Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Holding Corporations Accountable for Apartheid Crimes
A landmark class action case is under way in a New York federal court, with victims of apartheid in South Africa suing corporations that they say helped the pre-1994 regime. Among the multinational corporations are IBM, Fujitsu, Ford, GM and banking giants UBS and Barclays. The lawsuit accuses the corporations of "knowing participation in and/or aiding and abetting of the crimes of apartheid; extrajudicial killing; torture; prolonged unlawful detention; and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment." Attorneys are seeking up to $400 billion in damages.
The late anti-apartheid activist Dennis Brutus, who died just weeks ago, is a listed plaintiff. Back in 2008, he told me that "for [the corporations], apartheid was a very good system, and it was a very profitable system." As the U.S. observes the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, marks the first anniversary in office of the first African-American president and ponders the exposure of a racial gaffe spoken by Sen. Harry Reid, the issue of race is front and center, making this case timely and compelling.
The Alien Tort Statute dates from the U.S. Revolutionary War era and allows people from outside the United States to bring a civil suit against another party for alleged crimes committed outside the United States. Cases have been brought in recent years to address forced labor on an oil pipeline in Burma, the killing of labor organizers in Colombia and the killing of activists in the Niger delta. This suit alleges that the apartheid regime could not have succeeded in its violent oppression of millions of people without the active support of the foreign corporations.
Ford and General Motors built manufacturing centers in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, where Dennis Brutus grew up. He told me, "They were using ... very cheap black labor, because there was a law in South Africa which said blacks are not allowed to join trade unions, and they're not allowed to strike, so that they were forced to accept whatever wages they were given. They lived in ghettos ... actually in the boxes in which the parts had been shipped from the U.S. to be assembled in South Africa. So you had a whole township called Kwaford, meaning ‘the place of Ford.' "
Likewise with IBM and Fujitsu. The complaint states, "The South African security forces used computers supplied by ... IBM and Fujitsu ... to restrict Black people's movements within the country, to track non-whites and political dissidents, and to target individuals for the purpose of repressing the Black population and perpetuating the apartheid system." Black South Africans were issued passbooks, which the apartheid regime used to restrict movement and track millions of people, and to enable politically motivated arrests and disappearances over decades.
UBS and Barclays, the suit alleges, "directly financed the South African security forces that carried out the most brutal aspects of apartheid." The United Nations Special Committee Against Apartheid stated, in 1979, that "we learn today that more than $5.4 billion has been loaned in a six-year period to bolster a regime which is responsible for some of the most heinous crimes ever committed against humanity." Banks (including UBS) were punished for helping the Nazis during World War II, so precedent exists for reparations in the case of apartheid.
One of the plaintiffs' attorneys, Michael Hausfeld, told me: "Who is a corporation and what are its responsibilities? If companies can affect lives in ways that make those lives worse, so that people are suppressed or terrorized ... you are basically ascribing to eternity the fact that companies can act with both impunity and immunity."
South Africa went through a historic process after apartheid, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), led by Nobel Peace laureate Archbishop Desmond Tutu. Thousands of people took responsibility for their actions, along with scores of South African corporations. Not one multinational company accepted the invitation to speak at the TRC. The case, says Marjorie Jobson, national director of the Khulumani Support Group, which is filing the lawsuit, "takes forward the unfinished business of the TRC."
The election of Barack Obama, the son of an African, was a historic moment in the fight against racism. But unless U.S. courts are open to addressing wrongs, past and present, corporations will still feel free to go abroad and profit from racist and repressive policies.Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
- Posted in


18 Comments so far
Show AllEven if they win and fines/reparations levied, the cost will ultimately be passed on to the consumers. Without criminal charges the immunity and impunity persists.
Very fine, Amy. Now, when will we start holding corporations accountable for Israel's crimes of ethnic cleansing and apartheid, which, according to both Archbishop Tutu and Nelson Mandela, are worse than those committed against the indigenous populations of South Africa?
