EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US 'to Transfer Bagram Detainees' but Questions (and Many Prisoners) Remain
The US military has told Al Jazeera that it is negotiating with foreign governments to take non-Afghan prisoners from its controversial prison at the Bagram airbase outside Kabul, the Afghan capital.
Vice-Admiral Robert Harward of the Joint Task Force 435, who is head of detainee operations, said "a very, very small population" of foreigners are held at Bagram.
"We're currently co-ordinating with those governments," he told Al Jazeera.
"We're working to move them [the detainees] back into the legal systems of their countries."
The US has promised to hand over the Bagram facility to Afghan authorities by the end of the year.
Al Jazeera's James Bays, reporting from Kabul, said the Afghans wanted the foreign detainees transferred before they take over.
"The Afghans wouldn't want to take control of these detainees when it came under Afghan control, and that's why America is talking to some of the governments where these prisoners come from to see if they will take these prisoners," he said.
"At the same time, since the beginning of the year, there has been a series of releases of Afghan prisoners, substantially reducing the size of the prison population."
Bays said a US source and an Afghan official had put the number of foreign nationals held at Bagram to about 30 and 60 respectively.
The Bagram prison was established after the US-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.
Two inmates were killed while being interrogated in 2002, and other former inmates have claimed they have been abused and tortured.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

1 Comment so far
Show AllIf we had ever done this kind of thing to the slime ball European white Nazi scum we fought in the Second World War, we would never have heard the end of it, and it would have been wrong even then. At Nuremberg those accused of the worst war crimes of these Nazis got the same due process as is required under the principles of Anglo US law or was then, and I have a document from Nuremberg and on those very trials which details this. Yet today somehow the US Government tortures in the manner of a Charles I in England and his damn Star Chamber and all in the USA are quite about it. In England in 1689 with people who had guts people were as the Who would put it "fighting in the street/with their children at their feet. . ." Charles I decided and the "crossbow sang the song."
I digressed, but due process if it's good enough for the worst of Nazi war criminals, it's good enough for anybody damn else as well!
AD