Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Christmas is No Time to Talk About War and Peace
When I heard the President speak to returning troops last week, my mind flashed back to an article I once wrote for our local newspaper. Each week a different member of the local clergy would write a column, and I had been asked to write the piece for Christmas. That year all I could hear was the drumbeat leading toward a war with Iraq. I racked my brain trying to think of a way to put faces on the people we were about to bomb. Looking at a nativity scene I thought, “the people we are about to kill look like that.” Maybe a reframed Christmas story could help Americans stop hating Saddam long enough to care about the people who will pay the real cost of this invasion. I submitted the following article, covering the Christmas story the way the U.S. press was covering the build-up to the Iraq war. Looking back, I should have known what was about to happen.
Christmas Cancelled as a Security Measure
ELLIS ISLAND -- The three wise men were arrested today attempting to enter the country. The Iraqi nationals were carrying massive amounts of flammable substances known as “frankincense” and “myrrh.” While not explosives themselves, experts revealed that these two substances could be used as a fuse to detonate a larger bomb. The three alleged terrorists were also carrying gold, presumably to finance the rest of their mission.
Also implicated in the plot were two Palestinians named Joseph and Mary. An anonymous source close to the family overheard Mary bragging that her son would “bring down the mighty from their thrones and lift up the lowly.” In what appears to be a call to anarchy, the couple claims their son will someday “help prisoners escape captivity.” “These people match our terrorist profile perfectly,” an official source reported.
All of the suspects claimed they heard angels singing of a new era of hope for the afflicted and poor. As one Wall Street official put it, “These one world wackos are talking about overturning the entire economic and political hierarchy that holds the civilized world together. I don’t care what some angel sang; God wants the status quo -by definition.”
A somber White House press secretary announced that it might be prudent to cancel Christmas until others in the plot are rounded up. “I assure you that this measure is temporary. The President loves Christmas as much as anyone. People can still shop and give expensive gifts, but we’re asking them not to think about world peace until after we have rid the world of evil people. For Americans to sing, ‘peace on earth, good will to all’, is just the wrong message to send to our enemies at this time.”
The strongest opponents of the Christmas ban were the representatives of retail stores, movie chains and makers of porcelain Christmas figurines. “This is a tempest in a teapot,” fumed one unnamed business owner. “No one thinks of the political meaning of Christmas any more. Christmas isn’t about a savior who will bring hope to the outcasts of the world; it’s about nativity scenes and beautiful lights. History has shown that mature people are perfectly capable of singing hymns about world peace while still supporting whatever war our leaders deem necessary. People long ago stopped tying religion to the real events in the world.”
There has been no word on where the suspects are being kept, or when their trial might be held. Authorities are asking citizens who see other foreigners resembling nativity scene figures to contact the Office of Homeland Security.
A few days after submitting that piece, I received a nervous call from an editor. “We love your story. It’s very funny.”
“Thank you,” I said waiting for the other shoe to fall.
“The thing is, we want to take out the part about Iraq and Palestine.”
After a horrified pause, I explained that had been the whole point of writing the story -- to humanize the people who were about to be killed. When I refused to gut the story, he told me they would have to drop it all together.
I shouldn’t have been surprised. Clergy who want to talk about real events in the world are seen as too political for the religious section, and too religious for the political section. Of course, if a minister gets in the pulpit and waves the flag and prays for the troops, that’s not called “political”, but if a minister questions any war, then it is considered mixing religion and politics. The resulting pablum in most clergy columns validates their strategic placement somewhere between the obituaries and the comics.
President Obama welcomes home troops at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on Wednesday. December 14, 2011.What have we learned as a result of the war? That was answered by Obama’s words to the returning troops:
“Because of you -- because you sacrificed so much for a people that you had never met -- Iraqis have a chance to forge their own destiny. That’s part of what makes us special as Americans. Unlike the old empires, we don’t make these sacrifices for territory or for resources. We do it because it’s right. There can be no fuller expression of America’s support for self-determination than our leaving Iraq to its people. That says something about who we are.”
