EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Dollars for Death, Pennies for Life
When the U.S. military began a major offensive in southern Afghanistan over the weekend, the killing of children and other civilians was predictable. Lofty rhetoric aside, such deaths come with the territory of war and occupation.
A month ago, President Obama pledged $100 million in U.S. government aid to earthquake-devastated Haiti. Compare that to the $100 billion price tag to keep 100,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan for a year.
While commanders in Afghanistan were launching what the New York Times called "the largest offensive military operation since the American-led coalition invaded the country in 2001," the situation in Haiti was clearly dire.
With more than a million Haitians still homeless, vast numbers -- the latest estimates are around 75 percent -- don't have tents or tarps. The rainy season is fast approaching, with serious dangers of typhoid and dysentery.
No shortage of bombs in Afghanistan; a lethal shortage of tents in Haiti. Such priorities -- actual, not rhetorical -- are routine.
Last summer, I saw hundreds of children and other civilians at the Helmand Refugee Camp District 5, a miserable makeshift encampment in Kabul. The U.S. government had ample resources for bombing their neighborhoods in the Helmand Valley -- but was doing nothing to help the desperate refugees to survive after they fled to Afghanistan's capital city.
Such priorities have parallels at home. The military hawks and deficit hawks are now swooping along Pennsylvania Avenue in tight formation. There's plenty of money in the U.S. Treasury for war in Afghanistan. But domestic spending to meet human needs -- job creation, for instance -- is another matter.
Joblessness is now crushing many low-income Americans. Among those with annual household incomes of less than $12,500, the unemployment rate during the fourth quarter of last year "was a staggering 30.8 percent," Bob Herbert noted in a February 9 column. "That's more than five points higher than the overall jobless rate at the height of the Depression."
Herbert added: "The next lowest group, with incomes of $12,500 to $20,000, had an unemployment rate of 19.1 percent. These are the kinds of jobless rates that push families already struggling on meager incomes into destitution."
The current situation is akin to the one that Martin Luther King Jr. confronted in 1967 when he challenged Congress for showing "hostility to the poor" -- appropriating "military funds with alacrity and generosity" but providing "poverty funds with miserliness."
Such priorities are taking lives every day, near and far.
Early this month, the National Council of Churches sent out an article by theologians George Hunsinger and Michael Kinnamon, who wrote: "What the Haitians obviously need most is massive humanitarian relief. They need food, water, medical supplies. They need shelter and physical reconstruction. . . . Over half of Haiti's population are children, 15 years old or younger. Many were already hungry and homeless before the earthquake hit."
But the warfare state, with vast budgets for military purposes, has scant funds for sustaining life.
These priorities kill.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

104 Comments so far
Show AllWell Norman your guy Obama did promise change; perhaps those pennies are what he was promising.
Norman does this mean you won't go crawling back to the kinder-gentler war mongering party of Empire?
Does this mean, Norman, that you will be using your pulpit to speak more ardently against this war criminal peace-prize errand boy for global capital?
We know all of this Norman, have known it from the start. Why so late to the game? Tell us now Norman, what are you doing about the fact that you wholeheartedly supported this man with good diction who slaughters as easily as the pretzel Emperor?
Do you not bear any responsibility here Norman? You helped put him on the throne. You were told countless times what to expect. Still you ignored all the warning signs and now you seem disappointed and yet we still await some action of protest on your part.
Facts are facts and history is history, Norm. You're responsible for putting a War Hawk in the White House.
mcoyote: I think perhaps Obama, having read that darn book by Doris Kearns Goodwin about how Lincoln surrounded himself with enemies, is chest-deep in a swamp of market fundamentalists who live to serve corporate America and neocons who think the only way safety can be bought is with guns and bombs.
Do you think Vice President Biden might rent the movie "Dave" and show it at the White House so President Obama can see what we MEANT by Change?
If you've never seen "Dave," it features Kevin Kline as a fellow who just happens to be the physical double of a right-wingish prez who has suffered a stroke. He is asked to impersonate the president until he recovers but, of course, when he is actually on the job cannot resist slashing the defense budget, beefing up social spending, and all the other good things we liberals hoped for.
After he is done with "Dave" he might settle in to the easy chair and read "A Prayer For America" by Dennis Kucinich. Then again, Bernice, we're assuming those inputs would trump corporate money and their ownership of the presidency.
