EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
'Hey! You talkin’ to Mitt?': Mitt Romney's 'Robert DeNiro Moments'
Watch for it. At least once a week, as he’s hit in the chops with a sudden impertinent question from a reporter or some seditious moderate in a town-hall forum, GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has a Robert DeNiro Moment.
Mitt cannot, alas, meet these crises with the sheer Thespian virtuosity of his arch-rival Newt Gingrich. Faced with a similarly snarky query, Newt responds, first, with a long pregnant pause (also known as the Historian’s Hold), and seems barely able to stifle a sneer as — disdaining any pretense to a straight answer — he delivers a withering, well-honed soliloquy on the tawdriness of the question, the asker’s pernicious motives and the tragic decay of civility in the American body politic.
Mitt can’t even imagine ad-libbing this glibly. Whenever I see him gobsmacked by an unscripted question, I think of DeNiro’s character, Travis Bickle, in "Taxi Driver."
You know the scene. DeNiro faces the mirror with an air of bemused surprise and he says, “You talkin’ to me?… You talkin’ to me?…” In both characters, Bickle and Mitt, there’s a sudden awareness of trespass, followed by a defensive crouch.
Of course, there’s a lot of difference between the delusional Bickle and the illusory Mitt. In the film, DeNiro plays a faceless nebbish struggling to fish the shreds of his manhood from a swill-bucket of self-doubt. His life is a string of failures and insults, and his richest opportunities have amounted to little more than a mess of pottage.
Mitt clearly, has it better. His discomfiture with the occasional confrontational constituent derives from a sincere disbelief that anyone, not even Tom Brokaw, nor even a respected peer like Donald Trump, would venture such naked irreverence.
“You talkin’ to ME?”
How could you be so brazen and blasphemous, so bereft of lèse-majesté? Do you know who I am? Who my father was? Do you have any idea how much money I’ve made without breaking a sweat? This money belonged to me even before it was mine although I never, ever (cross my heart) sought mere wealth — no, the money is simply a symbol — because it has fueled, all my life, my powers of leadership. Because I was born to lead, to be a senior partner, a CEO, a bishop, a governor, a president! and I am shocked — shocked — that someone of your ilk would impugn my destiny, would dare to hinder my ascent by questioning my personal life, my financial privacy, my values, my faith, my character, my hair, my inability to wear anything but a suit, my fierce devotion to everything that is good and right and pure and American. And by “American,” I do not mean the squalid, muckracking, peeping-Tom, tabloid America where you live, ya creep, but the real, pure, clean, spotless, homogenized America that I love and cherish and helped build through my passionate belief in free enterprise, with the help of my wonderful wife, what’s-her-name. How dare you ask such a question? Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?
DeNiro and Romney, as they gaze at us past the headlights, have the same look. But Travis Bickle, waging a war within his fragile self, is merely shadow-boxing. Mitt, who’s genuinely pompous, is really, truly, honest-to-Joseph Smith surprised.
Although this has been happening a lot lately, Mitt just can’t get over the sheer crust of these people asking stuff they have no right to ask, not to someone like him!
“Excuse me, my friend. You talkin’ to me?”
Mitt remains so inexplicably easy-to-shock because of an almost superhuman air of self-assurance, a cocksure confidence that he’s not just right, but that being right is his birthright. Mitt is so right that if he were to change his position 180 degrees and, a moment later, reverse himself back to where he started, he would nonetheless never be wrong, because people like Mitt — and they know who they are — are always right.
If they were not right, how else to explain their wealth, power, privilege and soaring self-confidence? As we all know, the great American meritocracy selectively bestows wealth, power, privilege and soaring self-confidence only on the deserving, while justly forsaking the timid, the unworthy and the millions who turn their backs on certain success and, instead, reach out for food stamps, Lotto tickets and the sports page.
I’ve wondered where guys like Mitt get all this confidence. His father was a notably modest guy. But I think it helped Mitt to know that his dad, George, was one of Detroit’s great auto barons, then governor of Michigan, and afterwards a Cabinet member and candidate for president. At some point, I think, Mitt figured out that if he wanted to squeeze into Harvard — which he did — all he had to do was float the notion past one of Dad’s several dozen gazillionaire friends who happened to be Harvard alumni.
I can offer a contrast (as most of us can). My dad, when he was still with us, painted houses, tended bar at night. The first time I ever heard of Harvard was when the Carlisle Indian School beat ‘em in "Jim Thorpe: All American," which came around one night on the Late Movie when I was about 12. My parents might’ve met a few real-life college (well, normal school) alumni, but none from anywhere east of Stevens Point.
Travis Bickle acquired self-respect by buying a gun. Whatever confidence I have comes from paying a lot of dues, and it certainly doesn’t soar. It’s held to earth by anxiety, sarcastic friends, a sharp-witted wife, a stack of bills and a lack of firearms.
But confidence, I figure, is the secret ingredient that lifts and separates the one-percenters. Imagine having never once, in your whole life, had to sweat it out ‘til payday, or worried about a credit check, a child-support payment, a vindictive boss or a call from a collection agency. Or a test grade, a college application, an IRS audit, a security deposit, or where your next tankful of fuel is coming from. Or your old man’s drinking, your brother’s habit, your sister’s illness or where to take the baby when her fever won’t break and you got no insurance. Stuff like that tends to gnaw away at your sangfroid.
