Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Tears of Gaza Must Be Our Tears
When I lived in Jerusalem I had a friend who confided in me that as a college student in the United States she attended events like these, wrote up reports and submitted them to the Israel consulate for money. It would be naive to assume this Israeli practice has ended. So, I want first tonight to address that person, or those persons, who may have come to this event for the purpose of reporting on it to the Israeli government.
I would like to remind them that it is they who hide in darkness. It is we who stand in the light. It is they who deceive. It is we who openly proclaim our compassion and demand justice for those who suffer in Gaza. We are not afraid to name our names. We are not afraid to name our beliefs. And we know something you perhaps sense with a kind of dread. As Martin Luther King said, the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice, and that arc is descending with a righteous fury that is thundering down upon the Israeli government.
You may have the bulldozers, planes and helicopters that smash houses to rubble, the commandos who descend from ropes on ships and kill unarmed civilians on the high seas as well as in Gaza, the vast power of the state behind you. We have only our hands and our hearts and our voices. But note this. Note this well. It is you who are afraid of us. We are not afraid of you. We will keep working and praying, keep protesting and denouncing, keep pushing up against your navy and your army, with nothing but our bodies, until we prove that the force of morality and justice is greater than hate and violence. And then, when there is freedom in Gaza, we will forgive ... you. We will ask you to break bread with us. We will bless your children even if you did not find it in your heart to bless the children of those you occupied. And maybe it is this forgiveness, maybe it is the final, insurmountable power of love, which unsettles you the most.
And so tonight, a night when some seek to name names and others seek to hide names, let me do some naming. Let me call things by their proper names. Let me cut through the jargon, the euphemisms we use to mask human suffering and war crimes. “Closures” mean heavily armed soldiers who ring Palestinian ghettos, deny those trapped inside food or basic amenities—including toys, razors, chocolate, fishing rods and musical instruments—and carry out a brutal policy of collective punishment, which is a crime under international law. “Disputed land” means land stolen from the Palestinians. “Clashes” mean, almost always, the killing or wounding of unarmed Palestinians, including children. “Jewish neighborhoods in the West Bank” mean fortress-like compounds that serve as military outposts in the campaign of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. “Targeted assassinations” mean extrajudicial murder. “Air strikes on militant bomb-making posts” mean the dropping of huge iron fragmentation bombs from fighter jets on densely crowded neighborhoods that always leaves scores of dead and wounded, whose only contact with a bomb was the one manufactured in the United States and given to the Israeli Air Force as part of our complicity in the occupation. “The peace process” means the cynical, one-way route to the crushing of the Palestinians as a people.
These are some names. There are others. Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish in the late afternoon of Jan. 16, 2009, had a pair of Israeli tank shells rip through a bedroom in his Gaza apartment, killing three of his daughters—Bessan, Mayar and Aya—along with a niece, Noor.
“I have the right to feel angry,” says Abuelaish. “But I ask, ‘Is this the right way?’ So many people were expecting me to hate. My answer to them is I shall not hate.”
“Whom to hate?” asks the 55-year-old gynecologist, who was born a Palestinian refugee and raised in poverty. “My Israeli friends? My Israeli colleagues? The Israeli babies I have delivered?”
The Palestinian poet Taha Muhammad Ali wrote this in his poem “Revenge”:
At times ... I wish
I could meet in a duel
the man who killed my father
and razed our home,
expelling me
into
a narrow country.
And if he killed me,
I’d rest at last,
and if I were ready—
I would take my revenge!
*
But if it came to light,
when my rival appeared,
that he had a mother
waiting for him,
or a father who’d put
his right hand over
the heart’s place in his chest
whenever his son was late
even by just a quarter-hour
for a meeting they’d set—
then I would not kill him,
even if I could.
*
Likewise ... I
would not murder him
if it were soon made clear
that he had a brother or sisters
who loved him and constantly longed to see him.
Or if he had a wife to greet him
and children who
couldn’t bear his absence
and whom his gifts would thrill.
Or if he had
friends or companions,
neighbors he knew
or allies from prison
or a hospital room,
or classmates from his school …
asking about him
and sending him regards.
*
But if he turned
out to be on his own—
cut off like a branch from a tree—
without a mother or father,
with neither a brother nor sister,
wifeless, without a child,
and without kin or neighbors or friends,
colleagues or companions,
then I’d add not a thing to his pain
within that aloneness—
not the torment of death,
and not the sorrow of passing away.
Instead I’d be content
to ignore him when I passed him by
on the street—as I
convinced myself
that paying him no attention
in itself was a kind of revenge.
