Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
America's New Mercenaries
As American commanders meet this week for the Afghanistan review, Obama is hiring military contractors at a rate that would make Bush blush.
Top U.S. commanders are meeting this week to plan for the next phase of the Afghanistan war. In Iraq, meanwhile, gains are tentative and in danger of unraveling.
Both wars have been fought with the help of private military and intelligence contractors. But despite the troubles of Blackwater in particular - charges of corruption and killing of civilians-and continuing controversy over military outsourcing in general, private sector armies are as involved as ever.
Without much notice or debate, the Obama administration has greatly expanded the outsourcing of key parts of the U.S.-led counterinsurgency wars in the Middle East and Africa, and as a result, for its secretive air war and special operations missions around the world, the U.S. has become increasingly reliant on a new breed of specialized companies that are virtually unknown to the American public, yet carry out vital U.S. missions abroad.
Companies such as Blackbird Technologies, Glevum Associates, K2 Solutions, and others have won hundreds of millions of dollars worth of military and intelligence contracts in recent years to provide technology, information on insurgents, Special Forces training, and personnel rescue. They win their work through the large, established prime contractors, but are tasked with missions only companies with specific skills and background in covert and counterinsurgency can accomplish.
Some observers fear that the widespread use of contractors for U.S. counterinsurgency efforts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Horn of Africa could deepen the secrecy surrounding the American presence in those regions, making it harder for Congress to provide proper oversight.
Even in Iraq, where the U.S. has ended combat operations, the government is "greatly expanding" its use of private security companies, creating "an entirely new role for contractors on the battlefield," Michael Thibault, the co-chairman of the federal Commission on Wartime Contracting, recently warned Congress.
Among the companies getting contracts is Blackbird, which is staffed by former CIA operatives, and is a key contractor in a highly classified program that sends secret teams into enemy territory to rescue downed or captured U.S. soldiers.
Glevum, meanwhile, fields a small army of analysts in Iraq and Afghanistan who provide the U.S. military with what the company opaquely describes as "information operations and influence activities."
And K2 is a highly sought-after subcontractor and trainer for the most secretive units of the U.S. Army Special Operations Command, including the SEAL team that rescued the crew of the Maersk Alabama from a gang of pirates last year. It is based near the Army's Special Forces headquarters in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and was founded by Lane Kjellsen, a former Special Forces soldier.
Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander of conventional and special forces in the war zones, is using contractors because "he wants an organization that reports directly to him," said a former top aide to the commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command, the umbrella organization for all Special Forces. "Everyone knows Petraeus can't execute his strategy without the private sector." The former aide spoke on the condition that he not be identified, saying his career could be jeopardized if he went public. The International Security Assistance Force, the general's home command, did not respond to a request for comment.
The use of contractors could become a serious problem if controversies about them are not addressed, a senior British official warned during a recent visit to Washington. Pauline Neville-Jones, the U.K.'s minister of state for security and counterterrorism (and a former executive with QinetiQ PLC, a major intelligence contractor), told an audience at the Brookings Institution that "we have something of a crisis in Afghanistan" partly because of the "largely unregulated private sector security companies performing important roles" there.
The Pentagon's Central Command had nearly 225,000 contractors working in Iraq and Afghanistan and other areas at last count, doing tasks ranging from providing security to base support. Intelligence agencies such as the CIA and the National Security Agency field thousands more under classified contracts that are not publicly disclosed, but extend into every U.S. military command around the world. (According to reports in The Nation and elsewhere, Blackwater, which is now known as Xe, has contracted to send personnel into Pakistan to fight with the Joint Special Operations Command, although a command spokesman said the reports were "totally wrong.")
In response to a question from The Daily Beast, Neville-Jones said that American and British forces must work out "the operational rules and roles that they have when they are in the frontline." Unless that happens, "We are in danger of getting up against Geneva Convention problems and failure to observe fundamental rules of war."
