EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Austerity Anger Grows in Europe
MADRID – Tens of thousands protested against austerity cuts in Spain and Denmark Tuesday as Germany's powerful unions warned of mass action and Hungary became the latest debt-ridden nation to slash spending.
Civil servants protest during a demonstration to protest the government austerity cuts in Barcelona, Spain, Tuesday, June 8, 2010. Hundreds of Spanish civil servants took part in a one-day strike to protest wage cuts aimed at reducing the country's huge deficit.(AP Photo/Manu Fernandez) Tensions also
mounted between European Union governments over how to reduce spending
with Britain rejecting an EU plan for all national budgets to be seen
by other countries before they are passed.
In Spain garbage was left uncollected and high-speed trains delayed as civil servants went on strike to protest Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero's plan, which includes an average pay cut of five percent this year and a freeze next year.
Unions said three quarters of Spain's 2.6 million public workers heeded the strike call but the government put participation at just 11 percent.
Spain has ordered 65 billion euros (78 billion dollars) of spending cuts in a bid to slash the public deficit to the EU limit of three percent of gross domestic product by 2013 from 11.2 percent last year.
Thousands of people marched through the streets of the Spanish capital on Tuesday evening in one of 60 marches held across the country by civil servants and their supporters.
Ana Garcia Lago, 40, a teacher and mother of three whose husband is unemployed, said she joined the strike because her monthly salary of 1,600 euros will be reduced by around 150 euros this month.
"If I think about it I start to cry. We make it to the end of the month because we had savings which we are eating up," she told AFP at a rally outside the economy ministry in Madrid while others chanted "Zapatero resign!".
Spanish public workers strike against government cuts
Denmark's deficit reduction plans brought some 40,000 people to a rally outside parliament in Copenhagen, Danish police said, where union organisers blasted the government for endangering the country's social benefits.
Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen last month proposed an austerity plan, subject to parliamentary approval, that would cut off jobless benefits after two years, freeze development aid and set a ceiling for family benefits.
In Germany, industry, trade unions and the media criticised Chancellor Angela Merkel over the 86 billion euros of budget cuts she ordered between 2011 and 2014.
"It is not the poor who have lived beyond their means -- it is the rich who have," said the head of the German Federation of Trade Unions, Michael Sommer.
Even big business joined the assault, with German banks and the airline industry slamming a tax on financial transactions from 2012 and a levy on flights.
"These are serious times, these are difficult times. We cannot afford everything we would like if we hope to plan for the future and that is why the budget has been laid out like this for the coming years," Merkel told reporters as she announced the cuts Monday.
Merkel slammed over 'visionless' German austerity drive
In Budapest Prime Minister Viktor Orban stepped into the budget slashing fray, unveiling swingeing public spending cuts amid market concern that Hungary's situation was comparable to that of debt-stricken Greece.
At the same time Orban proposed tax breaks for families and a flat-rate tax of 16 percent for individuals, while imposing a new levy on the finance sector.
"Eighteen months ago, the state came to the aid of banks which then made significant profits in 2009. Now it's the banks' turn to do their bit to help solve the current problems," Orban told parliament.
European finance ministers on Monday agreed a new 525 billion dollar fund for debt hit nations and EU president Herman Van Rompuy said they also agreed a right to oversee national budgets, but Britain rejected any such move.
"The budget will be presented to parliament first," British Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Mark Hoban, insisted in a statement as EU finance ministers held the second day of a meeting in Luxembourg.
France had demanded that Britain fall into line with other EU nations.
However, Fitch Ratings warned Britain that it needs to put its public finances in order much quicker as it faces a "formidable" fiscal challenge.
The new British government of Prime Minister David Cameron announced Monday that Britain's finances were "even worse than we thought" as he warned of "painful" cuts to tackle the record deficit he estimated at 770 billion pounds (1.12 trillion dollars, 930 billion euros).

47 Comments so far
Show AllWealthy interests that caused this problem must pay to the point of bankruptcy before working people should pay a dime. This is class warfare.
Stone...Your 2 sentences say it all!
That would be justice.