And if these words are what it means to be a Muslim, and I believe it does, name me too a Muslim, a follower of the prophet, peace be upon him.
The boat to Gaza will be named “The Audacity of Hope.” But these are not Barack Obama’s words. These are the words of my friend the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. They are borrowed words. And Jerry Wright is not afraid to speak the truth, not afraid to tell us to stop confusing God with America. “We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands [killed] in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye,” Rev. Wright said. “We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back into our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost.”
Or the words of Edward Said:
Nothing in my view is more reprehensible than those habits of mind in the intellectual that induce avoidance, that characteristic turning away from a difficult and principled position which you know to be the right one, but which you decide not to take. You do not want to appear too political; you are afraid of seeming controversial; you want to keep a reputation for being balanced, objective, moderate; your hope is to be asked back, to consult, to be on a board or prestigious committee, and so to remain within the responsible mainstream; someday you hope to get an honorary degree, a big prize, perhaps even an ambassadorship.
For an intellectual these habits of mind are corrupting par excellence. If anything can denature, neutralize, and finally kill a passionate intellectual life it is the internalization of such habits. Personally I have encountered them in one of the toughest of all contemporary issues, Palestine, where fear of speaking out about one of the greatest injustices in modern history has hobbled, blinkered, muzzled many who know the truth and are in a position to serve it. For despite the abuse and vilification that any outspoken supporter of Palestinian rights and self-determination earns for him or herself, the truth deserves to be spoken, represented by an unafraid and compassionate intellectual.
And some of the last words of Rachel Corrie to her parents:
I’m witnessing this chronic, insidious genocide and I’m really scared, and questioning my fundamental belief in the goodness of human nature. This has to stop. I think it is a good idea for us all to drop everything and devote our lives to making this stop. I don’t think it’s an extremist thing to do anymore. I still really want to dance around to Pat Benatar and have boyfriends and make comics for my coworkers. But I also want this to stop. Disbelief and horror is what I feel. Disappointment. I am disappointed that this is the base reality of our world and that we, in fact, participate in it. This is not at all what I asked for when I came into this world. This is not at all what the people here asked for when they came into this world. This is not the world you and Dad wanted me to come into when you decided to have me. This is not what I meant when I looked at Capital Lake and said: “This is the wide world and I’m coming to it.” I did not mean that I was coming into a world where I could live a comfortable life and possibly, with no effort at all, exist in complete unawareness of my participation in genocide. More big explosions somewhere in the distance outside. When I come back from Palestine, I probably will have nightmares and constantly feel guilty for not being here, but I can channel that into more work. Coming here is one of the better things I’ve ever done. So when I sound crazy, or if the Israeli military should break with their racist tendency not to injure white people, please pin the reason squarely on the fact that I am in the midst of a genocide which I am also indirectly supporting, and for which my government is largely responsible.
And if this is what it means to be a Christian, and I believe it does, to speak in the voice of Jeremiah Wright, Edward Said or Rachel Corrie, to remember and take upon us the pain and injustice of others, then name me a Christian, a follower of Jesus Christ.
And what of the long line of Jewish prophets that run from Jeremiah, Isaiah and Amos to Hannah Arendt, who reminded the world when the state of Israel was founded that the injustice meted out to the Jews could not be rectified by an injustice meted out to the Palestinians, what of our own prophets, Noam Chomsky or Norman Finkelstein, outcasts like all prophets, what of Uri Avnery or the Israeli poet Aharon Shabtai, who writes in his poem “Rypin,” the Polish town his father escaped from during the Holocaust, these words:
These creatures in helmets and khakis,
I say to myself, aren’t Jews,
In the truest sense of the word. A Jew
Doesn’t dress himself up with weapons like jewelry,
Doesn’t believe in the barrel of a gun aimed at a target,
But in the thumb of the child who was shot at—
In the house through which he comes and goes,
Not in the charge that blows it apart.
The coarse soul and iron first
He scorns by nature.
He lifts his eyes not to the officer, or the soldier
With his finger on the trigger—but to justice,
And he cries out for compassion.
Therefore, he won’t steal land from its people
And will not starve them in camps.
The voice calling for expulsion
Is heard from the hoarse throat of the oppressor—
A sure sign that the Jew has entered a foreign country
And, like Umberto Saba, gone into hiding within his own city.
Because of voices like these, father
At age sixteen, with your family, you fled Rypin;
Now here Rypin is your son.