Looking back at my earlier Christmas article, I feel pain not pride at what the President said. His speech to returning troops could have been taken from any leader, of any nation, from any period of history, simply by changing the names and places. It is the kind of speech every leader has given since the emperors: brave and noble words, written in someone else’s blood. This President who ran, in part, against this war, has come to repeat the party line. This President, who once spoke of respect for all people of the world, has now deported more immigrants than Bush.
Hearing another speech expressing our nation’s narcissistic delusion made me physically ill. I could not help but think of the bloody wake such rhetoric leaves behind when put into action. The fact that we are leaving Iraq at this point says nothing about the purity of our initial motives. Even bank robbers don’t stay around after the crime has been committed. I appreciate trying to make our young soldiers not feel like they were pawns in someone else’s parlor game, but for the sake of future generations we must painfully remember and affirm, that is exactly what happened.
We, from the United States, are not like the people in our nativity scenes. We are like the Romans looming ominously in the background of the story. Christmas is about the little people of the world who find joy and meaning while living under someone else’s boot. We from the United States can only celebrate Christmas by ending our cultural narcissism, renouncing empire, and making room for the poor and the weak of the world like Joseph and Mary.
Christmas is not a fact of history, but Christianity’s particular symbol of every human being’s hope for world peace and universal happiness. When the angels sang, “peace on earth good will to all,” they were expressing the song written in every heart. But, that song calls us out of empire and into our entire human family. Maybe stopping the frenzy of Christmas long enough to really hear the song the angels sang to the wretched of the earth, would give us the humanity to stop hanging our Christmas lights until we no longer kill our brothers and sisters for the fuel to illumine them.
“O ye beneath life's crushing load, whose forms are bending low,
Who toil along the climbing way with painful steps and slow;
Look now, for glad and golden hours come swiftly on the wing;
Oh rest beside the weary road and hear the angels sing.”




59 Comments so far
Show AllAmen, brother!
Simply beautiful.
I don't like religions.
No one knows the source of Life.
It is telling that his article was rejected.
Read as mythology, religious books can express messages, through stories, and be used as a guiding light.
Jim Rigby has found it.
Good post, Buck.
Liberation psychology and liberation theology can be powerful.
http://brucelevine.net/how-the-occupy-movement-has-embraced-liberation-psychology/
i get tired of the religious crap
jew christian muslim - tired of it
in his book god is not great christopher hitchens tells a good story about how his rejection of this hateful neglectful old man who lives upstairs began
he went to school one day and the teacher - pushing her particular religion - told the "wonderful story" about how god cured a blind man and now he can see
as an 8 year old hitchens asked his teacher 2 questions, which got him into trouble
1. why didn't god cure them all the blind people
2. why did god make a world which had sick people at all
religions are a joke and bad ones at that
please....
...Imagine there's no blind people, it isn't hard to do.....
Quoting Hitchens, a chief war propagandist for the Iraq War and one of the most bloodthirsty to denounce religion, brings into extreme disrepute atheism.
This excellent article notes that "Clergy who want to talk about real events in the world are seen as too political for the religious section, and too religious for the political section." This is reminiscent to me of when Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses knock on my door in the rural community in which I live. When I ask them why they are not protesting against America's wars in the Middle East the way the Jesuit priests named Philip and Daniel Berrigan did against the Vietnam conflict as well as the Protestant minister named William Sloan Coffin, Jr., they try and use the excuse that they cannot mix politics with religion.
Cowards and hypocrites-the whole lot of them.
Hey Erroll, You exposed the hypocritical door knockers as the mindless followers they are. Your story made for an enjoyable mental image. But, it is not the whole lot of them. Case in point is the Berrigan brothers.
I met a Mennonite who lived next door to a farm at which I worked. I told him I appreciated the nonviolent stance his religion held and asked why. He matter of factly said, "Thou shall not kill".
Peace on Earth is the goal
happy solstice season
Buck
My original comment about the Berrigan brothers and the courageous stance that they had taken during the Vietnam conflict affirms what you had written about Philip and Dan Berrigan.
...with the clincher: "The resulting pablum in most clergy columns validates their strategic placement somewhere between the obituaries and the comics." - sort of a clerical 'vacation' rather than 'vocation'
Every bit of good thinking counts and never underestimate the tipping point of chaos theory/black swan etc - I love the idea of life being a journey, having been BORN out of the eternal cosmos, journeying through life WITH it, and HEADING TOWARD IT all at the same time.