Joe
Joe, justice is an illusion, a utopic dream, fantasy. We have a legal system. Big difference, as the system is rigged by those deserving its wrath. The people must take matters into their own hands or it only gets worse. Buck
to quote Camus; "there is no justice, but there are limits."-- from State of Siege...
http://financemymoney.com/student-loan-market-college-loans-for-profit-education-pell-grants-debt-educational-outcomes-bubble-in-higher-education/
Might seem unrelated but it is not.
In the EU the costs of a higher education are subsidized heavily by the Government.
So a very interesting look at the US system. In the US system the Government helps fund higher education via Grants with Private banking institutions providing the Capital. The result of this "for profit" model is private Institutions (Colleges etc) simply HIKING tuition rates so more of those monies flow directly into their pockets.
The Costs of education are rising faster then that of Health Care and drugs.
When it comes to providing education the Private for profit model is grossly inefficient with a great portion of "Government Spending" doing nothing to provide an education but used instead to finance DEBT and ensure profit continues to flow to the banks and Corporate interests.
This is a massive BOONdoggle and what is happening in Greece and Spain is the Bankers and Investor class are trying to replicate what happens in the USA. They want Public systems sold off and privatized so that Corporations can fatten their profits. They engineer these financial crises so as to get their HOOKS into the Public system and thus ensure a steady flow of taxpayer monies into perpetuity.
These forced "Austerity measures" are engineered by the Banking Class the World over so as to ensure the Worker is reliant on them for everything from Health care to shelter, from Higher education to Old age Security , from water and food to services such as police and fire forces , with that one small group of financiers owning EVERYTHING.
This is not freedom and it not liberty. It a cradle to the grave system of debt slavery.
In response to GwNorth: And I'm guessing that the U.S. was a test market for these CTG "products and services". First they sink their hooks into us here, then the net is spread worldwide. I know they've done this with one or two separate prodservs in pockets throughout the world but total CTG "packages" is something that would be unique elsewhere, especially in Europe. It's looking like "free University" is going to go the way of the dino in Europe.
Like here, where everything that matters is being privitazed: the health insurance, credit card, university, soon-to-be charter school system sort of replacing the public system, communications (cell phone, internet, cable), agriculture and on and on and on.
It makes me dizzy just thinking about where we're heading if these people and systems are not stopped.
In the US system, there exists state universities / colleges. You might argue that they aren't subsidised enough, but they are. And even paying full rate, non in state fees, at a public college in the US is quite a bit cheaper than paying full rate at a private college.
GWNorth: So well said!!!!!!!
Economic instability is a result of elite mischief. Economic stability is a result of principled popular demands. Unsurprisingly, the elites try to convince the people through the school curricula and mass media that principles are not practical. Certainly not for the elites...
"Economic instability is a result of elite mischief."
Capitalist crises have little to do with mischief, although mischief can certainly make matters worse. The very structure of the capitalist economic system, wherein capital is created through unpaid labor is the seed of the crises capitalism is constantly plagued with. In the normal operation of capitalism we see periodic economic instability as the system tries to deal with overproduction. The more capitalism matures the more frequent these crises happen. Each economic crisis is never fully resolved and remnants of the problem is carried over to the next crisis. Eventually these crises (recessions) are so in need of "correction" that a more serious crises unfolds (depressions).
The root cause of capitalism's crises during the monopoly stage of capitalism's development is the declining rate of profit. The cause and explanation of this is too much to get into in a msg. here, so you'll need to read K. Marx (Das Kapital) to get an understanding.
Today's present financial crisis is caused by overproduction of commodities. Technological change has made commodity production require fewer workers, leaving the majority of the working class under-employed or unemployed without sufficient incomes to purchase all that the capitalists can produce and wish to sell. The class struggle waged relentlessly over the last 30 years, have left workers earning today less than they earned in the 1970s. This situation has forced the capitalist class to tranfer large amounts of their capital away from the productive economy to the financial economy in an effort to keep their capital growing. As we've witnessed this financial economy is an artifical economy full of schemes and tricks to keep the system running.
