Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Schwarzenegger's Shock Therapy - Poor Pay For Sins Of The Rich
Now that Washington has ruled out an immediate bailout for California, we know who will pay the ultimate price for the crisis born on Wall Street: the state's most vulnerable citizens. And with many states facing similar crises, this could be a preview of where the country as a whole is headed.
California is facing a $24.3 billion dollar budget gap, and the governor wants to attack it with cuts to social programs alone. If Schwarzenegger has his way, the price will be paid by 1.9 million people who lose their health care coverage, 1.3 million who lose basic welfare, thousands of state workers who get fired, schools that lose $5 billion in funding, having already survived brutal cuts earlier this year.
I just spent a week in LA and Sacramento filming a documentary on the crisis for Fault Lines, the show I co-host on Al Jazeera English Television. We interviewed teachers who are on hunger strike against the cuts, students organizing protest marches, health care workers and their patients, politicians from both parties, undocumented immigrants and the talk show hosts who demonize them (Californians will know the John and Ken Show...)
What we discovered (beyond some priceless video of Arnold Schwarzenegger introducing Milton Friedman's TV series on PBS in 1990, is that thanks to the quirks of California's system, the state is a Petri dish for some of the most virulent strains of American political culture.
Around the world, government is seen as the last hope to stimulate a comatose economy. In California, anti-tax, anti-spending, and anti-government sentiments are converging: California is facing a de-stimulus package of epic proportions.
Watch both parts of my half-hour documentary below, and check out AJE live, 24 hours day, at livestation.com.
Fault Lines, California: Failed State Part 1
Fault Lines, California: Failed State Part 2



112 Comments so far
Show AllArnold is a PIG.
He has hurt many, many weak and poor in my state. The article did not mention that people on disability have had their state monies slashed twice in the last 4 months.
Thus wheelchaired people, dying people, living on $8-900 a month now live on $6-700 a month. Their rent and utilities did not decrease.
So, from sandwiches and juice to potatoes, top-ramen and water. As arnold eats caviar, drinks Chivas, amasses wealth. This progression is PURE MARX, perfect in it's form-as a Revolution hastens our way.
Arnold is a PIG. How much plastic surgery can one mask-face endure? He appears MADE of plastic.
Nobody mentions the fact that Arnold became governator in a neocon funded coup in 2003.
Neocons convinced California voters that Governor Gray Davis needed to be recalled even though Davis had contained the 2000-2001 Enron power price manipulation assault better than Arnold or any previous governor would have. As bad as the 2000 "energy crisis" was for California and several other states, it would have been worse if Davis had not taken the action he did.
Californians not only voted for the recall, they actually elected Arnold in 2006.
This isn't the first time California has 'elected' a Republican actor for governor. I'll bet Gray Davis is laughing his head off about now. If a bank or a state is too big to fail then it's time to break it up like Ma Bell.
Pigs will be pigs, az.
And he IS made of plastic. Or is it carbon fiber, or titanium? Didn't you see Terminator? And all the sequels?
They should have little farms at all the schools where the kids can learn how to grow food and raise animals. They could be raising most of the food they eat in school lunches, composting all the stuff they don't eat. This would be a good way to save money and the kids would be learning something useful.
But cutting programs for sick people is inexcusable. So they need to legalize cannabis cultivation, 100%. No strings attached.
I went back to my old school where we used to have a quarter acre horticulture farm. I loved horticulture! It was my favorite class. It was the thing I was most looking forward to seeing. When we topped the crest of the hill and looked, the little school farm was covered in portable classrooms.
I was so bummed that we kept on going without stopping.
Moondoggy,
The suggestion about schools including practical horticulture and the whole earth-to-earth cycle is excellent. When schools run it well, the children would eat well at school (beyond a sustainable minimum). Thus the school-garden becomes its own reward. (One practical problem: who maintains the garden during summer? - Easily solved, but someone has to do it.)
No school should be built without a veggie-garden.
Michelle Obama planted her veggie-garden at the White House, which re-minded everyone how our bodies literally comes from the earth. A much needed re-minding, to re-define our minding-set.