I read Goodwin's 'Team of Rivals' and Lincoln filled his cabinet with same ticket opponents who didn't get the nomination for the simple reason that Chase, Seward and the rest held views that he wanted to explore, particularly Chase's staunch anti-slavery position. Obama is no Lincoln.
Phyllis Bennis, the author of "Ending the US war in Afghanistan: A Primer", was on CSPAN-2, at the busboysandpoets meeting, and gave the best answer for what needs to be done to extract us from this war in Afghanistan. It was a January 27th show, the day Howard Zinn died, and they gave a small tribute to him as they learned of his death. She gave the five points that MLK gave to get us out of Vietnam in his speech on April 4, 1967 - all accurate then as they are now - just replace Vietnam with Afghanistan and NLF with Taliban and the like:
1. End all bombing in North and South Vietnam.
2. Declare a unilateral cease-fire in the hope that such action will create the atmosphere for negotiation.
3. Take immediate steps to prevent other battlegrounds in Southeast Asia by curtailing our military buildup in Thailand and our interference in Laos.
4. Realistically accept the fact that the National Liberation Front has substantial support in South Vietnam and must thereby play a role in any meaningful negotiations and in any future Vietnam government.
5. Set a date that we will remove all foreign troops from Vietnam in accordance with the 1954 Geneva agreement.
But the first step for solutions that she discussed, not just for truth in Afghanistan but all other issues from healthcare to global warming, was gathering intelligent, accurate information about what is going on.
Ignore network, mainstream media, pundits and follow alternative news sources to stay informed.
bernice sez: "I think perhaps Obama, having read that darn book by Doris Kearns Goodwin about how Lincoln surrounded himself with enemies, is chest-deep in a swamp of market fundamentalists who live to serve corporate America ..."
***
In other words, he read the book, then surrounded himself with friends instead.
Haitians die and our leaders lie about the real reasons for our occupation of Afghanistan. Just think if our priorities were reversed and we spent a hundred billion helping the Haitians what a difference that would make to radically change Haiti. Of course, it ain't gonna happen because it ain't profitable. Time to rid ourselves of imperialism?
Cuba experienced the same hurricanes that Haiti did a few Summers back and had only a couple of deaths. The difference was the infrastructure for getting people out was in place. How bout allowing Haitians free passage to the Estados Unidos?
A hundred billion spent on domestic issues might not be bad either, eh?
Foul!
Look, attacking Mr. Solomon for being late attacking the policies of an imperial white house is a bit unfair. I did not vote for Obama (living in CA, he was a shoein), but I am not going to blame progressives for not attacking him earlier nor for supporting him. What did you want? Four more years of bushism in McCain? Now we have demlite which is potentially worse because our guard is now down. But I think many progressives are in a quagmire about attacking Obama not to give fuel to the teabaggers.
What choice did the left have in this country? Should we have given Cynthia McKinney more support and risk getting a republican in office again. I voted for Nader and McKinney in the last three elections so I am not a DEM. But attacking the left for not not being left enough is counterproductive.
Rubbish.
Attacking Mr. Solomon, and others who supported Obama and the Dems, is essential. Remember Solly was a delegate, maybe even a DNS super delegate?
More importantly what is counterproductive is suggesting that folks aren't "left enough", whatever that means, or aren't "pure enough", whatever that means.
There are a number of implied assumptions behind this "not left enough for you" line of assault - and make no mistake, it is an assault, designed to silence people and terminate consideration and discussion.
To say that the “latest-greatest” Obama (for example) is being rejected because he is not quite perfect is to imply that he is kinda sorta there, or “in the right direction” or presumed to be an ally. What is being pointed out here is not that Obama, his supporters and The Dems fail some perfection test – an imaginary test that suggests that he/they are mostly OK but has a few flaws that only perfectionists would notice, and a test that the people being accused of using it are not using - but rather that these people are not at all, in any way, remotely, or vaguely aligned any of the working people and that the notion that they are aligned with us is all a carefully created and totally false illusion. What are presumed to be "flaws" – which a few of us are supposedly unwilling to overlook in our stubbornness and obtuseness – are actually accurate glimpses through the camouflage at the whole picture, not minor peripheral and insignificant flaws.