A spokesman for SOCOM would not say exactly how many people work on its contracts, but did say that between 2001 and 2009, SOCOM's budget has grown from about $3 billion to about $10 billion. Neither SOCOM nor Special Operations forces outsource combat operations, the spokesman said. "About the only contractors Special Operations forces might have with them on operations are interpreters," he said.
However, private contractors are now fulfilling vital functions previously done by the military itself.
Blackbird is a case in point. Based in Herndon, Virginia, a stone's throw from the CIA, Blackbird deploys dozens of former CIA operatives and provides "technology solutions" to military and intelligence agencies. Much of the company's revenue-including a $450 million contract awarded last year by the Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command-comes from the deployment of special teams and equipment into enemy territory to rescue American soldiers who have been captured by Taliban or al Qaeda units or have stranded after losing their helicopters in battle.
Until recently, the task of rescuing American soldiers was largely carried out by the military's Joint Personnel Recovery Agency. But Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has recommended that the agency's parent command in Virginia be closed. If the recovery agency is shut down, Blackbird would likely pick up the rescue business as it is outsourced. In that case, recovery of captured or stranded American soldiers "won't be a military command anymore; it will be a business," said the former Special Operations command aide (an agency spokesman said, "It's too early to say what will happen.")
Blackbird is run by CEO Peggy Styer, an investor once labeled a "serial defense entrepreneur" by CNN. Last year, she hired Cofer Black, the former head of the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, to a senior position. (Black hired and managed some of the first private operatives to enter Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks, and later joined Blackwater.) Perhaps anticipating a pickup in future business, a venture-capital fund launched by Styer and two other Blackbird founders recently raised $21 million on Wall Street. Blackbird did not return phone calls or emails.
Glevum Associates, for its part, has won contracts for controversial intelligence-gathering work.
The Boston-based company was founded in 2006 by Andrew Garfield, a former British intelligence officer with counterinsurgency experience in Northern Ireland. Garfield first gained public notice in 2004, when he was a key player in the Lincoln Group, a defense contractor that became notorious for engaging in a covert psychological operation to plant stories in the Iraqi press that put a positive spin on America and the U.S. war effort in Iraq. (Covert psychological operations are known in the trade as psy-ops.)
Garfield won his first contracts for Glevum as an adviser to the U.S. military in Iraq. Drawing on his experience in Northern Ireland, his company began researching the views of Iraqi citizens toward the U.S. military. At the time, "no one was doing systematic target audience research," he told me in an interview.
Glevum's contribution to counterinsurgency efforts is a trademarked program called "Face-to-face Research Analysis" that combines intelligence collection with polls and interviews, primarily for the Army's Human Terrain System-a system that some American social scientists have described as unethical because information gleaned from anthropological researchers ultimately can be used to kill people.
Garfield denies the charge. The U.S. military, he told me, can't "connect opinions to location." Rather, the military uses his information "to focus their operations the right way and to provide solutions that Afghans would choose." Several experts on the program said it's impossible to divorce it from other-bloodier-counterinsurgency efforts. "HTS has been an intelligence-funded program from the beginning," said John Stanton, a Virginia military analyst who has written extensively about the system.
(Glevum's corporate partners include primary contractors BAE Systems and ManTech International. K2, which declined to comment, also wins much of its classified work as a subcontractor for larger companies such as Boeing and CACI.)
Garfield pushes back against the notion that Glevum Associates bears any resemblance to Blackwater, which became synonymous with corruption and incompetence for a series of incidents that included shooting innocent civilians and smuggling illegal weapons. "Whenever people think of contractors now, they think of Blackwater," said Garfield. "Well, if you hire a cheap plumber, don't be surprised when the plumbing breaks."

79 Comments so far
Show AllThe problem with hiring multinational corporations to fight your wars and provide for your national security is:
At some point it may have to make the purely business decision that the corporate profits will be better served by helping the other side. Mercenaries are notorious turncoats.
