United States, and also filed grievances over delays in reopening the plant in Belvidere, according to The Associated Press. Union members had threatened to strike over the issue of the Belvidere plant.
In October 2024, members of the Senate and the House of Representatives sent two separate letters to Stellantis leadership urging them to keep the company's commitments.
On Wednesday, Stellantis "also committed to a significant investment in Kokomo, announcing plans to build Phase II of the GME-T4 EVO engine beginning in 2026, reversing plans to move work out of this country. There will be no change to existing GME-T4 EVO production at the Dundee Engine Plant. Finally, the company committed to increased component production at the Toledo Machining Plant," according to a press statement from UAW.
"I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration.
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates...
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's unilateral attempt to end birthright citizenship, calling the move "blatantly unconstitutional."
The decision from Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle came after Democratic-led states and advocacy groups sued the Trump administration over the president's executive order, which they argue runs afoul of the clear text of the 14th Amendment and more than a century of legal precedent.
"Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that is a constitutional order," the Reagan-appointed judge told an attorney for the Trump administration on Thursday. "It boggles my mind."
Reutersreported Thursday that Trump's order, which he signed shortly after taking office earlier this week, "has already become the subject of five lawsuits by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states."
Lawyers representing Washington state, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon warned in a court filing that if the president's order is allowed to take effect, "children born in the plaintiff states will soon be rendered undocumented, subject to removal or detention, and many stateless."
"They will be denied their right to travel freely and re-enter the United States," the filing continued. "They will lose their ability to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) and work lawfully as they grow up. They will be denied their right to vote, serve on juries, and run for certain offices. And they will be placed into positions of instability and insecurity as part of a new, Presidentially-created underclass in the United States."
The case could be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently dominated by conservatives—including three Trump appointees.