"We're all outgrowths on this planet
working on this planet's growth"
Moondoggy! High!
A. Yes, Teach the children to Grow.
B. Yes, Legalize Weed, AB390, I think it is, is working it's way through the ca. legislature now.
A + B=?
A + B=?
Happy Kids! Kinda like Jerry's Kids. If you've ever been to a "Dead" show you know what I'm talking about!
"Hey man, let's get all Chinese eyed." -Cheech Marin
Azjoe. . . I think it is unconscionable that CA lawmakers are so willing to patch their budget on the backs of the poor and disabled. . . but you make it sound like CA just slashed the state-funded supplement to the federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program by $200 a month. The simple truth is that CA has reduced its supplement to the federal SSI payment by a total of $40.
$40 is a lot of money to the disabled and the elderly poor who have to rely on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) . . . but there is quite a significant difference between a $40 reduction and the scaremongering implication of $200.
And consider this. Many people who rely on SSI (which supplements Social Security payments for people who earned such low incomes when they were able to work -- remember, we are talking about disabled and retired seniors, people unable to participate in the economy through no fault of their own) in CA are also likely to live in subsidized or affordable housing. Not all of them, of course, but many. Everyone in CA who does rely on SSI, who just got their income reduced by $40 a month, can, in turn, have their rent contribution under any subsidized program. It still ends up being a reduction in income. . . but all together, IF this person has some kind of housing assistance, the reduction comes to, in real out of pocket change, about $20.
And yes, $20 is a lot of money. $20 buys a monthly transit pass in Alameda County (Berkeley and Oakland are in Alameda, a bus pass for seniors and disabled is a great bargain). $20 can mean food on the last few days of the month.
Things are grim for poor people, in CA and everywhere, but you do not help the dialogue, azjoe, by making it sound even uglier than it really is.
And your personally derogatory comments about Arnold? They are uncalled for. They do not make a positive contribution to the discussion and they undermine your point.
When I first heard about the CA cut to the CA contribution to the federal SSI payment, I was angry. I reiterate that I think it is hideous to take away form the poorest and most vulnerable citizens (disabled and elderly poor). but then I started to think this: millions of people are hurting. Millions. compared to a low-wage parent struggling to feed a kid or two, and cloth them, without health insurance, people who might have lost their jobs, people doubling and tripling up with friends and relatives and struggling day and night to stay afloat. . . maybe it isn't completely awful that poor disabled people have to take a small hit along with many millions of others.
things are going to get uglier before they get better. for instance, there will not be the automatic, annual cost-of-living increase in social security checks come next january. . . . for most people relying on social security, the cost-of-living adjustment is very small amounts of money but when you are that poor, a few dollars means a lot. But inflation is real. Food costs keep going up. Utilities rise in cost.
Tree Fitz, you may be right insulting arnold is not helpful, point taken, thankyou.
However-The 2nd of the two cuts WILL be subtracted in July, I referred two them both present tense, forgive me. But when it accompanies the 1st, another $40.00 appx., the 2 cuts will have happened within 4 months as I think I said, and they will cause one living on 8 to have 7.2, comprende disposable income?
If one pays 450. for rent
If one pays 125. for utilities.
If one pays 25. for clothes and all else.
They now have 120 for food instead of 200. 30 a week instead of 50. 4 instead of 7 bucks a day for comida.
The people hit by these 2 cuts are weeping. The letters informing all of the 2nd July cuts came days ago, ask someone who is hungry in ca., they can probably confirm for you.
Hope you are most well, and again think your advice is good, insulting arnold is fun but useless.
Thank God....THE SOB IS TERMED OUT!!! Peace Tree Fitz! Peace.
AAAAAArnold's god is Ronald Reagan. His kind will be preaching Friedmanism with his last vile breath. A member of the Kennedy Clan, he won't have to worry about rent or food.
Ahnold's has acted not like an ideologue but like a henchman. He played moderate when he could - what's called *moderate* in this place - but as the jaws narrow, he stands with the money.