But that's precisely the point. They have fewer qualms (if any) about turning their weapons on any target that may be designated by those who provide the blood money. Plus the fact that it avoids all those constitutional constraints that apply (at least in theory) to the state and its officially consecrated armed forces. Robots would be even better, but although they're working as hard as they can, it may be a few years yet before total replacement is possible, especially for "on the ground" fighting and suppression.
As we've seen illustrated recently with the banking and financial sector, among others, private "corporate citizens" of the USA can do pretty much anything they want on a purely capitalist contractual basis, unconstrained by any silly nonsense about the "rights" of others, let alone any commonweal considerations. Why, then, should USA Incorporated's military muscle be thus inhibited, even in theory? -- It's not now in any real context anyhow.
Either way, you pay for all of it. And whether it's via taxes or private profits hardly matters in any practical way since it's no longer subject to that "goddamn piece of parchment" and it "supreme law" provisions in either case -- if it ever really was.
America, in the sense of its ordinary human (ovine?) citzenry, is totally screwed. Some know it. Some don't. But all will soon enough.
We are living in a dystopian science fiction movie. At least, that is what the powers that be (although they do not control time and space), have designed for planet earth.
Sociopaths are loyal to no one.
It is what i have always said about torturers. If you can torture 'them', you can torture 'us'.
'Mercenaries are notorious turncoats.'
More than that, mercenaries will go anywhere and kill anyone for money. They are, without any doubt, the lowest life form. They cannot be trusted!
I have been studying O's astrology chart and I don't like what I see. I wish I had looked at it before the election, I wish a lot of people had. As far as deception, he is more dangerous than Bush ever thought of being.
We've been studying O himself and don't like what we see, as we can see that he is far more dangerous than Bush. Put away your astrology charts and look at what is.
Don't know about Obama's astrology chart, but for some reason your post brought to mind what someone else on CD wrote a while back about Obama being a manchurian candidate. And even if that seems a stretch, I believe there is more truth than fiction to the fact that all these people in the heights of power are transformed into military and industrial tools.
Who knows what Obama's starting point was in all this - his ending point does not bode well for us. But then, did he really have much of a chance? It appears that if we are looking at Obama as the problem, we are missing the bigger picture.
Interesting response, if I may say so, Professor, to a comment about "O's astrology chart." What exactly is your position on "new age" mysticism anyhow? There's certainly plenty of it around here.
"There is a simple reason why Obama's "compromises" are all giveaways to the corporations, and do little or nothing to help the average working American: Obama is not on our side, and he never was. We were just the means to his election, his highway to power.
We have been witness to one of the biggest political deceptions in our nation's history. The ghastly immorality of this era will weigh heavily on our nation for a long time to come."
But this is nothing new. The corporate elite have essentially owned the political class for a long, long time, possibly since the beginning. Why would anyone expect Obama to be any different?
I was for Obama and supported him and voted for him and said so openly here. I still say so openly, though, the speed of his decent has surprised me, as it has a lot of people. In that way, he fooled a lot of people. It has instructed me plainly that there is no viable solution from within the system, including third parties. They can't win within the belly of the beast. I won't waste my time with them.
What I am most surprised by is the Left/progressive response to the fact that Obama is doing his masters' bidding. He could do nothing other than his masters' bidding or he would be drummed out of office one way or another. Can we not finally get over the fact that democracy, or even a semblance of it, has always been an illusion? Haven't great historians like Zinn taught us this? Obama is nothing new and we shouldn't expect anyone else of the political class to be.
So, what are we going to do about it?
Yes, the ghastly immorality of this era will weigh heavily upon us just as all the previous eras are weighing heavily upon us. This is cumulative shit and it is not only weighing heavily, it is now smothering us.
And once again, I ask: What are we going to do?
