EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Police Violence Against Veterans: A Long and Painful Legacy
When I read the headlines earlier this week, I felt as though I were in a time warp. “Police Fracture Iraq Vet’s Skull Clearing Intersection of Protesters.” But the location was wrong: Oakland, Calif. I thought that happened in Hempstead, N.Y.
POLICE VIOLENCE: Scott Olsen, member of Veterans for Peace and Iraq Veterans Against the War and a Marine Corps veteran of two tours in Iraq, who was shot in the head last night by Oakland police, is in critical condition with a skull fracture and swelling of the brain. Meanwhile, outrage against police violence and Oakland Mayor Jean Quan, already facing a recall election, is growing.(AFP)
I was reading about Scott Olsen’s cracked skull at the hands of the Oakland police, but all I could picture was my friend Nick Morgan’s head, fractured by the Hempstead police, bleeding out on the sidewalk in front of Hofstra University. Three years ago, almost to the day, they nearly killed my friend, a veteran of Iraq...when they fractured his skull...clearing an intersection of protesters.
Police violence against peaceful demonstrators in the U.S. has a long and painful history. Police violence against veteran demonstrators is absolutely no exception.
One need only search the words, “Bonus March,” for a bloody history lesson in how America treats its veterans demanding a fair shake from the 1%. In 1932, under the command of Gen. Douglas MacArthur, U.S. Infantry and Cavalry deployed in the streets of Washington D.C. to violently dismantle a large encampment of WWI veterans demanding benefits promised them for their service and sacrifice. The attack left more than fifty veterans injured and killed an infant who died several weeks later from tear gas-related injuries. While perhaps the largest example in history of state violence against veterans, it certainly is not the last.
Now we are made furious by the injuries caused to Scott Olsen. Like the Bonus Marchers before him, he was a veteran occupying public space, demanding a promise be made good on: a fair shake from the country that sent him to combat. And like the Bonus Marchers before him, we’ve all relearned a valuable lesson. Being veterans protects nobody when the streets become a warzone.
But that lesson is not new to us. Not those veterans who’ve been protesting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for the last decade. As I referenced earlier, veterans were injured by police before when American streets became a warzone Oct. 15, 2008. Outside the last Presidential Debate in Hempstead, N.Y., between Obama and McCain, protesters, including veterans, came out in droves to demand the “People’s Agenda” be heard by the candidates. Within that, the veterans had a very specific demand.
We were demanding two veterans in uniform be allowed into the debate to ask one question of each candidate. What happened when we approached police lines felt unreal at the time. The immediate of us were arrested, and then horses were used to disperse the rest. When protesters found themselves trapped between the advancing horses and a wall to their rear, they were trampled. Among them was Nick, a former Army sergeant, wearing his uniform, whose cheekbone was crushed by a horse on the sidewalk. Graphic Video of the incident still exists here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgOKgpWrT04
More shocking is that after his face was crushed, he was arrested. While unconscious, no-less, he was handcuffed and loaded on a bus to jail. Charges were later dismissed against all 15 demonstrators arrested that evening, but officers of the Nassau County Police Department have yet to be held accountable for their actions.
Nick still has a lawsuit pending against the County, but police lawyers have refused to negotiate as police officials have issued denials of wrongdoing and contradictory police narratives of the events that took place that evening. All of this makes the case that if you’re protesting in America, you are not safe from the police, even if you are in a liberal city, even if you believe they are part of the 99%, even if you are a veteran in uniform protesting the very same war you were sent to fight in. The police are not your friends.
We thought our uniforms made us safe. I wore an American flag bandanna around my wrist when we marched on the debate, and held another folded in my hands because I thought they were symbols the police would recognize and react peacefully to. I don’t wear my uniform anymore, and the flag no longer has any home on my body.
As I write this, Scott Olsen still rests on a gurney in a hospital in Oakland, Calif. And while he is not handcuffed to the gurney as Nick was handcuffed to his, he is no less a veteran survivor of police brutality, and joins the swelling ranks of those who made it home in one piece only to be broken by the system and have their movements dispersed.