Republicans are like Robin Hood, except that they see themselves as the poor people who need to take from everyone else. Yeah, those rich people, who now own more of the country's wealth than at any time since the 20's sure need to have more. Otherwise, how could they possibly keep trickling down on us?
To put the consequence of this economic disaster on those who already have nothing is inhuman. But then, the rich have NEVER been known to have much humanity amongst them. And for those of you who want to tell me that the rich pay more in taxes than the rest of us, I will remind you that they pay less of a percentage than we do, 18% for them, 36% for us. Warren Buffet's secretary pays more of her salary to the feds than he does.
Arnold is doing just what the rich want him to do, making the poor pay for being poor. They don't ever want to see that by being wealthy that THEY are the ones who benefit more from our way of life than anyone else does. They live in a country that makes it possible for them to make such fortunes, but they aren't willing to cough up for that fortune. Anywhere else in the world that is actually civilized would be taking 60% of more of their money, and they would STILL be on top of everyone else.
These people have stolen our country from us, sold our jobs off to foreign countries, taken away our futures, and they think that we don't recognize the class war they declared on us over 25 years ago. It's time for us to declare war right back, take back the country from those who stole it from us. If we don't recognize the war, we will lose even more than we already have. We owe it to the next generations to return this country back to a civilized place. We can't keep giving and giving and expect there to be anything left for the next Americans who follow us.
I have to say you are right. This is pure Marx. All those books we read in study group in the 70s are proving to be true! But, here's a little bit of good news to inspire us all. In Detroit, the major food retail chains have left they city. In a city of 900,000 people, there are major shortages of fresh foods. However, the unions are banding together to form a co-op so they can open their own grocery stores so that people will be able to eat.
We should try this in California. Those of us who are on welfare, foods tamps, disability, or slave wages could band together and do the same.
After all, as you say, we are already on "rations". What do we have to lose?
Because those top ramens, and 99 cent fast food menus are going to make us sick, and we have no health care!
Better do something soon, dont' you agree?
acuera, I like your attitude. You don't just regurgitate the problems, you offer solutions. Your fresh insights are welcome like a cool rain after a heat wave.
Please keep it up. We need wise "elders" to show us how to throw stones.
When the poor don't vote (and most of them don't), this is what they'll get. It's the only power they have other than rioting.
Of course, that assumes election fraud and voter disenfranchisement doesn't occur in a given election.
I never thought I would say this, but I see no point in voting any more, especially at the national level. There are a FEW decent politicians in congress but the vast majority are completely corrupted by the flow of lobbyists dollars. This makes the few that are trying to do the peoples business completely impotent. (Kucinich and Bernie Sanders come to mind as the small minority that are trying to do right by the average Joe/Jane).
Obama was supposed to be for change and hope. I was excited about him becoming president but I now doubt you will see any fundamental changes in anything. There are just too many crooks in congress and a corporate press that has no interest at even attempting to hold them accountable.
And may I add here the "Wonderful" too party system we have in this country completely sucks. We need more real parties, probably at least four. With the system we have now if you have a democratic politician that is a complete boob that means if you want to throw the bum out you have to vote for a Republican. Now there's a choice, a boob or a corporate whore.
I am poor. I have voted in every single election that I have ever been eligible to vote in, even those almost unnoticed municipal elections that sometimes pop up. Isn't it amazing that there are elections that people, like, hardly notice?!!
Not me. I have voted and voted. I have written letters. Gone to hearings. Lobbies at my state legislature (although not in the state I currently live in).
I have decided that it is meaningless for me to participate in anything even remotely connected to public discourse. My ideas do not matter to the people with the power to shape this culture. For-profit corporations have bought 'the people' out. This is not only true in USA, it is true just about everywhere on the planet. There are a few tiny pockets that have, thus far, escaped the corporate dominator culture.
Capitalism is going to have to collapse, with really ugly chaos ensuing. When our systems begin to completely fail, I predict that things will get uglier . . and then, only because of mass suffering, things will start to get better. This will not happen in my lifetime. Nor my grandchildren's lifetimes.
I am only going to focus on being happy. I can't control anything except my own personal choice to be happy in each moment. I want to be a good person, to not step on other toes, to take only what I need to get by. .. and lay low.
