Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The IDF Violated Nuremberg Principles During Operation ‘Cast Lead’
In what can be considered a sad paradox of history, an analysis of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) actions during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza shows that the IDF violated several of the Nuremberg Principles, as well as the principles of the Geneva Conventions.
The Nuremberg Principles are a set of guidelines established after World War II to try Nazi Party members. They were established to determine what constitutes a war crime. The Geneva Conventions consist of four treaties and three additional protocols that establish the standards in international law for humanitarian treatment of the victims of war.
According to Nuremberg Principle I, "Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment." As detailed in the "Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict," also known as the "Goldstone Report," several crimes against unarmed civilians were committed by the IDF during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza.
The UN Mission investigated 11 incidents in which the IDF launched direct attacks against civilians with lethal outcome. The facts in all except one case, states the Mission, indicate no justifiable military objective. According to the report, "From the facts ascertained in all the above cases, the Mission finds that the conduct of the Israeli armed forces constitutes grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention in respect of willful killings and willfully causing great suffering to protected persons and, as such, give rise to individual criminal responsibility. It also finds that the direct targeting and arbitrary killing of Palestinian civilians is a violation of the right to life."
Both Israeli government and military officials are responsible for the IDF actions during Operation Cast Lead. As Nuremberg Principle III states, "The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relive him from responsibility under international law."
It has been argued that those that were following orders are not guilty of crimes, and the responsibility for those crimes falls on the superior officers. However, Nuremberg Principle IV states that, "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him."
Nuremberg Principle VI establishes three kinds of crimes punishable as crimes under international law: crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Among crimes against peace are those crimes "involving planning, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances."
Although the Government of Israel has the duty to defend its citizens, it is clear that Operation Cast Lead was a war of aggression against Gazans, out of any reasonable proportion and aimed at inflicting massive damage on Gaza's civilian population. According to a study carried out by B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights organization, 1,387 Gazans were killed during operation Cast Lead, a figure that includes 773 civilians and 330 combatants.
Among the war crimes established by Nuremberg Principle VI are the, "...plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity." The UN Mission investigated several incidents involving the destruction of industrial infrastructure, food production, water installations, sewage treatment plants and housing. Among the installations destroyed by the IDF was the el-Bader flour mill, the only operating flour mill in Gaza.
As stated in the UN report, "...the Mission finds that there has been a violation of the grave breaches provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Unlawful and wanton destruction which is not justified by military necessity amounts to a war crime. The Mission also finds that the destruction of the mill was carried out to deny sustenance to the civilian population, which is a violation of customary international law and may constitute a war crime. The strike on the flour mill furthermore constitutes a violation of the right to adequate food and means of subsistence."
The UN Mission also investigated four incidents in which the IDF coerced Palestinian civilian men at gunpoint to take part in house search operations. The men, blindfolded and handcuffed, were forced to enter houses suspected of having combatants, ahead of the Israeli soldiers. "From the facts available to it, the Mission is of the view that some of the actions of the Government of Israel might justify a competent court finding that crimes against humanity have been committed," states the report.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Israel will never allow its soldiers and war-time leaders to appear before an international war-crimes tribunal regarding the IDF conduct during the war on Gaza. As stated in the UN Mission report, however, "In the context of increasing unwillingness on the part of Israel to open criminal investigations that comply with international standards, the Mission supports the reliance on universal jurisdiction as an avenue for States to investigate violations of the grave breach provisions of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, prevent impunity and promote international accountability."
- Posted in

101 Comments so far
Show AllI thought Bush and Cheney had thrown all that stuff out?
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
No. They threw themselves under a bus.
"The only means of straightening ones teeth, once into electricity,is to makeup one's pig with something,to let the county fair's beholden or was it bolden the thoughts of the outhouse'-John Keatskykoff
Nuttyahoo et al. have said that the Goldstone report (even though written by a fellow Jew and sypathizer with Israel) is biased and one sided against Israel.
Goldstone is a traitor, a self-hating Jew. Nothing in the report is valid.
Israeli rigt-wing Jews can do no wrong, they are superior in every way. If anyone dare critizize Israel policy (or US support) is either an anti-Semite, or a self-hating Jew, including Dr. Richard Falk, Rev. Desmond Tutu, and President Jimmy Carter.
Israel has a right to defend itself from these crazed terrorist Palestinians. They do not deserve the same rights as civilized white Jewish folks. Might makes right, you know social Darwinism and all that. The removal of Palestinians is unfortunate, but they brought it on themselves.
(NB:The post above was pure parody and sarcasm)
sounds like how progressives treat African Americans that don't vote Democrat.
"a traitor, a self-hating Jew" replace "Jew" with African American.