Consumption is an important ingredient in the capitalist system. Because workers' real incomes have stagnated and dropped, the capitalist class, rather than raising these incomes has chosen to lend the wages to the working class, in the way of cheap mortgage rates, easy access to credit of all types including credit cards, car loans, etc. High consumer debt is unsustainable as we all know.
The 2007 financial crisis was sparked by mortgage defaults. The next crisis will be sparked by general debt at the nation, state, city and family levels. How capitalism will try and resolve this crises is unknown and quite possibly impossible to resolve. Complicate the situation by adding the environmental crisis and I think we can all agree that the choice before humanity is either to go down in flames and towards barbarism or restructure the whole system to avoid the inherent contradictions of capitalism. This shouts out for a socialist system, that provides the basic necessities of life for all, stops the commodification of everything including the natural world and does away with the class of exploiters that have run the show for the last 400 years - the capitalist class.
What you have just read is a training pamphlet for Americans. You'll have to take many cuts in order to save the elite. The thing I abhor is the old saying that Americans are tough, hardy, individuals. I believe that to be propaganda that is necessary only when calling us to the latest war. I believe that most Americans are as gutless as Obama and you will never ever see them in the streets, as in Europe, trying to stop the elite from taking our money in order to pay for the mistakes of the wealthy. I have come to the point where I have as much disgust and contempt for the cowardice of everyday Americans as I do the pigs who run this country.
While i agree with the general thrust of your post, I am going to suggest that the various financial crises being seen world wide are not MISTAKES of the wealthy.
There certainly might be a layer of investors below the ruling elite who lose money here.
I am going to suggest this all by DESIGN. At the end of the day the already wealthy and powerful will be even more so and they were counting on these "collapses" and "austerity measures" to make it so.
Couldn't agree more that these are not the results of mistakes.
The layer of investors below the elite are as much the problem as the elite. They are the middle dwellers, the wanna be's. In the u.s., they were the ones that readily accepted the bank bailouts because it would have hurt their portfolios if the banks went under as they should have. Capitalist jerks, same as the elite, wanting to profit off of someone else's labor.
The call by ubrew for alignment between workers on all continents is WWI, the wobblies, that Debbs wanted to organize, inspired by Marx.
Capitalism must go. The proof is in the lack of pudding.
Seize the Assets of every other Financial institute and leave the workers alone.
in a time of increasing operational scarcity, win or lose is the game, no rules, no holds barred, to the death. the winners win , and the losers are left to die,...so the end of j. conrad's "heart of darkness"; "the horror-the horror!"
"Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen last month proposed an austerity plan, subject to parliamentary approval, that would cut off jobless benefits after two years, freeze development aid and set a ceiling for family benefits."
Quoted for the benefit of any who are uncertain (or are trying to convince the uncertain or mistaken) as to whether or not Citizens -at least currently- have it better in Denmark than in the U.S.A..
-matti.
This is Globalization. The global wealthy are basically saying that Europeans have to accept a wage scale set in Beijing, or Mumbai. While I don't agree with this, I'm simply pointing out that this is what is happening. The global wealthy MAY, for sentimental reasons, want to invest in European labor, but the numbers say 'invest in Asia'.
The response obviously requires a great deal of finesse. Europeans must act to retain their labor advocacy, but not at the expense of the global competitiveness of their products. And they need to understand that labor advocacy in countries like Thailand and China are NOT remote, foreign, adventures with no applicability to their own lives. Rather, those countries are actually where the wealthy want to set their wage scales. And one way to combat this is to align with workers in these countries so that they don't just accept the slave wages being offered to them.
United we stand, divided we fall. The global investor class (and lets face it, we are all a part of that, in one way or another) wants the labor class divided, the easier to fall to 'lowest common denominator' wages. Labor needs to push back, not just locally in Europe, but internationally, everywhere on Planet Earth.
For labor, what happens in Thailand matters to Europe. And a lot is happening, right now, in Thailand. The investor class is already globalized into Thailand, and responding instantly to the situation there. Why isn't the labor class similarly globalized? I guess what I'm saying is: until labor can successfully globalize, they are always going to be picked apart by the investor class. And we see now that the most reliable way of doing this is to manufacture a crisis in which the only way to address a fiscal crisis is on the backs of labor.