They aren't minor flaws in an otherwise perfect gem – they are indicators as to the true nature of this chunk of manure painted up to look like a gem so as to fool people. Looking through the holes in the fancy paint job at the interior of the object, and saying it is not a flawed diamond, it is a chunk of manure with a coat of paint hastily slopped on to make it look like a diamond is merely pointing out the hypocrisy and unreality of the liberal fetish.
On another level this assault is wrong-headed and destructive, and that is in the implied assumption that politics is a matter of personal taste - “well that is what YOU want but not very many people agree with you.” FORGET THAT. Politics is about the greatest good for the greatest number, not about “what I want.” The narcissistic belly button lint gazing is completely antithetical to working class solidarity, and is nothing more than an amusing little hobby for the pampered and spoiled and selfish latte' liberal.
Beyond the question of whether or not this particular person is "left enough", I also reject the assumption that we are all looking for a person to begin with, and that looking for a person is the essence of politics.
Barack Obama is the enemy. Looking for a person is the problem, not the solution. Insulting, frustrating, and silencing the most perceptive among us is what is destroying the possibility of a strong Left emerging, and is the tawdry and amoral House Negro work that keeps the ruling class in place. THAT is the fucking problem, and that is a LONG way from the snide and demeaning accusations that critics of Obama and others are being a prissy little perfectionists, carping and fault finding for the sake of irritating people or being a party spoiler.
This “you are being a perfectionist” propaganda is infinitely more destructive to the Left than anything that ever comes from the right wingers, and is one of the most important bulwarks of ruling class power.
This is not nit-picking. It is not "being negative." It is not being a "purist."
This is the whole battle.
We have tried being polite, reasoning with people, documenting the truth, respecting and considering people's complaints that we are being too harsh, too radical, that we are making attacks, that we are alienating allies, that we are hurting "the cause."
None of that has worked.
The years slip by. Conditions grow worse and worse, The danger grows and grows. The ruling class gets stronger and stringer. Polite nicey-nice "can't we all get along children and play nice?" is bringing no positive returns and there is nothing to lose by speaking the truth as harshly as needs be to get the message across.
Perfectly said. I agree.
Yawoooooo! Coyote! Nice stuff! I hope you're putting your eloquence to more use than just blogging.
I am. Have for years. I appreciate your kudos and you would probably not be surprised that some don't take what I'm saying as eloquence.
In any case your overall point is imperative. We all need to be taking these matters to the streets and the internet discussions are primarily useful for honing our ideas and in a more limited sense useful for strategizing on what can be done directly.
I guess I'm one of these people who does this kinda stuff with his every breathe whether it's in the grocery store amongst strangers or in the local boardroom with our local Rep or out in the streets at the latest demo or in the neighborhood tryin' to agitate for the next demo.
That's right.
..and the, I can't believe it's not butter, but Guns! "This" can't really be happening, can't we all just get along, populace. Isn't working for the people.
Bravo mcoyote, bravo!
Your assessment is spot on and while we all continue to bicker, same as it ever was, kapitalist globalization moves forward apace.
The international banking cartel is only moments away from finally achieving the goal it has lusted after since the goldsmiths began the fractional reserve system.
“Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws."
- Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
The for-profit paradigm, the privatization of every inch of Earth and all its resources, has finally succeeded in transforming our home into a third world planet.
There is no way to Peace. Peace is the Way.
Clearly, you understand Industrial Disease.
Nicely done, mcoyote.
If being burned by the Obama experience causes Mr. Solomon to eschew lesser-evil inanity in the future, well and good. I look forward to indications that Solomon has been appropriately radicalized by his errors.
But it's hardly "foul" to rub Solomon's nose in his enthusiastic complicity in supporting the disastrous Obama in accordance with standard lesser-evil philosophy.
· Yr Obd't Servant
How could you have voted for Nader or Mckinney in the last three elections and still be an Obama apologist? Doesn't make sense.
How convenient that you forget that Democrats as a group supported and let pass some of Bush's worst policies, including giving the green light to never-ending war in which we now do not have to declare war anymore as we invade country after country with drones, military strikes and subversion. The Senate "health care" plan, which Obama supports, is worse than no plan at all as it legislates that we have to pay to be extorted by insurance companies. Trying to scare us with "the Republicans are worse" argument doesn't work anymore.
"But I think many progressives are in a quagmire about attacking Obama not to give fuel to the teabaggers."