If there is a god he owes the world an apology.
or perhaps we owe her an apology.
¿quien sabe?
I agree if you are talking about mother earth.
There has always been broad bipârtisan agreement in favor of war because bpth republicans and democrats support slaughtering third wprld people whenever it suits them and this has been especially true after the Saudi's lucky strike on 9/11. The pro-war neocon elements in both parties have completely taken over and have already been engaged in fear mongering over their next target Iran. The only serious political opposition to this reckless imperialism is coming from a right wing libertarian Ron Paul who has been courageously waging a lonely battle against chicken hawk in chief Obama and all the republican candidates as well. There simply is no real push back against Obama's lust for war from within the democratic party and their make believe progressive caucus.
~"especially true after the Saudi's lucky strike on 9/11."~Thalidomide
that makes at least two of us!
however, as long as "we the people" seek salvation from ONE EXCEPTIONAL leader, who might be marginalized, disappeared, assassinated or crucified, we miss the point.
~"TO WHOM IT SHOULD CONCERN:
You are right on every point. Now what? You, alone, cannot correct the wrongs. I, alone, cannot correct the wrongs".-- James E. Miller, JD, The Dragon’s Teeth blog.~
As a non-Christian, and non-theist, I always found that Christianity in particular has had a very strange journey. Embedded into its central myth is the story of a working man of a militarily occupied country, who rose up to proclaim a new message of hope for a people living under the jackboot of Imperialism. His message, both revolutionary and transcendental, renounced the parochial nationalism of the zealots who did little to challenge the hypocrisies of the collaborationist religious authorities and rather opted for a class-conscious upliftment of the fringes of Judean society. Martyred with the brutal execution method reserved for political prisoners, memory of his deeds were strong enough to inspire a lasting religious movement.
How all this ended up in an oppressive church hierarchy, coopted by Constantine, has always been strange to me. Then again, Buddhism also went through a similar transition, giving rise to an enormously wealthy Lamasery.
This is what i was thinking too, ceti. The main problem I have with the practitioners of religions is that they are completely unaware there are tropes of hatred which develop out of faith. Lands and populations identified as being Christian in the past (and up until now) comprise some of the most hateful and avaricious actors in world history. Only the skill of its chroniclers has kept these hateful actions out of sight, and have exclusively promoted the myth of a loving and peaceful religion.
Unfortunately for believers, the self-image is not the same as the actuality.
CETI: Interesting synopsis (or account). If you read, "The Chalice & The Blade," by Riane Eisler, you'll gain a profound understanding of how the premise of peace became co-opted by those in eager pursuit of endless wars. The roots to this vision of life (and societal priorities) go back very far.
I really liked this article, especially the closing comment about not powering Christmas lights with fuel that's been violently misappropriated.
Christmas - the time of year when we all try to buy back our innocence. Made in China, that's a very cheap innocence indeed. Fala-freekin-laa lala lala.
Strange? Why? The answer is contained in one word: patriarchy. The religion, whatever its content, is bent to support the patriarchal pyramid - clerical, military, corporate, imperial, fascist, feudal - makes no difference. The argumentation may vary, but the goal is always identical.
thanks, jim, you've made some excellent points. well done!
~"God wants the status quo -by definition.”~
that line from your text caught my eye because of a current commercial for some "great new" hi-tech toy. i experience a real drop-jaw moment when the over-voice announcer claims, "if no one had challenged the STATUS QUO, the earth would still be flat." the life experience is all about change and adaptation, energies constanly in motion.
also, i wish to express my gratitude for your citing the obama's welcome message to the returning troops:
~"Unlike the old empires, we don’t make these sacrifices for territory or for resources. We do it because it’s right."~
your reaction, "Hearing another speech expressing our nation’s narcissistic delusion made me physically ill," concurs with mine and i had wanted to grab that quote. another jaw hits the floor! you know, i think the public's willingness to identify with the man-made hierarchy comes from a deep seeded inferiority complex. on 'black friday' one cd friend gave a link to a movie, "what would jesus buy?" (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1056487665981560376#) meant to shed light on the "blaspheme" of consumerism. one scene featured a young lady who denied that teevee commercials "lead us into temptation" because "i can resist the urge to buy........but i buy new clothes so i can FIT IN with the crowd."
last week jon stewart preformed a great bit about why the islamic reality show so offended "good christians." the broadcast made islamic people look too much like "regular" people.
