EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Wisconsin: Could a General Strike Happen Here? Experts Say Maybe
The confrontation between labor and politics at the Wisconsin Capitol was just starting as workers in Egypt who left their jobs and took to the streets toppled a government, and it wasn't long before activists in Madison began invoking the spirit of that uprising. "Fight like an Egyptian" emerged one cry as picket signs cheering the people's revolt half a world away were raised in protests on the Capitol Square.
Thousands have thronged the Capitol daily since large scale demonstrations began Feb. 14. Madison school teachers called in sick for several days to protest and on Feb. 21, the Madison-based South Central Federation of Labor took the unprecedented step of endorsing a general strike among its 45,000 members if Gov. Scott Walker's controversial budget repair bill is made law.
Could such a radical action get off the ground here?
Local labor leaders are careful to point out that no strikes have been called; the federation does not have the authority to call a strike and several union leaders stressed that job actions would be individual workers' decisions. But students of labor point to a confluence of circumstances in Madison with dramatic potential.
It is just possible, they say, that it could happen here.
General strikes have been very rare in the United States. Strikes widespread enough to interrupt general commerce date back to the Great Depression of the 1930s when longshoremen in San Francisco, autoworkers in Toledo, Ohio, and teamsters in Minneapolis touched off protests that helped establish industrial unions.
And while the labor struggle in Madison is unfolding in the context of budget deficits exacerbated by the severest economic downturn since the Depression, labor activists say the real conflict is over union power and partisan political influence.
It is dissatisfaction with the political system, not economic desperation, that sets the stage for a general strike, says Reza Rezazadeh, a professor emeritus at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville who has studied revolutionary strikes against repressive regimes in his native Iran and elsewhere. In the United States, he says, activists are challenging a political system that, despite freedom of the press and freedom of speech, is shaped by the influence of the economic elite and corporations.
Walker's challenge to union power is part of an established movement by the Republican Party to cripple unions, the most influential funding source for Democratic candidates and causes, say analysts of the showdown in Wisconsin. Aside from increasing contributions by employees for pension and health care costs, Walker's budget repair bill would also sharply restrict the power of most public unions to bargain with their employers. "It is viewed nationally and correctly as a decisive turning point for the future of labor nationally and for the Democratic Party more broadly," says Harley Shaiken, a labor expert and professor at the University of California-Berkeley.
Whether a general strike would be an effective tool for labor, local leaders will have to decide, Shaiken says. But the likely public reaction to any widespread job action would be an important consideration, and polls show a majority are opposed to stripping public workers of collective bargaining rights, he points out. A nationwide Gallup poll released last week found 61 percent of respondents opposed to an erosion of collective bargaining rights among public unions, and even a Wisconsin poll funded by the conservative-leaning Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity found 56 percent in favor of public unions' collective bargaining powers.
To mount a general strike, labor unions would have to take a more unified stance than is usual, with truck drivers and food service workers finding common cause with public sector workers, says Gene Carroll, director of the Union Leadership Institute at the New York City campus of Cornell University. To gain public support to allow it to be effective, an even more embracing class perspective would need to take shape, he says. "In Wisconsin, to the extent that people who are not in the public sector begin to understand that the designs of the government to break collective unions' bargaining rights are in fact an attack on the economic and political rights of anyone working for a living - the possibility of a general strike is conceivable."
On the other hand, a strike that does not win public support can be a public relations disaster, says Don Taylor, an assistant professor at the School for Workers at University of Wisconsin-Extension. But in Madison, where the battle over collective bargaining is centered, circumstances favor support for widespread job actions, he says.
Not only does the area have many public workers whose families have a direct interest in the issue, but it also has many other residents who are sticking up for their rights. "A lot of people not connected to the labor movement have a strong progressive outlook on issues of people's rights and social justice," Taylor says.
"Do I anticipate every worker in and out of a union would walk off the job? No. Could a strike be large enough to have significant leverage? Yes," he says.
Even the prospect of such an action might unnerve business leaders and other citizens, prompting them to call the governor's office and say "fix this thing," says Taylor.
