Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Un-Happy Holidays for Seniors and the Disabled – Here’s Your Donut
It isn’t sugar plums dancing in their dreams for America’s seniors and disabled who are covered by the Medicare program. It’s donuts. Donut holes into which many fall at this time of the year as they reach the maximum limits of the first tier of “Part D” prescription drug benefits.
I watched my 67-year-old husband trudge up the driveway on a recent morning as I pulled away. He had just showed me the printout of his drug costs for the year. He’s reached the Medicare Part D donut hole by using more than $3,000 in prescription benefits. He is disheartened because his costs tripled at just the time of the year when grandfathers like to be thinking about other things instead of how to manage the cost of their prescriptions or which drugs can be cut in half and still do some good to get through to January 1 and a new benefit year.
And it’s not as if those drugs had negotiated prices that would make it a fair playing field for Medicare beneficiaries. No, no. When Part D was put into place, Congress didn’t see fit to allow the Medicare program to negotiate for lower drug prices. You might think $3,000 sounds like a lot in medication costs, and it is until you fully understand that the prices are inflated as far as possible without any negotiated rates.
So it was a donut hole for the sick and the elderly. Reach it and you are on your own to pay for all of your drug costs until you reach the other side of the hole – or die because you could not afford to pay for those medications.
My husband’s $300 a month supplemental plan doesn’t help much or at all on most of the donut hole costs, so before folks judge him and millions of others as irresponsible and think they should be prepared for the costs, think again. Many pay40 percent or more of their retirement income out in healthcare costs even after buying plans marketed to keep them protected. Corporate America is making sure seniors and the disabled who rely on Medicare spend as much of their plan benefits and retirement funds on their profits. Not much “Ho, Ho, Ho, Merry Christmas” in that.
My 84-year-old mother called me last weekend worried about the beginning of 2012. She’s also on Medicare and a supplemental plan. She reached her donut hole last week too. But her bigger worry is the New Year when she’ll have to meet the drug and supplemental plan deductibles she has though her fixed income will not be changing. “How will I get my puffers?” She explained that one is as much as $400 when she pays out-of-pocket. She worries about paying her rent and buying her groceries during those weeks until she has paid for the medications, submitted her claims for reimbursement from the supplemental plan and finally gets a partial check for coverage. She worries.
My income is the back-up plan for both of them. Without me, my husband says, he’d be dead. My mom never knows if I’ll have enough to send her enough once I help pay my husband’s costs.
It is hard to imagine the kind of selfishness that allows our elders to worry so after decades of hard work and decades of paying taxes. It’s not as if my mother didn’t earn her keep all these years. She worked through World War II when times were tough for her family, and then in 1954, she contracted polio. She was very ill for some time and even spent time in an iron lung trying to survive and heal. She worked outside our home the whole time I was growing up, so she paid into Social Security for many years. My dad too. He also had a pension plan through his employer (ironically he worked as a pharmaceutical salesman), and he set up all that he could to keep my mom safe after he died. They did all they could do to plan for their retirement years.
But as my mom struggles to get her medications and worries about co-pays and deductibles, rent, utilities and food, the company my dad worked for has morphed through several huge buy-outs and legal entanglements (the IUD deaths in the 70s, phen-phen diet pill deaths in the 80s, and beyond). The company had to find a way to survive and keep profiting, so they cut pensions for retirees and survivors, they cut benefits, and they sold out the dead who helped build their empire of greed.
My mom’s worries this holiday season are not shared by the CEOs of the drug companies profiting off Medicare Part D and the donut hole. It is yet another example among many of why our system is so corrupt – profit rules over people. It breaks my heart and makes me mad.
I’d write shame-shame, but I’d say they’re a little beyond shame, wouldn’t you? Someday when we finally reach the point where a progressively financed, single standard of high quality care is guaranteed for all, we won’t leave our seniors and the disabled worried and upset for the holidays. Perhaps we’ll decide to honor them a bit more than what we have so far.
In the meantime, this holiday season if you know someone who relies on some combination of Medicare and supplemental benefits to help with their medical costs, ask if they need some help. Because many of them cannot join up out at “Occupy” sites and weigh in that way (though I’ll bet many would if they could) and because the people they elected to protect them aren’t too interested in this issue right now as they rush to get home for the holidays. Seniors and the disabled who have slipped into the donut hole aren’t on the radar this year – at least not until it’s turn-out-the-vote time.


