Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Pentagon Garrisons the Gulf
As Washington Talks Iraq Withdrawal, the Pentagon Builds Up Bases in the Region
Despite recent large-scale insurgent suicide bombings that have killed scores of civilians and the fact that well over 100,000 U.S. troops are still deployed in that country, coverage of the U.S. war in Iraq has been largely replaced in the mainstream press by the (previously) "forgotten war" in Afghanistan. A major reason for this is the plan, developed at the end of the Bush years and confirmed by President Obama, to draw down U.S. troops in Iraq to 50,000 by August 2010 and withdraw most of the remaining forces by December 2011.
Getting out of Iraq, however, doesn't mean getting out of the Middle East. For one thing, it's likely that a sizeable contingent of U.S. forces will remain garrisoned on several large and remotely situated U.S. bases in Iraq well past December 2011. Still others will be stationed close by -- on bases throughout the region where, with little media attention since the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, construction to harden, expand, and upgrade U.S. and allied facilities has gone on to this day.
Appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee early this year, General David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), stated: "The Arabian Peninsula commands significant U.S. attention and focus because of its importance to our interests and the potential for insecurity." He continued:
"[T]he countries of the Arabian Peninsula are key partners... CENTCOM ground, air, maritime, and special operations forces participate in numerous operations and training events, bilateral and multilateral, with our partners from the Peninsula. We help develop indigenous capabilities for counter terrorism; border, maritime, and critical infrastructure security; and deterring Iranian aggression. As a part of all this, our FMS [Foreign Military Sales] and FMF [Foreign Military Financing] programs are helping to improve the capabilities and interoperability of our partners' forces. We are also working toward an integrated air and missile defense network for the Gulf. All of these cooperative efforts are facilitated by the critical base and port facilities that Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the UAE [United Arab Emirates], and others provide for US forces."
In fact, since 2001 the Pentagon has been pouring significant sums of money into the "critical base and port facilities" mentioned by the general -- both U.S. sites and those of its key regional partners. These are often ignored facts-on-the-ground, which signal just how enduring the U.S. military presence in the region is likely to be, no matter what happens in Iraq. Press coverage of this long-term infrastructural build-up has been remarkably minimal, given the implications for future conflicts in the oil heartlands of the planet. After all, Washington is sending tremendous amounts of military materiel into autocratic Middle Eastern nations and building-up bases in countries whose governments, due to domestic public opinion, often prefer that no publicity be given to the growing American military "footprint."
Given that the current conflict with al-Qaeda stemmed, in no small part, from the U.S. military presence in the region, the issue is obviously of importance. Nonetheless, coverage has been so poor that much about U.S. military efforts there remains unknown. A review of U.S. government documents, financial data, and other open-source material by TomDispatch, however, reveals that an American military building boom yet to be seriously scrutinized, analyzed, or assessed is underway in the Middle East.
Consider, then, what we can at present know now about this Pentagon build-up, country by country from Qatar to Jordan, and while you're reading, think about what we don't know -- and why Washington has chosen this path.
Qatar: The Pentagon's Persian Gulf Pentagon
In 1996, although it had no air force of its own, the Persian Gulf nation of Qatar built Al Udeid Air Base at a cost of more than $1 billion. The goal: attracting the U.S. military. In September 2001, U.S. aircraft began to operate out of the facility. By 2002, tanks, armored vehicles, dozens of warehouses, communications and computing equipment, and thousands of troops were based at and around Al Udeid. In 2005, the Qatari government spent almost $400 million to build a cutting-edge regional air operations center.
Today, Qatar is all but indispensable to the U.S. military. Just recently, for example, Central Command redeployed 750 personnel from its Tampa, Florida headquarters to its new forward headquarters at Al Udeid to test its "staff's ability to seamlessly transition command and control of operations... in the event of a crisis in the CENTCOM area of responsibility or a natural disaster in Florida."
Qatar
has not, however, picked up the whole tab for the expanding U.S.
military infrastructure in the country. The Pentagon has also been
investing large amounts of money in upgrading facilities there for the
last decade. From 2001-2009, the U.S. Army, for example, awarded $209
million in contracts for construction in the energy-rich emirate. In
August, Rizzani de Eccher, an Italian engineering and construction
giant, signed a $44 million deal with the Pentagon to replace an
unspecified facility at Al Udeid. In September, the Department of
Defense (DoD) awarded Florida-based IAP Worldwide Services a $6 million
contract for "construction of a pre-engineered warehouse building...
warehouse bay and related site work and utilities" at the base.