And if to be Jew means this, and I believe it does, name me a Jew. Name us all Muslims and Christians and Jews. Name us as human beings who believe that when one of us suffers all of us suffer, that we never have to ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for us all, that the tears of the mother in Gaza are our tears, that the wails of the bloodied children in Al Shifa Hospital are the wails of our own children.
Let me close tonight with one last name. Let me name those who send these tanks and fighter jets to bomb the concrete hovels in Gaza with families crouching, helpless, inside, let me name those who deny children the right to a childhood and the sick a right to care, those who torture, those who carry out assassinations in hotel rooms in Dubai and on the streets of Gaza City, those who deny the hungry food, the oppressed justice and foul the truth with official propaganda and state lies. Let me call them, not by their honorific titles and positions of power, but by the name they have earned for themselves by draining the blood of the innocent into the sands of Gaza. Let me name them for who they are: terrorists.


223 Comments so far
Show AllHedges needs to take that finger pointing "terrorist" and turn it back on himself. We need to get to root causes and the USA is terrorist nation one. Who can deny this fact with two wars of foreign aggression, drone bombing in five nations, troops in 130 different countries. Talk to any Iraqi approaching an American road block about the word terror. Our client state of Israel merely reflects back on us. The outrages and atrocities continue to mount and as contributors to this society and tax payers to this government, we are the people who make it happen.
The rising atrocities in Gaza seem to be in direct correlation to our own increasingly brazen and criminal behaviours being played out throughout the world. I am reminded of a sex addict pedophile. We are being led by sociopath leaders and in their drive for greed and domination, each successive outrage tops the previous one as the thrill of the previous depraved action can no longer sate its appetite.
All Americans need to consider carefully how we extricate ourselves from this mess.
Agreed, Lefty.
I believe that Cheney dreams of being Netanyahu.
Israel is the neocon experiment, client state. I think they are a black contract site and have been for a while now.
But i still think the u.s. is in charge. But the u.s. neocons, that is.
agreed except no need to point any kind of finger at chris...he is great
Mr. Hedges is pointing a finger at himself, at us, and the U.S., and all who support the oppression of Palestine. At least that is what I read in his speech.
agreed, well said
"But i still think the u.s. is in charge. But the u.s. neocons, that is." –(readytotransform)
–The question of whether 'the tail wags the dog' or 'the dog wags the tail,' when it comes to Israel and America is a moot one.
In a 'mirrored' relationship of an ever shifting, exceedingly complex dialectic of altered valences, it is best to avoid reductive oversimplifications.
I have yet to read a convincing argument that seeks to resolve this conundrum by positing 'either/or' determinations as to which state bears the lion's share of influence in the wretched continuum of state terror.
We know. Your only answer is getting rid of America and Israel. Be nice now.
VashkarKim, I think so too.
Among other metaphors, I apply the Dr. Frankenstein/Frankenstein monster relationship to the US and Israel.
Superfically, determining which rules the other seems to be a matter of historical fact.
But the truth defies linear, superficial, cause-and-effect analysis.
One can find compelling examples that "prove" Dr. Frankenstein is in control, and countervailing examples that "prove" the Monster is the one pulling the strings and calling the shots. But ultimately the US/Israel relationship is a folie à deux.
Does anyone remember R.D. Laing's "Knots"? It was mind-boggling and painful to contemplate, but it nicely illustrated the difficult and elusive notion that indeed the truth is a transactional flux.
O.S., I remember "Knots"!
Excellent work here, Obedient!
Israel and America are indeed 'knotted' in the spasmodic weave of an imperial system that interacts compulsively in an almost narcissistic need for 'mirroring.'
What makes it uniquely hideous is that it has drifted from the contingencies of the rational materiality of 'policy'–of linear cause and effect–(and where the ability to assess the actual value of the relationship is no longer possible) into the stygian depths of a perverse psychological 'doubling.'
As you have correctly surmised, there is no 'chicken' or the 'egg' dynamic; no Frankenstein or Dr. Frankenstein calling the shots, rather a mutually enforced thralldom of an ever more entwined co-dependency.
Two failed states who have agreed to fail even more perversely, out of a twisted pride. The question of 'influence' becomes moot. All is compulsion and a mirrored voyeurism refracted through an evil prism.
Attempting to impose an order of logic or 'causality' based on strictly strategic or the independent needs for either state, falls short in explaining much of anything. As Ostrogoth has posted above, Israel is clearly a liability to the interests of the imperial behemoth. Why then, is it not abjectly jettisoned?