Confidence is what makes Mitt different from the rest of us. It’s why he’ll always be surprised when one of us stands up, looks him in the eye and pops a hard question, as though we’re just as good as he is. As though all men actually were created equal.
That’s right, Mitt. We’re talkin’ to you.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


14 Comments so far
Show AllNicely written piece, don't get me wrong.......
And Thank You CD for helping me decide that maybe i won't work for the Romney campaign. I was truly torn.
People like Romney, with their vast wealth and their upper class "pedigree," don't really live in the ordinary world, where 99% people have their livelihood.
In effect, Romney is a feudal lord living comfortably in his manor, while the peasants
labor away and suffer. In the good old days, the better sort of people had a natural route to power in the "House of Lords." Today, they have go through an absurd masquerade of pretending to believe in "representative government." Being aristocratic in nature, it must irk them somewhat that they have to "appeal" to serfs and villiens (ie, the scum of the earth) to get into office.
Mind you, I prefer Romney's natural elitism to the nauseous "populism" of the likes
of Gingrinch. If we are going to have feudal lords in power, then let our politics be openly reflective of feudalism. It's disgusting when people pretend that the serfs rule the Kingdom!
Pitch perfect.
Although, truth be told, it's the sense of entitlement that separates Mitt and others "of his ilk" from the rest of us more humbled beings. And it's that entitlement, coupled with the influence of his mega millions and cronies in powerful places, that makes Mitt Romney one scary dude. He is completed shielded from ever having the need to face reality directly, or to face his detractors and opposition. It's "beneath him," to use the popular parlance among his ilk.
That dastardly Romney!
Who does he think he's kidding?
Glad we got THAT sorted out!
The rich mans Heaven is the poor mans Hell.
RIP Tosh
I think the article would have been better if the author had provided us with some actual examples of Romney behaving in the way he describes. Some of us have no desire to go trawling through the Republican debates looking for them.
This is what came to my mind when I read the article:
Corporations are people, too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2h8ujX6T0A
The $10,000 bet comment (which I do not think is terribly substantiative but it illustrates a certain mindsent)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRT1AIP12w0&feature=fvwrel
Occupy Protesters try to bring up issues of substance. The look on his face is described spot on in this article:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7393741n
This article made my day! Although I would change the Joseph Smith reference to Brigham Young since Joseph never got to the Promised Land (he was murdered while jailed in Illinois on a "treason" charge against---Illinois!). Also, Mitt's right to flip-flop at will can find some justification in Mormon creed (see, for example, the wikipedia entry, "Joseph Smith". If you have a revelation one day, and six days later you have a contradictory revelation, well, that's all right; it will work itself out (but it seems like a hell of a way to govern!). (Caveat: my paternal side were RLDS.)
-30-
As though all men actually were created equal. what a concept! .......I like it, but it will never catch on .... ever....Not while there are Mitt's in the world...
Mr. Benjamin describes the perfect sociopath, a cult disciple blithely untroubled by empathy and wholly possessed by megalomania, the blind addiction to power. The mind shudders with revulsion; Mitt Romney is not an enviable man.
Mr. Benjamin has not had a piece published on C.D. in some time. Well, the respite did him well. This was a wonderful piece of writing... or as another poster put it: Pitch perfect.
Here's what I'd add. It was one thing when all the opulent wealth was hanging out inside the Bastille, inured to the poverty and hunger on the streets outside, However, centuries later, in an age of mass education added to mass media, no one can pretend they don't understand what's happening outside of the protected circles of extreme wealth. History holds up a dark mirror.
The theory of karma suggests that each of us will account for our actions based on the level of awareness that produced them. It may have been plausible two hundred years ago for the Calvinist inversion of truth to effectively argue that wealth represented a direct depiction of God's blessing, and its absence, therefore, the reverse; but now we know better. We know that very real behind-the-scenes powers buy access, and with it, laws, economic theories, and policies. These are carefully developed to manufacture great prosperity for the few, at the direct expense of the toiling masses.
My point is that there is no excuse in the 21st century for the sorts of wealth disparities (along with the sense of entitlement these tend to promote) that we're seeing. And furthermore, it is my FIRM belief that those who position themselves, like Romney and Obama, to skim the cream off the top when so many are going homeless, hungry and without health CARE will have an ENORMOUS karmic price to pay. As I type this, I'm getting a flashback of the scene from Indiana Jones' "Raiders of the Lost Arc" where the Nazis, now in possession of the Grail, wish to see what riches and powers it holds for them.
The misuse of resources, sacred as well as profane, has its price. And seldom is the cost covered within the range of a single lifetime. When you think of Romney parading around like a human peacock, think of that.
It's amazing. While the .01 percent reap more and more of our decaying nation's wealth, They are affronted by anyone discussing their privileged position, and seem shocked and outraged that any of the rest of us might feel hostility towards them.
Romney is just a Wall street pirate with loot buried in the Cayman islands.
Benjamin does it again. Confidence: that's it. Mr. Romney is full to bursting with confidence. He knows he's right; he knows it's his right always to be right, even when demonstrably wrong; his confidence in his own confidence is a given. Watching him, I become very nervous--and increasingly anxious for the 99.9%..