Later in the month, American International Contractors, a global construction firm that specializes in "US-funded Middle East and African infrastructure projects," inked a deal for nearly $10 million to build a Special Operations Forces Training Range, complete with "a two-story shooting house, an indoor range, breach and storage facilities[,] a test fire bunker and bunker road" in Qatar. Just days after that, the Pentagon awarded a $52 million contract to Cosmopolitan-EMTA JV to upgrade the capacity of Al Udeid's airfield by building additional aircraft parking ramps and fuel storage facilities.
Bahrain Base's and Kuwait's Subways
In nearby Bahrain -- a tiny kingdom of 750,000 people -- the U.S. stations up to 3,000 personnel, in addition to regular visits by the crews of Navy ships that spend time there. Between 2001-2009, the Navy awarded $203 million in construction contracts for military projects in the country. One big winner over that span has been the engineering and construction firm Contrack International. It received more than $50 million in U.S. government funds for such projects as building two "multi-story facilities for the U.S. Navy" complete with state-of-the-art communication interfaces and exterior landscaping.
In September 2009, the company was awarded a new $27 million deal "for the design/bid/build construction of the waterfront development program, US Naval Support Activity, Bahrain." This facility will join the Navy's undisputed crown jewel in Bahrain -- a 188,000 square-foot mega-facility known as "the Freedom Souq" that houses a PX or Navy Exchange (NEX). The NEX, in turn, offers "an ice cream shop, bicycle shop, cell phone shop, tailor shop, barber and beauty shops, self-serve laundry, dry cleaning service, rug Souq, nutrition shop, video rental, and a 24/7 mini-mart," while selling everything from cosmetics and cameras to beer and wine.
Work is also going on in nearby Oman where, in the 1930s, the British Royal Air Force utilized an airfield on Masirah Island for its ventures in the Middle East. Today, the U.S. Air Force and members of other service branches do much the same, operating out of the island's Camp Justice. From 2001-2009, the Army and Air Force each spent about $13 million on construction projects in the sultanate. Contractor Cosmopolitan-EMTA JV is now set to begin work there, too, after recently signing a $5 million contract with the Pentagon for an "Expeditionary Tent Beddown" (presumably an area meant to accommodate a potential future influx of forces). Meanwhile, in the neighboring United Arab Emirates, the U.S. Army alone spent $46 million between 2001-2009 on construction projects.
In 1991, the U.S. military helped to push Saddam Hussein's army out of Kuwait. After that, however, the country's leader, Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmed al-Sabah, refused to return home "until crystal chandeliers and gold-plated bathroom fixtures could be reinstalled in Kuwait City's Bayan Palace." Today, about 30 miles south of the plush palace sits another pricey complex. Camp Arifjan grew exponentially as the Iraq War ramped up, gaining notoriety along the way as the epicenter of a massive graft and corruption scandal. Today, the base houses about 15,000 U.S. troops and features such fast-food favorites as Pizza Hut, Hardees, Subway, and Burger King.
Another facility in Kuwait that has become a major stopover point on the road to and from Baghdad is Camp Buehring. Located north of Kuwait City, near the town of Udairi, the installation is chock-a-block full of amenities, including three PXs, telephone centers, two internet cafes, Morale, Welfare and Recreation centers, a movie theater, chapel, gym, volley-ball court, basketball court, concert stage, gift shop, barber shop, jewelry store, and a number of popular eateries including Burger King, Subway, Baskin Robbins, and Starbucks.
Writing about the base recently, Captain Charles Barrett of the 3rd Infantry Division's 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team remarked, "There's a USO with computers and a Café. You know the café is good because it has that little mark over the letter 'e.' Soldiers are gaming on XBOX, Play Station and Wii. There are phone banks and board games and a place where parents can read to their kids and have the DVD mailed home."
The price tag for living the big-box-base lifestyle in Kuwait has, however, been steep. From 2003 to 2009, the U.S. Army spent in excess of $502 million on contracts for construction projects in the small, oil-rich nation, while the Air Force added almost $55 million and the Navy another $7 million. Total military spending there has been more massive still. Over the same span, according to U.S. government data, the Pentagon has spent nearly $20 billion in Kuwait, buying huge quantities of Kuwaiti oil and purchasing logistical support from various contractors for its facilities there (and elsewhere), among other expenditures.
In 2006, for example, the international construction firm Archirodon was awarded $10 million to upgrade airfield lighting at Al-Salem and Al-Jaber, two Kuwaiti air bases used by American forces. Recently, there has also been a major scaling up of work at Camp Arifjan. In September, for example, the Pentagon awarded CH2M Hill Contractors a nearly $26 million deal to build a new communications facility on the base. Just days later, defense contractor ITT received an almost $87 million contract for maintenance and support services there.