Excellent post, ubrew12. The situation calls for a dispassionate look at reality - which includes the games played by the capitalist masters, the system of capitalism itself, and, as you said, competitiveness. If citizens of a country don't care for competitiveness, but still demand a certain standard of living, they have to examine the feasibility of such a demand - once again, dispassionately. The unfortunate reality is that some countries have gotten used to a certain living standard as a result of past colonial exploits - before other countries had woken up to the machinations of the European powers. Even consuming everyday things that are not grown natively - such as coffee and chocolate - demands that these countries export something in return, at competitive prices. The game is up.
Labor solidarity is important - but it will have to be innovative and in keeping with the times. Perhaps ecological sustainability should be put right at the top of the agenda - and not as an afterthought. But first things first - so, understanding the games of the investor class - that doesn't much care for national interests or boundaries - and coming up with ways to counter them should be the priority.
UBREW12 --- THAT is one of the most elegantly presented explanations anyone can make. Thank you!!
as the Asiatimesonline writer , Henry CK Liu - in voluminous essays repeatedly says:
"There is NO reason or justification that global wages should be in disparities...there is NO justification for a chinese worker doing the same job to be paid less than an american..
where there are global cartels of MONEY capital - what the world needs is a corresponding Global Cartel of LABOR to control money capital...towards a relationship in which it is LABOR which supersedes and is pre-eminent over Money Capital, no the other way around.
Corporations and Money capitalists and chamber of commerce are effectively like their own UNION of a global scale...proper governments need to create for Labor a Global Cartel of Labor".
Quite so - I'm in agreement. But what you are advocating is that well worn cry to action from a century and a half ago "workers of the world, unite".
The cry may be "well-worn", but how effective was it? The masters soon found out that there were a myriad ways to distract, divide and bribe the workers and their leaders. And the labor leaders, for the most part, didn't much care for the environment or sustainability - so it was easy to play them. I know there are exceptions. In the US auto industry, for example, there were voices calling for the development of more fuel-efficient vehicles even as the executives were keen on taking care of their bottom-line by selling the gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks (where the "big three" enjoyed some kind of protection against imports for a long time). But developing fuel-efficient vehicles is still not sustainable enough - mass transit has to take a greater share of the commuting. Who is to do the fighting for *that*? Certain industries will have to go or be scaled down greatly. Obviously it will affect the workers in those industries. But these industries should never have grown to that extent in the first place.
So something has to be different this time, and it calls for everyone to look at the big picture even while fighting for survival.
To me, the problems are a result of the central banks issuing money at interest instead of the governments simply issuing money debt free. Recommending the movie, The Secret of OZ
Wall Street, with the help of compliant governments (suckers), ripped off the US and the EU.
Now Wall Street demands that those same governments dismantle their own social infrastructure in order to pay back the money that it stole from them.
There is no money to pay back and there is no productive economic activity to create that money.
The ponzi scheme is over. The game is done. Next comes collapse.
After that, who hangs, the criminal bankers, the angry victims, or some scapegoat?
In that collapse many of us will drown out of existence while these global opportunists and their working bees get to live in the lap of luxury.
A lot is being said about the decline of the American Empire. But the British Empire while being a thing of the past still sports a considerable wealthy class enjoying all the trimmings of riches. The same with all other countries including the U.S. The wealthy will continue to get richer while a growing faceless majority slides further into poverty. The light has been snuffed out of the American Dream and the social democratic ideal. Unless you are in the corporate food chain in some way (government jobs included as they have adopted the corporate structure and now lead the charge towards privatization) you might very well find yourself marginalized like the German Jews during Nazi Germany, or the Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, or the hunted Mexicans in Arizona to name just a small sampling of history's battered and demoralized classes.
"It is not the poor who have lived beyond their means -- it is the rich who have," said the head of the German Federation of Trade Unions, Michael Sommer.
