EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
Popular content
Today's Top News
Living for Change: If Not Now, When?
I won't be marching with Jesse Jackson in the March called by the UAW and the NAACP to commemorate the August 28, 1963 March on Washington.
That's not only because at 95 my marching days are over.
As early as 1963, Malcolm X called the "I have a Dream" March a "Farce on Washington" because John Lewis had been forced to delete from his speech any references to Revolution and Power by the MOW's "Big 6" organizers: A. Philip Randolph, Dr. King/SCLC, Roy Wilkins/ NAACP, James Farmer/CORE, Whitney Young/Urban League, John Lewis/SNCC.
Marchers were also instructed to carry only official signs and allowed to sing only one song ‘We shall overcome,' (see p. 127, Living for Change).
Malcolm never put lipstick on a pig. Malcolm thought outside the box. If he were alive NOW, he would be telling us that we should no longer be marching. We should no longer be protesting. We should no longer be dreaming. We should no longer be encouraging democratic illusions.
• WHEN millions of Americans do not have meaningful work,
• WHEN as a result of our obsession with economic growth, wildfires in Russia burn dangerously close to nuclear plants and millions drown from floods and mudslides in Pakistan, China and Iowa,
• WHEN Congress decides to cut back food stamps for the poor and hungry in order to provide paychecks for public employees because trillions are being thrown away on unwinnable wars in the Middle East and military bases around the world,
• WHEN our cities are dying because corporations are exporting jobs oversea to make bigger profits,
• WHEN our prison population is the highest in the world because our schools structured in the factory age have become pipelines to prison,
IT IS TIME TO STOP DREAMING AND PROTESTING.
Instead in every community and city we should be discussing how to make the "Radical Revolution of Values" not only against Racism but against Materialism and Militarism that Dr. King called for in his 1967 anti-Vietnam war speech.
King's call for this "Radical Revolution" came only four years after his 1963 "I have a Dream" speech. But in those few years, youth in Watts, California and other cities had risen in Rebellion. In Chicago King and anti-racist marchers had experienced the raw ugliness of Northern racism. The genocidal war in Vietnam had exposed our country as the world's worst purveyor of violence and on the wrong side of the world revolution.
That is why in 1967 King decided that the time had come to warn the American people that unless we make a Radical Revolution in Values, we face spiritual death.
In 2010, 42 years later, we are experiencing massive physical and spiritual death.
Why are we STILL marching and dreaming?
Why are we not making a "radical revolution in values"?
Why are we STILL obsessed with economic growth?
Why are we STILL allowing corporations to deprive us of jobs by replacing human beings on the line with robots and by exporting jobs overseas to make greater profits?
Why are we STILL accepting the dictatorship of technology and of corporations?
THE TIME HAS COME to
• slow down global warming by building sustainable local economies and by living more simply.
• reject the dictatorship of technology so that it is no longer normal and natural to replace human beings with robots.
• stop corporations from exporting jobs overseas.
• end factory-type schooling and start engaging schoolchildren in local community rebuilding.
LET'S START THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX!
IF NOT NOW, WHEN?
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


39 Comments so far
Show AllThe question is how. The citizenry is very good at naming what is wrong, and poor at working on what is right.
I believe in research and development as a tool for developing local sustainable economies. It's raining today or I'd be out painting the prototype.
"Replacing human beings with robots" is a tougher issue. I have a solar tracker that I'm developing. I don't see inherent issues with robots, except that to be human is to exercise and our cars take that human privilege away from us.
For once in my life I recommend a Newsweek magazine article, on the declining creativity in the next generation of kids. I can't tell if it's the schools beating the creativity out of kids with skill and drill, or if it's the boob tube and video games, but it's wrong. Also wrong is making the kids fat and diabetic, hopping vast numbers of them up on Ritalin, and putting them into giant bullying machines, gang recruitment centers that we call schools. Run for school board, you can actually win.