Saudi Base Building and Jordan's U.S. Army Training Complex
According to a recent Congressional Research Service report, "From 1950 through 2006, Saudi Arabia purchased and received from the United States weapons, military equipment, and related services through Foreign Military Sales (FMS) worth over $62.7 billion and foreign military construction services (FMCS) worth over $17.1 billion." Between 1946 and 2007, the Saudis also benefited from almost $295 million in foreign assistance funding from the U.S. military.
From the lead up to the First Gulf War in 1990 through the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the U.S. military stationed thousands of troops in Saudi Arabia. The American presence in the kingdom -- the location of some of the holiest sites in Islam -- was a major factor in touching off al-Qaeda's current war with the United States. In 2003, in response to fundamentalist pressure on the Saudi government, the U.S. military announced it was pulling all but a small number of trainers out of the country. Yet while many U.S. troops have left, Pentagon contracts haven't -- a significant portion of them for construction projects for the Saudi Arabian military, which the U.S. trains and advises from sites like Eskan Village, a compound 20 kilometers south of Riyadh, where 800 U.S. personnel (500 of them advisors) are based.
Between 2003-2009, the U.S. Army awarded $559 million in contracts for Saudi construction projects. In 2009, for example, it gave a $160 million deal to construction firm Saudi Oger Limited for the construction of facilities for a Saudi mechanized brigade based at Al Hasa, a $127 million contract to Saudi Lebanese Modern Construction Co. to erect structures for the Prince Turki Bin Abdul Aziz Battalion, and an $82 million agreement to top Saudi construction firm Al-Latifia Trading and Contracting Company to build ammunition storage bunkers, possibly at the Saudi Arabian National Guard's Khashm Al An Training Area.
Additionally, military weaponry has continued to flow into Saudi Arabia by way of the Pentagon and so, too, have contracts to provide support services for that materiel. For example, earlier this year, under a U.S. Air Force contract extension, Cubic Corporation was awarded a $9.5 million deal "to continue to operate and maintain the air combat training system used to support F-15 fighter pilot training for the Royal Saudi Air Force."
Like the Saudis, Jordan's leader, King Abdullah II, has long had a complex relationship with the U.S. shaped by domestic concerns over U.S. military action in the region and support for Israel. As with Saudi Arabia, none of that has stopped the U.S. military from forging ever closer ties with the kingdom.
Recently, after testing and evaluating various training systems at multiple U.S. Army bases, the Jordanian Armed Forces selected Cubic's combat training center system and under the auspices of the U.S. Army, the company was "awarded an $18 million contract to supply mobile combat training center instrumentation and training services to the Kingdom of Jordan."
The Pentagon has also invested in Jordanian military infrastructure. Between 2001-2009, the Army awarded $86 million in contracts for Jordanian construction projects. One major beneficiary was again Archirodon which, between 2006-2008, worked on the construction of the King Abdullah II Special Operations Training Center (KASOTC) -- a state-of-the-art military and counter-terrorism training facility owned and operated by the Jordanian government but built, in part, under a $70 million U.S. Army contract. In 2009, Archirodon was awarded two additional contracts for $729,000 and $400,000, by the Air Force, for unspecified work in Jordan.
When that 1,235-acre $200 million Jordanian training center was unveiled earlier this year, King Abdullah II himself gave the inaugural address, speaking "of his vision for KASOTC as a world-class special forces training center." Not surprisingly, General Petraeus was also on hand to give a speech in which he lauded Jordan as "a key partner... [which] has placed itself at the forefront of police and military training for regional security forces."
Garrisoning the Gulf
Even as it lurches toward a quasi-withdrawal from Iraq, the U.S. military has been hunkering down and hardening its presence elsewhere in the Middle East with little fanfare or press coverage. There has been almost no discussion in this country of a host of possible repercussions that might come from this, ranging from local opposition to the U.S. military's presence to the arming of undemocratic and repressive regimes in the region. With the sole exception of Iran, the U.S. military has fully garrisoned the nations of the Persian Gulf with air bases, naval bases, desert posts, training centers, and a whole host of other facilities, while also building up the military capacity of nearby Jordan.
The CIA efforts to topple Iran's government in the 1950s, Washington's support for Saddam Hussein's Iraq in the 1980s, the Pentagon's troop presence in Saudi Arabia in the 1990s -- all were considered canny geopolitical moves in their time; all had unforeseen and devastating consequences. The money the Pentagon has recently been pouring into the nations of the Persian Gulf to bulk up base infrastructure has only tied the U.S. ever more tightly to the region's autocratic, often unpopular regimes, while further arming and militarizing an area traditionally considered unstable. The Pentagon's Persian Gulf base build-up has already cost Americans billions in tax dollars. What the costs in "blowback" will be remains the unknown part of the equation.