I see an unfamiliar tone cropping up in the commondreams.org discussions lately. This used to be a place of very civil discourse, and reasoned discourse but more and more people seem to be flailing in their anger and suffering. People make uninformed declarations (such as the azjoe who made it sound like CA reduced SSI payments by $200 when, in fact, CA SSI supplement has been reduced by $40. . . this kind in inflammatory statements serve no good purpose. . . except, maybe, to inflame. . . )
"This will not happen in my lifetime. Nor my grandchildren's lifetimes."
Yes it will.
Tree Fitz, please brother, above I clarified my SSI post.
Your 2nd & 3rd paragraphs in this post here touched my heart, I humbly tell you I felt myself speaking but they were your words.
Politics are emotional, the strings controlling our world to our detriment, when illuminated as they are here on CD cause me to become angry. But God In Heaven I wish only to be kind, I'm sorry my post's tone's abrasiveness was troubling.
I'm so glad you said something, it is a heads up for me to try to express myself with kindness, Love, always shrouding ANY Truth,
This will be a fun challenge for me, Thanks!
Hope you are well, watch for gentler posts,
Why? Because I respect you and what you said, azjoe, peace& peace of heart too.
This is what you get when you elect a steroid injecting narcissistic former body builder, gone really bad actor as YOUR GOVERNOR! I mean don't get me wrong, hes not solely to blame, I'm sure there are plenty of republican and democrats that have helped perpetuate this, but seriously...I don't get how he got elected...then re-elected, altought I could say the same for Hilary Clinton (as senator) in my state...some day...the people might wake up.
He got "elected" like any other person who gains a high-level office in our country. Through a corrupt election and party system that makes the choices for us. The lies and narratives perpetuated by the corporate mainstream media help out quite a lot as well, an integral part of the whole process. Most people lack even a basic education in civics and democratic theory, so they don't even know their interest are being undermined until it is too late. All the more reason to slash education budgets, it is win win situation.
Schwarzendikker is just one example of the viral systemic corruption, there are hundreds more just like him, both D and R. He is unique in that: he can barely speak English, his father was a member of the Nazi party in Austria. Even ol Ronny Ray-gun was a B movie actor
Terrific documentary. It makes clear that Schwarznegger's rollback of the vehicle tax is one of the root causes for the deficit. OTOH, Scheer's comment about how all of this was caused by people back east (presumably Wall St/Wash DC) isn't explained, and sounds like vague ranting (from an otherwise very reasoned voice). Thanks for posting it.
This is pure class warfare in action. These anti-tax loudmouths are sending the message that the working poor are disposable, so forget food, health care, education - but don't we dare tax their planes, their yachts, their sprawling estates. They call taxes violent?
They do not value the lives of people beneath them. They're out of touch at the top of their ivory tower and hammering away at the society that props them up. The scapegoating of illegal immigrants is a smokescreen that is going to blow away when we see how many people this affects, people who've been devalued in an economy geared for these same rich folk, paid ridiculously low wages, dispossessed by gentrification, robbed by proxy through market shenanigans and bubbles. Meanwhile, the elite keep their hands on the till while the hard-working suffer.
The American Constitution went through great pains to prevent concentration of power, but wealth is power, and there isn't a law that can prevent the government from becoming corrupt and bought out when wealth is concentrated. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness have been suborned by the robber barons our system has created.
So, read your Marx, people. He has been widely misinterpreted in this country - on purpose. People think he attacks the middle class; instead he attacks those who maintain near-complete control of the means of creating wealth by class-based privilege and reduce those beneath to wage slaves. We can see what the government thinks; we're not created equal and the wealth-serving government is not of, by, or for the people.
The modern democratic socialist movement takes its ideas from many sources, including Marx. But it has evolved, and continues to do so. Combine social policies that are as non-authoritarian as possible with economic ones that prevent a too top-heavy distribution of wealth, and you have the gist of it.
I agree. What people don't realize in this country is that this works. Check out Kerala for example.