What I do is small, but it is what I feel compelled to do. What I am wondering is what other left/progressive types are doing. Pointing at that which is evident is not a solution.
Thanks for the reply, Visiting Professor. And many thanks for answering my question.
Of course, there is no one right answer to the question, "What do we do?". Indeed, there are 300 million answers. We must each do what we can. That includes everything, small to large.
At the end of your post you mentioned a general strike or other mass action in the U.S. I think this would send a message, but find the possibility of this happening remote. The U.S. is not Europe or Greece. Nor are we Argentina.
Speaking of Argentina, I am thinking of the book "Horizontalism." Someone gave me the book which I started reading. I guess I wasn't ready for the message because I donated it to my library. Time to check it out and read the whole thing.
This from a review on Amazon (please don't buy it from Amazon - libraries and local bookstores are horizontal):
"The movements in Argentina have been among the most creative and inspirational in recent years. Marina Sitrin’s collection allows us to learn from the activists themselves and continue the experiments in autonomy and democracy they have begun.”—Michael Hardt, co-author of Empire
“...a fascinating account about what is fresh and new about the Argentine uprising.”—John Holloway, author of Change the World Without Taking Power
"The popular rebellion that began in December 2001 in Argentina with the IMF melt-down and subsequent capital flight sparked a process of creativity that continues to this day. Different from so many social movements of the past, this rebellion rejects political programs, opting instead to create directly democratic spaces on street corners, in factories, and throughout neighborhoods. Many have come to call this new social relationship, “horizontalidad.”
"Horizontalism is an oral history of the exciting transformations taking place since the popular rebellion. It is a story of cooperation, vision, creation and discovery. It is a history told by people in the various autonomous social movements, from the occupied factories, neighborhood assemblies, arts and independent media collectives, to the indigenous communities and unemployed workers movements."
I don't know whether the U.S. is ready for Horizontalism. We are a very atomized and socially incohesive nation. Argentina and the EU and Greece have long-standing social structures that support people and mass movements, the U.S. is quite the opposite.
However, things don't stay the same. The pressures Americans face today will undoubtedly grow worse as time goes by and the people may be forced, by dint of the loss of more liberties and quality of life, to move out of their comfort zones and into the street corners and factories (what's left of them) and neighborhoods.
I am struggling with how to implement Horizontalism in my own community. I am a member of a few local groups (Permaculture, Transition Towns, a time bank, a peace and justice org.) and am struggling how to bring people out of the group mode, with names and organizers and structure, into face-to-face get-togethers to discuss the very notion of Horizontalism. But more than getting together to address the lack of democracy, I really feel that people yearn for a social structure that has humanity and support and justice at its core. It's a struggle for me because first, I am not a natural organizer - I have to work at this stuff, and secondly, the notion of getting out of our very narrow comfort zones is anathema to so many Americans, even those on the Left.
A hopeful thing to note: the peace and justice group that I work with has requested that I facilitate a discussion on the question, "What do we do now?". They are coming to realize that the protests and vigils and events have served a limited purpose and they too are struggling with what to do. This is hopeful because only by questioning the status quo will another way be found. It remains to be seen whether we can set aside our egos for the common good.
Additionally, and maybe most importantly, most Americans are soul-dead. We are lacking a sense of spirituality and self-knowing that has been bred out of us and replaced with materialism in the extreme. We are soul-dead. And what do we do about that? IMO, we come together, face-to-face, to say exactly that. If we can hear each other's stories and see each other's eyes and touch the same feelings we have, then we will have bridged a huge gap that makes so much of what is going on seem so small. Knowing what the system has done to us, putting it in the context of what has happened to us and our friends, will make all the sacrifices that are necessary (and they are necessary) seem worthwhile and doable.
Sorry for the rant. Hopefully I haven't sermonized here. I just hope that when we do decide to act, we will make our actions count. We can't do that if we don't address our own humanity and the truth about what has happened to it. I hope we can, for all our sakes.