29 Comments so far
Show AllTo me, Medicare Part D stands for the Democrats version of medicare.
It is one of the steps toward Medicare Part Zero - the destination sought by both corporate parties.
Can you say PRIVATIZATION ?
It's way past "shame", it's criminal. Part D was nothing but a handout to big Pharma. Another thing we have to thank GW and Cheney for. It was made so complicated from the beginning that many seniors paid for programs that offered them less than they had before, and they were locked in for a whole year before they could change their policy.
The hoops doctors and patients have to jump through to get their prescriptions approved for coverage would be a joke if it didn't lead to so many complications. This isn't insurance for anyone except the insurance companies and big pharma that are insured of their profits and bonuses.
There a Drug Company that raised the price of a single dose of a drug from 10$$ to 1500$$. This a drug that prevents premature births . They did not devlop this drug. They purchased a company that had been making it , rebranded the drug under another name and upped its price.
I wonder what the view of the "Fetus as a person" crowd is here and whether those same politicians who demand jail times for mothers who neglect that "person" or cause it harm will go after this drug company with the same zeal.
Will the mother go to Jail for failing to pay that 1500$$ per dose?
It should be very clear WHY GW Bush passed this Drug Plan and put in those provisions that prevented the prices from being negotiated. It was to ensure another revenue stream to the Drug Companies.
Bush was well paid by the drug companies for passing Medicare Part D. Nothing happens in Washington D.C. without money changing hands. The USA is a "plutocracy". In the United States of America the corporations and the 1% rule.
Their political organization is called "The Republican Party". They own it. Their propaganda outlet is called "Fox News". They own that too.
My thoughts about this are that there are some drugs out there that people really need to survive. But there are a lot more that do more harm then good.
Cholesterol drugs don't save lives. It even states that in the add.
those drugs deplete the kidneys and do more damage then good.
People should educate themselves. I bet if more people got in to juicing and natural remedies, they would not only be richer, but healthier.
You need to rethink this and get some new thoughts about it. You are shifting blame back onto the victims of the predatory system. "If only people ate better and took better care of themselves" is the excuse the corporatized medical and health industry use to justify continuing to prey on vulnerable people. "They have no one but themselves to blame."
Any natural remedy quickly becomes hijacked, co-opted and corrupted by the corporate food industry. That means that the "personal choice" model, based on consumerism and individualism, is irrelevant and harmful.
You should educate yourself on what it means to live in a society of your fellow human beings. Clue - it is not about your clever personal lifestyle choices, nor is it about throwing others to the wolves because of theirs.
ixnay on the replyay..... buzzer..... WRONG answer.....
I have observed a few people who've been taking multiple pharmaceutical drugs. I think that they display characteristics I would describe as akin to putting a "tap" on your brain & letting your personality - your soul - pour out. Big Pharma doesn't list THAT side effect, now do they?!
Perhaps one drug, maybe a blood thinner isn't so bad. HOWEVER, I've been pretty diet conscious for the past 30 years, & I think our society should be SCREAMING about diet & lifestyle. At 57, I haven't been to a doctor since 1976. There is abundant information out about healthy choices in life. Yeah, I drink beer & smoke pot - & can jog a few miles at the drop of a hat - but most all of these westernized lifestyle illnesses & health problems can be avoided & even ameliorated by eating mostly high quality, mostly vegetarian food & exercising. There is really nothing good about any of these drugs. Almost no one should be taking them, and then, for only a short period. Some people will defend the silly drugs.... I tell ya,.... I'm just laughing at the stupidity..... bottom line: all individuals should get a clue! Hello!...
A friend of mine puts on a "shorts" film festival, & one year someone did a short with two people running on the beach while a voice over told of some drug they should take. The film maker collected every negative side effect they could find from lots of existing drugs & stated them all..... It was really funny........
Now go eat some organic green leafy vegetables!
Your rant has nothing to do with my post. I agree with you completely about Big Pharma and about diet and lifestyle choices.
However, are we seriously to believe that if all people followed your lifestyle, that public health would no longer be an issue?