You clearly don't understand the point of Goodman's article. If this case succeeds, it will make it much easier to pursue the actions which you desire. These cases are not mutually exclusive.
q
And you clearly don't understand the point of my post. I never said or implied that these cases were mutually exclusive, and I clearly approve of this action against these corporations. My point remains: that while it remains politically acceptable (and, in any case, justified) to pursue such entities in their collusion in these sorts of political crimes, the very similar and more egregious example of Israel remains taboo by comparison, and is light years away from getting this sort of judicial hearing. Amy Goodman, of course, does her part in trying to right this situation, but she does not, as far as I know, have any political or legal power.
We may disagree about 9/11 but here I completely agree with your point that Israel is a sacred cow both for the Fawning Corporate Media and within the beltway. Money is part of the reason from AIPAC to individuals' contributions and sweetheart deals. Political expediency is another -- it suits the American Empire to have a strong and nuclear armed supporter in the Middle East (actually Near East but I gave up on this point years ago).
There is a double-standard here. Apartheid is universally (well nearly) seen as an evil and now safely in the past. Israel is very much in the present and very clearly fascist in a terrible irony.
Gary
From your first post: "Very fine, Amy. Now, when will we start holding corporations accountable for Israel's crimes . . . ."
And from your second: "Amy Goodman, of course, does her part in trying to right this situation, but she does not, as far as I know, have any political or legal power."
The tone of your first post is clearly - and inappropriately - plaintive and accusatory.
q
Nonsense, q. You jumped the gun, admit it. I'm a big fan of Amy Goodman, and I certainly would never accuse her of being "soft on Israel." My initial statement was intended generally. I suggest you hone your reading skills.
I jumped nothing and I suggest that you work on your composition skills.
The unmistakable implication of your original post is that Goodman is avoiding Israel.
q
No, that is only your inference. Israel is a separate subject, and I know Goodman's work well enough not to imply that she would ever avoid this subject, since she's one of the better wide-audience journalists to cover the issue in honest detail. But it's silly to quibble like this, since I think we both agree that it's a good thing these proceedings are taking place, and it would be an equally good thing for similar actions to be taken against those business interests that collude in the destruction of the Palestians.
Chill out, and have a good day.
"The election of Barack Obama, the son of an African, was a historic moment in the fight against racism."
Or was it, more accurately, the latest media meme that helps Americans forget that their country was built on exclusion of blacks and other minorities from positions of power?
Other than that, I liked the general tone of this Amy Goodman article. And it's funny to see quickstepper call someone else's comment "accusatory" when it appears that q is trying to get an "antisemitic" accusatory meme off the ground.
Well done, qatzelok, to dispel the bromides regularly served up to make us "feel good" about a deplorable situation.
Once again dam few Amerikans will ever know there is a law suit going on; and the chances success in Amerika are deem to deem witted.
But maybe in a European court. Spain maybe, don't know. But thanks To Amy Goodman for reporting it.
I would say our first "African-American" President is so imbedded with corporate power, oligarchs, the elite and privileged that he would only acknowledge a working-class African American if it was politically advantageous for him to do so.
He appears to be a man of two faces. Is the one we don't see that of the brotherhood to whom he owes his true allegiance?
In a recent UN report, Haaretz columnist Danny Rubinstein admitted that "Israel today was an apartheid State with four different Palestinian groups: those in Gaza, East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Israeli Palestinians, each of which had a different status...even if the wall followed strictly the line of the pre-1967 border, it would still not be justified. The two peoples needed cooperation rather than walls because they must be neighbors." [1]
"An apartheid society is much more than just a 'settler colony'. It involves specific forms of oppression that actively strip the original inhabitants of any rights at all, whereas civilian members of the invader caste are given all kinds of sumptuous privileges." [2]
A Little History @
http://wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1552&Itemid=228
The United States directly supported Israel’s deadly assault on the Gaza Strip for Israel used weapons paid for and supplied by the United States during “Operation Cast Lead.”
U.S. F- 16s, hellfire missiles, and ammunition used by the Israeli military devastated the Gaza Strip for 22 days and U.S.A. corporations also directly profited from “Operation Cast Lead.”