Ted
"Thank you for mentioning the book Horizontalism. I had not heard of it, and will look into it and the experiences of the activists in Argentina. By the way, some of the ideas mentioned in your description appear to be similar to an effort I was involved in several years ago called "Do-it-yourself democracy." Essentially, the goals of DIY Democracy are to take control without taking power; to begin creating our own structures of communal and economic interaction that can exist outside of current commercial and social boundaries."
This is exactly where I find myself and what I believe needs to happen. I'd love to hear more of your experience with DIY Democracy and whether it worked or not and the reasons for either.
It's interesting in that I am finding myself at the crossroads of spirituality and materialism. I realize that so much of what I do is connected to how I am in the world. I need to get as honest with myself about how I live right now in order to move out in the world with integrity. Not that I live in perfect harmony, but that I am trying and can relate that struggle with other people. Everyone is struggling with these issues and in the context of all the external issues we know, it matters that we relate these things.
So, my idea sounds very similar to DIY Democracy: To form a community of people who are interested in moving their values out into the world, of creating an informal economy based on barter and loaning (no payments) and trust (knowing that some will break that trust), and of forming "horizontal" ways of doing this - a social way that we do not have in this country. The essential thing is that we create community that models the things in life that we value - our values!
Synchronicity happens, and I'm glad we are having this discussion. Please do let me know about your experience with DIY.
Best,
Ted
Well, this happened to many efforts.
Some here have written that Obama's win may have been the worst thing to have happened since it siphoned off so much energy that had gathered in reaction to Bush and the neocons. Maybe they were right. Then again, maybe seeing Obama and the Democrats for what they are - little difference - has cemented in people consciousness the fact that nobody is going to help the people. The people have to help the people.
Best of luck with your continued efforts, VP.
How the heck did you do that without the original birth certificate and the exact time of birth??!
Heh.
Sorry no offence pleases. I dun believe anything about astrology, gods or whatever. However, I whole heartily agree with you. Obama is far more dangerous than Dubya. Include all the NeoCon includes Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bolton, Wolfowitz, John Ashcroft and Gonzales.
Robert Fisk sniffed that out right after the 'election.'
definitive information about the destardly apparatus can't be leaked soon enough.
O.K I am freaking out. DID WE JUST HAVE A MILITARY COUP D' ETAT?
Petraeus wants"A military organization that reports directly to him??????"
Isn't the Commader in Chief, the President, supposed to be in charge of the military?
Let's face it, private mercenaries fit in with corporate governance. The sun is setting on Democracy.
The following quote attributed to Scottish history professor Alexander Tyler in 1787, seems to portray an accurate reflection of what has occurred during our 200+ years of existence as a democracy.
“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”
The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage
http://thoughtstoliveby.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/lifespan-of-democracy/
"At the 20th century's end, two of freedom's excesses particularly threaten democracy's longevity. The first and greatest physical challenge is generated by tensions from ethnic, isolationalist and other social rivalries. The second, and the most stubborn moral challenge, is corruption."
http://articles.latimes.com/1997-02-17/news/mn-29670_1_freedom-house/2
Baby its approaching Midnight!
Think Global we no longer have a national government we have a Global Corporate oligarchy ruling the USA, much more and attempting the rest of the world.
You got it!
I agree, think Global. But thinking of what is happening globally is not getting you nor I nor anyone else down here any closer to emotional and physical health. What we need to do once we "get it" (and who, at long last, doesn't get it?) is to think and live and be local. And by local, I mean from the inside, out.
We need to realize that things are changing, and fast, and that we have very little control over what those in power can and will do. We need to create tightly knit communities of people (tribes, if you will) and work to strengthen our resilience
We can sit and chronicle and gasp at Empire's march, but if we don't personally do things to strengthen ourselves and our relations, shame on us!
Yes we are very powerful in our personal day to day lives.