One of the many blatant inconsistencies in your glib and self-righteous approach to this serious issue is the fact that your "fresh organic leafy vegetables" are not available year 'round, other than in upscale specialty stores reliant on imports of questionable quality, as often as not deceptively labeled, over-priced and not easily accessible most people in the country. "Fresh leafy vegetables" however is a useful buzz phrase, a feel good bunch of nonsense, one that many entrepreneurs are making a killing on, and one that allows you and others to look down your noses at the plebes and shift blame for the public health crisis onto those most cruelly affected by it,
Live your lifestyle. Convince yourself that you are cleverly ahead of the game. But do not present that as a serious response to the public health crisis.
By the way, people in the US are most seriously deprived of fresh and seasonal fruit, and fruit that is allowed to ripen, and a greater diversity of varietals. Remedying that is not within reach for most of the population due to circumstances entirely out of their control. Nutrition is being systematically, and deceptively, stripped out of the diet of modern people for the purpose of meeting the needs and whims of marketers and investors. The choices available to people are being limited, and that is a far greater factor than individuals making the "wrong choices" in a personal consumer paradigm.
Again, by the way, even in cultures that are entirely vegetarian there is still a need for a public health infrastructure. Even in communities eating entirely local and fresh there is a need for a public health infrastructure.
Again, by the way, even if your formula were the solution to the public health crisis, socially responsible behavior would demand that you promote a public health infrastructure to make your "choices" available to all, and to educate people about nutrition and diet, and to eliminate the bad choices from the shelf. Instead, you promote a "personal choice" model, a two-tier food system - one for enlightened people such as yourself who are making the "right choices" and another system for the less fortunate ones, and present that as an alternative to a public health system.
Now, put your veggies down and go do your homework.
Two Americas, you are right about much of the shifting the blame onto the people is wrong. But in this case, maybe not so much.
WE have been inculcated with the idea that drugs cure - but the evidence for this is sorely lacking. We are inundated with pharmaceutical ads telling us what to tell our doctors to perscribe, but when we listen carefully to the side effects in the ads, maybe no one should ever go there. Drugs, it seems, rarely cure. At most they reduce symptoms - but that is not the same as a cure.
Drug companies recruit scientists to explore natural solutions to certain conditions and then alter these solutions chemically so they can pass it off as a "wonder drug".
My roomy was a kind, and generous man before he was prescribed Gabapentin for pain.
Shortly after taking this crap, he became suicidal. The doctor's response was to lower the dosage. Since then he just lies in bed day after day and bitching about everyone and everything and complaining that there is nothing to do - but he never wants to do anything either.
Gabapentin, it seems is chemically similar to GABA (gamma amino buteric acid) which you can buy much cheaper at a suppliment outlet. And you won't get the side effects.
I believe that every pharmaceutical out there has a natural analog and we should chose the natural one instead of the synthetic one every time.
And, yes, I am a chemist.
I am very leery about all the drugs the doctors tell us we HAVE to be on, too. I have rejected drugs that caused blood clotting and cancer (oddly enough that's what I had already) because I researched them all and found I really did NOT need them. Yes, there are some that are very necessary, but I would not get on a new drug unless I was convinced it was very necessary. But these seniors on drugs they need for survival should HAVE THEM. Like the writer says -- they worked their entire lives and contributed their taxes to this country. Seniors should not have to worry about how they will make ends meet.
"Cholesterol drugs don't save lives." Easy for u to say u don't have genetic based heart disease. I 've been an athlete all my life and a vegetarian as well and I still almost died of a arterial blockage in 2009. I take various meds. now to keep my heart beating and among them is a cholesterol lowering med. When exercise and diet are NOT enough as the add says, try Crestor. I do and even at that I need to take 1000 mg. of Niacin and 1000mg of fish oil daily to keep it under control, that's with a lo fat diet and no meat etc. So don't be so fast to judge.
