EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Libyan “Humanitarian” War Creates Humanitarian Crisis
Europe and America’s ghastly military intervention in Libya’s civil strife – supposedly for humanitarian reasons – has created its own humanitarian crisis, especially for Black African migrant workers trapped in that country. Whether by death at sea or by lynching at the hands of U.S.-backed “rebels,” the death toll among migrant workers and their families is certainly in the thousands – although the U.S. superpower and its European allies seem not to care in the slightest. Dead Africans – whether Arab or sub-Saharan, Muslim or Christian – are of no consequence to the rulers in Washington, Paris, London and Rome, who seek to strengthen their grip on the region and its resources by force of arms. In their mouths, “humanitarian intervention” is an oxymoron.
For the 72 Black passengers of a rickety vessel that ran out of fuel shortly after leaving Libya in late March, there was no humanity in NATO’s intervention. All but 11 died from thirst and starvation during 16 days of agony in the Mediterranean Sea. At one point, they passed very close to a NATO aircraft carrier, almost certainly the Carl Vinson. Two warplanes buzzed the stricken ship as the Africans on deck held up their babies to show their distress. But then the planes went back where they came from. The NATO fleet could not be bothered with rescuing otherwise doomed Africans – even though NATO claims the purpose of its mission is to save civilian lives. Clearly, the Black American commander-in-chief did not give his sailors and flyers the impression that Black lives matter. The dead included men, women and children from Ethiopia, Sudan, Eritrea, Ghana and Nigeria.
“Whether by death at sea or by lynching at the hands of U.S.-backed “rebels,” the death toll among migrant workers and their families is certainly in the thousands.”
At least 800 other refugees from Libya are presumed to have died on the high seas last month. Add to that, many of the 600 onboard a vessel that sunk just off the Libyan coast, this week.
According to the United Nations, about 750,000 refugees have left Libya since the rebellion broke out more than two months ago. But there were more than three million foreign workers in the country at that time, one and a half million of them Black Africans who were relentlessly hounded and hunted by racist lynch mobs. The rebel’s political leadership and their backers in NATO dismissed out of hand an African Union cease-fire proposal that would have opened a safe corridor for refugees to escape. Under the conditions of a civil war that has been nurtured, armed and funded every step of the way by the U.S. and its allies, it was totally predictable that the western intervention would put civilian African workers at terrible risk. At best, NATO is guilty of depraved indifference to human life – as are the western news media that act as cheerleaders for the superpower aggression.
Which reminds us of the U.S.-backed Ethiopian invasion of Somalia, in late 2006. The same “humanitarian” interventionists that now hold sway under President Obama, applauded the Somalia invasion as “humanitarian.” Instead, it resulted in what the United Nations called “the worst humanitarian crisis in Africa.” The U.S. didn't care about civilians then, and it doesn't now. Washington's cynicism is an affront to the very idea of civilization.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


20 Comments so far
Show AllThere was a strong vocal group on these boards that supported the NATO actions in Libya.
Where did they go? It appears to me the rebels kill more civilians then did Ghaddafi.
Liberals who believe in the benevolence of NATO "humanitarian intervention," are like Charlie Brown. Trying to kick that ball one more time, believing that this time it will be different.
But capitalist imperialist intervention will always be self-serving and will always cause the very humanitarian crisis it is supposed to be preventing.
And by the time this is over, NATO will have killed more civilians than both sides combined.
Yes, I've also noticed that the True Believers who formerly fiercely defended the NATO "kinetic military action" and Obama's enthusiastic and self-righteous support for this approach have abandoned the field.
In a way, I find this gratifying. It suggests that they've wised up, which is to their credit. If Ghaddafi gets the Bin Laden treatment-- or is finally drone-missiled to extinction-- and they all roar back cheering, I'll be the first to admit that I was wrong.
Unless they're huddling somewhere with Juan Cole to come up with some new plausible-sounding rationalizations.
" Washington's cynicism is an affront to the very idea of civilization ". Looks like Ghaddafi is not our thug anymore, much like Saddam was when he decided to change the oil bourse. Humanitarian crisis? That is merely a propaganda term like instability, to feed the sheep people. Those lies mean that the foreign policy fascists, see a perceived threat to their vested interests of wealth and power. At least Trump said the truth that we need to have control of Libya's oil. I agree with Jesse Ventura when he says: " We have been lied to so much by our Government, that we cannot believe anything they tell us anymore". How unfortunate. Good article by Glen Ford.
