EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange
Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.
Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.
We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.
So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:
**Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."
**The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."
**Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."
**Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."
**Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."
**Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."
And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!
WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.
I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.
But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?
But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)
Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?
Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.
Instead, secrets killed them.
For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.
Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.
And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.
I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.
P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here.
P.P.S. If you're reading this in London, please go support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


342 Comments so far
Show AllThank You Michael...Keep up the good works!
Ditto. Thank you very much, Michael, for using your reputation, money, internet resources, and rhetorical skills to defend freedom.
Here's a good article by Michael Moore and really as expected. He does a good job otherwise as well despite all the right wing hot air!
AD
I sense that Michael may finally be acknowledging that the Democratic Party and their corporate money magnet Obama are part of the problem and are working against the solution.
"It just makes things harder for the US govenment's goal of world domination." [fixed] You're welcome.
Johnny J-Rock
What you don't realize is that CD is a fake website, and all of the people you are talking to here are fakes as well.
Right wing talking points:
- Moore is just in it for his ego.
- He is a self-serving propagandist.
- The Wiki-leaks will cause war and destruction, possibly the end of the universe as we know it.
- Wiki-leaks as done terrible damage to America.
- There is nothing new in the material from Wiki-leaks. We knew "all of that" already. Nothing to see; move along, now.
- Wiki-leaks will have no effect; no one will change their minds.
- Wiki-leaks has crippled diplomacy
So, you are saying that it is OK for those in power to listen in on us, but it is a very bad thing when we listen in on them. Because...they are in power and we aren't, and they want it to stay that way. And you think we should all support them.
Your every post is a negative sermon to hopelessness and bitterness. I believe that people come to forums such as this to seek potential paths to solutions, to stay informed about issues and answers.
Why you come here is pure speculation of course, and some may speculate that you are being paid to spread negativity. I cannot say with any degree of accuracy what are your motives. Only that your posts are the opposite of helpful.
Oh, and thanks Mr. Moore, your political evolution is a great thing to watch.
I see, you are a legend in your own mind. Not so much outside of it though.
The truth is what it is:
Your every post is a negative sermon to hopelessness and bitterness. I believe that people come to forums such as this to seek potential paths to solutions, to stay informed about issues and answers.
Why you come here is pure speculation of course, and some may speculate that you are being paid to spread negativity. I cannot say with any degree of accuracy what are your motives. Only that your posts are the opposite of helpful.
You are, I fervently hope, wasting both your time and ours.
Leftist suicide bombers? Do tell.
Johnny J-Rock
Hee...I just spewed coffee all over my keyboard.....Well worth it! Thanks.
I found his post hilarious, it is for you I reserve the epithet 'stupid', or, more accurately, divisive and unproductive.
Truth.
Another in an increasingly surreal painting of the facts of this matter. You conflate the personal with the public, an individuals right to privacy with a democratic governments necessity for openness and honesty.
We are not speaking about private and personal communications, post it notes to friends or facebook stupidities here, we are discussing state department cables, between officials charged with the nations business.
You climb further out on that increasingly shaky limb with every additional post.
When you manage to pull your head out of your ass you might find that these cables were from government officials to government officials, thus your stupidity regarding private and personal conversations only applies if your vision of the way our govt operates includes jackboots and undemocratic secrecy allowing abuses and the slow death of democracy.
Wow, you caught me, "Two Americas". I'm just an evil robot here to inject my highly destructive ideas into your subconscious so that we commondreams.org robots can take over the world with (OH NO!) JUSTICE! The plots been exposed, my fellow fake bloggers...what will we do?!?!
cam cam 3:45 Excellent satire! Congradulations you imitated a USA fascist propagandist perfectly! Bravo!
Ah, if only the Democratic Party had made use of footage from Fahrenheit 9/11 in the 2004 campaign, and especially at the Democratic Convention. BUT NO (channeling John Bulishi) they chose to banish Michael to the spectator balcony. Michael Moore did not fit with the DLC strategy of the Dem candidate for pres "reporting for duty."
Amen to that! Great heroic patriotic democratic statement, Michael Moore!!! You are 100% correct!
Interesting point, but false in at least one way:
It doesnt really matter if Julian Assange is on bail, or still in jail right now. He already agreed to comply to all kinds of measures (like giving in his passport) that would make it impossible for him to just run away and hide.
So, it is really not that anyone gained "more time" by keeping him in jail. If the US find a way to accuse him, they will just do that. Assange will be summoned to appear in court - and he will do so; no matter if he is walking over from jail ... or drive over from some hotel.
And he better does so. As soon as he tries to underground ... he will be lost for good. Today, nobody could openly do something in public. But as soon as Julian gets out of sight of the cameras ...
Agreed - thanks Michael Moore for putting your money where your mouth is.
Thank you, Michael!
