Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Race and the Obama Administration
In 2001 I traveled to Durban, South Africa, to join the tens of thousands of people who came to participate in the United Nations-sponsored World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. More than 2,000 came from the United States, a rainbow of people crossing all lines--racial, ethnic, national, language, immigration status, religious and much more--joining an equally diverse crowd from across the globe. It was an extraordinary opportunity to meet, discuss, argue and strategize over how to rid the world of these longstanding evils.
Our participation paralleled that of the official US delegation. And that's where we faced a huge challenge. The Bush administration team, having only grudgingly agreed to participate at all, made clear they had no real commitment to fighting racism or offering leadership on other challenging issues of discrimination. When they didn't like a few small parts of the sixty-one-page text, they packed up and walked out of the conference. It was a sad but hardly surprising moment, exposing once again the history of US failures to take seriously the consequences of its own legacy of racism, a point most recently made by Attorney General Eric Holder.The 2001 Declaration expressed powerful truths. It stated: "We acknowledge and profoundly regret the massive human suffering and the tragic plight of millions of men, women and children caused by slavery, the slave trade, the transatlantic slave trade, apartheid, colonialism and genocide, and call upon States concerned to honour the memory of the victims of past tragedies and affirm that, wherever and whenever these occurred, they must be condemned and their recurrence prevented." Another part declared, "We recognize the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to the establishment of an independent State and we recognize the right to security for all States in the region, including Israel, and call upon all States to support the peace process and bring it to an early conclusion."
Now, eight years later, the United Nations is convening the Durban Review Conference in Geneva April 20 to 24 to review and assess the progress since 2001. Member nations have toiled for two years to craft an outcome document that assesses the current analysis and challenges. This document--which called for particular measures to provide support and reparations to all the victims both of long-ago histories, like the descendants of the European-Atlantic slave trade, and those facing contemporary forms of discrimination and apartheid policies, such as the Roma, the Dalits (India's "untouchables") and the Palestinians--was rejected by the Obama administration.
This year we thought things would be different. Our country has taken a huge step in our long struggle against racism: we have elected our first African-American president. And perhaps more important, the mobilization of people who made Barack Obama's election possible brought more young people of color into political action, with others of various ethnic and political backgrounds, than perhaps any campaign before. It is a moment not to sit on our laurels; certainly, we have much farther to go. But it is certainly a moment for our nation's political leadership to acknowledge a new marker in the long and painful struggle for justice, and a time to offer global leadership in the United Nations forum organized to combat bigotry and injustice.
In an effort to address the administration's concerns, the United Nations has released a new "outcome document," stripped of all language deemed offensive or controversial. Yet we face the sad reality that our president, the first African-American to lead this country, who has galvanized hope among victims of injustice around the world and encouraged them to stand up with dignity for their rights, has yet to indicate if he will send an official delegation or continue to abstain from the entire process.
Our historical struggle against racism can claim great progress as a legacy of the civil rights movement led by the likes of Fanny Lou Hamer and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., but this 2009 review of the 2001 Durban conference against racism should still be a moment in which the administration of President Obama returns to the world stage to join deliberations aimed at making even further progress against injustice.
For twenty years, Congressman John Conyers, dean of the Congressional Black Caucus, has annually introduced a bill urging the United States to form a commission to study whether reparations are an appropriate response to the continuing legacy of slavery in our country. Would not the Durban Review Conference be a perfect venue to the administration to support the remedies recommended by the global community of nations to overcome the impacts of racism, slavery, anti-Semitism, apartheid and other forms of discrimination?
Would this United Nations conference not be exactly the right place for our new president to show the world that his administration's commitment to "change we can believe in" means rejecting our country's tarnished legacy of violating international law, undermining the United Nations and using American exceptionalism to justify walking away from the leadership responsibility many in the world expect of the United States? To make that change clear, wouldn't this be a great opportunity to remind the world that even if the final document does not call out the name of every perpetrator government, the United States at least believes that every group of victims facing discrimination or worse based on their identity, especially the most vulnerable, and those who are stateless and thus in need of special attention by the international community, should be named and promised assistance?