The political standoff over workers' rights continues into a third week, but some of the urgency for labor unions locally has been relieved by the actions of their public employers. The Madison School District delayed until May the issuance of pink slips for teachers despite looming state funding cuts; the Madison City Council met in special session on Feb. 17 to approve outstanding labor contracts.
Nonetheless, David Poklinkoski, president of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2304, says area labor is more united than it ever has been. Meetings of the Labor Federation -- which covers 97 labor organizations in six counties -- can be tense over competing interests, he says, but the vote to endorse a general strike was unanimous. "The breadth and depth of solidarity in the labor movement right now is unbelievable," says Poklinkoski, whose union represents employees of Madison Gas & Electric.
"We know the private sector is next," he says of efforts to strip workers' rights. "Local unions are trying to figure out what to do if the governor doesn't change his mind and work out a reasonable solution to this." That includes studying general strike actions of the past, as well as the budget repair bill's impacts beyond collective bargaining.
"The local union will not call a general strike - it would be each person's individual decision," he says.
Leaders of Local 60 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which includes many city of Madison and some non-teacher Madison Metropolitan School District employees, are asking their members to think about a general strike.
"We've been asking people to think about what they would do," says President Donald Coyier, so that if the union calls for a job action, they are ready.
Idling transportation is a key element of general strike efforts, Rezazadeh says, but there's no sense yet if that could happen in Madison. Teamsters Local 695, the union that represents Madison bus drivers, is not a member of the Labor Federation. Recording secretary Gene Gowey says union members are protesting and transporting other protesters to the Capitol Square, but as to a strike, he says his members are "attempting to address issues in a peaceful, law-abiding way."
The stakes are high for strikers. State law restricts strikes by public employees, but job actions in protest of proposed legislation might not be considered a "strike" under state law. Private sector workers might not be protected by federal law in general strikes not related to contract provisions or unfair labor practices, meaning that they could be fired.
Meanwhile, some Madison residents are beginning to meet and talk about how the community might respond to a general strike. One of them, union supporter Judith Zukerman-Kaufman, recalls how during a 1960s parent protest that kept Chicago schoolchildren out of classrooms, alternative schools were established. Creating similar set-ups to teach children about civil rights or labor history is one thing people are starting to talk about here, she says. "There are seeds of some ideas."
Madison teacher Susan Stern says that the focus of her union continues to be legal protest. "But people are starting to ask: ‘What if?'"
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


50 Comments so far
Show AllI feel sorry for all these people. Walker and his ilk only care about contracts and law when it helps his clients the top 1%. The kind of law he will apply to the rest of the population is the butt end of a police baton. The private Union movement having been crushed the last 35 yrs. by off-shoring all the jobs ( no need for a Union with no jobs right?) It's now the turn of the Public Service Unions to feel the knife. The Fascist thugs that are doing this are actually enjoying the show. It's been planned quite awhile. Oh bye the way they'd like to thank all the stupid MOFOS that actually voted for them to cut their own throats. What's left of America's once thriving Middle Class is being shit canned before our very eyes. Next up are any other orgs. that are bothersome to these people. Then it's time to go after SSI, Medicare and any other so called Social program. All will be looted by the same crowd that looted the economy. The robbery goes on and who and how will we stop it? Any ideas?
The Unions and MoveOn are rallying the troops everywhere. That's good. I am all for it! Bring the fat pigs down just like the Egyptians, Libyans etc. But hold it!
Are these the same peoples that funded the Democrats and Obama back in 2008? I have a terrible nausea feeling and it just won't go away. There are "elders", "academia", "brilliants thinker" so eloquently bearing down on the fat pigs and rallying the troops for a just cause. Whom will benefits most at the end of the day? I am sure not the working class. but think again, How will the key benefactors - The Unions, The Democrats and MoveOn do to help the working class? Mind you there are in the same bandwagon. Will they stop the foreclosures, break up the banks, and bring those who are responsible for the housing collapse to trials?
It's like rallying the people with Gaddafi against Gaddafi in Libya. No?
Maybe, I am just simply stupid, or I cannot understand that rallying in the same bandwagon with the Unions and MoveOn will help the working class. Can someone straighten an old retired engineer trying so hard to understand.