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!
I think Obama's statement about not doing it for empires was his biggest lie to date. The new empire consists of the corporations.
What a disgusting, sick fuck he is.
I cannot stand to even see or hear him.
Boy, he sure conned the World with his campaign. And I can't believe how stupid people are that will vote for him again.
Just like those that reelected Bush.
I wonder what those soldiers really thought of that statement?
Doesn't matter I guess since they were stupid enough to put their lives on the line for the MIC and oul companies.
The last comment was really base. A good number of those enlisting into US military service are young, ill informed, naïve, and have otherwise few, if any, job opportunities. Have you ever watched the obscene adverts that the directors of the armed services pump through the MSM on the tax payers dime? Denigrate the filthy militarists in the driver seats of the US war machine, but the grunts don't deserve your derision. Obama may be a deficient human being, but the low ranking service personnel aren't necessarily so. Labeling them "stupid" was uncalled for.
I enjoyed this article but let's all please not buy into this "we are leaving Iraq" nonsense. It is (purposefully) hard to find accurate numbers... but I have read there are somewhere between 50,00 - 250,00 private contractors who still remain there, dozens of active military bases, untold # of Xe employees etc.. and if you believe that we are not still conducting covert military operations there right now and doing all we can to control the oil/money/politics for years and years to come then I have a bridge to sell you...
I think Mr. Rigby is to be commended for making such an insightful effort.
I also think that anyone who promotes religious beliefs in which the holiest of the holy is a male figure is part of the problem.
God, HE, the combination goes to the core of corruption.
The same would be true for the idea of a highest holy who is female.
ALL sexes (beyond only human) and the belief in EQUAL JUSTICE beyond any sexual identity must be simultaneously raised above the typical corrupt worship of maleness.
p.s.
Angels - Human-looking beings with the wings of birds are just another human projection full of envy and dreams of domination. If you want to see something "miraculous", take a walk in a park.
Thank you, Bird. It amazes me that this forum, for all its thoughtful commentary and signs of some real intelligence, bypasses this seminal issue altogether. To pretend that the centuries under which women had no input in government, law, religion, or ethics mean nothing... because TODAY women are suddenly "emancipated," is to miss altogether the fact that what passes for ethics and priorities were entirely and exclusively shaped by a MALE vision. What is needed is a BALANCED vision, and that means OTHER voices active at the decision making tables.
When one finds a Nancy Pelosi or Hillary Clinton seated there, the insightful person recognizes that these women are there because they have identified with the pre-existing power structures. They don't challenge them. It's the same way when Black or Hispanic figures rise to power within the PRESENT paradigm. Few of them shake things up. Heck, the author of this article explains it quite well.
Years ago when I actively began pitching books and book ideas to receptive agents, I was chastised that my work didn't fit neatly into any category. It's a very adroit way to censor what The Controllers don't want heard. Was the material feminist? Was it astrology? Was it sacred ecology? I term this experience "tyranny through nomenclature," or "Censorship through Categorization." It's amazing how viciously a few react (in this forum) when I speak about the expunging of the Divine Feminine over the centuries, and how that's crippled society's evolution and vision. The hostile reactions suggest a mindset like those seen in the Inquisition and related witch-hunts. These forum snipers seek to discredit any source or messenger that challenges the fundamental ideological basis for "civilization" as it now exists. They may CLAIM to be Progressive, but why then reinforce a status quo that inevitably leads to war? They actively discredit and invalidate the voice of the Visionaries.