============
THAT -- we all should know -- is the gist of the entire global Monetizing everything under the sun scheme that we all know as Capitalism.
its main and essential PROMOTERS and participants are the "chambers of commerce" of the world, as well as the "stakeholders" . regardless of the moral or ethical personal merits of the members of THESE "classes" - the essential EFFECT is what matters:
that it is the "moneyed class" that ultimately IS responsible for the "maintainance" of the System which RESTS ON the backs of ordinary people...and when that system runs into trouble - it is the ordinary people who have to pick up the bill to "preserve" the viability of the VERY SAME SYSTEM that causes the disasters.
unfortunate -- but this is what the world has become.
This is great news, and things are moving fast and according to the script put in place by a group of very profound human thinkers who decided to bring the current world order that has existed on Earth for the last many thousands of years to its knees. The problems in the world today are beyond the ken of the run of the mill politicians and their supporting wealthy and religious oligarchies who have held human reasoning and creativity in shackles. Europe, the birthplace of the Enlightenment, true non-superstitious science and the French Revolution will again show the world the way by a European Revolution. I posted the next few remarks elsewhere in response to metal's comment, but they are relevant here too.
The speed and manner in which events are unfolding in the ME, an attack on Iran is going to occur much sooner than 2012 after Obama is defeated by a right-wing surge, draft or no draft. Having any hopes of a peaceful resolution of conflicts in the ME any time soon is not facing reality. It is a mistake to think that the conflicts are rational and are about oil or an Israeli grab for territory - - errors in thinking too many people are making on CD inorder to believe that there are raesoning and intelligent people in charge of most of the great nations in the world. To rationalize something they are too scared to face, namely that the main parties running the show now all over the world are irrational is also a form of irrational head in the sand action.
It is time to realize that most humans are irrational, superstitious and religiously crazy, including most of the so-called "leaders" in the world today. If the leaders and their populations had any sustained power for reasoned thinking ability,the world would not be in the pickle it is - - a looming climate disaster, a looming nuclear war and a completely, economically stupid concentration of wealth in the hands of a few oligarchs propped up by armies of sycophantic religious leaders and corrupt politicians.
The world needs statesmen and women with huge amounts of reasoning power and knowledge about the natural world a la science, wisdom and the ability to break the shackles of false beliefs, superstitions about non-existent divine beings who will materialize from thin air and solve everything, and belief in the voodoo economics of concentrating wealth in a few hands and then expecting the flowering of the human mind to solve problems through creativity, reasoning and science.
But there is a small, as yet seen by only a handful of humans (include Chomsky in this group) RAY OF HOPE. That ray of hope is that the leaders of reason and humanity have played this game over a century or more to scare the living daylights out of ordinary people and make them dump the above described caste of characters and start solving problems by reason, and not religion or ideology.
Time is short for them to make their climax moves in this game.
I see everyone is 'gassing' it up on the internet.
Too scared to take to the streets like the Europeans seems to me.
The 'sheepie' label sure fits.
Be encouraged that there are limits to EVERYTHING. There will be breaking point if the rich keep impoverishing the middle and working classes; it's like trying to cap a well where the pressure continually grows. No matter how strong the lid, there is a point where it will blow off. God help the elites then. Like this gushing oil well in the gulf, they won't be able to contain it. At first, the oppressed peoples will try to narcotize themselves, but this will eventually fail. Once they feel they have more to gain than lose, watch out!
Eat the rich, before they eat you!
Have you seen the election results?
Looks like the incumbents and corporate scum are getting voted in, again.
I knew this would happen. The elections are rigged. You can't change the systematic control that the ruling elite have within the system.
Globalisation equals globalised fucking for everyone but the wealthy.
from n. chomsky: ...Wall Streeters exhibited what Chomsky describes as a Western elite imperial mentality, dating back to 1491 (his first chapter is entitled “Year 514: Globalization for Whom?”). Only this time instead of impoverishing Haitians or Chileans, it was Americans who were afflicted by a “system” of “fuck the poor” (in the words of successful Wall Street trader Steve Eisman). [See Branfman’s review of “The Big Short” in Truthdig.]