It does little to assume just because America is the biggest player in the room that it unilaterally 'dominates' the junior partner by necessity. In any relationship so morbid a shifting 'flux' is indeed the operational dynamic. There are ultimately no 'junior partners' here in this wretched co-dependancy.
The shared and processed morbidity of the Israel / America relationship has all the logic of an addiction. It is committed to sustaining an image 'complex' of overwhelming violence which has been automatized, as if it had a life of its own– irrespective if it is ultimately good– or even useful to either nation.
And indeed it does, have a life of its own.
Brilliantly observed.
in the wretched continuum of arms manufacture....
>>I have yet to read a convincing argument that seeks to resolve this conundrum by positing 'either/or' determinations as to which state bears the lion's share of influence in the wretched continuum of state terror.
I am of the opinion that US actions often lead to complementary Israeli actions, rarely vice versa. Merely an opinion.
It is, in my perception anyway, a stylistic difference. Israel makes no apologies or pretense that they are doing it to help out. As in 'Democratization".
As i said, Cheney dreams of being Netanyahu.
Point well taken, VashkarKim.
But it is always tempting.......
u.s. neocons/neoliberal is all of our federal government leadership today.
I know i have mentioned this some where before, but i think it is worth repeating.
About seven years ago while listening to Democracy Now, there was a journalist whose name escapes me (unfortunately). He said that a friend was attending some gathering in the White House and over heard George W. asking his father, "What does 'neocon' mean?" Bush senior answered, "Israel".
That made an impression on me. But don't ask me to remember anything more specific.
it was andrew cockburn.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/3/7/journalist_and_author_andrew_cockburn_on
{AMY GOODMAN: In 2006, you write that George W. Bush said to his father, "What’s a neocon?"
ANDREW COCKBURN: That’s right. One of the rare moments of sort of communication between the two. Bush said to—they were out at Kennebunkport, and Bush Jr. says, "Can I ask you a question? What’s a neocon?" And the father says, "Do you want names or a description?" The President says, "I’ll take a description." He says, "I’ll give it to you in one word: Israel," which is interesting on all sorts of levels, including the confirmation that our president doesn’t really read the newspapers.
AMY GOODMAN: Explain what you mean when you say that. And how do you know that this conversation took place at their vacation home?
ANDREW COCKBURN: Well, I can’t really say who told me, but it’s someone who was—I have absolute confidence in both in their—that they’re telling the truth and also in their position to be aware of this conversation.}
...peace...
Iowablackbird, THANK YOU so much!!!
I knew i wasn't imagining this....Although i did get some of the specifics wrong. To say the least.
Peace.
rita
They are morphing....
You miss the point. Hedges has pointed his finger back toward the US for years ... a major voice in criticizing the US. Where have you been?
Please read Hedge's article again and notice the " ... with a bomb was the one manufactured in the United States and given to the Israeli Air Force as part of our complicity in the occupation." THAT, if you pay attention, is a finger pointing back to ....
Oh well.
Lefty and Gene
Sometimes, the Flying Fickle Fickle Finger of Fate is appropriately pointed at the correct target.
Funny, how you take an oppositional stance, and then mereley repeat what was implied/understood already in the article.
Hedges is brilliant, compassionate, insightful, and an excellent writer. Always worth considering his work with respect.
I feel that the US needs to be held equally culpable for these atrocities. I didn't see that balance in spite of the bomb quote.
Didn't you read what Chris just wrote?
Hedges is justified in pointing an accusing finger at the Zionists. Certainly terrorism is an important and often-employed weapon in the imperial arsenal, and Hedges routinely denounces American oligarchs for using terror against their victims.
But Israel is no ordinary U.S. client. This is a myth that implies that Israel serves U.S. interests, which it certainly doesn’t. Zionist ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and territorial expansionism have instead turned Israel into a strategic liability for U.S. imperialism.
Of course the Zionists don’t dictate U.S. foreign policy, but they influence it heavily, and right now they are using their political muscle in the U.S. to trap us in a war against Iran that is unwinnable and counterproductive, even when U.S. interests are narrowly defined as hegemonic control of Middle Eastern oil.
Therefore Zionism deserves to be singled out as a distinct and probably even more dangerous threat to world peace than U.S. imperialism, and not just a tool of U.S. interests.
I have no problem singling out Israel for their atrocities. I certainly don't view them as more dangerous than US imperialism. I will state my point again. Israeli leadership are like a pack of cowardly, duplicitous hyenas waiting in the bushes. If it weren't for the last eight years of American belligerence and criminality on the world stage, I seriously doubt that scum would be doing what it is doing today.