But the movement may withstand the system this time. We were much smaller when Nick was attacked, and had nowhere near the publicity. For as shocking as the images of Nick being trampled were, the incident was blacked out by the Mainstream Media. The organizers, myself included, divided ourselves and fought over how we could have protested better, when we should have been rallying around Nick and demanding an end to police brutality. But we were driven into our separate corners, so many of us, and remain largely unreconciled to this day.
That was the third veteran-led direct action at an electoral event that year, the first two being held at the Democratic and Republican National Conventions. It was destined to be the last. Police violence functioned to fracture the organizing core.
May the Occupy Wall Street movement never forget that the only people to blame for Scott Olsen’s injuries are the police and the 1%. No matter what circumstances come to light, no matter if he was committing civil disobedience at the time or if there could have existed some better way the situation could have been negotiated. The police and the 1% bear sole responsibility, and it is for this reason that we must grow and continue to confront them.
If veterans like Scott Olsen, Nick Morgan and the Bonus Marchers can’t be safe from violence at the hands of the system, why should any American feel safe? Grow the 99% and create a country where people don’t have their skulls cracked for occupying public space.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


17 Comments so far
Show AllThis is a great article. Thanks
I have an idea. How about no more veterans?
What if they threw a war and no one signed up to fight it?
I don't understand why people are joining up today to go fight these illegal wars.
That is just dumb.
Just because you are out of a job, to sign up to go murder innocent people is wrong.
Especially now that Obama is repeating Hoover's legacy of violently discouraging veterans from opposing the fascism that so many veterans never realized they were enabling when they were active duty.
i had to love the articlle and historiical perspective and provide the following from Roots Action below/
Share this action on Facebook
Share this action on Twitter
The violent police assault on Occupy protesters in Oakland left Iraq War veteran Scott Olsen in critical condition with a cracked skull and hundreds of others injured and sick. This is unacceptable.
It’s time for Oakland Mayor Jean Quan to do the right thing.
Because of public pressure, including from RootsAction, she is allowing Occupy Oakland protesters back in the public plaza -- for now. But the Mayor, Police Chief and Oakland City Administrator must answer for the larger issue of the abuse of power, excessive force on unarmed protestors, and our right to free speech and assembly under the First Amendment.
Mayor Jean Quan should:
Fire the newly-installed interim Police Chief Howard Jordan for his mishandling of the entire operation
Order the Oakland Police Department to release all records about the use of force
Begin a thorough investigation into police misconduct and punish those responsible
Allow protesters to remain in "Oscar Grant" Plaza, as is guaranteed by the First Amendment
Please sign our letter to Mayor Quan of Oakland NOW.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Aimee, David, Sarah
and the RootsAction team
Joecool, your naivete is not uncommon among american liberals. I am a member of Veterans for Peace, and a long time worker for peace. But if we had not served our country, you would be learning Chinese, and so would every American and Canadian west of the Mississippi. It is undeniably true that our government, at the behest of corporate scum, has used our military for unconscionably vile purposes. But to think for even a moment that this country could survive without our service is to totally ignore history, current events, and common sense. While I am joining hands with other VFP members, with IVAW members, with Occupy demonstrators, my son and my niece are both serving in the US Navy, keeping your ass safe.
A Michael Colfer, PhD
Veterans for Peace
Bellingham WA
When LBJ addressed the troops in Vietnam, a question was shouted out "Why are we here" LBJ replied " We are here to keep these gooks out of your sisters crotch". I don't believe if you had not served I would be speaking Chinese, and I don't believe we need to spend more on war making and killing children, than the rest of the world combined to keep "Gooks" out of my sisters crotch! The US military does not stand to defend Americans any longer. It is an aggressive offensive tool of imperial conquest. If they are defending us where the hell were they on 9-11-01?
Those who choose Rash Windag over Noam Chomsky in the USA and favor the USA being the imperialist, war mongering power it is today would likely choose Bismark, the Kaiser, and Hitler over Schilling, Goethe, Kant and Beethover. Oh, that's right that the Prussiana already did that. Now we have beome the Prussians-- oh what a "transformation."
