EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Report: Big Profits Drove Faulty Ratings at Moody's, S&P
WASHINGTON — Analysts who reviewed complex mortgage bonds that ultimately collapsed and ruined the U.S. housing market were threatened with firing if they lost lucrative business, prompting faulty ratings on trillions of dollars worth of junk mortgage bonds, a Senate report said Wednesday.
The 639-page report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations confirms much of what McClatchy first reported about mismanagement by credit ratings agencies in 2009.
Credit rating agencies are supposed to provide independent assessments on the quality of debt being issued by companies or governments. Traditionally, investments rated AAA had a probability of failure of less than 1 percent.
But in collusion with Wall Street investment banks, the Senate report concludes, the top two ratings agencies — Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's — effectively cashed in on the housing boom by ignoring mounting evidence of problems in the housing market.
"Instead of using this information to temper their ratings, the firms continued to issue a high volume of investment-grade ratings for mortgage backed securities," the report said.
Profits at both companies soared, with revenues at market leader Moody's more than tripling in five years. Then the bottom fell out of the housing market, and Moody's stock lost 70 percent of its value; it has yet to fully recover. More than 90 percent of AAA ratings given in 2006 and 2007 to pools of mortgage-backed securities were downgraded to junk status.
Wednesday's report provided greater detail about the behavior of Brian Clarkson, the president of Moody's at the time of his departure in mid-2008, when the financial crisis was in full bloom.
Clarkson rose from the head of Structured Finance, which rated complex bonds backed by U.S. mortgages, to president of the company. His rise paralleled the decline in ratings quality. He has refused to talk to McClatchy or other news organizations, and was scheduled to testify last year before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission but was rushed to the hospital with a kidney stone.
Analysts had confided to McClatchy that Clarkson bullied and threatened them as he rose up the ranks, and the Senate report details that in numerous emails. One email dating to 2003 shows Clarkson suggesting the need to "refine our approach" to keep pace with competitors "easing their standards to capture (market) share."
Similarly, an S&P employee in an August 2006 email described his company's cozy relationship with Wall Street banks this way: "They've become so beholden to their top issuers for revenue they have all developed a kind of Stockholm syndrome... ."
Stockholm syndrome is the bond a kidnapping victim feels with captors.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

33 Comments so far
Show AllWhat's new? Most of what the "corporatocracy" feeds the public is nothing but bullshit!!!
Was it greed? Who would have thought? It took three years to figure this one out.
richsmith2,
The report will somehow will be forgotten. If you expect something good coming out from it, you are wasting your time. Geithner, Eric Holder, Obama and the whole craps Democrat and Repug are good part and parcel of the Oligarchy. I cannot see no change and not expecting one.
I thought this was an article from the Onion when I read the common dreams headline. Did we need a report to figure out that corporations are greedy?
The McClatchy spin, quoting ...ummmm.. someone,: "..they have all developed a kind of Stockholm syndrome... ."
here is another quote from a different someone: "..they have all developed a kind of Chamber of Commerce syndrome... ."
haha
whocares;)
For the record, many of the people connected with Wall Street, perhaps even most, are indeed greedy. However, it is wrong to say that ALL those connected are greedy. There are still many decent people within the American business structure.
"There are still many decent people within the American business structure."
But are any of them in positions of importance? It sure does not seem so.
Yes, the American business structure as exists in you local market, restaurant, and most other small businesses.
As for the corporate class that matters as per "running the show", greed rules. Money and power are their drugs and gods of choice.
Somewhere quote from PT Barnum is sure to pop up, something about a fool and his money, or fooling all of the people all of the time... something like that.
Plenty of blame to go around....
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/11/congressional-members-personal-weal.html
Look at who owned what stock....May 15th is the next reporting period.
READ:
The Real Housewives of Wall Street
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/
news/the-real-housewives-of-wall-
street-look-whos-cashing-in-on-
the-bailout-20110411
The FED has two sets of books!
Audit the FED!
Bill, here is a NYT story that appeared today.
In Financial Crisis, No Prosecutions of Top Figures
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/In-Financial-Crisis-No-nytimes-220824617.html?x=0&.v=1
Then you have to remember that this mess really got legs back in 2007-2008 and the AG then refused to investigate it.
Mukasey Declines to Create a U.S. Task Force to Investigate Mortgage Fraud
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/business/06justice.html?adxnnl=1&pagewanted=print&adxnnlx=1302794258-4OzmvVKBQ77JJYmXSjjTrw
How is it done? First you deny it as no news, until it becomes old news. Then everybody is so distracted by all the new disasters, nothing get done about it.
This time we can rub their noses in it...(grin)
Goldman traders tried to manipulate derivatives in 2007
http://dailybail.com/home/goldman-traders-tried-to-manipulate-derivatives-market-in-07.html
You can download the Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations report at the above link.
URGENT BREAKING: Get this out far and wide!