I think that you are confusing an organization (AFL-CIO or MoveOn) with the positions that an organization takes at one time or another. Yes, both are seriously compromised nowadays (MovceOn always so since its founding), but if you are going to oppose an organization and all its resources (office space, employees and volunteers, funds and foundation money, etc.) for taking bad position, you better have equivalent resources on hand to build a replacement organization - specifically, replacement unions. You do understand the necessity of organized labor, don't you?)
So, perhaps, co-optation of existing organizations might be a better strategy.
SaboCat,
A simple excellent reply. I appreciate it. "you better have equivalent resources on hand to build a replacement organization - specifically, replacement unions....?"
I understand. You cannot build up an organization overnight from Ross Perot and Nader's past experienced. Nope, never!
I disagree with your paragraph. We are basically in agreement in many areas, except “more or less the same” and can promise you this "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result.”
Finally, I conclude. I shudder to think Obama's second term.
Pry your gaze away from partisan electoral politics long enough to observe objective reality. Read and learn about Union history. Get involved. Forget about media-controlled sham-democracy corrupt partisan electoral politics. That crap is an effect of political and social change, not a cause, The Union, and the Left. is the cause of social and political change. Don't take my word for it, read the history.
Never mind about Obama. What does Obama have to do with anything? Those politicians are just well-paid errand boys for the ruling class. The mobilizing, organizing and marching that is happening right now is a fight back against that ruling class.
Two Americas,
I love history very early, but not academically. My gifts are my hands and creativity makes me embarked on engineering careers. I got the feeling you are referring to "which come first the chickens or the eggs". Are you saying to build a new organization bottom up or work within the system for change? Of course Obama and the Democrats have everything to do with it and include the other side. Than again, they are a well-paid errand boys. It goes round and around, while we got the screw repeatedly.
Somehow the Egyptians are very much smarter than us as what you said.
One votes for people, but supports causes, ideas, measures, struggles.
I have lost connection to MoveOn and am not convinced to renew. But if it is helping to organize strikes in Madison, my hat's off and I am willing to applaud, too--and disagree with them all over again if they back 0bama again, which I suspect they will.
Let us recognize partial victories as partial victories. If Monsanto creates an astroturf organization with a Green-sounding name, that does not constitute a victory, complete or partial. When the States elects a man of Republican principles on a Democratic ticket, that is not a victory, not even a cutting of losses. But if an organization like MoveOn that has certainly made its share of errors and bogus compromises actually does help organize workers who actually do hit the Wisconsin capital en masse and actually do accomplish something, as they have already even if that legislation passes, then that is a genuine move for MoveOn, and what they ought to have been doing in '08.
Bravo.
We have seen so few victories in recent years that we seem to have a hard time recognizing them for what they are. They are messy, incomplete, inconclusive things fraught with rightist backlash. But they happen when resistance spreads to sectors in which it does not usually dwell. MoveOn is one such sector, unfortunately; fortunately, it appears to be operating differently in Madison.
There happens to be another wonderful example in Madison at the moment. Apparently the police have refused to remove the protesters. Now, I have made no poll, but I suspect we can agree just on the face of it that there are probably not a lot of closet socialists among the police force of Madison Wisconsin. The guv has excluded them from his union-busting for the moment, but apparently they have not taken the bait.
Should the police action in declaring their solidarity instead of removing the protesters not be praised because a majority of those officers (almost certainly) vote Republican, and most of the rest Democrat and not Green or Socialist?
Let's approve of this and then disapprove of people going back and supporting dinos again when and if they do.
You do not understand what a Union is if you think it is similar to Moveon.
Moveon is not "rallying" any "troops." Don't be deceived. Moveon and other liberal organizations are trying to get in front of the parade, hijack it and steer people back into partisan politics.
Working class people are taking to the streets. The Union is the working class people's organization for coordinating and building on that action. Leaders are elected in unions. More workers can be organized - and will be now. The interests of 90% of the people in the country are represented by the Union. All can be changed within unions by the members. All unions help all workers. What are you not understanding?
This is not about partisan politics nor is it about the Democratic party. Moveon wants people to think it is.
A general strike has been long overdue.
A general strike may be long overdue (I thought since 1981, when Reagan fired the PATCO union members) but its not a fight that working people can afford to lose.
If its done, it must be done in such a way as to maintain public support.