This should be a moment for the United States to rejoin the global struggle against racism, the struggle that the Bush administration so arrogantly abandoned. I hope President Obama will agree that the United States must participate with other nations in figuring out the tough issues of how to overcome racism and other forms of discrimination and intolerance, and how to provide repair to victims. Our country certainly has much to learn; and maybe, for the first time in a long time, we have something by way of leadership to share with the rest of the world in continuing our long struggle to overcome.
- Posted in

18 Comments so far
Show AllWhile I commend efforts to eliminate intolerance (especially because I am Native) I find Obama's policies advocating an escalation of war in Afghanistan, covert drone missions in Pakistan, and his marriage to unsustainable environmental solutions like coal, nuclear, and bio fuel, represents intolerance to the Earth and to other cultures but especially to the non combatants that will be killed to appease the military industrial establishment. Or the continued occupation of Iraq. It must be a form of elitism to have such an antiseptic view of human life, by compartmentalizing these issues, or avoiding them. I voted for Mckinney and intend to do every thing in my power to insure this is Obama's last term. We don't need another watered down version of Bush sitting in the White House. Wake up Danny.
Danny will wake up when he sees Obama¡s actions for what they are--those of Bush in blackface.
Until then I guess he deserves to hope as much as anyone else does.
The way the US has handled this, both under Bush and Obama, should serve as evidence of how much command and control Israel has over US policy and practice. Israel is why the Bush delegation walked out and Israel is why Obama isn't going. When, oh when are we going to tell Israel to go F*%@ themselves. This is the United States and you're not the boss of us.
'Don't get fooled again' - Pete Townsend
"Meet the New Boss, same as the Old Boss." The Who
President Obama during his campaigning kept bringing up the subject of voter participation. It will take a strong, loud and persistant public to keep him informed of our dislike and distrust of his compliance with policies from the old administration. Clean up his economic team, replace it with a completely independent team, clean up the banking and investing community, rethink his war policies and military budget, stand up to the Israeli Lobby, and begin to be his own self and be the President we voted for would be a good start. He has made a few changes but they are insignificant compared to his major efforts which are highly suspect as he continues to grant concessions to the elite whether military or economic rather than to those who so enthusiastically supported him for real change, not just piecemeal pacifiers.
Essays like this one, written by the multi-millionaire actor, Danny Glover, always amuse me. At once, Mr. Glover, a successful and well-known celebrity, insists on racial inclusion and consideration by way of racial separation and blame. This kind of bizarre reasoning is the bane of contemporary liberalism.
There is only one race of people on this planet - the human race - and we are genetically, phenotypically and culturally diverse and we all originated in Africa, and, Mr. Glover, having traveled the world for decades, I can say with honesty, the United States of America is the least "racist" and most generous nation on Earth.
Here's what Mr. Glover is all about, "For twenty years, Congressman John Conyers, dean of the Congressional Black Caucus, has annually introduced a bill urging the United States to form a commission to study whether reparations are an appropriate response to the continuing legacy of slavery in our country." In other words, let's send black folks a check every month because in the past racial discrimination and privilege was wrong .... but now it's right.
I wonder how much the Nez Perce would enjoy paying taxes for black reparations?
As a Native American activist, I do not sneer at the efforts of Danny Glover. He was active in the Black Student Union back in the 60s when both of us were at San Francisco State--one of Reagan's primary targets for his rightwing rage, along with UC Berkeley. He has a long history of putting his money where his mouth is, and his energy where his convictions lie--something that posters like you are much too cynical and pompous even to understand.
You are just another genocidal whitey trying to get out of your responsibility as a citizen of this planet by trying to divide and conquer your victims--in this case Native Americans and Afroamericans.
Pack your bags and get the fuck out.
You slipped in before me there with that recitation of the sincerity and actions of Mr. Glover. While I do not claim to know the ethnicity of that poster I recognise the rant all too well.
We are ,all of us, victims of a system and a society that undervalues life and fails abysmally to honor diversity. One of my proudest moments was watching my grandson become a member of the Red Lakes band of Chippewa's. Though he suffers from serious illness he is a joyous gift to me.
patgarrett,
You wrote, "You are just another genocidal whitey trying to get out of your responsibility as a citizen of this planet by trying to divide and conquer your victims--in this case Native Americans and Afroamericans.
Pack your bags and get the fuck out."
Sir, do you ever consider your writing and responses before submitting them to Commondreams? I have read a number of your posts, and clearly, you are a victim of your own racist hatred and rage. I, too, am a native American, patgarrett, just like you, and all of our ancestors evolved in Africa.