The many Americans whose lives have been damaged by financiers’ single-minded focus on short-term profits at the expense of everyone else are only a harbinger of what is to come. Financial elites remain in charge, as evidenced by recent “financial reform” legislation that does not even reinstate the Glass-Steagall law separating investment and commercial banking. New York magazine has described how Obama officials blocked even inadequate reforms, let alone the stronger proposals from Nouriel Roubini, one of the few major economists to foresee the economic crash. Former International Monetary Fund chief economist Simon Johnson tells us “our banking structure remains—and the incentive and belief system that lies behind reckless risk-taking has only become more dangerous,” thus setting the stage for an even worse crash than that of 2008. And, as U.S. competitiveness continues to decline and it cannot afford its endless wars without drastically cutting social spending, countless more Americans will find themselves paying the price for U.S. elites’ imperial mentality.
This mentality described by Chomsky includes the following elements: (1) a single-minded focus on maximizing short-term elite economic and military interests; (2) a refusal to let other societies follow their own paths if perceived to conflict with these interests; (3) continual and massive violations of international law; (4) indifference to human life, particularly in the Third World; (5) massive violation of the U.S. Constitution, especially through the executive branch’s seizure of the power to wage unilateral and unaccountable war in every corner of the globe; (6) indifference to U.S. and international public opinion, which is often more progressive and humane than that of the elites; (7) a remarkable ability to “manufacture consent,” aided by the mass media and intellectuals, that has blinded most Americans to the truth of what their leaders actually do in their names.
To pick but one example of the dozens Chomsky provides: U.S. elite opinion unanimously celebrated the 1990 Nicaraguan election defeating the Sandinistas as a “victory for fair play,” to quote a March 10 New York Times Op-Ed article. But Chomsky reminds us of Time Magazine’s March 12 report on just what this “fair play” meant:
In Nicaragua, Washington stumbled on an arm’s-length policy: wreck the economy and prosecute a long and deadly proxy war until the exhausted natives overthrow the unwanted government themselves. The past ten years have savaged the country’s civilians, not its comandantes. The impoverishment of the people of Nicaragua was a harrowing way to give the National Opposition Union (U.N.O.) a winning issue.
Wrecking a Third World country’s economy and savaging its civilians are such standard U.S. elite behavior that it is barely noticed, let alone criticized in the mass media or halls of Congress. Perhaps the most dramatic example of America’s imperial mentality, however, is the answer to the following question: Which nation’s leaders since 1945 have murdered, maimed, made homeless, tortured, assassinated and impoverished the largest number of civilians who were not its own citizens?...
CHINA
A lot of populist protesting and forcing the government to pay attention to what they plan on cutting is something the US could learn from Spain. Spain must be having a lot of self confidence and team confidence unlike the States. It is a shame that the only protests that get portrayed are Tea Party or anti-abortion ones and they are all for protecting the status quo. The US government in the meantime is confident that nobody will protest them for answering to the corporate elites and not the people.
Socialism works pretty good till you run out of other people's money
Socialism doesn't rely on robbing other people's money. The culprit is capitalism which rewards the "robbing Peter to pay Paul" ideology and putting profits first over true value.
What other people are you referring to? Obviously you have no idea about socialism is. Do you get your knowledge from the Tea Baggers Bible?
GREECE
What you fail to understand is that the capitalist's capital (profits) are derived by appropriating the the value of unpaid labor provided by the working class. It is the capitalist class that is getting rich by receiving the surplus value that the working class produces. It is the source of all their real capital. "Greece" means absolutely nothing. Greece is a country in Southern Europe. It's economic "problems" are the result of capitalist exploitation as are all other economic crises that arise within the capitalist system. Period.
Of course Tea Baggers know squat about economics or political economy and hence resort to such profound explanations as "GREECE". Geez!
The Greeks might not appreciate your belittlement.
Another sound bite from someone taken in by the capitalist ideology. No depth of investigation needed. I know, you're going to point at the Soviet Union. That's the ideology that Americans have been fed from the 1950s. It's pretty ingrained.