"But Israel is no ordinary U.S. client. This is a myth that implies that Israel serves U.S. interests, which it certainly doesn’t." –(Ostrogoth)
–While this is a well taken point, the larger point is that it no longer matters–and has not for a long time–whwther Israel is a liability for America or is not a liability for America.
The shifting dialectic in the conception of junior partner and senior partner is now a dark continuum of psychologic opacity that is impossible to untangle with any degree of assured accuracy.
Attempting to discern the question of dominant influence is not an obvious one and quickly degenerates into mootness.
I thought his summation was going to be: We Americans. Other than that, Mr Hedges, it's a wonderful speech and thank you for the two beautiful poems.
After the munitions trains sped across the USA delivering bombs for the Gaza Holocaust, and before the Imperial USA Senate gave an unnaminous thumbs up to the slaughter,
OilBomber said he would do the same as israel if his daughters lived in the stolen lands.
Very well done. This is written in the spirit of MLK or Gandhi.
I love the Edward Said quote and the poem by Taha Muhammad Ali
We need more moral voices like Hedges in the face of all of our wars.
Vacuous Posts OUT of Common Dreams NOW!
actually it's a big "israeli" talking point...every single "israeli"i have spoken to has used it..."well thats what you did with your indians...why should we, a nation like any other, be held to a higher standard?"....
when the argument is used, knowing in detail the story of the u.s., canada and the native americans,( at one time i had many native american friends) my stomach usually turns into a knot, i don't say anything, i just look them directly in the eyes till they flee... once an israeli woman as she fled, cried out "if there were an israeli man here, he would show you,.....interesting.....in the case of "israel" we are dealing i think, with a kind of mass psycho-pathology, not unlike the nazis...
And what is your answer?
Just interested.
"Vacuous Posts OUT of Common Dreams NOW!"
?
Vacuous posts OUT of CommonDreams NOW!
One way of protesting Israel's treatment of the Palestinian people is to engage in BDS-Boycott Divestment Sanctions. Please sign this petition to support this Food Co-op's Boycott against Israeli goods.
http://www.olympiabds.org/get-involved/petition-in-support-of-the-olympia-food-co-op.html
The revolutionary force of Chris Hedges' love for others and the courage with which he confronts the oppressor (that is the US/Israeli govts), no matter how cleverly we disguise ourselves, is profoundly heartening.
How has this revolutionary soul managed to slip through all of the filters of greed and corruption that ensnare so many?
Hedges is a deep, cool pool of water at the center of a vast desert. Thank you, Chris.
Rachel Corrie was sorta kool but Jeremiah Wright? The guy's a controversial spokesman for terrorists. Rick Warren sounded much nicer than radical hypocrites like JW living richly like the whites he claimed to be against.
The Palestinians have my support but hating and destroying Israel isn't how you save them. Instead of looking to terrorists as heroes, the Palestinians should just leave Israel and find other countries that'll support them and then come back when discrimination against them is gone.
Peace
The Palestinians should leave Israel?
Gee, now wouldn't that fit in so nicely with the zionist plans for ethnic cleansing?
You'd think that zionists would be making this suggestion.
q
It's not ethnic cleansing if they choose to leave by themselves and then return when they're done hating the Palestinians. I don't like it that all Palestinians have to be labeled as terrorists just because of a few of them. Unless the Israeli left pushes its government to the left, the Palestinians have no room to live or grow. It's like keeping the solar panels tilted where the sun don't shine on them. You just goto adjust until you got it. The new panels are better though and need little adjusting. But bring them over here to MN. We elected a Muslim to Congress. How about Texas? They could turn the state blue and then no more neocons from Texas to help those zionists you mention.
Actually, dude, my first response was a joke. You didn't think that I'd take your chidishness seriously, did you?
q
Your childishness is my childishness quickie.
Why should those people leave ? Why doesn't Isreal ,a people that has known the same thing being done to them, stop being such rightous assholes ? All of those people on both sides should stop, they are so similar ,it's like the Methodists hating the Lutherans how stupid ! I do think Isreal is wrong though, whichever side thinks they deserve everything, and that they are the right religion, then to me they are wrong. Plus they have movies and toys, and fishing poles so they are the bad guys in this.
It'd be nice if they just get along but not gonna happen.
And then lets kick all of the Texans out of Texas...
I never said kick.
Yeah, you're right. I was wrong.
Ignore this poster. He's only here to dumb-down the site.
Translation, can't debate. Poor you.