I just read something I'd never knew (or heard) before from Riane Eisler's book: "The Chalice and The Blade." She relates that Themistoclea, a priestess from Delphi (i.e. the Delphic Oracle) was a teacher to Pythagoras, and that Diotema, a priestess of Mantinea, taught Socrates. (quoted from page 106 of the text). So much wisdom and understanding has been suppressed, when not burned (as in the Library at Alexandria). Just as American schoolchildren are taught that Columbus discovered America, the roots of civilization, based on more egalitarian living arrangements are kept hidden... so that images of the male dominator in thundering tribal conflict is taken for the truth of our origins... and destiny.
HIS-story repeats because only ONE oar was used to navigate mankind's shared vessel for thousands of years. Societies that were far more balanced and far less oriented towards war have existed, and WOULD exist, if hierarchies based on patriarchal claims to Divine Right of Heavenly King were not FORCED into norms. The problems that ail civilization are MUCH deeper than that of the worker versus boss capitalist conundrum. The roots of inequality go back much further and need to be recognized and healed AT THEIR SOURCE. Otherwise, if Earth Mother sustains human life into the future (given the methane releases, added to CO2 build-up) new forms of power-abuse will arise. The model is wounded... and therefore wounds in return.
In my new book, "Dolphinity," I feature a minister who's sufficiently touched by the book's enlightened hero to state that he will henceforth amend his view of End Times to one of Mend Times. Sounds like a wise plan to me!
FYI. Eve Ensler delivered a powerful TED talk about the repression of the 'girl cell' in all of us. She made some outstanding -- and painful -- observations.
www.ted.com/talks/eve_ensler_embrace_your_inner_girl.html
That's what I said an hour ago: patriarchy.
Re: Eisler - we all read her stuff, and much more, in the 40+ years ago already.
Cheez, I hate it when people take the long way around to "discover" the obvious.
"redballon"
Perhaps you need to take a deep breath.
You may have read something a long time ago, but that does not mean that you own it or that you need to express "hate" when someone else isn't fast enough for you, especially when you supposedly are in agreement.
Try counting to ten and re-reading your comment before presenting it.
All of us occasionally go overboard.
The answer in one word is hierachy and it doesn't matter if's headed by woman or man. That's so much distraction. "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Hierarchy, yup, that's it. Now have a look at 95% of the human hierarchies on this planet.
As usual, things always get interpreted as though one's observations were objective. I never claimed ownership, only impatience at how things get repeated over and over and they've been around a long time, and not even specifically at S-R. Sioux-Rose is brilliant, articulate, creative, and I was disappointed that it took her so long to discover that book. What redeems her comment is that she has reached intelligent observations without it.
There is an inherent problem with text, and that is that there's no inflection, no vocal modulation, no gesture, that indicates the mind-set of the writer. It's a hazard in this activity. It often surprises me that people read in my comments a mood I did not feel. Perhaps that's my shortcoming, perhaps it's that of the medium. Peace.
Hi, RED. Sorry if I appear behind the curve. I was in college in the l970's and took courses in Feminism. Eisler's book, however, came out in l987. At that time I was a struggling single mother trying to get by in Key West. So I was out of the literary loop and mostly reading up on Esoteric topics. Someone in the forum mentioned the book, and the title didn't pull me in. However, I had it on my list and recently got to it. For me it's revelatory... too many presuppose that if women ran things it would be exactly the same society they see men running (or recently running).
I've used this analogy before and it's quite fitting. In fact, it was chiefly through Margaret Mead's ACTUAL LIVING examples, that certain gender myths were finally done away with. In any case, the anecdote involves a tourist facility in Africa. Its garbage was routinely plundered by baboons. The male dominant baboons always ate first, and on this particular occasion, what they ate turned out to be poisonous. Therefore the macho boys died off. The observers EXPECTED the 2nd tier males, the ones who had always been pushed around by the dominant ones to enact the roles of their former dominators. That is NOT what happened. These males formed a more egalitarian form of sharing in their social relationships with the females.
Eisler reveals societies akin to this; those she termed the PARTNERSHIP society. Instead of making war its central focus and fascination, collective energy was directed at art, pottery, clothing, architecture, gardens, and the pursuits of PLEASURE. The war emphasis is equated with Mars (and that came later), and the peace/art emphasis is equated with Venus. These are natural polarities and which ever one is exalted influences how a society will organize itself. Of course the problem to the peaceful orders becomes outside invaders, and that's what took these more socially egalitarian societies down.