CIVILIZATION
What is the civilization that everyone aspires to? It seems that throughout history that people who have been supposedly civilized the one thing that is common to all is that they acquired things and the more things they had the more they thought they were “more” civilized than any other people that they could have contact with. When they reached a point where there were not enough things they encouraged their leaders to raise an army so that they could go and get more things and they could show other peoples how civilized people do things and if they had no desire to learn how to be civilized they were removed and collateral damage was the norm. When the leaders saw how easy it was to sway the people with things it became easy to control them and push them into ideas and actions that were against their own self interest. Power corrupts.
Civilization, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing
Civilization, what is it good for absolutely nothing, say it again y’all
Civilization good God what is it good for absolutely nothing, listen to me
Oooh, civilization I despise because it means destruction of innocent lives.
Civilization, it ain’t nothing but a heartbreaker
Civilization, friend only to the undertaker
It’s an enemy to all mankind
The point of civilization blows my mind
Who wants to die?
Civilization what is it good for?
As you can see I took some deep liberties with Edwin Starr’s song, hope he doesn’t mind. We are nothing new under the sun; are we going to have a short shelf life? Tony
One possible inaccuracy as to the identity of the carrier. In the Guardian article carried in Common Dreams, the ship was tentatively identified as French: (http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/05/09-0)
"The Guardian has made extensive inquiries to ascertain the identity of the NATO aircraft carrier, and has concluded that it is likely to have been the French ship Charles de Gaulle, which was operating in the Mediterranean on those dates.
"French naval authorities initially denied the carrier was in the region at that time. After being shown news reports which indicated this was untrue, a spokesperson declined to comment."
Exactly! France's fingerprints all over this criminal military action.
This intervention has been instigated by Sarko, that little nobody with a huge Napoleon complex. He is greatly unpopular in France, everyone I've met heartily hates him. He has the lowest ratings of any president in the Republic's history.
I hope he rots in hell for what he's done to Libya and its people. He was cosying up to "mad dog" Gaddafi until said mad dog started to make noises for a common African currency (preferably Libya's dinar) to rival the Euro.
A humanitarian empire is a contradiction
When will they ever learn : " War Is Not The Answer!"
Genie: War is the answer if you are a war profiteer. The war racket is a very profitable racket, the war profiteers learned that along time ago! That is why they keep manufacturing enemies and bad guys in order to mollify the sheep people. Unfortunately, It is the answer for the elite few that determine America's foreign policy.
Too bad CD didn't choose to publish this Ford essay, "Obama's Kill at Will Strategy," http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28074.htm
Excerpt: "It’s on. The United States, frightened out of its imperial wits by the sudden eruption of the Arab Reawakening, has embarked on a new version of Shock and Awe designed to terrorize both old and emerging forces into submission to Empire. President Barack Obama, whom deluded progressives continue to insist represents the lesser of U.S. major party evils, has activated, in ways that even George Bush never dared, the operational capacity of America’s Full-Spectrum Dominance machine, in the process discarding layers of international law and established norms of behavior among nations."
Their blood is on the hands of all pro-imperialist propagandists, especially those posing as "progressives" like Juan Cole and Immanuel Wallerstein.
I always appreciate Glen Ford's awesome political commentary at Black Agenda Report, so it's nice to see him posted here. He's been particularly great on Libya and Cote d'Ivoire. (He is always good on Africa, check out his article on U.S.-backed Paul Kagame in Rwanda).
Great to see his stuff posted on CD.
NEW FRIEND...
I have not read G. Ford's analyses elsewhere ("Black Agenda Report")
but certainly appreciate his views here.
I marched with Dr. King in the 1960's (no "leader"...a "follower"! )
As one of Jewish heritage, I have become a strong anti-Zionist.
Keep on keeping on!
email: peterloeb@yahoo.com
The people controlling the so-called Western "democracies" don't give a rat's ass about anything except smashing and grabbing.
I don't support the bombing, but it is clear that these Africans are also victims of the Gadaffi regime.
The Green Book is clear: "Blacks are sluggish in a hot climate" to quote Gadaffi.
The boat that sunk left from Tripoli, but Gadaffi had also hired African mercenaries to enforce his will. (Which is why the African indentured servants had found themselves to be uncomfortable).
And a happy "bung bunga" to you Glen!
How does that explain why the NATO forces totally ignore the plight of those fleeing?