One of the absurdities of the way we are governed is that we elect political parties with quite limited internal democracy to run the cities, counties, states, and country and then we expect these rulers to respect democracy. Why would we expect them to do so? If anything we should expect these "elected" rulers to govern their citizens much the same as their parties are governed. Until we make an issue of the internal democracy of the political parties this will not likely change.
What I am trying to say is that while I hear that the modern democratic socialist movement wants many good things worth supporting, what I do not hear about is how the modern democratic socialist movement is designing and building alternative parties that are internally democratic to challenge the two parties of the oligarchs. I do not hear discussion about how to build parties that are internally democratic with stable mechanisms to ensure that they will continue to be internally democratic. I do not hear discussion of how insane it is for people to vote for a party that is not internally democratic and expect that it will run a democracy in the interests of the people. In most cases expecting that is insane. Rather give us internally democratic parties and the programs we want will soon follow.
If we can make an issue of the internal democracy of the political parties, and figure out how to build and grow a political parties where the internal democracy cannot be easily compromised, then we can challenge the establishment parties on that issue and we will see people move to support the internally democratic parties. How then do we design and build political parties where the internal democracy cannot be compromised?
Very astute, RandB. And exactly the reason I dropped out of the Eugene steering committee of the Pacific Green Party. It was being controlled by the iron fist of the Portland branch. This was some years ago and maybe they've experienced a democratic conversion. But somehow I doubt it. Power corrupts. But to be fair, I will give them a call and see how they're doing. I do know one of the leaders in the Eugene branch was just as much an authoritarian as those people in Portland. He turned up in the local Nader campaign and was a pain in the rear.
I propose a Main Street Party, with local autonomy including local fundraising decisions. No social issues on the agenda, just economic ones. Public financing and if not available, small contributions only. If we start with Congressional districts, electing people with stalwart backs, we can retake the House of Representatives and then start on the Senate.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
Abstractedaway - excellent voicing of the rage I feel for the complete disregard of the intentions of the US Constitution.
I live in South Dakota, a state with only one rep to Congress - a Bluedawg Democrat, Stephanie Herseth Sandlin. Prior to yesterday's vote to spend $106 billion on the war there was ZIP coverage in the local press (Rapid City Journal). Today however there was a small column on page 6 saying the Supplemental Spending Bill had passed along "party" lines. How she voted or why was not even mentioned! WTF? Not to mention that the bill included $5 Billion to be funneled through the IMF to bail out big-ass Euro banks.
An entire state and absolutely no dialogue on continued funding of war. Interesting time.
Her voting pattern is pretty much the norm given that she's a Blue Dog. Then again, nothing on Thune or Johnson either. I used to be a conservative Republican, then I turned to voting Democrat. Not a day goes by that I apologize to my wife for voting Obama while she voted for Nader. While I sort of understood why she preferred Nader over Obama, I was still under the impression that Obama might do something a little progressive. Well, here we are and nothing to show for it. I never expected Obama, a Constitutional scholar whatever that means anymore, to push for more trashing the Constitution as if Bush doing it the last 8 years wasn't enough. So much to do in life just to keep up. No wonder our reps love to cash in on it ! And then there's the pro-war fundies in the state. I used to be one myself but that was earlier in the decade. Losing my job, my home, and nearly bankrupting my family forced me to snap out of this madness. I don't think that even our local media will pay attention until everyone is forced to learn the hard way and then we'll only get some.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Some people can't even afford to go bankrupt - see Avi Lewis's Tale of Two Bankruptcies - also for Fault Lines.
And, after seeing the California show, the Detroit one seems almost like a good news story.
TMinSD, I'm usually not a sucker but I got suckered this time. I really believed Obama respected the Constitution and that however else he might disappoint - and I did expect some disappointment, I didn't believe he would turn out to be another fascist like Bush. That one shocked me.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
Sioux Rose
ABSTRACT: Excellent post.
Thank you! I hold your posts in regard as well!
At the root of the problem is the 2/3rds supermajority. That is frankly undemocratic. The heart of democracy is that the majority rules (with exception for basic human rights). A majority of Californians in-fact want higher taxes (especially property taxes) to pay for these shortfalls. That's why the majority of state legislators are consistently democratic.