Take a socialist revolution that experienced:
1. foreign intervention in its earliest days
2. not an advanced capitalist system, but chiefly a peasant rural society
3. a civil war lead by White Russians against the new socialist state
3. an invasion by the fascists that killed 20 million of its population, destroyed some of its major cities, pounded into dust
4. a Cold War that threated nuclear attack and the formation of a capitalist military force with the one goal in mind to destroy this socialist country (NATO)
5. an arms race initiated by the West to bleed the Soviet economy in an effort to keep up
6. a socialist country that helped major Third World countries to shake off the colonial system, at great cost to the Soviet economy.
Capitalism proved the stronger in that battle, along with some very serious mistakes made by the Soviet leadership. So socialism failed there ultimately, although the odds of it surviving as long as it did, was a surprise to most.
What it did accomplish in its 60 year span:
1. full employment - no unemployment (costly to the system)
2. free health care for all
3. free education for all
4. housing for all and subsidized food
5. technological advances in things like space
6. livable pensions for all retirees
7. good support for Third World countries fighting their way out from under colonialism
8. forced Western countries to implement social programs such as medicare, pensions, unemployment insurance, housing subsidies for the poor, etc.
9. provided a road map and more experience for the international working class as to how to get to socialism and avoid the mistakes made by the Soviet Union.
10. prevented imperialist wars which were a common part of European capitalism
Now that is a little deeper analysis than your sound bite.
what a way of life they had, Socialism is a miserable failure everywhere it's tried
actually -- you are wrong -- it is CAPITALISM that STEALS "other people's money" -- in the form of Cheapening LABOR against "money capital"...it is capitalism that gathers unto a FEW PRIVATE HANDS - at the top of any organization and entity and community comprising an economy that consists of WORKERS who COLLECTIVELY produce wealth - and then in "gathering PUBLICLY , COMMONLY" produced wealth (whether in production or consumption cycles and any other way) to a FEW PRIVATE HANDS
effectively is a GRAND THEFT and LARCENIOUS system.
it is capitalism that is the ROBBER of "other people's money" in reality.
that's how it is set up.
a very good example of how capitalism in action does this is:
taking the now notorious "housing bubble" in prices...due to "added value" .
it comes from a basic fact that capitalism enriches - say - ONE person at the expense of MANY laborers that produce the wealth that that single person can gather...enabling THAT person to built a big , beautiful House...compared to the others...and enables that person to choose a particular "more desirable location"..."safely away from the masses"....
THAT"s "added value"...
now -- take THAT as an example - and society createst people - even laborers , workers - who are taught that to be "worthy" they must "succeed" by "working harder" - to enable themselves to EMULATE THAT single person's ability to have a big, beautiful house in a more "upscale" neighborhood....and themselves wishing to have more "added value"......
and so on and on and on -- and the "competition for prices" begins and expands.
but note -- THAT first "added value" possession - the house that is better than the others' houses - was built by acquiring wealth by a single person on the SHOULDERS OF MANY workers who produced the wealth that That single person now "owns" which capitalism - ignoring the fact of the WORKERS having created the wealth collectively to begin with...teaches that
ONLY BY THE "hard work" of THAT single person did that single person gather that much wealth ....that it has NO penalties to be paid to the workers who collectively created that wealth to begin with .
CAPITALISM is a system that TRANSFERS COMMON WEALTH to a few private hands.
that's a definition of THEFT, u know. ROBBING MANY PEOPLE of the value of their lives, work and potentials, labor, time, strength....
so a FEW PRIVATE HANDS can live like kings and THEN tell OTHERS "if you want to live LIKE ME -- work harder" ...
and then STEALS some more of people's individual and common wealth in their labor, time and resources.
furthermore -- governments are created by societies to have a certain "order" and cohesion.
CAPITALISM - ironically though its adherents intone about "non-government interference in free trade" (which is a code word for Free-for-all THEFT of commonly produced wealth and natural wealth that no PRIVATE entity REALLY owns and THEREFORE is , under any stretch of human civilized thought - can ONLY be considered "public" owned) -
yet DEPENDS on GOVERNMENT to give capitalism its "legitimacy" .
it DEPENDS on government to MAKE PEOPLE BELIEVE and OBEY the laws of Capitalism which are the "laws" of THEFT!
Socialism takes my money and spends it so much better than I ever could=theft
And capitalism doesn't? You garbage capitalists hate socialism and yet depend on it.