- Posted in




27 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
Mr. Turse raises the curtain on subjects most of us would never otherwise know about. Reading all the statistics on what each base cost brought to mind a world in the future where the only jobs available will be those that pertain to the military (or one of its agricultural units). With so much investment in weaponry, the one thing that probably won't go "out of style" is fear; and with fear, increased violence is rendered inevitable. Good news for the "war business," and with economies feeling a crunch in so many places, seems there is never enough money to throw at one military branch or another. The only growth industry is that which makes for death and destruction. What does this say about the boast that America is a religious (i.e. "Christian") nation? As if these priorities in any remote way reflect the teachings of Christ, or any enlightened Master. It's a fraud perpetrated upon the world's people by leaders who truly worship mammon, but require Mars (the military) to facilitate their control of others' profitable resources. The masses are lied to every which way to make the theft and its impossible costs in the way of lost lives, limbs, and treasure possible. I am glad that the age of delusion is nearly over.
SiouxRose -- being that the USA clearly "exceptionalises" itself based on what it evermore insists is its "christian" character:
I am reminded of a painting by a Filipino artist - he nicknames himself "santo" (saint) - in which he painted a jesus christ crucified on a huge Dollar Sign.
which basically represents what the USA "capitalism" for profit, for the Almight Dollar - using "morality" and "jesus christ" and "western civilization is christian" kind of manifest destiny justification for conquest and thievery (starting with the native indians and spreading outwards) - really is.
If anything -- what the USA has done as a country - regardless of the conscientuous americans trying their best to speak up against that - is to USE "jesus christ" and then
CRUCIFY HIM every single day - again and again and again - with EVERY profiteering venture ever perpetuated by the USA - in "western/christianity"'s name of "civilizing" -
on the CRUCIFIX of the U. $. A.
that's what it really has amounted to.
if Jesus Christ called himself as the person in whom each of US lives and suffers or has joy or salvation....
then EACH and every person on the planet whose suffering has been caused or precipitated by the SYSTEM promoted by the USA for profit and power
IS a Jesus christ Crucified billions of times over on the ALTAR of the DOLLAR ....and the Cross of the DOLLAR.
for its behavior - it is true what Mahatma Gandhi said of christians ...but particularly applies to the USA "christianity".......
"EVERYONE IN THE WORLD KNOWS THAT JESUS CHRIST PREACHED GENEROSITY, PEACE AND KINDNESS........EXCEPT CHRISTIANS".
if christ were walking today and preaching in the street corner against Wall Street's "money changers"...and bailouts, and economic injustice, and the poor widow and the rich man..and violence, and hurting others especially the weak....
HE would be declared a TERRORIST by the US government - frmo local politicians careful of maintaining "law and order" for their business streets....
to Barack Obama signing "preventative detention" orders...
this is in fact the story already told by the great Russian novelist - Dostoevsky :
"The Brothers Karamazov" .
but then -- beyond Mark Twain or Arthur Miller -- i am not aware of any american "thinker" or playwright reaching that DEEP into such matters....
Sioux Rose
Hi, TEDDY: The Christos as living concept of spiritual atonement with Source is kept alive in hearts like yours. Those of us who still maintain a capacity for compassion, still seek justice FOR ALL, still add our contributions to make this a better world are living that CHRISTOS force... in spite of great odds and much aimed against these efforts.
I think it can be argued that the religious fundamentalists of all three patriarchal religions are largely to blame for much of the calamitous events of our times. There are some on CD who focus primarily on the economic engines and the philosophies that run them. Certainly capitalism or the present corporate capitalism without conscience that's run rampant around the world presents a major deleterious factor with respect to planetary health (on all levels). Still, it takes belief to fuel any system, and religion has done its part to turn tribe against tribe and celebrate vengeance where ALL the Masters taught forgiveness. Not the sort of forgiveness that's passed out like the church did Indulgences some centuries ago, but the species that emerges from catharsis, inspiring a change in the behavior of the offender. (The example in Mafia films is that the killer need but just go to confession and all is well, and he may resume his "employment" all over again until the next necessary confession. I think Federico Fellini did his own mockery of this.)
By the way, before I got to the end of your post, I was thinking Jesus would be arrested as a terrorist... and then boom, you said the same thing. The same ones who fill churches and sing hymns in his name would be first to cast the first stones or scream for a public hanging. The hardest thing in the world is self-mastery and that is why it's been wisely stated that, "He who conquers himself is greater than he who conquers a city." Were that the adage used as qualifier in our national elections, what a difference we'd see in state policy! But then I suppose I am merely dreaming on...