Caterpillar and Motorola equipment were used by the Israeli military during its assault on the occupied Gaza Strip. American made Caterpillar bulldozers demolished the civilian infrastructure throughout the Gaza Strip.
Amnesty International and the U.N. Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict/The Goldstone Report documented that Motorola components were also used in the bombs that Israel dropped. Human Rights Watch reported that shrapnel with Motorola serial numbers were found at the site of bombed civilian infrastructures in Gaza City.
Israel's attack on the people of Gaza was enabled by US-supplied weapons and we the people of the US who pay taxes provide over $30 billion annually to Israel although Israel has consistently misused U.S. weapons in violation of America's Arms Export Control and Foreign Assistance Acts.
America is the worlds largest arms supplier to Israel and under a Bush negotiated deal with Israel, we the people who pay taxes in America will also provide another $30 billion in military aid to Israel over the next decade.
During Israeli assault on Gaza, "Washington provided F-16 fighter planes, Apache helicopters, tactical missiles, and a wide array of munitions, including white phosphorus and DIME. The weapons required for the Israeli assault was decided upon in June 2008, and the transfer of 1,000 bunker-buster GPS-guided Small Diameter Guided Bomb Units 39 (GBU-39) were approved by Congress in September. The GBU 39 bombs were delivered to Israel in November (prior to any claims of Hamas cease fire violation!) for use in the initial air raids on Gaza. [1]
In a 71-page report released March 25, 2009, by Human Rights Watch, Israel’s repeated firing of US-made white phosphorus shells over densely populated areas of Gaza was indiscriminate and is evidence of war crimes.
"Rain of Fire: Israel’s Unlawful Use of White Phosphorus in Gaza," provides eye witness accounts of the devastating effects that white phosphorus munitions had on civilians and civilian property in Gaza.
"Human Rights Watch researchers found spent shells, canister liners, and dozens of burnt felt wedges containing white phosphorus on city streets, apartment roofs, residential courtyards, and at a United Nations school in Gaza immediately after hostilities ended in January.
"Militaries officially use white phosphorus to obscure their operations on the ground by creating thick smoke. It has also been used as an incendiary weapon, though such use constitutes a war crime.
“In Gaza, the Israeli military didn’t just use white phosphorus in open areas as a screen for its troops," said Fred Abrahams, senior emergencies researcher at Human Rights Watch and co-author of the report. "It fired white phosphorus repeatedly over densely populated areas, even when its troops weren't in the area and safer smoke shells were available. As a result, civilians needlessly suffered and died."
During the attack on Gaza, the UN Security Council, Amnesty International, International Red Cross, and global voices of protest rose up and demanded a ceasefire, but both houses of Congress overwhelmingly endorsed to support a continuation of Israel’s so called "self defense."
Excerpted from:
http://www.arabisto.com/article/Blogs/Eileen_Fleming/The_Good_out_of_the_Misery_in_Gaza_Love_in_Action_and_Global_Conscience/52664
http://wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1523&Itemid=227
Eileen Fleming,
Founder of WeAreWideAwake.org
A Feature Correspondent for Arabisto.com
Author of "Keep Hope Alive" and "Memoirs of a Nice Irish American 'Girl's' Life in Occupied Territory"
Producer "30 Minutes with Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu"
Just another greedy lawyer scam to make some more cash. Suing GM? I thought GM went out of business in 2009.
I can't wait till the likes of Lockheed Martin and Cartepillar can be put on trial and made accountable for supporting and facilitating the tools for Israel's Apartheid of the Palestinian people.
I posted a similar comment on this issue and it appears to have been deleted.
So here goes again: It is always so easy to condemn what has already been erased by history - like South African apartheid, or British rule over the colonies, or rejection of Impressionism. What counts is whether one understands what is currently happening, even if it means rejecting widespread assumptions. Israeli apartheid is one of those problems that gets too many passes.
This lawsuit is late, but would set a good precedent for suits against companies like Caterpillar that enable Israelis to raze Palestinian homes.
Joe