Exactly! and all by design .... "Oh my God, teabaggers! We must protect Obama from this threat!"
The attacks on Obama during the election - when progressives were starting to notice he might not be who they thought he was - was meant to corral restless progressives. "They're racists!" (this is what got to Dave Lindorff) "Sarah Palin wears super expensive clothing and she's dumb - and we progressives hate dumb people!" (this is all progressives in my town could think about.). It distracted them from Obama's record and stated objectives and his funding. And yes, I believe it's all stage managed. Why wouldn't it be?
These things need to be taught in school but they aren't. Kids might start to look for other mechanisms of psychic coercion and .... just think what that could lead to!
$Big Money$ buys candidates as an investment. The advertising industry and media then sells them to us and the initial investors profits increase. duh. This is the same industry that sells sugar coated corn cereal to our children, Viagra to our men, anti-depressants to our teens and endless wars.
They sold Obama to progressives. It was a masterful campaign. I was in awe of it. It had it's own intrinsic beauty ... in a very dark kind of way. Go again to Obama's video, "Yes We Can!"
Beautiful, seductive evil.
"But attacking the left for not not being left enough is counterproductive"
How so? Not being left enough is what landed us here, for God's sake!
McCain would have had massive protests in the streets had he been elected and done what Obama is doing. Obama can get away with it. It's a beautiful thing, the human ability to manufacture consent. I suppose the technique is useful, has been useful in the distant past, tribal past. But those tribal leaders who psychologically coerced the people also had to walk among them, vis a vis. Not so today. We only get a media pastiche of our dear leaders.
Just watch as those hundreds of thousands of children and other civilians at Refugee Camps
grow up and learn how to use AK-47s to rid their country of the occupying army.
Attacking Mr. Soloman is counter-productive and juvenile, the same as an ad hominem attack here in some protracted, bandwidth-wasting, flame war. No matter what Soloman's earlier position, this is his current one, and it's a good and progressive one. A penny on the dollar for aid to Haiti compared to five wars (or six with Nigeria). That's the real subject. Shall we discuss THAT perhaps instead of snide and rude comments about past transgressions of Norman Solomon. Everyone deserves a second chance and the opportunity to reconsider -- do they not? I certainly have changed my position in recent months on any number of things.
Gary
"The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew."
-- Abraham Lincoln (happy "President's" Day)
I agree, Gary. If people can't learn and change, there is no hope at all.
I am a former Obama suporter. Smarter people than me studied him more carefully and voted for third party candidates in the last election. I made a mistake but have learned...no more votes for Democrats or Republicans (except if I lived in a district with someone like Grayson).
Do you know the damage that Mr. Solomon has done? The election of Mr. Obama would have been only worst by the election of Mr. McCain.
Our nation needed a clear break with the past. We needed criminal trials of the Bush regime. We needed to leave, quickly, Iraq, and Afghanistan and third quarters of the rest of the world.
We need jobs here, health care here, the best educational system in the world. We need new roads, public transit, new water system, new sewerage systems, etc.
The election of Mr. Obama is a huge lie and fraud which cannot be undone.
And Mr. Solomon was the front man of the democratic ruling elite oppressing progressive people.
When anyone apologizes for that, one is allowing the evil to continue.
Change you mind and your ass will follow. Mr. Solomon has not changed his mind. He is a Judas Goat.
You're being inane and small-minded. One reason few Americans take seriously what little there is of a Left in this country is that there are so many like you totally unable or unwilling to forgive minor transgressions, as you see them, such as someone supporting Obama in '08. Your purity and moral self-righteousness are ultimately self-defeating. You write as if Solomon alone is responsible for all of Obama's failure to live up to his advertised image. Or as if one person is powerful enough to determine an election's outcome. Solomon is now very critical of Obama, but that's not good enough. He needs to commit suicide to satisfy clowns like you.
No, Mr. Solomon has proven himself to lack judgment in whom he supported. He knows it, now, or so he says. On the other hand, he may be a shill conning and fooling us again. Setting us up for the next round.
But, it is too late. And the problems facing this nation are not being address, because of Mr. Solomon and people like him.
The victory has been to the ruling elite. This is the big picture. Attitudes like yours only set us up to make the same political mistakes against our collective interests, over and over.