The lesson is not to turn every nation into a war-oriented potential dominator through trafficking in fear and weaponry, but rather to bring the ideals of earlier eras, those based on greater sharing and equality (ideals resonant with socialism) into more and more lands. The Earth Changes may bring this very thing about as life as we know it WILL soon be interrupted. Out of necessity comes invention; and I am somewhat warmed by the realization that often in times of weather-based calamities, community members DO work together. The exception was Katrina where the state-based powers left too many to die or marinade in the rising fecal waters. "Heckuva job, Disaster Capitalism, Brownie," style
P.S. Thanks for the compliment! It's tough self publishing book after book because my work is not considered "commercial enough" (translation: easily digestible pabulum) by agents, the culture's gatekeepers. When I think of what is taken FOR commercial, I realize that not being read in such an era is actually a compliment to my work.
It's a wonderful book, and I'm delighted you found it, after all. Re: commercial saleability - when I see all the books on "vision" and self-esteem, I want to retch, but they fit the "itsyerowndamfault" paradigm that justifies economic injustice. They're superficial, facile, propagandistic.
Not many people are capable of understanding analogy - whether its source is astrology or mythology. Not many people can keep up with that. It's lonely at the top.
Maybe what happened to the baboons...(I don't dare finish the thought)
It's been around a while, but if you haven't read Robert Graves's "The White Goddess", do. It's challenging, but mind-blowing. You may have seen her yourself. And there are a couple of fascinating books by Leonard Shlain, maybe you haven't seen yet. "The Alphabet vs the Goddess", and "Sex, Time, and Power".
http://leonardshlain.com/blog/
Yuletide blessings!
CD - Why was this comment flagged, and by whom? There's nothing in it that merits flagging. If it's the reference to the new book, writers refer to their own work all the time. But I think it's more like something SR mentioned in her comment: attempted censorship in another guise. Unflag this comment!
Great article and well written, however I have one comment regarding your statement that "This President, who once spoke of respect for all people of the world, has now deported more immigrants than Bush".
Being a Canadian, I am not totally familiar with US laws, however I do know that presidents do not write bills or create laws even though they allows them to pass. Therefore your statement blaming the president for the current immigration laws is unjustly made, regardless of the fact that he allowed the passage of the law.
If you want to point the finger at the originators of the immigration legislation, point it at the Republican dominated congress.
And finally, if you were the President speech writer, what would you have said to welcome the troops home? Sorry boys and girls your efforts were wasted?
Are you really a Canadian? If so, you should understand by now that while both parties have been COMPLICIT in all sorts of illegal wars, illegal distribution of funds (hiding the amounts they GAVE to the banks while not re-regulating the system... shades of pouring water into a reservoir before fixing the dam), and embezzling the American public, the Republicans just look like the worst offenders due to their ignorant, 18th century attitudes.
Your post reads like an apologia for Democrats, and/or Obama. That's why I ask if you're really situated in Canada, what with all the shills showing up to spread all the pre-election words of Good (Obama) cheer, and all.
Finally, where a president would probably NOT tell the troops the truth about an illegal war of choice, i.e. THE SUPREME crime according to The Geneva Conventions, he might not lay on all the silly putty slick goo... if he had a heart, soul, or iota of integrity.
With the world rushing towards the ecological abyss, a person who cared about humanity just might use his bully pulpit to alter priorities. At a time when so much is needed to offset climate change, instead, $ is tossed at creating (and inventing) new wars, before the last ones are finished. They just declare that they won, leave an economically raped and emotionally shattered public (what's left of it) behind, and move on. What a legacy... and you sound like you're validating it!
Great rant, but not very much information to support your conclusion.
True, the information we have today suggests that Iraq was invaded illegally, but the United Nations has not called for anyone's arrest in response to the alleged invasion. And you would think that the Iraq government, who demanded that US troops leave their country, would be the first at the door of the UN war Crimes Commission. But no, that is not the case. Should those people who created this fiasco be held accountable. Yes, you bet . But what in hells tar nation does the current president have to do with all of this.