While all too many Americans believe it is our "divine right" to militarily conquer all that we need . . .
What force will ever be able to combat the massive American military juggernaut?!?
When will the people awaken to leviathan's ever tightening coils, ere we are all choking on our own blood . . .
Wow. With all that hardware we should be really "safe". Uh, unless we get sick and don't have a good insurance plan. Oh well, at least the oil is safe. Isn't it?
Nope.
Long enough, but surely solid information:
"Former Soviet States: Battleground For Global Domination",
by Rick Rozoff, Stop NATO, Nov 23 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16243
What an effing, bleeping joke this nation is.
amazing how the pattern of USA Behavior around the world is, isn't it?
Bases all over the globe....
garrisoning The Middle East. the persian Gulf...
Central Asia.
Near and South Asia.
Regions around Russia
Eastern Europe
Caribbean
Latin America even as far south as coast of brazil and argentina
Far east asia
inserting itself deep in the regions between India and China. Indochina, japan, pacific
it's ..whew!
this Entity calling itself the paragon of democracy and virtue and PEACE
goes around the world for "national interests"
basically LUSTING after the world's riches and resources.....and getting at it by hook or by crook and unabashed aggression and militarism and warfare....
AND THEN proclaiming itself as the saviour of humanity....
no country or civilization in history ever compared with such breadth of arrogance and hubris and pure cravenness for power and domination...NONE approaches it in that.
in THIS -- the USA is truly "the exceptional nation".
of course one shouldn't forget that the USA ITSELF
is really a GARRISON.
a GIGANTIC one...PRETENDING to be a democracy....and probably half of the populace actually LOVES it that way .. thinking it is "freedom and liberty".......
if one can consider being "free" to become glorified slaves in a Fascistic Corporatocracy "free" that of course has to be "secured" by
GARRISONNING the USA and the world.........
That's a fair list of regions where U.S. (and NATO) militarisation has developed and continues to build up, BUT you FORGOT an unforgettable, AFRICA and AFRICOM, on land and, when land is refused for U.S. military bases, on sea or the ocean.
And there's also NORTHCOM, which you didn't list.
Furthermore, there are U.S. bases in some European countries, including one or two countries in Britain, where, according to an article I read over the past couple of months, or so, said the bases I'm referring to are officially referred to as British, but they're not. Instead, they're really U.S. bases. Or maybe these are about military intell. operations or "facilities"; or a combination of both the latter and military bases. If I could recall the title of the article or at least the author's name, then I'd look for the bookmark or article and provide the link, but I don't recall this information, so I won't bother spending a half hour trying to find the piece. However, I think that the article is certainly credible and that it shouldn't be difficult to find such articles and provide the links (for people who know how to go about doing this).
The following is now old news, but tells of U.S. military intelligence bases in Britain, and I think there's an inference for regular U.S. military bases there; certainly U.S. military forces anyway.
"Rambler's campaign challenges US bases: Nurse arrested 150 times in rights of way protest",
by John Arlidge, July 7, 1993
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ramblers-campaign-challenges-us-bases-nurse-arrested-150-times-in-rights-of-way-protest-1483386.html
QUOTE:
LINDIS PERCY has walked through the United States listening station at Menwith Hill in Yorkshire 500 times. The 51-year-old nurse has been arrested 150 times in her campaign against the base, which is not marked on Ordnance Survey maps and, she says, blocks historic rights of way.
At York County Court yesterday, in a case which questions the future of US military bases in Britain, she opposed an application by Malcolm Rifkind, the Secretary of State for Defence, for an injunction banning her from paths which cross the site.
Mr Rifkind, she argued, could not seek the injunction because, although the Crown owned the site, it was the US government, not the Ministry of Defence, which occupied it and, under English law, only the occupier could apply for an injunction.
The question of occupancy has important constitutional implications for relations between Britain and America, the court was told.
Robin Tam, for Mr Rifkind, conceded that if the US government 'unwittingly' found that it was a 'landlord or licenser', it would have to go to court to seek the injunction to bar Mrs Percy from the site. This would compel Washington to surrender the legal immunity traditionally enjoyed by foreign governments which sign treaties with Britain.
'Agreements might have to be renegotiated for all bases where there are US forces stationed,' he said.
Lawyers for Mrs Percy say leaked documents show that the US Department of Defense has leased the site until 1997. The MoD denies this and says that US personnel could be forced to leave 'tomorrow'.
Mrs Percy, from Bradford, West Yorkshire, has gate-crashed a military ball, slept in the base, hung banners from its water tower and followed US staff through code-locked doors into the 'golf ball' domes which house surveillance satellites. Challenged by MoD police, she says she is 'just on a walk through the dales going to look at the orchids in the fields'.