I must have hit a nerve, because you felt compelled attack me by calling me a "clown". BTW, if I were a clown, I would be a union belonging one.
Mr. Solomon is rescuing his credibility, and you are falling for it. That is pathetic.
Sorry, Mr. Absolutist, but you didn't hit any "nerve." Your idea of the Big Picture is laughable. You draw all your objections to anyone who deviates from your subjectivity as shills, cons and elitists. I also criticized Solomon when he was urging progressives to vote for Obama, but I don't see any great prophets out there on the political horizon so I've never held him up to that impossible ideal. You're a pipsqueak raging against someone who has at least been trying to fight for progressive values for years. Everyone makes mistakes, except of course you. Live in those billowy daydreams if you must. But your scolding manner for anyone failing to live up to whatever idealism you cling to is counterproductive, unless you envision a New Puritanism. And we don't need any more of that.
Calling names like 'pipsqueak' does nothing for your argument. Name calling is a pathetic response; I know it, you know, and everyone here knows it.
How about an argument? You know, a reasoned logically thought out argument.
Sioux Rose
DCH: I'm with Ephraim. Your idea of an argument means agreeing with you. You set the parameters so narrowly that any facts, perceptions, or sentiments that fall outside of the bounds YOU have designated are considered unworthy of consideration. Some take into account a bigger, more holistic picture than you do. We are imperfect human channels. Most of us succeed in doing some good some of the time. A few do great evil too much of the time. Solomon may be stuck in the duopoly (for now, and that could well change soon), however, at least he speaks against war and the absurd militarism that is driving our nation to ruin. And yes, inciting particularly lousy karma in its wake.
May I put Mr. Solomon's "crime" in perspective?
If one beats up someone else, that can be forgiven.
If one murders ten people, the damage can never be removed or forgiven.
Mr. Solomon helped murder millions of people he now proposes to be helping with his writings.
Let's call a truce, can we? Had he supported McKinney or Nader, Obama still would have won. The election is determined before we vote. It was the way the money wanted it this time. The two-party takes turns. Gore "lost" in order to save the Democratic Party and I think he knew it.
Progressives were livid: "We could have had Gore the environmentalist in the White House had it not been for egotistical Ralph Nader!" (and Gore won a prize even though the League of conservation Voters gave him a poor rating! Scam alert!) This sailed right past many progressives.
You see, the third party movement was getting out of hand - remember Nader in Portland, Oregon! 10,000 excited, motivated people! a real movement was breaking out. Can't have that! Gore's loss killed third parties in one fell swoop. The Supreme Court had to be called in, just so that Gore could lose. Gore would have been an Obama. It's the corporatocracy who sets the agenda, not some whore politician. duh. There is no doubt in my mind that third parties would have grown, not shrunk under a Gore presidency.
Now I'm just waiting for what other techniques they have up their sleeves. Fomenting the teabag movement is just a start! These people are soooo good at what they do. That's why they are getting so rich while we are getting screwed!
You have a good point: I voted for McKinney, but our system is rigged, I knew it, and I knew she did not have a snow ball's chance. As Crhis Hedges, Chalmers Johnson, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky, Sheldon Wolin, Steven Hill and others have shown us, WE DO NOT HAVE a democratic process in the first place. Chomsky calls it a "sham", I call it the world's most expensive PR stunt.
Sioux Rose
Thank you, Gary. The resident trolls may speak of the need for the left to unite, but then they act as the first ones to throw stones at prominent persons ON the left.
These 2 psychological problems thwart change:
1. Lots of people really do not see any way outside of the duopoly. They truly think a 3rd party will just take votes away from what they perceive as the lesser of two evils/parties. They literally cannot envision OTHER.
2. Some have stakes they are afraid to jeopardize. I think DM Green can't afford to become so radical that he'll lose his job as a professor. Solomon has his gigs to protect. Not everyone is willing to go to jail, become impoverished, or die for "the cause."
Up until Obama, the merger of both parties was less evident. Sure, Clinton enacted a basically pro-corporate Republican set of policies, but since the economy appeared to be doing well (the damage invoked by these devices had not yet come into evidence) few connected the dots. The lobbies, a ridiculously pro-corporate capitalism Supreme Court did not have a chokehold on one of the government branches. In short, things were not yet entirely corrupted. Now the rot sits in plain sight. Obama is NOT apt to get the same sytle free pass. People are angry and scared, and the media is helping to channel that anger at inappropriate targets. THAT is a big problem. Still, the military's cannibalizing the nation's funds at a time like this is a significant factor that MUST be exposed. I am glad Solomon is reaching for that Touchstone.