Think Global was primarily aimed at people who attempt to analyse the National situation within National structure. Most of the National structure has been superceded and overwhelm by Global Corporate power.
And besides local we have Global Power witness WL.
SD; best one yet and if you can tell me where you found the info about the Native Peoples and the Bible. Tony
Hey shadow dancer what is your opinion on the phrase "backward tribal people",
you know the imperial phrase so many duped " progressives" use.
This same phrase dances with "lawless tribal areas", the dance of death and ignorance.
Tribal people continue to be victimized; however, the biggest source for that victimization has and remains to this day the purveyors of christianity!
savroD commenting from The Fascist States of America!
Do you hold babies born today, of European descent, liable for the sins of their forefathers?
I only voted for Obama because of my disgust at the possibility of McCain/Palin; now it's pretty obvious my vote was wasted on someone who has sold out every bit as much as McCain, or Palin for that matter!
savroD commenting from the Fascist States of America!
Don't you think we all would have been better off today, if McCain and Palin instead of Obama and that whoever crab? You know the Dem. would never have allowed the tax crap, Healthcare or even the wars in Iraq and Afghan to go on forever. Now the Dem. sits silently while the Republican enjoying every minute of it. Too bad you screwed yourself and all of us too!
We can only hope this is a sign the American empire is in decline very much like the late Roman empire. Yet, even those enlisted in the U.S. military are mercenaries. They get paid to kill whoever they are told to kill.
But the private armies may be the ultimate commercialization of criminal corporate imperial wars. Part of "globalization". Private corporate armies supported by our taxes now wage war to further the interests of larger trans-national corporations.
The illegal invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq are corporate energy wars and part of the 21st century Great Game.
It is that growing realization and recognition of the gross misuse and abuse of the state's armed forces that their privatization seeks to address, at least in part.
Frankly, I think that corporate concern is overblown, at least insofar at the U.S. and its docile citizenry are concerned. Some erstwhile allies, on the other hand, do seem to be getting just a bit antsy. In any case, it's just an intermediate stage while fully robotized drones and other automata can be perfected and diversified as required for total suppression of all types of opposing forces.
As for the decline of the "American Empire", I think you may be over-simplifying its true nature. As suggested by another commenter above (glenn ford December 19th, 2010 1:17 pm) it's really a global entity, American in name only. America itself is certainly declining. The empire is a whole other question. Even the nominal affiliation may change as the privatization and globalization continue to progress toward their logical conclusion.
Fantastic statement Shadowdancer.
Terribly true but not without a touch of dark humor.
Thanks.
Ain't capitalism wonderful?
Guys...let's review!
Blackwater committed tax evasion.....well, OK, they didn't.
Blackwater smuggled weapons....well, OK, they didn't.
Blackwater bribed an Iraqi official....well, OK they didn't
Blackwater killed Iraqi civilians....OK, they did that.
Blackwater was unprovoked in the civilian attack.....well, not sure about that but they pulled AK-47 rounds out of their armored vehicles. Surveillance satellite imagery showed shots being fired at their convoy....
We need to get rid of Blackwater....but Obama expands their role and continues hiring them. Leon Panetta says, those boys have "really cleaned up their act."
WE ARE BEING LIED TO! Both sides lie! We bash Bush for using Blackwater, then say nothing when Obama expands their role.
If we don't want ex-US military servicemen assisting in national defense, then STOP DOING IT. BUT QUIT POLITICIZING THE ISSUE AND LYING ABOUT IT.
See the related piece on "Rich Counties get richer and Poor Counties ger poorer".
In it a mayor for a City in the richest County in the USA boasts that high standard of living due in part to all the Federal Agencies and Government Contracters in the area.
Keep in mind the mantra "Governments Cannot create jobs".
Recognize this for what it is. Private Individuals of tremendous wealth are getting FAT off GOvernment Contracts (Read taxpayer dollars) while at the same time that same Government cuts funding to the poorest of Americans in order to help "Balance the budget".