I don't know why more people with the financial security to do acts of TRUE PATRIOTISM like you've just done elect to do nothing. You earned your money and are probably honored to use it as you have, to attempt to free Julian Assange. Why wouldn't SO MANY of the truly wealthy (*cough* Hollywood, etc...) be doing precisely what you've just done?
It's a mystery to me, but I'm very grateful that YOU remember how The U.S. Constitution works, and what it stands for, despite the fact that Julian is not even an American citizen.
The "press" is the ONLY industry mentioned by name in the U.S. Constitution. That was not mere accident-rather, the Founding Fathers felt a free press was essential to our pursuit of liberty, etc....
Thank you again, Mr. Moore. Millions of us are out here, starved for such acts of altruism and patriotism as you've just committed.
Please consider a THIRD PARTY RUN at the U.S. Presidency. I will give you a possible plank in your platform, and you can use it, royalty-free (just maybe save me a place in your campaign? LOL):
"Restore the Rust Belt" You can build on that by talking about how our civil rights have also been allowed to "rust and decay," from disuse during the B*sh Crime Family years, and under OilyBomber.
Anyone liking what I'm writing will enjoy the LIBERAL talk show host www.mikemalloy.com. I have no affiliation, other than I pay my $60./year podcast fee like anyone else--though you can listen FREE OF CHARGE, live, M-F, at 9pm-midnight.
Mr. Moore, I hope others are inspired by your act of pure patriotism.
Be well.
True Patriot
Gotta admit, the idea that Moore would actually consider running as a 3rd party candidate is even funnier to me than that he would challenge O in the primary .....
Moore's support of Assange in the name of freedom of the press is a good thing, on its face, but don't make "moore" of it than it is. He realizes that if they can come after Assange they can come after him. Whether anyone would think it worthwhile to do so is another story; perhaps he was a bit shaken by the revelation that the insurance industry apparently expressed a desire to, although i suspect that when they found that the maker of "Sicko" stumped for the guy that delivered healthcare to them on a platter, their zeal for "revenge" dampened considerably ....
Mr. Moore,
join forces with sanders, nader, amy goodman, grayson, kucinich, and many more,
Start a Progressive Party, a Socialist Party, or a Communist Party, or whatever you want to call it
with a coherent set of programs,
from a non-profit universal health care, non-profit public bank, public education, public transportation, local currencies, etc.
and go state by state.
please. we the people will be there at every step.
Yes! Yes! Yes! A REAL progressive party that addresses the REAL needs of the American people, and especially working class Americans, is desperately waiting to be born. All it would take is one true progressive with considerable visibility and stature to step forth--and I believe there would be a rush in that direction, certainly from disillusioned Democrats.
Yes, but don't call it anything like communist; that the whore press can demonize. Maybe something like the New Republic Party. What is needed in my view, is a coalition that appeals to the left and the right, because that would be unbeatable. Maybe Ron Paul/ Dennis Kucinich or something similar.
Really Paul,
Ron Paul doesn't like Federal aid to education, unemployment insurance, public works, or public health care. He thinks corporations should run the country even more than they do now. Kucinich wouldn't go into a party with him, and neither would I. Please, do some research.
Yes, we will support such a move. Welcome it. Work hard to make it successful.
Yes. The first step is to convene a unity convention between all the left third parties and all progressive forces.
It might produce a unified left wing challenge to the Duopoly, or perhaps encourage a primary challenge to Obama. Or possibly both might happen.
But at the very least we need a unified statement for peace, jobs, unions, health care, education and an end to corporate control - the opposite, in other words, of Bush-Obama. If enough organizations and well known names can get together to produce such a statement, followed by organizing and by electoral campaigns, we will be heard.
"According to an August poll by the respected WorldPublicOpinion.org (WPO), 81 percent think that the US 'is pretty much run by a few big interests' and '83 percent of the general public says that the will of the people should have more influence than it does'."
... http://www.zcommunications.org/the-democrats-choice-and-ours-by-kevin-young
There is plenty of room for a party that really practices democracy. Let's go make one.
Mutual Left/Right planks:
1) Remove unConstitutional Health Mandate.
2) End true porkbarrel spending ( not social services)
3) stop Federal Overreach ( in fascist endeavors).
Totally agreed! That's one thing that has always held me back from my full support of Moore in the past. STAND UP WITH PEOPLE like Kucinich and Grayson!! Don't write them off as you have in the past. They are from the PARTY OF THE PEOPLE!! Our only hope!
Michael Moore -
I have trashed you in the past for being an enabler of the two-party duopoly.
I now salute you for taking the proper stance in defense of true freedom.
Julian Assange is a "Hero of the People".
He does NOT speak... but lets the corrupt Oligarchy speak for themselves - which should give any sentient human being shudders.
Assange exposes the mendacity of 'Power' and all should be greatful.
THANK YOU MICHAEL MOORE!
Is there really much difference between being an "enabler of the two-party duopoly" and being a promoter of partisan electoral politics, particularly a promoter of the idea that electoral politics is the main or only way to affect political and social change? I don't see much difference. Most CD posters fall in the second category. They are taking an extremely conservative position on this when they suggest that the only thing wrong with the electoral political system is that we don't have enough choices. or the right choices in candidates or parties.