I believe your suggestion for school board is an excellent one - it is being involved in the most local of levels.
Again, by wearing the histroy you feel is important may real bother some people, but then you are being the change you want to see.
Love
Zero
In addition to diminishing creativity, we see even more pronounced diminishing critical thinking skills among young Americans. This explains why more 18-29 years olds believe Obama is Muslim compared to other age groups. It also explains why college students have not protested the many legislative issue that are negatively affecting and will negatively affect them more than any other age group.
Therein lies the problem of dumbing down and spending more time on ideology than education. Its a wonder that our "educators" are surprised at what they have wrought.
Some of us educators aren't surprised at what we "have wrought". Some of us do fight against the education "machine". And there are more of them than you may realize, it's just that most teachers are rather humble, quiet folks who prefer to spend their energies helping/teaching the students rather than fighting political battles.
OYE
You know you all will get a response from me when you bring up teachers and public education.
"Educators" meaning those in charge of our system at the college level down. Those in charge of training new teachers. Those that insist on needless classes or textbooks that reflect fantasy history or ideology. Those that believe a new facility or a new administrator is more important that another teacher. Those that indulge in the "think system" of education. (See "The Music Man") Its those that want to teach our kids "what" to think rather than "how" to think. Those that bring their own politics into the classroom.
Teachers are NOT our problem (except ejecting those that are bad across the country, Union or not)they are not "wroughting" anything in this area.
"OYE
You know you all will get a response from me when you bring up teachers and public education."
I count on it. I count on you and others to make sure I am being clear in meaning.
My principal asked how long I had until retirement. And wanted to know if I thought about running for the school board when I retired--I've been schooling him on the myriad problems in public education and how we focus on the wrong things, never getting to the base problems. He's one of a few public school administrators that I trust. I may just have to run for the school board after I retire.
OYE
Where creativity is reduced I would expect a lack of parenting first. Kids are creative enough with video games, and if anyone has every watched more TV than the baby boomers, I have yet to see it.
I don't think they current generation of parents necessarily worse than my generation or my parents' or their parents'. But most of them are single, and most who are not have both parents working. Has there ever been such a large percentage of a population raised by underpaid domestics?
Likely there are other factors, but we might want to lead the elephant out of the kitchen before we start searching its wrinkles for fleas.
To be clear, by none of this do I mean any moral injunction against parents, though I retain my grievances against certain practices. I mean that any society that refuses to provide infrastructure, opportunity, time and support to children and their parents will harvest the wind. The resultant problems will not die with one generation or another, but will be passed from parent to child, to be grown out of or not in some unforeseeable seventh generation.
Well, I don't suppose my concerns are new. But I will say when we ask "how" that we ought to start right there, with the elephant, with the infrastructure around parenting and the liberty we give corporations to abuse workers with children. When one must betray one's job or one's child, the results cannot be good.
The action may well be local. In my somewhat conservative area, we support public libraries, we support the Conservancies which preserve land, we support farm markets, we support millages for senior citizens, we support the arts in so many ways, we support bike paths, we support community gardens, we support food co-ops, we support keeping four chickens (without roosters) within the city limits, for Chrissakes! In the sorry state of Michigan most requests for higher taxes were approved, not rejected. The screw-ups wind up in Washington, the people who want to accomplish something stay home.
This is one of the best and most useful pieces posted on CD. That is because Grace gets to the heart of the matter we need to change our values and rebuild from the bottom up. We should be past protest, past the endless analysis of how stupid the right is and on to doing something about it beyond keyboarding and appealing to the owning and political class to make it better. Go out and organize your neighbors! We in the belly of the beast are least clear because we keep watching mainstream media and voting for one of the parties of the plutocracy. No body left to do it for us. Time to do it for ourselves.
Grace Lee Boggs, This is a clear mandate of what we need to do and what not to waste our time doing. Thank you for pointing out King's going beyond his "Dream" speech. And thank you for pointing out Malcolm's clarity.