You might try this web site for additional information:
http://www.mercola.com
I take a full strength coated aspirin every day. Keep your blood thinned out. The cholesterol drugs affect the liver and can create muscle problems in some people. Blood pressure medications also have adverse effects on some people. The medication slows down your circulation. Note that before there was so much money to be made from medications like these, doctors didn't concern themselves all that much about blood pressure and such. But these medications are money makers both for the doctors and the drug companies. Remember you have to have a prescription to buy these drugs. That means paying a doctor for his or her "permission" to buy medicine. Not just once, but again and again. Parallels with "street corner drug pushers" and their addicts. Same basic idea. Anyone can measure their own blood pressure, decide whether or not to do something about it. Actually the human body regulates your blood pressure according to the needs of the body for oxygen carrying blood to all parts of the body. You may note after you start on blood pressure medication that you have cold hands and feet. That means that the medication in reducing your blood pressure is also cutting back your circulation. With most people it isn't that harmful. Then there is a lot of disagreement as to how high blood pressure should be allowed to go. Back before treating blood pressure was so common, the allowed top figure for blood pressure was your age plus 100. Now the medical industry has decided it should be no higher than 120 or so. Draw your own conclusions from this. Remember the doctor is a doctor because here in the US it is a sure road to a upper middle class income. The cost of becoming a doctor is high (couple hundred thousand dollars perhaps in student loans), but once you have that "MD", you're pretty much set for life. With that monopoly over the supply of medicine you can create your own supply of patients who will come to your office every few months to get their "check ups" and their prescriptions renewed... And thanks to Obama's "health reform", the supply of patients is going to be even larger! Better car, maybe that boat you've been wanting, etc...
1000 mg of magnesium daily (in 3 separate doses) will keep your blood circulating and avoid clots....far more efficient and safer than aspirin, which can destroy your stomach lining and cause an ulcer, eventually.
With all due respect, it's not just seniors and the disabled suffering. My husband and I are in our 50s and are long term unemployed. We do freelance work to try to get by and prevent foreclosure/homelessness and, for us, medical advances might as well have stopped in 1914. If we have a problem that can't be solved with either aspirin or a bandaid, well, it just won't get treated.
Too true.
Occupy!
Rest assured your payouts will continue to grow. I read a few days ago that one hospital C E.O. got 145,000,000.00 for his pay last year. Can we say our system is insane? People all over our country cannot aford healthcare, and this CEO gets 145million for one year. This is highway robbery, without the gun. I'm sorry, but I don't think anyone is wiry a half a million dollars a day. We ate being robbed and sold out, by those we have voted into office. We need to sweep all the incumbents out of office. All career politicians need to be voted out. These people who have supposedly been looking out for us have filled thier coffers at our expense. All career politicians need to go. Use your vote, put them on the street. They are so out of touch with reality, and life on the street. Let's start fresh, and let them know who's boss.
I think it is going to take stronger measures because you can ask nicely for your money back but until you have a negotiating position it is not going to change anything. That guy needs his office occupied on a regular basis. A face to face meeting with the people he cheats and sends to an early grave.
Patent law should not apply to drugs. Most innovation in medicines comes from university research. Instead of buying $800 a gallon fuel to fly helicopters shooting million dollar missiles up and down the canyons of the Hindu Kush in Afghanistan the money should be spent building research labs and manufacturing plants to produce medicines which are made available for free to people who need them.
And we should be providing training for free to any of our people who want to become health care professionals. If we can afford to train and pay people to kill, we can afford to train and pay them to heal.
Employ them at comfortable but reasonable salaries at publicly owned, not profit facilities like the Veterans Administration hospitals that would provide care free to anyone who needs help. I am a teacher. I am reminded of a comment one of my 6th graders made last week. "Asking for money when someone comes to a hospital and needs help is messed up."
Some day all these things will come to pass and the crimes of the way in which health care is the privilege of the wealthy, as it is now in America, will be looked back upon with disbelief as a dark age that is impossible to understand.
OCCUPY!
Why can't we have leaders who talk like this? Does becoming a politician turn you into a greedy sociopath, or are greedy sociopaths the only ones seeking office? We've got to get money out of politics so that people who make sense have a chance at running for office instead of stark, raving lunatics sucking up to the corporate teat. HELLA OCCUPY!
Read Herbert M. Shelton. His Natural Hygiene program got me off all drugs and doctors. It can do the same for you.
Ah, yes, "enlightened Capitalism" and consumer choice and alternative lifestyles to the rescue.
So I guess the problem is not that people's health and well-being has been thrown onto the "free market" where people are preyed upon by every sort of hustler and con artist, rather the only problem is that they are not making the right choices as consumers.
