Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
An Estate Tax Victory by Any Other Name
Sometimes you can't declare victory until the other side concedes defeat. That's what happened Monday in the decade-long struggle over the future of the federal estate tax, our nation's only levy on inherited wealth.
The coalition of corporate lobbyists and wealthy families, including the U.S Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Businesses, dropped their long standing call for complete abolition of the tax, shifting their lobby resources into weakening the law.
A Bit of History on the Tax
Wealthy families, including 18 dynastic families such as heirs to the Mars candy family fortune, had spent millions in lobbying funds to save billions in future taxes.
For over a decade, opponents of the estate tax attempted to confuse the public about who really paid the tax. They called it a "death tax" on everyone, when it applied to only a small sliver of multi-millionaires and billionaires, less than two percent of taxpayers
In the late 1990s, they ran advertisements and a media campaign claiming the estate tax was the death of the family farm. In 2001, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, David Cay Johnston, exposed this as a sham. His investigative reporting found not a single case of a farm having been lost because of the estate tax.
Proponents of repeal found a friend in President Bush, who included a phase out of the estate tax in his 2001 tax plan. Over the ensuing decade, the amount of wealth exempted by the tax rose from $1 million to $3.5 million ($7 million for a couple) and the rate was cut from 55 percent to 45 percent. At this current level, only one in 200 taxpayers will owe any estate tax.
Advocates for retaining the estate tax have pointed out that it raises significant revenue (a $1 trillion over the next 15 years) from those most able to pay. It provides an incentive for the wealthy to give to charity and places a brake on the concentration of wealth and power --which corrodes democracy.
Bill Gates Sr., the father of the founder of Microsoft, called the estate tax "a fair tax" and a "mechanism for wealthy people to pay back the society that created the fertile ground for wealth creation." Warren Buffett testified before Congress that "dynastic wealth, the enemy of meritocracy, is on the rise. Equality of opportunity has been on the decline. A progressive and meaningful estate tax is needed to curb the movement of a democracy toward plutocracy."
If Congress takes no action this year (an unlikely scenario) the estate tax will expire next year, 2010, but only for one year. The entire 2001 tax law sunsets on January 1, 2011, with the estate tax reverting to a $1 million exemption and 55 percent rate. This gives advocates of keeping the tax enormous leverage in holding the line against gutting the law.
Celebrate and Get Back to Work
The anti-estate tax lobby is now shifting its considerable resources toward raising the wealth exemption to $10 million and reducing the rate to 35 percent. This additional tax break for multi-millionaires would cost over $100 billion over the next ten years.
President Obama has signaled his support for retaining the estate tax at its current $3.5 million level, while indexing it for inflation. Congress will likely act this fall to continue the existing law for one year, taking up permanent estate tax reform in 2010.
There is a real risk, however, that anti-tax forces will rapidly coalesce around a proposal to permanently raise the wealth exemption and gut the law. The same wobbly Democrats who axed the public option out of health care reform -- Sens. Max Baucus, D-MT, Blanche Lincoln, D-AR and Ben Nelson, D-FL -- are all likely votes for a bad estate tax bill.
Progressives are pressing to ensure the House of Representatives holds the line to a reasonable reform of the estate tax. Some members, like Rep. Jim McDermott, D-WA, have introduced legislation to lower the wealth exemption to $2 million and establish a graduated rate structure, with higher rates on inheritances over $10 million.
In 2003, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist confidently predicted the demise of the estate tax. He characterized the movement to retain the law a "dead fish." "They're embarrassing," he told the Washington Post. "They're flipping around like that stupid fish in the boat." Yesterday he told Bloomberg News that his coalition, Americans for Tax Reform, was working to get the best possible deal because "this Congress is not going to abolish the death tax."
The dead fish swims again.


5 Comments so far
Show AllIt's a "death tax" on Dynasties. This is a good thing.
I fail to see why ANYONE in the U.S. should inherit anything. We bray about merit, so, if you don't earn it, you don't get it. (Unlikely to pass into law--the rich think their children are better than we.)
Obama has the right idea. The 3.5 million level is just what is needed to tax the wealthy and help keep our country functioning, while not putting an undue burden on family businesses. Repealing the tax is not a good idea, as it would require capital gains basis to be figured many years previous to a death and could be worse than the estate tax for many middle class people.
godistwaddle has obviously worked his/her entire life relying on someone else/the system to employ them and take all the responsibility and risk. Either that or they are the victim of the Paris Hilton news media.
There are people out there like me, my father, and his father who who have merit and work like a dog until the day we die to EARN our inheritance.
I worked in my family business all through high school, losing all of my teenage years. I had 2 work 12 hours/day so it would survive. I dug ditches with my old man in the freezing cold on Christmas Eve to repair broken water lines, for no pay or overtime! How many of you would have done that? Yeah, many of you might have worked at McDonald's for school or college, but my family was luckier, smarter (or stupider) and stuck it out and kept the opportunity together for three generations at great sacrifice as a family. No Sister who started her own life in CA or your other brother who left home to be in New York? What did your parents/grandparents do? Sell everything off years ago and enjoy their golden years? Did you and your siblings liquidate it to pieces? My grandparents struggled with the family farm during the great depression and ate the vegetables that were intended for the horse! My parents took it on, grew a business on it and worked for years for less than minimum wage and had me do it also. Paid taxes 3 fold along the way! Now it is worth something, not to sell off once and scatter to the wind, but for my family and children to make a living off of, pay our own health care insurance and not rely on a welfare system, employ others to get their start and contribute to the town. The tycoons should no be allowed to pass on their power for free, but the 3.5 adjustment is essential or it is going to wipe out many thousands of small businessmen like me.
Grampa lost the farm during the depression. The family that bought it eventually became very rich selling the land because the interstate came by. I believe if you earn it, you get to keep it; if you don't... That is, the man who bought Grampa's farm deservers everything he gets. If his kids worked hard, they should inherit, based, of course, upon their labor.