The 2/3rds supermajority is a classic example of the GOP being willing to shut down a democracy if they don't get their way. That's not just undemocratic, its unAmerican. If they continue down this path they may find themselves extremely unpopular in America.
As long as Californians remain starstruck, right wing Hollywood B-movie actors like Regan and Schwarzenegger will get elected. Who will be the next right wing Hollywood California governor? Bruce Willis? Wake up California from your Hollywood fantasies already, it's later than you think!
It's going to take an earthquake.
Californians voted for Reagan TWICE for governor and he was the one who started the ruination of their economy which led to the taxpayers' revolt. It appears no one ever caught on to that. When I saw it happening I thought OMIGOD. This man can be elected president and he will do the same to the entire country. Was and did.
And from that lesson we have learned - nothing.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
Well put. I always wondered though if Raygun was popular more as governor than as president in CA. He did win big in CA both in 1980 and 1984 ironically. If only Jimmy Carter had won CA in 1976 instead of letting it tilt to Ford that year.
I agree with the majority of the comments that I read concerning this article. I, for the life of me, do not understand how the good citizens of California could vote this man into office when he had no experience whatsoever in governance? I think that the things we need to do in this state to economically turn things around is to (1)order a 1% pay cut for all county and state employees. This includes all politicians,police officers, and firefighters.(2) Repeal of the Jarvis-Gann tax initiative.(3)Repeal of proposition 8.(4)Legalizing marijuana with the state taking the lead in the cultivation, packaging, and sale of the final product.(5)Introduction of a consumption tax. (6) The introduction of a luxury tax. Note: All income from property taxes should be based upon square footage of land owned so the the more square footage you own the more taxes you should pay! That seems fair to me
"how the good citizens of California could vote this man into office"
that would assume we have a democratic process that offers real choice, sadly that is not the case. The whole recall of Gov. Davis was a set-up and a sham anyway.
(1)order a 1% pay cut for all county and state employees.
Why not a 1% pay cut for everyone in California, not just government employees? The 1% cut would be forwarded by all employers, including the state, to the "bail out California" fund.
Turn that subtitle around! It should read, "pay poor for the sins of the rich"!
I'll be baak.
Avi Lewis' analysis misses the mark as all will do when it comes to California, until they take into account a most bizarre phenomenon, which is that in California, capital is slung around with the most reckless abandon, eveyone is able to scoop up some of the waste. It piles up in the gutters. Much of it washes out to sea. There are no poor in California. It's an orgy of gluttonly.
Open your eyes.
Beside the orgy of gluttony -- which is sure there, no doubt; you're stone right about it -- the very poor pull their cardboard together, hollow their places in the sand, sleep in the urine and bugs under the freeway passes and in the thicker plants by the offramps.
You can find them near the beaches because it is less cold in the wee hours when the ground chills them makes them shake. They pull what they find of garments around them and try to sleep during the day, shaking while the kids step around them in shirtsleeves because even gentle weather gets cold when one has not eaten.
Then let's think of the immigrants laying like cordwood until 5 or 6 am, when the labor pool opens, or maybe 8 or 9, when the repo folks may come around their properties.
If the water has been turned off and no one has the sense to take a wrench to the key, the smell is another good reason for leaving for a few hours. Usually the fleas are anyway.
There to scoop up the waste? Did you mean metaphorical waste or literal waste? I suppose it partly works either way.
Then we have the longterm working poor. When Americans and Europeans visit L.A., they don't spend much time in Boyle Heights or Cudahy or wandering up and down Slauson or Central Avenues or hanging with the people set on the street when the hospital closes.
It has been a while, but I remember the garbage in the gutters. The garbage I most easily identified was literal. It might have some value for someone more concerned with starvation than infection, but I suspect this is not what you meant, is it?
California has been 47th in per capita spending on education. Schwarzenegger wants to cut another %20. No, I see no reason to blame that on folks from Mississippi or Michigan. That was primarily the decision of a California electorate made largely of people who arrived in one or another gold rush.