The Natural Hygiene movement is said to have been founded during the 1830s by Sylvester Graham, (inventor of the "Graham cracker") but declined until "resuscitated" from "almost dead" by Herbert M. Shelton (1895-1985). Shelton claimed that "Hygienic care is the only rational and radical care that has ever been administered to the sick in any age of the world in any place."
In a 1978 interview in Natural Living, Shelton described his educational background this way:
"I postgraduated from the University of Hard Knocks and left before I got my diploma. I went through the usual brainwashing process of the school system in Greenville, Texas and revolted against the whole political, religious, medical and social system at the age of sixteen."
During the next several years, Shelton obtained a "Doctor of Physiological Therapeutics" degree from from the International College of Drugless Physicians, a school established by Bernarr Macfadden, and took a postgraduate course at the Lindlahr College of Natural Therapeutics in Chicago. Then he went to New York where, "after nine months of brainwashing," he acquired degrees in chiropractic and naturopathy. In 1920, after further study and apprenticeship at various institutions, Shelton published the first of his 40 books, Fundamentals of Nature Cure. In 1928 he founded Dr. Shelton’s Health School in San Antonio, which operated at seven different locations until 1981. From 1934 through 1941, he produced a 7-volume series under the title The Hygienic System. In 1939, he launched Dr. Shelton’s Hygienic Review, a monthly magazine that was published for about 40 years.
http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/natural_hygiene.html
Thanks for sharing that, Two Americas, you are on top of your game today and taking no prisoners. Healthy people always congratulate themselves on their pure and enlightened lifestyles until they get sick.
Shelton taught that doctors and medicines have nothing to offer the sick. That they interfere with healing rather than promote it. After many years experience, I agree with him. I understand what he was saying. Shelton was a brilliant man and no quack. I have medical coverage from the government but no longer have occasion to use it because Shelton taught me how to take charge of my own health. To hell with the free market, the medical and pharmaceutical businesses! Yes, they are businesses. If Americans adopted Natural Hygiene, health care costs would plummet while the nation's health would be vastly improved. Don't knock Natural Hygiene until you have tried it.
I can relate to that, many of the drugs available for chronic disease have serious side effects. There are many ways to heal yourself but you have to work at it and it is difficult to do in this culture until you are really sick. Once you are in late-stage illness it is even harder to correct. When I was in the hospital for an injury, I refused several of the medications. Some were given to everyone as a precaution. The food was horrible and not something that would give you strength or good health. I don't want all those drugs and they have little else to offer except surgery (which is sometimes necessary)
When the bill collectors started phoning me at home for the Medicare co-pay after a recent brief hospitaization during which time I was drastically overdosed with synthetic painkillers and a bunch of other crap, I told them that I was in talks with the hospital about my "diminished capacity," which was true as I was having a hard time doing math and had developed a st-st-st-stutter, which was also true. They stopped calling. I think. I've mostly stopped answering the phone. The only times I've answered it lately some loud female robot voice starts yelling that "THIS IS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR CREDIT CARDS...!". I haven't used a credit card in 45 years...
My illness became a money machine for the hospital (and the crooked gastroenterologist). I'd have been better off with minimalist palliatives (to kill the pain) instead of the massive interventions. With my "illness," this is KNOWN but not profitable. Like some cops, some doctors lie. It's a nasty greedy world out there. They have only your best interest at heart and they of course know what is best for you, you ignorant peasant.
-30-
The answer to the health-care woes in the USA is very simple. It is the "Beveridge Report" written in the UK in 1942 and which laid the ground for nationalisation of the country's health-care. It worked, brilliantly. And it still does a very good job. The British National Health Service was so well constructed that doctors, surgeons and dentists were warning the British people in the 1980s that Thatcher, the out-of-sight-right PM was trying to wreck it, as she and her cronies and subsequent British governments have wrecked for private profit the social fabric of a once decent democratic socialist country.
It's perfectly clear to me that Representational Government does not work at all in an environment of unchecked mafia capitalism.
Let's just shut Wall Street down completely before they get us all killed. Nationalize everything since they didn't pay any taxes forever, and reset everyone's personal wealth below a million dollars a person. If you can't get by on a million/year, we don't need you.
There's not one thing wrong with the system: Everything is wrong with the system, imho. Let's just get up, and quit playing this skewed Monopoly game. It's time to quit and start over, or just throw the whole thing in the trash.
TJ