Yeah, or an American of any color or class who criticizes war, imperialism, corporate crimes and injustices, corruption etc. is called a "traitor" "hates America" "supports terrorists" or even worse a "socialist"
NOW DON'T FORGET THE SHORT PEOPLE! THEY HAVE A HELLUVA TIME IN THE DISCRIMINATION HIERARCHY. MEN OVER 6'2" get higher salaries.Imagine that.
sounds like how progressives treat African Americans that don't vote Democrat.
"a traitor, a self-hating Jew" replace "Jew" with African American.
just like the red-man invite us from the old world to to take over the Americas because he did not know how to develop his lands.
Gee here I got another preview message.
Naomi Klein has already said it's time for a boycott, divestment, and sanctions policy toward Israel. Let's damn do it!
AD
IT'S HAPPENING AND I LOVE IT!
During the 30's, every other nation either turned a blind eye or contributed materially to the actions of the Nazis. None of those contributors have been taken to task for their actions.
The same is happening again. While you and I are deeply appalled at what Israel is doing to the Palestinians, leaders in every Western (and self-proclaimed civilized) nation are supporting, encouraging and excusing the violence against them.
The same nations that supported the Nazis.
the same nations that created and enforced Nuremberg and Geneva.
The same nations that are blind to Israel's genocidal actions now.
Hah, and while Germany is still beating its breast about the Holocaust, it is a contributor to the crimes against Palestinians.
WTF?!
Unbelievable. Nothing makes sense anymore. How can one respect laws that are so selectively enforced?
Of course the double-standards, racist imperialism and hypocrisy is thicker than pea soup. However this makes perfect "sense" for the imperialists. We have to remember Israel is a proxy state, a garrison state for the (albeit informal) US Empire. The USA is more to blame for Israel policy than Israel itself is.
These policies make perfect "sense" when viewed from a racist, imperialist viewpoint, of course morality and justice has no place in economics or foreign policy according to neo-imperialists. These policies serve the perceived interests of the corporations who largely control imperial foreign policy.
WHO PULLS THE PURSE STRINGS OF THE MOTHER OF ALL WAR CRIMINALS HEINRICH Kiss my grits KISSINGER and there lies the answer.
This won't go down well in either Tel Aviv or Washington: most of the weaponry used by Israel is a 'gift' of the US, making that country complicit in these alleged war-crimes, and they've already committed quite enough all by themselves.
And we wonder why statements like this are made:
"However, I realized that decades of armed and political struggles could not help to inch forward a resolution of this issue. Nevertheless, East Timor's issue was resolved without losing much time. Why? Because the entire game was in the hands of the great Satan, the USA. Organs like the UN and countries like India and Israel were simply the extension of its resources and that's why there was a failure to resolve the Palestinian issue, the Kashmir issue and the plight of Afghanistan.
"So I and many people all across the world realized that analyzing the situation in any narrow regional political perspective was an incorrect approach. This is a different ball game altogether for which a unified strategy is compulsory. The defeat of American global hegemony is a must if I want the liberation of my homeland Kashmir, and therefore it provided the reasoning for my presence in this war theater."
The person making the statement is al-Qaeda's top military commander, Mohammad Ilyas Kashmiri. The whole, very recent, interview can be found here, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KJ15Df03.html
His reasoning and goal is no different from that of Luke Skywalker and the Star Wars rebels.
I AGREE!
Yes, Israel is a state that behaves exactly like the fictional "Dr. Jekyll". Like Jekyll, it generally is respected and admired by its allies; also like Jekyll, it began a great enterprise for ostensibly noble purposes-- but there was ALWAYS some question about the legitimacy of its pursuits.
During Israel's existence, the cruelly and viciously-murdered bodies began to pile up in its neighborhood. Like Dr. Jekyll, Israel deplores violence, and professes to be wholly innocent of any crime or evil. On the contrary! Like Dr. Jekyll, Israel is nothing if not humane and altruistic.
Oh, there are thugs and dangerous criminals in Jekyll's neighborhood, and Jekyll himself has been forced to defend itself when beset by street thugs now and then-- but Jekyll has nothing to do with the mayhem they perpetrate.
Over time, the bloody footprints and fingerprints are clearly traced to Jekyll's door.
There IS another twist that doesn't fit the Jekyll tale, but evokes one of the "Jack the Ripper" hypotheses, i.e. that this serial murderer was a member, or near relation, of the royal family who was protected by the authorities.
Unlike Jekyll, Israel benefits from an association of has powerful allies who enable and protect it.
Thus, "Jekyll" can stand confidently, even indignantly, on its porch and decry the horrified and outraged world public, as if WE are the brutes, and a mob at that. Since Jekyll "knows" that HE'S not the monster called "Mr. Hyde", in his deranged mind its the accusers who are malevolent, sinister, and suspect!
Expect a few "Mr. Hyde irregulars" to project their delusional claims in this thread. You'll know them by the squishing of their blood-filled shoes.