Solomon has never been on the left Sioux. He is a liberal. Big difference.
Solomon should not be excused for his ardent support for Obama.
Do remember that Solomon's support was not blase or even the lesser-evilism sort of support. He was on the rooftops pro-Obama and a delegate. He plugged his ears and went faith-based crazy and now offers up not much more than milquetoast liberal cants at a time when we need hot fire. It's very late.
You do point to a problem but in this case you offer it as an excuse. It's way, way past time for people to be concerned about protecting their positions. Let's stop pussy-footin' around these issues. Norman Solomon supported with passion a man who from day one has been giving orders which have resulted in the deaths of many innocent children. He deserves to be raked over the coals for that without mercy.
Fuck Solomon's precious "gigs."
Sioux Rose
MCOYOTE: I do agree about his support for Obama being a very difficult item to make sense of. And I HOPE that he, as a very intelligent man, will perhaps forfeit his "gigs" and acceptance into the circles of power (Democratic convention, etc.) and look truly at what's become of the democratic party. In some ways, his position reminds me of Dennis Kucinich. Both are more principled than most within the democratic camp; and yet both stay in that camp because they are pragmatists. That is, they are not convinced any viable alternative can emerge. (Or not one within a fast time frame.) I understand this thinking, which is not to say I support it. It's just since there are so few voices speaking against war, I have to give Solomon praise for that. On the other hand, his support for Obama as you and others have wisely pointed out, has helped create an electoral victory has succeeded in doing NOTHING to stop the march to militarism at the point where EVERYthing else is at stake.
It is not my intention to give a pass to ANY democrat. On the other hand, instead of black/white with-us-or-against-us thinking, I believe it's important to locate the shades of gray, where they exist. I am not a political strategist. I leave that for others who have more understanding of those dynamics than I do. However, I can speak about higher truths and spiritual principles, and that's where I believe Solomon has a heart and a functioning soul, unlike so many that enter the dark circles of power, those that exist inside the belly of the (MIC-led) beast. I am hoping he can wield influence there.
Solomon ought to spend the rest of his life building a third party.
I, for one, grew sick of his attacks on third party politics and his 'rally round the dems' election patter. Now he sits back and writes this sort of thing. Somehow it seems utterly pathetic and useless.
I want the Obama supporters to do a little more soul-searching, think a little harder about the problems. During the next round of elections, I don't want to hear a peep from Solomon about supporting Democrats. I hope the editors at Common Dreams will tell him to start his own blog or magazine ancillary to the Democratic Party. I feel I have almost nothing in common with him.
He was a Democratic delegate for Obama in 2008.
Picture a group of starving people... men, women and children, fighting savagely over a discarded bone while to one side, a grotesquely obese man smilingly observes. As he tosses unwanted snacks into an open sewer he demands ever more and it is brought to him without delay. This is our world, with it's ever diminishing resources, our evaporating wealth, feeding none but a deranged, belching military-industrial monster, detached, overstuffed, and apparently insatiable. And endless brainwashing prevents even the politest questioning of this imbalance.
This is not stupidity. This is evil.
"This is not stupidity. This is evil."
Good point. Our government, and the corporations that control it, are not run by "stupid" individuals, and to call them "amoral" is inadequate. We are talking about evil, pure and simple.
Very well said.
Starve the beast. Resist and defy.
Sioux Rose
FD: Excellent analogy, or illustration. If someone in the forum is a good cartoonist, this item should be drawn and sent to publications. Granted, in today's publishing climate only an extreme Left magazine would probably consider printing it. But it may be worth a shot. A picture is often worth 1000 words, especially when words themselves have been diluted to the point they are nearly divested of meaning!
Norman Solomon was a Democratic Party delegate for then candidate Obama in 2008. President Cynthia Mckinney would have followed Hugo Chavez in forgiving the Haitian debt and providing immediate aid to Haiti.
You beat me to the punch. We must never forget that Mr. Solomon is part of the hypocritical left. He is part of the ruling elite, therefore, his desires and interests are always bound up with the rich and powerful.