"It is undeniably true that our government, at the behest of corporate scum, has used our military for unconscionably vile purposes."
__________________
You should have stopped with this statement.
Instead, you follow it up with contradictory, jingo rhetoric about serving your country and that your son and niece are currently serving in the military to keep US citizens "safe." Bullshit. If you truly believe this, I think you are either naive, conflicted (due to your past service) or both.
The truth is that your son and niece are currently serving in an authoritarian, undemocratic institution devoted to imperial force projection and war profiteering, which have nothing to do with keeping US citizens safe, but instead intended to preserve not only the international capitalist system but U.S. hegemony of that system, to protect ruling oligarchs and transnational corporate investors from the perils of anti-capitalist insurgency abroad, and to insure the demise of any emerging social, political, or economic system that might provide an effective and democratic alternative to the capitalist system. Period.
The military-industrial complex, like the barbaric interventions it fosters, is a racket for big-business interests and could not care less about the safety of its own members or the safety of ordinary US citizens. On the contrary, US imperialism foments anti-American sentiment, which imperils the safety of US citizens.
Wow Yes Giovanna, Very well said. I'll add this, the MIC has metastasized into a full blown militarized economy. Soon the only business the US will be in is theft and destruction!
Thanks, Giovanna.
The self-serving conceit that those in military service constitute a bulwark (thin camo line?) protecting and "saving" the civilian populace from being harmed by malevolent, predatory Others is a useful rationalization inculcated by the overclass authorities and accepted as gospel by indoctrinated members and sycophants.
It's been trotted out in pop-culture form from "The Caine Mutiny" to "A Few Good Men".
It serves a vital and effective morale-preserving purpose in both individual and group psychology: it's an "end justifies the means" anodyne for individual consciences, and it promotes an esprit de corps arising from the shared affirmation (and commiseration) that Those Who Serve are a breed apart, permanently occupying the moral high ground as a reward for their professional selflessness.
It's compelling high tragedy: they are out there doing the heavy lifting and dirty work, despite the indifference, complacency, or ignorant ingratitude of many who benefit from their ultimate sacrifice.
Those who uncritically internalize this mythos express either supercilious contempt or vituperative rage when they encounter people who don't buy into it, and are either flatly skeptical or even just insufficiently deferential towards it.
Fortunately, the vast majority who serve have the brains, character, and common sense to see through this high-flown hype.
And when we figure it out, we join Veterans for Peace or some similar organization and work to keep our military out of the wars currently being fought. My statement still stands, however. You all assume that other countries do not have designs on their neighbors. You assume that if we had no military we would continue in some kind of idealistic state of world peace. Not a chance. Countries sitting on large resources that have weak military machines do not last long. Neither would we. I work for peace, but I do it with my eyes open. I deplore and fight against the inherently evil use of our military might to rape small countries, but I am not ignorant enough to believe we would be safe in our cozy homes if we had no military might at all. And, incidentally, we ARE a breed apart.
Again more rhetoric and jingoism.
Please indicated which of Canada and or Mexico has designs on US resources. Your country is no neighbour to China. Russia has more to fear from China then the USA with or without a military.
Russia removed itself from a number of its neighbours because its own land mass is too large for its population to control and controlling those other neigbours was bankrupting the Nation. Russia certainly has no designs on more territory .
Which country do you claim is waiting to Invade the USA? Would it be Granada? Please name one.
I would point out as further example that of the bonus army mentioned in this article and others. Those men that joined or were drafted in WW1 to fight Germany,
Germany had no designs on US territory in WW1. In fact they had offered the British and French a peace wherein they would return to all territories as they stood prior to that war. The British and French refused because they knew the USA was on the brink of entering that war on the German side.
Detail whose rights were being defended when the USA entered that war.
And no, you are not a breed apart. That is the same crap the SS claimed.I highly doubt the USA is involved in "breeding programs" to develop the "super soldier" though I would not put it past them in the future.
You are just another man that was trained to kill and the technologies your nation employs against third world nations makes you better at it. There no inherent superiority.