· Yr Obd't Servant
I think they'll be easier to recognize by their screams of anti-semitism and holocaust...
On the Nuremberg trials -
"[The Nuremberg] war-crimes trials were based upon a complete disregard of sound legal precedents, principles and procedures. The court had no real jurisdiction over the accused or their offenses; it invented ex post facto crimes; it permitted the accusers to act as prosecutors, judges, jury and executioners; and it admitted to the group of prosecutors those who had been guilty of crimes as numerous and atrocious as those with which the accused were charged. Hence, it is not surprising that these trials degraded international jurisprudence as never before in human experience."
Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, (Columbia Univ.)
Yes, but the reference in the article is to the set of Principles adopted to guide the trials and not the trials themselves. The Principles seem sound, if selectively applied in the decades since.
Netanyahu's refusal to accept international tribunals while also refusing to conduct proper internal investigations is why certain Israeli military and politicians can no longer travel abroad.
The claims of "self defence" are ridiculous in the case of Operation Cast Lead and are serving to devalue the concept. Rocket and mortar fire from Gaza had effectively stopped as part of a cease-fire in place from June 2008 until early November 2008 when the Israelis themselves broke it.
There is currently an effective international boycott and divestment campaign against Israel. No need to wish that it exists, it does.
[Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, (Columbia Univ.)]
"Harry Elmer Barnes (15 June 1889 – 25 August 1968) was a prominent American historian in the 20th century. Associated for virtually his entire career with Columbia University, Barnes at one time was held in high academic esteem but later lost his credibility with legitimate historians by entering into the practice of historical revisionism, and specifically Holocaust denial." From Wikipedia.
Seig Hiel!
I was pointing out to the holocaust denier that his source was full of crap. Troll. Do your own search on wiki to see the whole story about the Germanophile 'historian' quoted above who rewrote the history of WWI claiming that the allies provoked Germany into launching that war. How that 'historian' was funded by the German gov't's of the interwar years to write flattering accounts of German history. And how that author later started to write books that denied that there was a holocaust at all.
Good to see you have no reading comprehension. But thank you for correcting my spelling of the German words.
If the UN lets these people skate away from these atrocities then the world might just as well restart the Holocaust. The IDF knew better than to do this - the Nazis didn't.
On the contraty - Adopting the report would reward terrorists worldwide.
It would in effect send the message that this new form of warfare - in which terror groups launch attacks against enemy civilians from behind the shield of its own civilian population - will win immunity for the terrorists and prevent law-abiding states from defending their citizens. If this tactic gains acceptance in the UNHRC, it will be repeated by terrorists throughout the world, to the detriment of all other democracies fighting terrorism.
I am sure that if the US provides the Palestinians with the same kinds of arms that it has provided Israel, they will not wage guerilla warfare. As it is they have no alternative except of course to accept the Zionist agenda and leave their country.
Law abiding state? Israel? Are we talking about the same Israel? I really don't have time to list all of the ways in which Israel has broken and continues to break international law but this site has some of them.
http://www.geocities.com/savepalestinenow/internationallaw/studyguides/sgil3.htm.
Israel is just a reflection of US foreign policy, the US is even more to blame for arming and financing the atrocities. What do we expect from a country that killed 100s of thousands of innocent poeople in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan?
Whereas suppressing the report rewards only a few terrorist rogue states.
It would in effect send the message that rogue state terrorism-- in which nations launch attacks at innocent civilians behind the shield of "national security"-- will win immunity for the rogue state and prevent its victims from defending their citizens. If this tactic gains acceptance in the UNHRC, it will be repeated by rogue states throughout the world, to the detriment of all other democracies fighting state-sponsored and conducted crimes against humanity.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Hey, if the shoe fits.....the only antisemitism that is being propagated is by fools like you. So you can take that antisemitic race card and shove it up where the sun don't shine.
Only for blinded racist fools like you would call it a big IF..The massacre was broadcast for the world to see...you must be one of the racist zionists that were having a picnic while watching the IDF commit its crimes..
How dare you call zionism racism??
Israel's population is made of 20% israeli arabs - who live a wonderfull life here, go to university and take part in all the state's foundations.
Israeli arab's socio-economic situation is the best to be found in the middle east, and they enjoy the great prosperity this country has to offer to all its residents.
No one thinks that the situation would have been the same if the regime here was palestinian.
Tell me which bits of the following statements are not racist:
"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.
"We must do everything to ensure they [the Palestinian refugees] never do return" David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar's Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even
know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because
geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab
villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz
Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar
Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in
this country that did not have a former Arab population." Moshe Dayan, address
to the Technion, Haifa, reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.
"We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his
question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion
waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'" Yitzhak Rabin,
leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23
October 1979.
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism,colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands." Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.