I think it would be a good idea for anyone seriously contemplating such a strike, to study the history of general strikes. Learn about which succeeded and which failed, and why, and work out tactics and strategy based on that knowledge.
A general strike that makes life miserable for everyone will very quickly lose support.
I agree with you, to a certain extent. But all those successes in the past seem more like concessions. We're at the point where, for the last ten years, it has been all-out war on every front against Democracy itself - and the methods have been waged on every front - psychological, economic, false-flag terrorism, and overt violence. This isn't strictly about labor unions even if this is finally what wakes up the American people. This is a world war whose endgame has been unleashed as a blitz for no less than ten years - even while I accept that it has been waged covertly for far longer than that. None of the means used previously will succeed, because it is all or nothing now. These fuckers have been gunning for the republic, and for the destruction of democracy altogether. They're no longer satisfied with creeping fascism.
Labor needs to quit playing defense and go on the attack. If they want to take away collective bargaining, let's demand--DEMAND--that Congress pass the Employee Free Choice Act. We in unions need to make a bond with those not in unions. Our cause is also your cause; our fate is also yours. Labor is very united and aware of what is being done to them. (as you have done unto my brothers you have also done unto me), and so a general strike is in the air if not on the ground. Wall Street and their sock-puppet politicians should be worried.
I'm trying to think in terms of tactics that would win public support,
I don't think that tying up key transportation systems or otherwise greatly inconveniencing the general public is a winning tactic.
However, if labour causes inconveniences to the operations of Wall St., say by staging a major peaceful occupation of Wall St.,(like the occupation of Tahrir Square in Cairo) making it difficult for Wall St. to operate, and waving banners asking Matt Taibbi's question "why these thieves are not in jail?"
If labour were to target Koch Industries and some of their allies, throwing a monkey wrench into their gears, demanding an end to the political system that permits billionaires like the Koch brothers to buy the politicians that make the laws, I think that labour could retain general public support, which is key in winning this battle.
Labor is the general public. The idea that we need to gain the support of the public before we fight back is false. Fighting back is what gains the support of the public, because fighting back is to everyone's benefit. The more we fight back, the more clear the ruling class agenda becomes - as is now happening in Wisconsin - and the more people rally to the resistance.
It is events that drive people's thinking and not the other way around. We can see it happening right here, as people are being radicalized by events, or else are becoming more clear and obvious in their support for the ruling class.
Being on the Left, supporting organized Labor, and fighting back against the ruling class is not a "good idea" that people need to be sold on.
This battle has already been won - it has mobilized people, it has radicalized people, it has made people aware of the need to fight back. Merely stopping this governor on this action is relatively minor. In fact, the more intransigent he is and the longer this goes on, the better.
I am a former teacher. I earned my pension and I want what belongs to me. The private sector contains all too many people who worked for slave wages for a lifetime. They need to be included in this fight for justice.
They probably belonged to no union, no matter. They have done work for which they have not been paid, and most need desperately what belongs to them.
This is good news, but Wisconsin is just one, not particularly populous or economically significant state. when is this movement going to spread to states with more substantial populations - California, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois?
The Unions are acting in measured responses. Walker remains unmoved; therefore, a general strike is necessary. The sooner the better. Git er' done!
Right now people are getting more clarity, becoming more class conscious and connecting the dots. That makes the action in Madison an enormous success - the biggest we have had in decades - no matter the immediate outcome.
A general strike will happen when the timing is right, if things continue as they are.
Moving Walker is not the goal here. The more intransigent he is, the more clear the ruling class agenda is to people. That is a good thing. Walker is one very small part of the larger problem - the ongoing general assault on the working class people on all fronts.
"If we have the money to kill people [with war], we've got the money to help people."-former British MP, Tony Benn
Enough talk, let's have it.
A general strike could be quite successful. So many workers are already out of work; they'll show up too.
We can finally use that word here! But a general strike is an action that workers who ARE employed take, along with consumers and with sympathetic non-union store and small businesses. Sort of a mass labor action along with "buy-nothing day".
The only genuine general strike in the US was the Seattle General strike in 1919.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_General_Strike
There was also general strike in Winnipeg, Manitoba in 1919. Also worth looking into.