The use of these mercneraies is not only immoral at the level of the ethics of it (granted one can not even call the use of regular US forces against Afgnans, Yemini's and Iraqi's as in any way "Ethical") , it is another means by which the lootacracy impoverishes the nation in favor of a few.
I don't mind if we stop using contractors for defense services....but keep in mind, every plane, ship, satellite, truck and submarine is built by a defense contractor. Like it or not, the things they make keep us safer. Do you really trust the government more than them? I, for one, do not. Let the government do the job and we will get lesser results for one heckuva lot more money. But either way, let's stop complaining about it.....both sides have now demonstrated their utter dependence on the private sector for defense issues.
How can we have peace if our defense establishment makes their money from increasing war?
Please tell me how every plane truck and airplane keeps you safer? The USA spends more then the rest of the world put together on arms . Are you SAFE enough yet?
What a crock.
Safe has nothing to do with it. Maintaining a global empire ain't cheap.
Strangely, it was the cost of the previous one that was at least partly responsible for the rebellion leading to this one. Well, that plus a lot of envy and ambition in certain quarters, and a guy who was pretty ticked off about not getting his King's Commission in the regular army of the day.
Inthemiddle5...
Spoken like a true Neo-Con Democrat. It must suck to be so afraid.
"Like it or not, the things they make keep us safer. "
That is completely false. They just abuse our intelligence and labor for destructive purposes. As for making stuff, where have you been for the last 10 years? It's all being made in China with plenty of slave labor.
"both sides have now demonstrated their utter dependence on the private sector for defense issues.
True but does that mean that we shouldn't try changing that? You got to start somewhere. Ignorance is not the answer.
Does your last name happen to be Prince?
This link clearly reveals why the recent DADT victory is such a double-edge sword.
There were always more military contractors than soldiers since Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003 so nothing new there. All we're seeing here is the indisputable fact that neither greed nor war have died down even when the economy has been in a long term decline. Who wants to bet that the US will be taking to the streets protesting the use of more mercenaries? Don't forget the other jobs themselves that are tied to the MIC.
...and when America is attacked it will be because of this.
Blame the "Pentacorp" culture and the right-wing mind for sowing attacks.
Life could be good if we get back the USA the way it was when the indigenous people ran it, and it was a democracy or collection of democracies. That's where European, well half Euopean in my case, "my dad was black" like that Who song says, got it from or at least the idea of same. We didn't ever learn how to really practice it, but hey we need some help. People of color including indigenous people have saved us many times before. Now is the time to do it again. Please! Can't we get invaded by blue UN helmeted black African tropps under the UN command? Damn! We want to be liberated. We want our freedom!
AD
"Everyone knows Petraeus can't execute his strategy without the private sector."
And everyone knows he can't execute his strategy WITH the private sector either.
"Obama Hiring More Mercenaries Than Bush"
Personally, I think he should hire more bush.
Talk about "unit cohesion" - there is none when your combat unit depends on people who care only about the biggest paycheck with divided loyalties and have no share of experience with your own "unit" - if anyone is really part of a unit anymore.
We started losing "unit cohesion" not with gays, but the first time we contracted out KP ("kitchen police"). I did KP when I was in, and floors and more. It was irritating, small, and not my regular job. It never occurred to me that something so trivial was really part of the base for a unit's set of shared experiences. Had you asked me, I would have been glad if we hired out for that.
Remember the old bit about cooks who could put down the ladle and pick up the rifle. And everybody gets paid alike. This was a unit. Bring back KP - or more precisely, bring back the concept of units which work together on everything. Work together , fight together, depend on each other.
Mercs are not about dependability. Mercs are about warlording and private armies and shoot you in the back or run like hell the minute the pay comes from the other side or the conditions get tougher than they signed on for. The government troops are stuck with staying or desertion charges. The Mercs just go.