Need I go on - and believe me I can. Indeed if a Palestinian makes a statement as racist as these it is trumpeted from the columns of the MSM as evidence of how nasty those Palestinians are and how they must be "dealt with". On the other hand here is a statement by Emir Feisal, son of Sherif Hussain and later King of Iraq, in 1919:
"We Arabs, especially the educated among us look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist
movement. Our deputation here in Paris is fully acquainted with the proposals submitted yesterday by the Zionist Organisation to Peace Conference, and we regard them as moderate proper. We will do our best, in so far as we are concerned, to help them through: we will wish the Jews a most hearty welcome home."
This of course was before the Palestinians realised that the Zionist program was to drive them from their land.
Fake quotes coming from fake human beings. How appropriate!
Letto is that you?
Nah, Letto is far more intelligent and able to argue respectfully. sanny is a troll.
Zionism is TEXTBOOK RACIST IMPERIALISM!
Are you, Michalos, an Arab living that wonderful life you describe in Israel? (thanks to American tax payer dollars may I add.) Something tells me that you ain't or you wouldn't be defending it. You racist zionists become pretty transparent once you open your mouths.
All the reports of 'massacres' were fake like...hmmmm...say all the reports of the Holocaust were fake? I believe you've got a point there. And what's good for the jews is definetely good for the gander.
Where were those civilians supposed to run? To the closed border? The Goldstone reports descibes how civilians carrying white flags were killed in cold blood. Gaza was another example of Israel's horrifying "experiment in human despair" ( as J.Cook puts it in his latest book).
Now you are resorting to straight up racist denials. Why do you hate "Arabs" (Palestinains). Does your pale skin-tone mean that you are superior? Are white European Jews superior while Palestinians/Arabs are not human?
What do you propose to do with the millions of Palestinian refugees in the Occupied Territories? What is the next step? Israel has a big demographic problem.
The shoe DOES fit! And it won't be long before Israel is made to wear it too.
For decades now any rational discussion of USA policy with Israel is de-railed by charlatans and immoral people who scream "anti-Semitism, Holocaust Denier, Self-Hating Jew!" This tactic is not only morally disgusting, pathetic and anti-intellectual, but is backfiring.
It is pretty sad and pathetic that the only "defense" for racist imperialists is AVOID talking about Apartheid, War Crimes, International Law and Imperialism.
Horrified, you sound intelligent."where the sun don't shine" Catchy, I should use that
How about being just fair and take responsibility, like the Germans took responsibility for the actions of Nazis? Why do some (not all!) Jewish people constantly put this notion and demand that they are above the law?
Because they are the "Chosen People" and therefore entitled to do as they please, when they please and what they please and the rest of the world is not supposed to notice much less critize unless they wish to be accused of 'anti-semitic' and reminded of the Holocaust TM.
[comparing Israel to Nazi Germany ]
The shoe does fit, irregardless of whether or not you want to define it as antisemitism. Of course, aren't the Palestinians also a semitic people?
[claiming that Islamic terrorists are freedom fighters, etc.]
Well, of course they're terrorists. They're not fighting for 'us', they're fighting for themselves. Terrorists are those evil people who bomb civilians on our side, freedom fighters are those heroic warriors who bomb civilians on the other side...
Exactly! And the IDF is plenty guilty of that and, yes, they are terrorists, US tax-payer backed terrorists, state-sponsored terrorists no less.
Well, considering that everyone in Israel is conscripted into the IDF, (and that service is for how long?) I'm not sure you can claim that the 'terrorists' are actually targeting civilians.
Circa 2009, "antisemitism" is defined as a Zionist ploy to quench criticism of its evil actions and as carte blanch to continue perpetrating crimes against humanity.
Nice try...
My pointing out that the Arabs who live in Israel are also Semites is not a claim that they are incapable of hating Jews. Given the events of the last 40+ years that some of the Arabs claim to hate all Jews is hardly surprising, I'd hate them too if they bulldozed my home, shot at my kids and dispossessed me of my land. I was pointing out that the Israeli Gov't is guilty of antisemitism (at least) with its treatment of the Palestinians during and before the siege of Gaza, as well as the attack on that besieged strip of land.
I'm not antisemitic, I have condemned the barbarity of both sides of this issue. The fact that Israel is far more powerful and is willing and able to kill far more Palestinians must be taken into account. Israel has the ability to settle the dispute, but is obviously not willing to make any effort whatsoever at making peace with its neighbours; unless that peace is a Roman style of peace.
It is a tired old trick of the racist imperialists to de-rail any rational discussion of international politics, and jump up and down and scream "anti-semite/self-hating Jew!"
Hiding behind the Holocaust to justify racism, war crimes and Apartheid is not only the lowest level of morality, but is an abomination to the victims of the Shoah. The lowest of the low.
Ask Norman Finkelstein about this, and read his book "Beyond Chutzpah, the mis-use of anti-Semitism and the abuse of History"