Yesterday, Judge Crabtree referred the case to the High Court in London because, he said, it was 'a state trial' of great public interest. He ordered the MoD to pay Mrs Percy's legal costs.
END QUOTE
That's the whole article.
The following book evidently provides a lot of information on U.S. military bases, globally, albeit I'm not sure if Africa is mentioned. There's at least one reference for U.S. military bases in Britain.
"The Bases of Empire: The Global Struggle Against U.S. Military Posts", by Catherine Lutz
I found this online book by doing a Google search for "U.S. military bases in Britain", including the quotes, and the resulting link for the above book is a two-liner for url, and the link the Google search returned for the exact match with the aforementioned search phrase is much longer, so I won't include either of those two links. Instead, for readers wanting to read the reference I'm referring, it's simpler to just go to books.google.ca, select the Advanced search, and then enter the above title of the book in the "exact phrase" field, the author's name in the "written by" field, and hit return. Then click on the link for the book in the resulting webpage, which brings up the page for online book. In that page, enter "U.S. military bases in Britain" in the Go search field and click Go.
I just tested the above steps and this immediately goes to the part of the book I'm referring to; BUT to be able to see the whole related part of the paragraph evidently requires clicking on the Page link appearing above the initially displayed text.
According to the Overview page for this above book, Tom Engelhardt is among the many contributors, so maybe there's TomDispatch.com content on U.S. bases in Britain.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
US military bases (and their black budget twin CIA/NSA facilities) cluster and metastasize in the Persian Gulf region because that's where the mother lode of the planet's oil reserves are located. The Pentagon's aircraft, ships, tanks, Humvees, and trucks require and consume staggering quantities of petroleum daily, just for ordinary supply, support, and training exercises and to maintain constant combat readiness. At the time of the Gulf War I blitzkreig into Kuwait and then on up the road to the outskirts of Baghdad, it was the proximity to Saudi Arabia as a staging area - the "largest filling station on earth" - that made the whole air war and ground invasion possible.
Is the US military there in order to stabilize the world market for petroleum, or is it the ready availability of oil there that enables the Pentagon war machine to thrive?
Bill from Saginaw
"Is the US military there in order to stabilize the world market for petroleum, or is it the ready availability of oil there that enables the Pentagon war machine to thrive?"
Both, of course. The military-industrial complex would never be able to justify the money they take from us to garrison the gulf if it weren't for the fact that we've adopted a lifestyle that would be turned upside down if the price of a gallon of gasoline approached the $10-level it should be at.
I'm not sure gasoline for the U.S. market is a key objective or interest to the Big Oil chiefs and their allies in the corporatocracy or U.S. political body. Americans (and Canadians) are or at least were, though surely still are, the heaviest consumers per capita, but gasoline sold for much less in the U.S. than it did in European countries, and considerably less than in Canada. With the rising prices in the U.S. over the past few years or so, maybe the differences have seriously diminished, but gasoline also rose to around $1.45 or a little higher a ... not gallon, but litre, which is roughly a U.S. quart, a litre being 33.8, instead of 32, ounces. However, I read about prices rising to around $4 in the U.S. and if this was common across the country, then the differences became considerably less than before, between U.S. and Cdn pump prices.
A serious part of the cost in Ca is taxes, instead or revenues for Big Oil, but the fuel tax in the U.S. is not negligible, either. The government needs the taxes, for whatever they're used for, the corporatocracy needs the government, and both profit. How much of the taxes are used to do real good for the general public is a question I don't know the answer to; however, fuel prices should be high and should've been high starting long enough ago. During the early 1990s, actually 1992, prices in France, or at least Paris, were around $5 Cdn for a gallon.
I don't know that the above is really relevant when considering your post, but the Asian consumer market is growing in numbers ... by much, many, and the U.S. ruling corporatocracy wants to be in control over the oil market; there'll be "tremendous" profits to be made with these rising or skyrocketing consumer markets. How many Asians, I suppose especially people in China and India, will become serious consumers of gasoline is something I don't know enough about to be able to say anything more detailed about this; but the numbers are rising, by much.
Meanwhile, the U.S. economy continues the downward slope, so I suppose consumers in the U.S. will decrease their consumption levels, which would decrease U.S. consumer-based revenues for Big Oil in the U.S. And the ruling corporatocracy in the U.S. might not be planning to ensure a revived economy in the U.S. anytime soon. According to the documentary film entitled "The Money Masters", which is recommended by well-enough known Ellen Brown and which I also recommend viewing, the corporate elites of Big Finance, etcetera, make Great Depressions and economic revivals happen; it's something they apparently can do, have done, and will surely do again. They're doing it today. It's credible, I think, that they don't have near-term economic revival for the U.S. planned for anytime soon, and if this is true, then what value would the U.S. consumer market have for Big Oil revenues? I don't know the answer; only posing the question.