Hi Two,
There is nothing wrong with electoral democracy IF it is preceded by really thorough democratic organizing - in neighborhoods, schools, jobs, unions, etc. That way people can derive their opinions by talking to each other, rather than by watching the billionaires' media.
Participatory democracy is a precondition for effective representation. Of course we don't have either one now. Which means that when people "suggest that the only thing wrong with the electoral political system is that we don't have enough choices, or the right choices in candidates or parties," they are, as you say, conservative. For now, under present conditions.
It's true, babies aren't made by voting - unless they have been previously been fertilized by person to person contact: in other words by organizing.
Or perhaps you have another idea of an alternative to voting. If so, I'd like to hear it.
I do not seek to quibble with your belief that there is a better form of government than the one we now endure. But, rather than speak to what and why you only run down, continually, our efforts to speak to the forces that taint our current system.
I happen to think that some major alterations , such as removing the power of money in politics,the installation of IRV in selecting our leaders, elimninating corporate personhood and, yes, the presence of more than two all too similar parties are the main thrust of improving our lot. You call this "extremely conservative thinking". I call it reality politics. I might, but I wont, speak to your own insistence upon radical and mostly unspecified changes as Utopian.
kakh zucker, I am amused your quick change of heart. What Michael Moore did is genuinely commendable. Most voters are spineless and this is a classic case, MM throws a crumb and Liberal jump on the wagon trains and jumps off again in the near future should MM continue to support Obama. Don't you think Obama knows this? We got screwed again and again. Obama will throw a price of juicy meat prior to 2012 and timidly Dems return to the fold. Don't be fools by MM or other any Dem. $20K is just a drop in the bucket, I wanna see MM denounce Obama publicly and forcefully. Someone here in CD and elsewhere make a remarkable observation, I forgot his name (handler). He clearly shows that No third Party will succeed in topping either the Rep or Dem. He continues, during the midterm the Tea Party forcefully changes leaderships/candidates. Maybe, we should hijack and remove Obama/Reid/Pelosi/Dean and etc.
To my Progressive friends, dun jumps on me. I don't trust the media and had been screwed far too many times. Anyway I hate liars!
Liars are bad, pessimists are worse.
CuriousSteve, I suggest Progressive as the new party name. Socialist has such a negative conotation created by the Right.
Technically you are correct, BUT in reality that is not so. VT has a Socialist party known as Liberty Union but it lost its major party status a couple of years ago. The censorship by the print media in VT is overwhelming and the main reason that there is not really a 'a progressive movement' here. I know. I was a VT candidate for Attorney General and even my local newspaper ignored my candidacy and other non dem/repub candidates. In Vermont it is legal to hold debates that exclude non dem/repubs. Not very democratic and an insult to all voters. When a non dem/repub candidate tries to get his message to the voters at the debates he is arrested.
Censorship, we have a lot of that. Free speech, not so much.
I think that's a great idea on one hand. On the other, political parties like other social institutions eventually devolve to self-preservation and gradually will alienate their constitituency to the point that they're a menace rather than a positive contribution.
Right on John,
How about a Nobel Peace Prize for Wikileaks?
How about a Nobel Peace Prize for Wikileaks?
How insulting to Wikileaks. The last presentation of that lusterless award should have shown you the type of person who wins it.
You do mean the second from last do you not? The last award went to a Chinese dissident languishing in prison.
http://nobelprize.org/
See: Does Liu Xiaobo Really Deserve the Peace Prize?
By TARIQ ALI*
* http://www.counterpunch.org/tariq12132010.html
Why criticize MM when he has put his life and his family's life in jeapordy from day one of his activism. He lives the life of an activist/celeb and trust me, he pays the price. People hate him. I dont think he thrives on hate. Dont you think the pathetic Lindsey Lohan and her spawn of no-nothink, do-nothing gen-Bimbo are not keeping their celeb status on front page with their worthless and entirely selfish antics? Give MM a break.
Thank you Terry, you speak the truth.
If we are going to have a viable left party, we are going to have to create it, probably through a unity conference of existing parties and progressives.
In the meantime, if we go around calling all the people who voted Democrat in '08 assholes, our new party is not going to make a lot of new converts. You grow a group with program, organizing, and through integrity, not with insults.
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State." -- Dr. Joseph Goebbels
Thank you, Michael Moore!
Good for you MM!
But i must admit, and feel free to criticize if warranted...I think he still doesn't understand the complexities of 911. I am not a 'truther' as anyone here would know. But he does tend to over simplify certain very large issues.
For what it's worth.
I think that, in this article, he certainly was suggesting the most credible "conspiracy theory", the "let it happen" theory that certain upper level individuals in the Bush administration deliberately impeded action on the known suspicious movements and flight-school behavior of the hijackers.