"If Not Now, When?" The only way that real change is going to take place is to quit having babies. We need to cut the population by one half or more. All else is just temporary.
The only way we will ever make real change is to drop all the stupid labels the powers that be give us to define ourselves and just consider ourselves as working class American citizens. What works to our benifit and what doesn't. It's so effin simple that it will never happen.
Thank you! it really is simple - if we cannot even overcome "labelism" how the heck do we expect to address the other "isms" that afflict us?
When then indeed.
The question is 'How'.
The only values the rich and powerful care about are monetary ones ( their own.) Beyond these values they care about nothing & no one.
That is why the rich must not be allowed to rule.
Ms. Boggs is famous for her clarity of vision. Let's get busy following her recommendations not arguing about what to do first.
While over population of the planet is a big issue, just stopping having babies is not the answer for our ecological woes. We must change our sources of power to stop the pollution and our sources of food long before any reduction of population would have any effect.
We are in a real emergency, and most people in the US have their heads in the sand, hoping that things won't get too bad for them, while they think it's too much trouble to recycle. Even so, those who recycle at their houses deserve praise, but most businesses, including apartment building owners, do not. So much of what we do is a drop in the bucket compared to the real scope of the changes needed.
More troubling than apathy is that most people have been propagandized over the last 35 years to believe that they have no power over government or corporations, so they don't try to make any changes. The more militant among us need to show them that by various actions to oppose corporate and government practices we can create a lot of change that will show the others that change can be done.
There are so many ways we all can thwart the corporate state, so let's do them all, both opposing it and creating positive changes, and spread the word.
good article...when?
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...worldwide, unanimous rejection of the modern world...cessation of property ownership, industry and electricity...individual engagement in local sustenance, resource management, governance and defense...
I've been thinking about it.
Since our communities are cash poor but skill and time rich maybe we should start parallel gifting economies or barter economies. How about tokens that can only be spent within the community.
How to get around the IRS is the problem.
Some communities are in fact issuing their own forms of Currency. The idea has a lot of merit.
Dear Editor:
Speaking of "change", Grace Lee's misspelled surname in the headline is a glaring error that needs to be changed.
It bogles the mind!
__________________________________
Thanks for the correction. [3:10PM edit]
Speaking of farce
I just got a rather curt response back from a woman whose work I respect a great deal. In her first email, she told all about her travels, her adventures to and fro Europe, back home again, then to Milwaukee, all over the globe she trots as an "environmental activist." My letter back to her asked if "environmental activists" could do their work without using so much gasoline and jet fuel. Can environmental activists focus their efforts locally, creating and using a vast network all from their home base?
She said jetting and driving around aren't the problems and judgmental purism isn't the way. According to her, the problem has more to do with our personal journey to create a world where people can have their deep desires honored.
OK. I'm with her on that. And maybe she's right, the wars, the empire, etc. are all far more important, waste far more energy. But for some reason "environmental activism" juxtaposed with jet fuel and gasoline made me flinch.
I am seeing progressive movements, environmentalism, etc. all compromised by our desires. We're spoiled, we don't want to give up a thing.
Interesting comment. Where does the egg come from in the end?
Grace hasn't been outside in a while, apparently.
Over 60% of the country is fat or obese.
That is a country that simply does not give a f**k anymore - about themselves or anything else.
We've become passive, stupid and scared - the perfect storm for collective slow suicide. And anytime a potential 'revolution' leader pops up, Big Corporate Government and Media crush him/her.
Sorry, but the only thing that might save us is a huge disaster. Not the World's Worst Ecological Disaster in History - been there, had no effect. No - we need something that takes out millions.
Then, maybe - just maybe - the revolution in thought might begin...
Hah, a succint analysis of North American culture. What an incredible waste...
never as an educator, cheered, "success for all" or NCLB. in fact I left my career behind......miss the "kids". ah.