This is just some "rough-sketch" thinking and questioning, for I don't know enough about the related statistical details to be able to say anything definitive. About all I can say, f.e., is that I've read that the consumer market in Asia has been rising; the bit about what the aforementioned documentary says regarding the financial elites making economies boom and bust for their strategic planning or plans to PROFIT ... BIG TIME; and the U.S. elites definitely plan on controlling the global oil market. But it seems reasonable (I think) to say that if these ruling elites plan on letting the economy continue its decline in the U.S., then they're looking at other consumer markets for profits from OIL more than they're planning on profiting from the market in the U.S.
I don't know if the latter is a valid guess, but will state it anyway. If we stay silent, then it's not likely that we will drive or help to drive debate or educational feedback.
Hail the Empire!
Hail Caesar!
Was Caesar, Julius, emperor, as bad as western history makes of him? Based on the documentary film, "The Money Masters", he was most likely assassinated because of his plans to rectify the poverty for the general population at the time and this struck against the "interests", i.e., greed, of rich elites of the time, so they would've had him assassinated. The same film says, and this is if I'm recalling this well enough from the film, that an emperor or two preceding Caesar was or were very bad, but that he wanted to implement economic corrections to try to alleviate the widespread poverty at the time. And a lot of "history" taught in schools in the west is revisionist crap compared to what people say to be the real historical accounts or events.
Has Caesar been bashed while the blame actually fits for his predecessor(s) and not him, or also him, but to much lesser extent? I don't know, but he apparently and credibly planned on doing some real good for the poor at the time and this is always good; unless it's like what's happened in the U.S., where the economy rose a lot with WW II, and following it, very much or mainly because of the U.S. having always been a a war-based economy ever since. Or so say plenty of apparently knowledgeable people about the U.S. since WW II anyway.
"Father," he asked, "are the rich people stronger than anyone else on earth?" 'Yes, Illusha," I said. "There are no people on Earth stronger than the rich." "Father he said, "I will get rich, I will become an officer and conquer everybody, the Tsar will reward me, I will come back here then no one will dare..." Then he was silent and his lips still kept trembling. "Father, he said, "what a horrid town this is."
–(Dostoyevsky, "The Brothers Karamazov.")
Provided by Jill Bains.
Smart kid, that Illusha.
It is not that hard to keep up with the Empire's next war as the propaganda machine has been going on about how dangerous Iran could be never mentioning how dangerous Israel already is. The anti-war movement should start demanding a return to the draft which would at least insure strong opposition. The problem is they have figured this out after Vietnam and now they have private crusaders and drones.
"The anti-war movement should start demanding a return to the draft which would at least insure strong opposition."
I disagree.
I believe that the anti-war movement should start demanding a surtax divided equally among the approximately 150 million Federal Income Tax paying entities in the United States. This would at least insure strong opposition to continued militarist intervention in foreign countries that pose no threat to this country. Wouldn't you rather pay a few thousand a year right now to support our wars? Or would you rather pay double for these wars by the time the loans are repaid with interest. There is a third choice. NO MORE WAR.
And the drones are often driven by contracted cies.
"Spies for Hire: New Online Database of U.S. Intelligence Contractors",
by Tim Shorrock, Special to CorpWatch, Nov 16, 2009
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=15468
EXCERPT:
CorpWatch Releases Online Database of U.S. Intelligence Contractors
Joint project with SPIES FOR HIRE author Tim Shorrock
...
WASHINGTON – Starting today, journalists, activists, and corporate researchers will be able to use the Internet site SpiesForHire.org to track the nation’s most important intelligence contractors.
Increasingly, secret drone attacks in Pakistan, CIA prisons in Guantanamo, and domestic surveillance of American citizens, have drawn public scrutiny to U.S. intelligence. These and other policies have triggered calls for criminal investigations and congressional commissions to investigate possible abuses in the post-9/11 “war on terror.”
But there's a big piece missing from the national debate about spying: the role of private intelligence contractors. ...
To help the public and media understand this new phenomenon, CorpWatch is joining today with Shorrock, the first journalist to blow the whistle on the privatization of U.S. intelligence, to create a groundbreaking database focusing on the dozens of corporations that provide classified intelligence services to the United States government.
...
These contractors, database users will find, do it all:
...
• From bases in Nevada and Virginia, they control the military and CIA Predators that launch missiles at suspected terrorist bases in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
• Contractors also run covert operations, write intelligence reports that are passed up the line of command all the way to the president, and advise agencies on how to spend taxpayer dollars.