In Europe where workers can walk out and shut their country down to make a point and usually ends quite quickly. Since Governor Walker is so intransient that a total stoppage of all services for say two/three days should get his attention.
I would not call it a general strike but a workers holiday.
What I really find strange is human beings in the Middle East are revolting against years of tyranny and here in the United States a Governor is acting like a Despot. Something is way out sync here.
In this particular case the workers are not wrong and the Governor is way out of line and reality.
Nothing is out of sync. The workers in Wisconsin and the workers in Egypt share a common enemy and are having the same tyranny imposed on them.
If that's hat it takes.
There can not be any real change in this country until labor leaders break with the reactionary Democratic Party and start building a nationwide labor party that runs its own candidates at every level: local, state, and federal. Now is the perfect time to do so.
friend,
You have said the magic word "break"'so many brilliant eloquent posters missed before jumping onto the same bandwagon. Maybe they know something we don't know or understands.
.
The rank and file is already "breaking" with any leadership that is not on board. The members can handle this. You should be supporting the workers, not casting doubts and suspicions about unions. You give aid and comfort to the enemy when you do this.
We cannot do anything about the various problems without power, and working class people gain power by organizing and fighting back. Organizing and fighting back is called "unions."
Stop judging actions and organizations according to their imagined effect on partisan electoral politics. That is all a sham, and you should stop buying into it. We should not worry about who supports which politician or party, but rather which politician supports us - the working class people. We will discovery that by their actions, not by their "beliefs" or other nonsense.
The solution to poor leadership is a stronger and bigger Union. Don't allow criticism of Union leadership to be used as anti-Union propaganda. It is and has been for a long time. If you want to change the leadership of your Union - you are a Union member I presume, or you would not have the audacity to attack the Union - then get to work within the Union. Now is the perfect time to do so.
Well I guess as an unemployed, my acts of going on strike would be no posting on CD and no long walks.
But we all must sacrific for the common good.
The best defense is a good offense, strike NOW!
glenn ford
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result.”
You did the right thing by being there. You help not only yourself, but many others as well. I salute you for it.
Have you look at the people that are rallying the troops and aren't these the same people that caused the housing collapse and scores of other problems? Please help me to understand. Thanks
Sivasm ---- Thanks for the Praise, always welcomed but what did I do?
Are you refering to the Santa Fe protest?
The people who caused the housing collapse are the Banks who wrote complicated contracts and gave mortages to people who the Banks knew were most likely to default. The banks laid traps for ignorant and innocent home buyers. ( Banks can write contracts that almost no one can understand)
Then the Banks ruined States and Unions and other Banks and Financial Institutes etc. funds by selling what was useless derivatives from these faulty mortgages as AAA Bonds.
Then the Taxpayers bailed out the Banks who knowly created mortegages sure to fail
and had multiplied the disaster by multiplying the worth of the mortages by creating derivitives from the faulty mortegages.
Glenn,
Thanks. No, not particularly to Santa Fe protest I am speaking in general but focusing more to Madison.
I share your pain and I understand. I can tell you even more heart breaking stories that happened. I cried and really wanted help.
Did you know it's maybe the same bank and the more prominent ones like Goldman Sachs, Countrywide, IndyMac and GE? I have read and understand the derivatives and SubPrime, a casualty from it. I also know AIG and their roles in the banks’ meltdown. You and many are familiar with. They poured millions and elected Obama. Not forgetting the unions and MoveOn. They are the ones that rallying the troops now.
What I am trying to squeeze from you, are you aware the Union and MoveOn are complicity to the demise of the working class and how do you feel in the same bandwagon?
No offend intended: :-)
The Union and Moveon bear no resemblance to one another. The Union is the body of working class people united, not the leadership. Moveon is self-serving parasites, totally in the pocket of the Democratic party, anti-democratic and run as a private business, and consistently anti-Left. No comparison.
Two Americas,
Please do bear with me for my poor choice of words and my expression in general.
In my mind, I am thinking of the Union's leadership and not referring to the grassroots or the working class, when I use "union". You can't blame the foot soldiers. When the leadership mobilizes them and for a "Just Cause" a crusade the christians commonly use. They did the right thing. Here, against the Repug, especially Gov. Walker and the Kohl Bros. I will never depute it. My heart goes out with them. You SaboCat and so many eloquent speakers’ empress so beautifully. I salute you and everyone and I mean it. That's why I said you are one of my favorites posters.