Glass-Steagall Reintroduced (Basically) - HR.1489
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=184237
Rep. Marcy Kaptur introduces bill to repeal Glass- Steagall
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52995397/H-R-1489-Introduced-in-House-United-States-Congress-via-MyGov365-com
Nancy in action...
http://dailybail.com/home/rep-kaptur-sticks-an-ied-inside-paulson-and-then-presses-boo.html
http://dailybail.com/home/kaptur-exposes-tim-goldman-sachs-geithner-video.html
http://dailybail.com/home/marcy-kaptur-gets-her-bailout-rant-on-fed-gets-lambasted-cli.html
http://dailybail.com/home/rep-marcy-kaptur-warned-about-foreclosure-fraud-2-years-ago.html
http://dailybail.com/home/dylan-ratigan-with-rep-marcy-kaptur-mers-whitewash-fraudclos.html
This appeared in todays NYT.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14prosecute.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1
I strongly recommend everyone read it.
I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you, to find that there's gambling going on in this establishment!
As has been clear for a long time, these so-called "rating agencys" like S&P - exactly like the so-called "accounting" firms like Anderson & Assoc - were in on the "fix" all along. Their behavior is clearly fraudulent. The "Law" is useless against these white-collar criminal bastards. Why would anyone even consider listening to what they say - it's all bullshit.
Oh, what a web we weave, when we practice to deceive. Off with their heads!
Well, gosh! Who knew?
Maybe now they can make a three-year study to determine whether war causes death and destruction for anyone. Or if cancer is a bad thing. I thought Oliver Stone already showed that greed is the only real glue holding Wall Street together. Without unbridled greed it couldn't exist. But it's so reassuring to know that Congress needs a 639 page report to confirm the obvious. The Department of Redundancy Department. And of course this will really shake things up! The banksters must be trembling in their thousand dollar shoes.
Well Duuhh!
and the bear's a catholic.
Indeed, this is old news for anyone who's been paying the slightest attention.
The real question is: who on Wall Street is going pay for the demonstrated collusion and corruption? Whether through fines or time in jail or, ideally, both?
The answer, tragically, is "no one". Which essentially guarantees we are going to see this happen again. Duh.
Talk about a toothless government and insanely useless policies.
Gaza And the Warsaw Ghetto
same place
different times
while the world stands by
genocide
live*
*slow motion in Gaza
I worked as an editorial manager, helping to put reports and books out on corporate ratings. I soon got into trouble when I refused to attend a meeting with an "analyst" who--I knew--wanted to make pigheaded and wrong changes to the manuscript. I felt that something was up: either he was being arrogant or was under the influence of others above him. Of course, in the miltaristic operation that S&P was in the 1990s, my refusing to meet with that analyst did not bode well for me. What editorial officers and financial officers wanted was "Yes, sir!" "No, sir," "Anything you want, sir!" My editorial bosses Paul Stanwyck and Don Schultz and Bill Lewis applied the pressure to me, by taking me off that assignment and giving me grunt work to do. As is the way of corporate pigs, they shunned me, making my life one of isolation as they hoped I would quit. If a change to the editorial product was requested by analysts such as Sol Solomon and others, it was made--immediately. Once again, editorial was just a puppy on a leash for the financial officers trying to increase S&P's profits even if it mean sacrificing someone else's money, retirement fund, nest egg, and so on. Stanwyck, Shultz, Lewis, and Solomon, to name just a few that I can remember truly had a bond with their captors. Who wants to sacrifice expensive lunches paid for by corporations looking for high ratings, and the secret under-the-table bonuses, and the regular bonuses, and the cushy 9-5 job on swanky Wall Street where you feel you are a master of the universe. No one makes those sacrifices for the sake of nameless buyers of those bonds with inflated, fraudulent ratings who will go into retirement living in a nursing home smelling of urine and having no call buttons or who will have to cancel their son's chance to get out their one-horse town. This is NOT an "Empathic Civilization" as Jeremy Rifkin would have us believe. People like Stanwyck, Shultz, Lewis and Solomon were no better than Sean Hanna, the owner of Investment Wires, who is a Libertarian. Who else are Libertarians? The Koch brothers, who really run the country. That philosophy says: I deserve everything I can get via my skills whether they be in mathematics or maneuvering people or ratings. And no one takes it away. Anyone without those skills deserves to be culled from the herd. That would help make more room on Earth for us "deserved elite."
Informative post. Thanks and sorry about what you had to go through to gain these insights.
The corporate culture has so many truth killing rules. Always be positive. There are no problems, only opportunities. Be a team player. Taken as a whole that culture tends to support fantastical evaluations that benefit the few at the top.
I'm sick of hearing the word "greed" and letting it go at that. How about the word "criminal"? Where will all this go?? Will some prosecutor somewhere take up the violations and actually file criminal charges? Is there a basis for a class action suit or some other civil action? Or are they just going to chaulk it up to "greed" and say that "boys will be boys" and move on to the next abomination? I suspect the later.
It appears to me that the rating agency's are now performing the opposite trick. Downgrading good investments (i.e. sovereign debts) to force draconian budgets on the public, to help pay back the inflated expectations of bond holders.
I wonder how much it costs to-day to convince a rating agency to downgrade a bond issuance.
You mean to say that there still are people who pay attention to Moody's and S&P??? If they do, then they deserve what they get: screwed.