My antecedents immigrated to the United States from Bohemia in the early years of the twentieth century and they had nothing to do with slavery nor the conquest of aboriginal Americans. Nothing. My family was dirt poor when they arrived in this country, and eventually, they became citizens of this nation. What they didn't do was look for excuses, handouts or a bottle of whiskey.
Even a multimillionaire actor like Danny Glover as you put it experienced the indignities of racism up close and personal. That gentleman couldn't even get a taxi in NYC because the driver didn't like the color of his skin.
"This document--which called for particular measures to provide support and reparations to all the victims both of long-ago histories, like the descendants of the European-Atlantic slave trade, and those facing contemporary forms of discrimination and apartheid policies, such as the Roma, the Dalits (India's "untouchables") and the Palestinians--was rejected by the Obama administration."
It wouldn't have been rejected without "the Palestinians". AIPAC owns us.
If there are to be reparations of any sort, the Native Americans have a much better case than African Americans. Similarly, the descendants of immigrants who came to the USA long after the abolition of slavery (or after the passage of the 1965 Civil Rights Act in my case) would loath to pay one cent as their ancestors had nothing to do with the whole vile business; and collection of said funds from said group would be problematic, to say the least.
You obviously aren't aware of the privilege that is gained, just from being a 'white' person in this society. I wouldn't care when you got here, the lowest, piece of crap, dirt farming cracker could lie down at night and know, beyond any doubt, that while he might be poor, at least he's not a nigger. As for reparations to our Aboriginal brothers, there's not enough money in the world to pay them back for what was done to them. I say giving the land back would be a good start and go from there. Won't do that? Oh well, honor the treaties that the snakes of the US government made with these sovereign peoples and let that be enough.
As a black man, I'm not sure where I stand on reparations but, I do know this. The US Government was complicit in allowing the crime of slavery to be perpetrated against my people (yes, I am a dec. At the very least a goddamned apology would be in order. But, I guess that would be too much to ask from Snobama.
Black_Anarch,
Sir, your logic escapes me. Your words indicate that bizarre idea, offered by so many liberals, that it's perfectly OK for you - "a black man" - to post hateful, racist rants .... "I wouldn't care when you got here, the lowest, piece of crap, dirt farming cracker could lie down at night and know, beyond any doubt, that while he might be poor, at least he's not a nigger." then expect the people you've just insulted to be more understanding, perhaps even pay reparations for crimes they did not commit nor likely approve. WTF?
I did not post anything remotely racist. As a matter of fact, the term 'cracker' was and is not a racial epithet. Please study your history. I would suggest reading "Cracker Culture: Celtic Ways in the Old South by Grady McWhiney". Also, I have experiential knowledge of poor whites who have said exactly the same thing that I reported in my previous post.
To be honest, I expect nothing but more of the same. The descendants of those who profit from their white skins, the blood, sweat and pain of my ancestors (yes, I am a descendant of slaves) and from the land, deaths and resources of our aboriginal brethren, will not give up one bit of what was stolen. Reparations would go a long way toward healing the breach caused by one of the biggest stains on the history of this nation. But, I believe that I will see a pig fly before this happens.
One more thing. Even if you don't support helping the descendants of slaves in this country, why not get behind an effort to see an apology given to them by the President? A simple apology and acknowledgment of the government's complicity in the slave trade would be an amazing thing to behold.
Actually you bring up a good point. Obama has this belief that "we need to move forward". But to move forward one needs to deal with the past, and I believe Obama in his haste to "move forward" doesn't want to deal with the past. As for reparations, I'm all for it. Why can't the government pay that in the form of college tuition to send African Americans through college, grant money for African American businesses, rebuild the infrastructure in the inner cities, grant money for homesteading, grant money to African American farmers, filmakers, artists, etc? I would rather see that than the government blowing trillions of dollars on financial firms to remove their "toxic assets" and bake their books. JMHO.
I applaud Danny Glover for his insightful article. It is a shame and a slap in the face for all freedom loving people for the US to boycott the Durban Review Conference. I and others in the Reparations movement have written letters to President Obama and there are currently emails and phone calls being made to the White House encouraging him to send a delegation to Durban. For more information on these efforts visit;afro-descendantissues.blogspot.com.