"You all assume that other countries do not have designs on their neighbors. You assume that if we had no military we would continue in some kind of idealistic state of world peace. Not a chance. Countries sitting on large resources that have weak military machines do not last long."
_____________________________
No one in this forum denies the US -- or any country-- a right to defense, which is an entirely different matter. Incidentally, while the US claims the exclusive right to violate sovereign borders to assert lethal force, which it euphemistically terms preemptive defense, other nations are denied even the ability to develop independently of US interference and/or coercion.
People who are not inculcated in the absurdity of patriotism and US exceptional superiority and virtue are capable of accurately observing and acknowledging that the US does NOT engage in defense for the protection of basic international human rights or its citizens. Instead, it wages illegal wars of naked aggression against defenseless countries that serve global capital's ruling plutocrats' insatiable appetite for wealth and domination. This is an undeniable fact.
If the US were truly interested in defending its sovereign borders and citizens, it would not have 1000 international bases. It would slash the military budget to a reasonable amount necessary to protect its borders. It would not be engaging in covert and overt interventions and acts of subversion. It would not be laundering financial (military) "aid" through brutal, anti-democratic regimes in countries like Tunisia, Egypt, and Colombia into the awaiting coffers of transnational companies like Northrup Grumman, Boeing, and Raytheon.
If the US gave a damn about the safety of its citizens, billions of taxpayer dollars that are currently funneled through the Pentagon would instead be used to provide healthcare and environmental protections.
It's interesting that you stand in support of OWS, a movement protesting the devastating inequality and misery created by a corrupt and declining political and economic imperium reeling from the austerity inflicted on the masses by global neoliberalism, and yet fail to see the nexus with US imperialism and militarism, which are inextricably linked.
_______________________________
"And, incidentally, we ARE a breed apart."
This is a telling statement about how you honestly feel and what you truly believe. You and your military compatriots may be "a breed apart", but the question is what breed? People who claim superiority over others--who see themselves as special and unique ("a breed apart") -- tend toward narcissism, among other ugly and dysfunctional personality disorders. This is the same smug attitude of fascism and conservative/regressive "social Darwinism" that objectifies OTHERS as inhuman (hajis, gooks, kikes, wops, niggers) and, in the past, provided the justification for overt racism, legal slavery, and genocide. It's not a surprise to me to find this attitude fostered by an authoritarian and anti-democratic US military culture, as Obedient Servant outlined effectively in his earlier reply to my original comment (Oct 29 2011 - 8:41 pm).
There is NO more faithful servant of "corporate scum" on this wide planet than a U.S. professional soldier. I long for the day that this country institutes compulsory military service so you "professionals" will cease to exist.
Your service in the Military has not kept anyone "safe". China has no intentions of invading the USA and forcing everyone to speak Chinese. They can not even keep a lid on their own population.
There are only two countries that border the USA and neither of them have the capability or the desire to invade the same and a Naval Vessel off the Coast of Iran is doing nothing to defend citizens of the USA.
The US Military defends nothing. It is a force of aggression and just because you might have served does not mean you somehow have better insight to the same.
That 2 million man army of Communists marching from Nicaragua to attack the United States of America was a myth only an idiot would subscribe to and you are not going to find many here who will buy into the nonsense that were the US fleets not cruising the Coasts of China or its armies not based in Germany , we would all be speaking Chinese.
Welcome to the America you served to 'protect', sergeant. Sucks to see the truth doesn't it?
Mentioning it again because it is important: I think the rightwing noise machine is gearing up for a character assassination of Scott Olsen because it is alleged that when he returned to the states he created a website called IHateTheMarineCorps.com. The fake patriots hate it when one of the warriors turns against militarism, so watch them try to vilify him. I hope this boomerangs in their faces - and I think it will - and more people will see through the BS.
to joecool why is it that veterans are baby killers etc. until one breaks ranks and becomes a dissenter. Then the so called pacificists fall in love with him and even rave about his rank if he makes it above e4 msgt so n so major so n so and mg butler who was so crazy he wasn't given a command in WWI.