But the students did not vote in '78. The teachers in '78 did not back Jarvis. The poor in California don't vote; most don't speak English. By and large, the people who backed Jarvis and the Governator and the rest are the ones who have been slinging that capital around. The ones who will be out in the cold are the ones you seem to suggest should live from the (probably metaphorical) waste in the gutters.
Still bizarre? Or are we getting more familiar?
Sioux Rose
BARDAMU: Poignant and powerful post.
I remember an abandoned movie theater around 13th st. in the New York City "village," that attracted enough homeless people that it almost looked like a quirky T.V. set for a sitcom. Someone had dragged a couch there, and another a chair, still another a table. A friend of mine got pregnant in rather late life and could not take her toddler to the NYC/local playground. It was a known fact that homeless persons were forced to use the sandbox (like cats with litter boxes) as their banos.
Governor Schwarz is the poster child for this new Gilded Age where celebrity, what some might take for good looks, and certainly luck casts a select few into a galaxy of good fortune; and driven so high among "the stars" they need not look back on earth and notice (or feel) their humanity with those forced to use sandboxes. More tragic still when celebrity becomes political muscle, and such a bankrupt set of souls get to determine others' relative privileges or misery. Our rich society so brutally and blatantly abandons its own, leverages the wealth of workers on a casino-style-economics, and makes its greatest profits from the killing of strangers in foreign lands. Can anyone think of a recipe for a greater moral/spiritual disaster? And we raise our voices in this forum, many of us have done peace marches, written the letters, sent the donations... and it's as if we are utterly voiceless, passengers on a train rushing towards a deep, deep chasm.
And Obama, a hot air balloon, flies around the world to speak of hope, and run an empty PR campaign for America's brand of freedom. Please pass the air bag.
i think you got it
i wonder
as i was in la
in '78
and did not vote..
should i have
which surly i
say no to jarvis
different results??
i wonder??
hang in there california
you be the leader
ken
They called him a moderate republican. That is an oxymoron. When the chips are down republicans will always side with the rich. The moderate Democrats are not much better. The liberals have been demonized by the moderates and conservatives to a point of no return. And when the Liberals had a little power big business knocked them out of power with "super high inflation" and phony gas shortages with Americans waiting in long lines for gasoline for their cars. They told us the world was running out of oil. And they blamed inflation on taxes for the programs that helped the poor and disabled. The next thing we knew, the republicans were in power and big gas guzzlers were the popular vehicle.The contract on America stripped the social programs and we do not know how many Americans have been ,food and health care insecure, since. I wonder how much power Obama has or is it true that Presidents are just puppets of the multibillionaires who are in control and call all the shots.
Sorry, guys and girls. Californians are in a way to blame for their present situation. They voted for Proposition 13 in 1978. Douglas Bruce campaigned for Amendment 4 in Colorado, a government limitation ballot measure, similar to P 13. Fortunately, it did not pass.
Anyway, I am not a Schwarzenegger's fan.
...and then there is Proposition Hate! That should be enough to drive all the honest people out of California. Maybe it will be like the 1930's except the caravans will be moving North, East and South. The Fat Cat Republicans can pick their own damn Grapes of Wrath.
Yes. This is the fruit of Prop 13.
But, also, nothing is worse than the 2/3rds supermajority California legislators must develop before they can raise taxes. Thats like telling 2/3rds of the state, 'your vote doesn't count'. Californians consistently vote Democrats into the state legislature, but it doesn't matter, as long as 1/3rd of the legislature is GOP they can't raise taxes.
California is in trouble because its no longer a democracy and hasn't been one for 30 years. The State GOP did that to California, and they'd like to do the same thing to the Federal Government. When I think of how profoundly un-American the CA state GOP is and has been for 30 years, willing to destroy the bedrock principle of any democracy (that, on the subject of finance, majority rules), it makes me sick. Any party that can develop such a casual relationship with the concept of 'democracy' should be banned, as the communist party is banned presently.
You can mess with my state. But, if you mess with my democracy I'm going to hunt you down! The california state GOP should be banned.