(My comment is not related to what's being discussed here, all of which is true, serious, intelligent and sad. I'm almost as old as Ms Bloggs and have seen almost as much criminal behavior by our government. I wish I could be as optimistic as she is.)
Doing research for a section of a book I'm writing for my grandchildren about the 20th century (and me), I read the Declaration of Independence today. Here's what it says about King George III's iniquities (just three of the 27 accusations):
1.He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
2. He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of the Head of a civilized nation.
3. For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury.
For King George substitute our Federal Government of the post- WW2 era. And here's what it says about our remedy:
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Damn right.
what absolutely beautiful words
Thank you, wonderful post. Ironically, the Tea-baggers are using such words, with much tangible success, to rally 'resistance' against 'us' _ Democrats, Liberals, Leftists, Socialists, whatever _ who they say would oppress them with taxes, regulation, diversity, etc.
I don't know what mental gymnastics they use to put us on the hook for 'plundered our seas' or 'transported large Armies,' but they do. And they believe eachother.
Now we face the question of whether to fight them _ because they are working very effectively for a very different world than we are _ or to somehow harness the energy they've stirred. For now, that energy is working contrary to our goals. We're both fighting for Revolution, but theirs will look very different from ours.
For an entertaining illustration of why traditional forms of activism is ineffective, Derrick Jensen tells us the plot of the "original" script of Star Wars.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwhL4Lc1VNo
For a "Radical Revolution" we need the "revolutionary overthrow" of the U.S. and global "free market" capitalist market system called Capitalism.
Organized labor, with millions of members and millions in dues-money available. must call for a break with both pro-business Democratic and Republican Parties. A call for the foundation of new, anti-capitalist socialist political party must be made NOW! A new party to represent the social and economic interests of the vast majority of society, of humanity, for the economic interests of working people.
Nothing less than an end to Capitalism, that enriches a tiny minority at the expense of everyone else, will be sufficient to end the crises of human survival today. End Capitalism and transition to a global socialist economy to end wars for profit, to stop global warming, to stop the destruction of public education, public health, or to stop the destruction of the environment, the planet and it's peoples.
Read daily the World Socialist Web Site. http://www.wsws.org
Right on. With all the references to Malcolm X, Boggs didn't mention capitalism once. Malcolm was a committed revolutionary socialist. The "revolution of values" will proceed naturally from the revolution in political economy, that is, the overthrow of capitalism. Boggs has the cart before the horse.
The revolution starts from the ground up.
Ignore the capitalists, forget politics, create a parallel new world from the ground up.
I lost my job as a special ed teacher for being Politically Incorrect at Woodrow Wilson Elementary School. I said in a teachers meeting in response to the question, "How can we raise the academic level of our students? My response was, "We should try to raise the economic level of the neighborhood.? (Lynwood, California ) Next day I was called into office and told I wouldn't be rehired. When I asked why the response was that I was Politically Incorrect. That was in 2003. Never got another teaching job again and I was in a field where they were begging and offering extra money for Education Specialist or Special Education teachers. Biggest problem I felt as a teacher was the creativity of teachers was taken away. No Child Left Behind left every child behind.
I agree with numbers 1, 3, and 4.
But you lost me when calling for a cessation of technological advance...Humans can't stop screwing with things it's imbedded into our very existence...and therefore it's both illogical and highly ridiculous that you would even suggest it.
The best you could hope for is a more responsible use of technology.
AND You only want corporations to stop giving jobs to other countries
What about stopping the corporate ownership of our democracy?
I found your list of demands both asking for too much and not enough
I don't know whether you're naive or an extremist.
If I had to sum up my feeling for this article in a word: weird.
It's a Detroit list. :D
From the article: "LET'S START THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX!"
How does TOTAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE grab you?
As Bob Dylan sang, "When you got nothin', you got nothin' to lose."
Even the MSM gets it. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/righteous-right-leads-us-straight-to-wwiii-2010-08-24