END OF EXCERPT
The related hyperlinks are provided in the press release.
One of the qualifications for making a good confession is the promise to repent, that is, change ones sinful nature for the better. The daily struggle to live a life in the image of Christ is not easy and it is only with the help of a close and very personal relationship with God that we can come close to attaining our true purpose in life: loving one another in eternal.....
Peace
Which god? I'm partial to Dionysius, myself. Mercury is pretty cool, though, too. Yahweh is kind of an asshole if you ask me.
That's because you don't know the real Yahweh and probably true Jewish religion, which we don't and can't learn about when wearing blinders and only looking at the criminal and insane Zionists and any other Jews, and Christians, who don't understand that the Old Testament, as applies with the whole Bible, was written by people and not God, and that God would never tell anyone to do any harm, for God is immutable, not a changing person, wicked one day, nice another day. Wherein Scripture refers to so-called orders from God to commit bloody massacres, like with "King" David accounts, among others, then we can be certain that it was the writer who lied in claiming that God stated these orders. To lie is one of the very common bad traits of humans throughout history. Exaggerating, distorting, ... are other ill human traits throughout human history.
You might want to stop your ill habits, but perhaps you prefer to maintain them. Christians, however, have an obligation to correct our ill ways. And that also applies to true Jews and Muslims of sane and wise understanding of Scripture; instead of believing every word of it is word of God, who didn't write a single letter, so much less word, of Scripture.
The true Yahweh speaks through people from all parts of humanity. Every person who calls out for or prays for real peace and justice, for truth and human rights to be respected, f.e., can be considered a medium of God's real Word and, therefore, view. This therefore also applies with intelligent and sane atheists who disagree about known religious beliefs, but who state their views [respectfully] of religious believers, the believers who aren't wicked anyway.
You could learn well, if open to it, from such atheists, who evidently are difficult to find among Americans. Whether they be religious or not, Americans have a tendency to be egotistical, disrespectful of others, narcissistic, and so on. You could grow by shedding your ill American characteristics; but you're American, many Americans are [pig-headed], as well as the other traits previously mentioned, so the likelihood of seeing other peoples' views as respectable and then to respect them might be too far of a reach for you, and others like you.
It never fails, an ass American is around every corner.
If there is a "God", human beings can no more understand the nature of that being than can an amoeba understand the nature of a human being. Human beings can posit all sorts of ideas about what "God" wants or does not want us to do. There seems to be an assumption that "God is good". I believe, that if there is a "God", there is no way to know whether it is evil or good or moral or amoral. All of the things that you attribute to a loving, or at least benign "God" are still posed by human beings proposing to understand the nature of God, not that those are not good things for which to aspire.
"God would never tell anyone to do any harm."
Neither would you, nor would I. Why must a "God" exist for us to arrive at such a conclusion, that we should not do harm?
"Christians, however, have an obligation to correct our ill ways."
Why would one need to be a Christian to believe this? I believe it myself, though an agnostic.
"Every person who calls out for or prays for real peace and justice, for truth and human rights to be respected, f.e., can be considered a medium of God's real Word and, therefore, view."
Or, those persons could simply be considered rational beings. One simply can not know "God's view" whether or not one exists.
"Americans have a tendency to be egotistical, disrespectful of others, narcissistic, and so on."
As do many Christians, Jews and Muslims.
"Whether they be religious or not, Americans have a tendency to be egotistical, disrespectful of others, narcissistic, and so on."
As do many other peoples in many other countries. Israel comes to mind, Saudi Arabia as well, France, too, and Japan, just to name a few.
"It never fails, an ass American is around every corner."
There are many asses around many corners.
Tell that to Obama and the many other [false] Christians in the body politic of the USA. And, btw, GW Bush is and was not truly Christian; not according to what Russ Baker has found through his investigative research into the Bush family anyway, and this is more than certainly credible. It's obvious. Your words wouldn't make a dent in GW's heart or mind, but likely wouldn't do any good with Obama and the many other false "Christians" in the body politic of the USA, as well as the many false ones among the general population of the USA.
So what would a person saying what you posted be doing, preaching to the choir, since all other ears are deaf and the minds between them are totally dumbed?
operation enduring freedom - remember that line of bullshit - will be over when the oil and gas is gone
but the bases will remain - so long as there are stooges like the sheeple paying for it
suckers....
"SouthCom: Washington Develops its Operations in Soto Cano Airbase in Honduras",
by Arnold August, Nov. 23, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16252
I already posted this with a full copy of the article, having done this for the following article specifically about Honduras.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/11/24-9