The sad part is that he does not see himself as part of the ruling elite problem.
Sioux Rose
DCH: This painting with a broad stroke to demonize a person who may not be to your liking politically but STILL has wisdom to impart is suspect. Part of the hypocritical left? "Let he who is without sin among you cast the first stone." Where are your published bona fides? Solomon has made political errors, as have many in not believing a 3rd party could viably emerge to make a difference. That doesn't negate the fact that he's also done important writing, most notably, that which reflects an awareness of the brutality and senselessness of war. Since there are so few voices in media that have the courage to speak about war this way, I'll applaud the pacifists even if their political stripes are not 100% pure. In this forum we've seen Dave Lindorff, David Micheal Green and others start to lose their luster for the democratic party. We need these voices to help shape the tide of discontent which probably represents the truest majority of "voters" in our land.
But, why do you listen to someone who has proven himself to be so utterly wrong about his candidate?
Who would have hired the captain of the Titanic? The sinking of the Titanic was only a small event in ocean travel, was it not? My point is that the captain lost credibility to lead, instruct, and plan on ocean navigation.
The company who would hire the captain of the Titanic would have to advertise him as: He learned his lesson, now he will be more careful of icebergs.
It used to be that people with great responsibility got only one shot. Not today. For example, the Challenger space shuttle exploded because of bad leadership. No one responsible lost their jobs. They knew that the rockets o rings were being launched outside of engineering specs. And the result was predicted.
Ben Bernanke just got reappointed. Any dispute that he let the problem of the real estate bubble grow until it crashed the financial system? Not much, huh?
We just continue to forgive the incompetence at our national peril. Give Mr. Solomon a pass and it hurts us all. He has nothing of value to contribute.
Sioux Rose
DCH: I take this very seriously, "Seek ye first the kingdom of God-dess and all else will be added unto you." I believe we are foremost SPIRITUAL beings having the experience of earthly embodiment. To me, the spirit is more important than the apparent conditions, or the pragmatic "read" on events. With that being said, I totally believe in both forgiveness as well as second chances. And while it's a damned shame how things worked out, the degree to which Obama sold out all those who figured SURELY THINGS CANNOT GET WORSE, that even the worst Democratic leadership has got to put the brakes on... given the ample evidence that Bush was like a drunk driver sending our nation (as vehicle) straight over a cliff. I can't IMAGINE that Solomon thinks highly of Obama now. Of course, that's between him and the lords of karma.
Once again, my central point is that the whole polarized camp mindset, which is truly an outgrowth of sports (teams!) can blind us to the good in persons. I hear you, that the greater evil was his endorsement of Obama, as this new prez has made himself another tool of war and financial destruction of the middle class. Yet I believe Solomon owns truly anti-war views. Trouble is, he believed in the wrong Messiah, but I am not convinced that his spiritual principles are sold out. And in times as dark as these, seeing shades of gray instead of the awful absence of light is helpful. At least to me!
I am not questioning Mr. Solomon's sincerity, but his judgment. I have one of his anti war films and believe it is well done.
He knew before the election, Mr. Obamageddon stated that invading Pakistan was on the agenda, and escalating in Afghanistan, too, and increasing the size of the US Military. His judgment was and is impaired, and he should not be trusted further.
Mr. Solomon has karma confusion, methinks.
Sioux Rose
DCH: Someone can be a lousy chef but a great musician. So I don't eat their prepared meals, but I do elect to listen to their symphony. Perhaps that explains... I am not of the "one size fits all," or "one castigation serves as unitary umbrella" school of perception. If you are, then you win the benefit of living with those limitations you argue FOR. Different cognitive strokes, for different folks. You take a punitive stance. I prefer to seek out the Light or good, rather than PAINT with a single diminishing brush stroke.
We are not at war. No matter how many times the lie 'WE ARE AT WAR" is repeated it does not become true.
It is not war when a gang of thugs break into a house and hold the family living there hostage.
A school yard bully beating up the smallest kid in the class is not a fight.
Israel is not at war with Palestine. The US is not at war with Iraq. The rich are not at war with the poor.
The invasion and occupation of a weak country by the strongest country is not a war.
People are dying because they are being deprived of basic human rights. More are dying every day because the rich want to be more rich.
But it is not a war. Murder maybe. Insanity certainly, but hardly a war.