You must be thinking a damn purist. It does not matter, my nausea feeling continues as I see the mass of protest nationwide and “the leadership” and MoveOn machines gaining momentum. I am pointing to what will happen after 2012 assuming Obama win a second term!
What Moveon thinks, what happens to Walker, Obama's fortunes - those are all secondary and relatively minor concerns. Can you see how what I am saying could be true?
It is not "the Jews" who are our enemy, who are secretly running the show, who are evil conspirators plotting in the shadows. All of that is straight out of some of the most deranged minds and dangerous political movements that ever existed. That was not true in the 30s in Germany and it is not true now. I don't know what you are reading, or what is going on in your mind, but on the chance that you are reasonably sane I am going to suggest that you do some serious re-thinking of whatever garbage is now occupying your mind.
Will I be the only one here to object to this deception, this figurative insertion of the word "national" in front of the word "socialist" in the conditions of a time when Labor is rising up?
"National" - Amerikka for the Amerikkans and get rid of the Jews (and anyone else "we" don't like)
"Socialist" - some radical sounding pro-Labor rhetoric
The conditions - hard times make people susceptible to appeals to find and blame scapegoats.
The deception - by posing as a friend to the working man, a person can promote the hateful and dangerous agenda and it will be listened to and considered by people.
"...Walker's challenge to union power is part of an established movement by the Republican Party to cripple unions, the most influential funding source for Democratic candidates ..."
Poppycock. Unions aren't even in the same league as the moneyed interests. Unions didn't buy the white house puppet.
"It is viewed nationally and correctly as a decisive turning point for the future of labor nationally and for the Democratic Party more broadly," says Harley Shaiken, a labor expert and professor at the University of California-Berkeley.
Just a few years ago, all the jabber was that the republican party was on its death knell. Nation wide, people voted the democrats into majorities in the senate, house of reps, and the white house. The results are all around you.
"To mount a general strike, labor unions would have to take a more unified stance than is usual,..."
This is the bottom line on the unions, factionalized self interest. Now that they are in the line of fire, we are hearing cries of unity from them, after they sat in their camps and watched their competition fall. They are asking us to help them out-compete us.
General strike to protect their union? Not me.
General strike to overthrow the lying murderous capitalist thieves that run this country? I'm in.
Peace and goodwill
Buck
"Experts say maybe."
LMAO. Nice work guys, now I see why you earn the big bucks. Have another cone....
Commandant Walker acts like he has a mandate to save the world from the tyranny of working people. I hope the union and non-union workers of Wisconsin shut the state down completely. Or better yet, move to impeach him.
Begging your pardon? What are you talking about?
If the political standoff continues, Walker will win. The people have to "up the ante" or lose momentum. Short of outright violence and a takeover of government buildings, a general strike would be the most peaceful means of doing this. Unfortunately, the decades of disunity among workers and unions, and a total lack of any class consciousness among Americans, is now coming home to roost. Americans just don't get that they live in one of the most strongly class-based societies in the world. And now the elites are pulling the plug on workers. Every aspect of American society is class-based: from schools to jobs to wars. If the unions go down in Madison and other states, private sector employees will soon see cuts in their pay and benefits--because they all belong to the same class.
The longer the standoff continues, the better for us. So long as it goes on unity among workers and unions increases, as does class consciousness.
What happens to Walker is peripheral and relatively minor. The goal is not to get rid of Walker, or stop this bill. The goal is to build solidarity and give a working class movement a chance to form.
Let's not miss the forest - the beginning of a general working class uprising - for the trees - this or that politician or partisan concern.
American unions are so lame. They have been knackered, infiltrated, and divided. Time to renew the union paradigm. Sack the paper-tiger leaders.
Anyone heard a whimper from the Teamsters recently? They are writing nice letters to Obama I hear, asking him to "speak out". Diesel is $5/gallon. Whos hurting? IBT members are, but not a single word from their leaders. Lame, lame, lame.
C'mon, lets get this party started, March 4 General Strike, Go Go Go Go ! ! !