You people south of the border have a broken two party political system. Fix it our this BS will go on forever. Create a third or fourth political party to restore at least some measure of democracy, because your current two party system is broken and is only working for the corporate elite, and you no longer have have a democratic system.
Like Canada and our big oil dominance , your two parties are dominated by the corporations and only a political party which is owned by the people can straighten this mess out.
The current political parties certainly won't change the status quot. Why should they, the money for them and their corporate sponsors is just too good.
If you want a Canadian opinion on who should be the next president, I would pick Ron Paul. But he is being marginalized by the corporate dominated press. My second choice would be Obama, hands down he to me is the black Kennedy I remember is a young man. He just needs a bit more back bone.
Yikes! Obama needs more than a backbone. He needs a soul.
Welcome to the CD pile-on. Your comment was obviously too subtle. You "offended" by failing to include the Dummycrats, even though the Repukes have had the bit between their teeth since 2009. See what happens? Also, there will be no appreciation here for the fact that Obama's speech to the troops had only ritual value - and an empty ritual at that; therefore, you get accused of validating injustice and not caring about humanity. Ya gotta watch those shades of grey around here -they confuse people.
Excellent piece. Those who reject it based on who is saying it or because it is about a humanistic religious response to events and the symbolism of Christmas are ignoring the fact that the vast majority of people hold some religious belief. You can't just pretend they don't exist. ;-)
The essay also reminded me of the Simon and Garfunkel song, "7 O'Clock News/Silent Night"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZazHqdNeXA
all the peace on earth good will gobbledegook is only to keep the ignorant ignorant and on their knees. Life on Earth is not a myth. Many indigenous people in occupied america translated jesus as "death"
Yawn.
Yawn.
REMEMBERING OPERATION JUST CAUSE
Peace on Earth, Good Will Toward Men...American Style
It was a quiet and gentle night
Filled with joy and childhood’s delight
Some families recited a solemn prayer
While seasonal music filled the night air
Anticipation filled every girl and boy
Who eagerly awaited a holiday toy
It was a time for celebrating Peace on Earth
A time to honor every child’s birth
Meanwhile, in Washington plans were underway
For a holocaust on that very day
The year was 1989, the twentieth of December
A day of infamy, that the world will always remember
Suddenly the silent night air was pierced with a strange vibration
But still the children played with eager anticipation
The strange vibration grew louder, just like approaching thunder
Could it be an airplane, one could only listen and wonder
Suddenly explosions were everywhere
It looked as if bombs were bursting in air
To the sleepy village that was preparing for Santa Claus
The President had sent Operation Just Cause
All hope and joy gave way to fright
Fear and horror filled this historic night
A demonic order from the Commander-in-chief
Brought death and destruction and endless grief
Planes dropping death right out of the sky
Left a stunned world to question, “WHY?”
Dante’s inferno replaced the tiny village
Destruction was everywhere, nothing left to pillage
The village was wiped right off the map
While our national conscience took a long winter’s nap
The president’s planes had accomplished their mission well
They transformed the peaceful village into an instant Hell
When the massacre ended thousands lie mangled and dead
Unarmed civilians and babies snuggled in their bed
Then soldiers came, like robotic slaves
They bulldozed the bodies into mass graves
Hoping that the world wouldn’t see enough to remember
The holocaust that happened on the twentieth of December
Thank you, thank you.
Trylon
Excellent. So sad. Thanks.
The point is "how can" the "wonderful status quo/quid pro quo" folks stop this? Why it's "just terrible."
"Aha!" I "just knew it!"-- one of those Church of Scotland "trotskyites likely" just like that "terrible Tommy Sheridan" formerly of the Scottish Socialists and also a British militant when part of the British Labor Party. "Just think" if the party hadn't purged Sheridan and those other "trots" what "terribel fate" might have befallen that party and even the UK. Uh oh! Oh that's already happened. "Damn." Presbyterian is just Church of Scotland on this side of the Atlantic. Without knowing just how "radical" these folks are. They actually believe in "consent of the governed," one for all and all for one and all that kind of thing.
Well done, Rosemarie. Imagine if such a message went out on millions of U.S. Christmas cards...