SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard listens during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on April 10, 2025.
(Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Gabbard Dispute Shows Trump Willing to Ignore Intelligence for War With Iran
Trump said he "didn't care" that his own intelligence officials, including DNI Tulsi Gabbard, contradicted his claims about Iran's nuclear capabilities. Critics decry it as willful ignorance to justify another colossal war.
Jun 18, 2025
A growing public fallout between President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has exposed what anti-war critics are denouncing as glaring efforts to push aside inconvenient intelligence as Israel attempts to force U.S. military involvement in an all-out regional war with Iran.
Aboard Air Force One Tuesday, with American jets scrambling to the Middle East, Trump casually brushed aside assessments from his own intelligence community that Iran was not on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon.
In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that U.S. spies had determined Iran is not building a nuclear weapon:
The [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.
When asked about this assessment, Trump, who famously "doesn't read" his daily intelligence briefings, insisted that he knew more than Gabbard.
"I don't care what she said," Trump told reporters on Tuesday. "I think they were very close to having" a nuclear weapon.
Gabbard, a former supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) who rose to prominence as a critic of America's "forever wars," has been one of a shrinking number of Trump administration members willing to raise alarms about the risks of escalating conflict with Iran.
As the administration has begun to chart a course for that conflict, she has become increasingly marginalized from critical decisions. Fox News reports that Gabbard was excluded from a June 8 meeting at Camp David in which Trump "convened senior national security officials to discuss the Middle East."
That revelation shed light on a cryptic video Gabbard released two days later in which she warned that the world is "closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before" and that the "political elite and warmongers are carelessly fermenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers."
According to Politico, Trump was "incensed" by the video, "complaining to associates at the White House that she had spoken out of turn." It also may have spurred conversations about eliminating Gabbard's office entirely, placing it under the purview of the CIA or another agency.
Gabbard's testimony has been bolstered by CNN's Tuesday reporting, which quoted four officials familiar with intelligence assessments of Iran:
Not only was Iran not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, it was also up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver one to a target of its choosing.
Despite this, Gabbard has begun to fall back in with the Trump party line. After Tuesday's tongue-lashing from the president, she falsely asserted that "President Trump was saying the same thing that I said in my annual threat assessment back in March."
Anti-war critics have described Trump and his pro-war allies' fanciful claims that Iran is on the verge of obtaining a nuke as a form of willful ignorance.
"Disregarding the director of national intelligence seems like an odd thing to do unless you really want to go to war," wrote Branko Marcetic in Responsible Statecraft.
Progressive Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), an outspoken critic of American foreign policy, described the administration's lies as eerily similar to those that formed the pretext to the Iraq War, a comparison made starker by the president's threats Tuesday night to "take out" Khamenei.
"We were lied to about 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq that killed millions," Tlaib tweeted.
She urged Congress to invoke the War Powers Resolution to limit the president's capability to deploy troops without congressional authorization.
Trump, meanwhile, continues to hint at direct American involvement. When asked on Wednesday whether he'd launch strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, he played coy with reporters.
"I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do," he said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A growing public fallout between President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has exposed what anti-war critics are denouncing as glaring efforts to push aside inconvenient intelligence as Israel attempts to force U.S. military involvement in an all-out regional war with Iran.
Aboard Air Force One Tuesday, with American jets scrambling to the Middle East, Trump casually brushed aside assessments from his own intelligence community that Iran was not on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon.
In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that U.S. spies had determined Iran is not building a nuclear weapon:
The [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.
When asked about this assessment, Trump, who famously "doesn't read" his daily intelligence briefings, insisted that he knew more than Gabbard.
"I don't care what she said," Trump told reporters on Tuesday. "I think they were very close to having" a nuclear weapon.
Gabbard, a former supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) who rose to prominence as a critic of America's "forever wars," has been one of a shrinking number of Trump administration members willing to raise alarms about the risks of escalating conflict with Iran.
As the administration has begun to chart a course for that conflict, she has become increasingly marginalized from critical decisions. Fox News reports that Gabbard was excluded from a June 8 meeting at Camp David in which Trump "convened senior national security officials to discuss the Middle East."
That revelation shed light on a cryptic video Gabbard released two days later in which she warned that the world is "closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before" and that the "political elite and warmongers are carelessly fermenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers."
According to Politico, Trump was "incensed" by the video, "complaining to associates at the White House that she had spoken out of turn." It also may have spurred conversations about eliminating Gabbard's office entirely, placing it under the purview of the CIA or another agency.
Gabbard's testimony has been bolstered by CNN's Tuesday reporting, which quoted four officials familiar with intelligence assessments of Iran:
Not only was Iran not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, it was also up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver one to a target of its choosing.
Despite this, Gabbard has begun to fall back in with the Trump party line. After Tuesday's tongue-lashing from the president, she falsely asserted that "President Trump was saying the same thing that I said in my annual threat assessment back in March."
Anti-war critics have described Trump and his pro-war allies' fanciful claims that Iran is on the verge of obtaining a nuke as a form of willful ignorance.
"Disregarding the director of national intelligence seems like an odd thing to do unless you really want to go to war," wrote Branko Marcetic in Responsible Statecraft.
Progressive Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), an outspoken critic of American foreign policy, described the administration's lies as eerily similar to those that formed the pretext to the Iraq War, a comparison made starker by the president's threats Tuesday night to "take out" Khamenei.
"We were lied to about 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq that killed millions," Tlaib tweeted.
She urged Congress to invoke the War Powers Resolution to limit the president's capability to deploy troops without congressional authorization.
Trump, meanwhile, continues to hint at direct American involvement. When asked on Wednesday whether he'd launch strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, he played coy with reporters.
"I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do," he said.
From Your Site Articles
A growing public fallout between President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has exposed what anti-war critics are denouncing as glaring efforts to push aside inconvenient intelligence as Israel attempts to force U.S. military involvement in an all-out regional war with Iran.
Aboard Air Force One Tuesday, with American jets scrambling to the Middle East, Trump casually brushed aside assessments from his own intelligence community that Iran was not on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon.
In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that U.S. spies had determined Iran is not building a nuclear weapon:
The [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.
When asked about this assessment, Trump, who famously "doesn't read" his daily intelligence briefings, insisted that he knew more than Gabbard.
"I don't care what she said," Trump told reporters on Tuesday. "I think they were very close to having" a nuclear weapon.
Gabbard, a former supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) who rose to prominence as a critic of America's "forever wars," has been one of a shrinking number of Trump administration members willing to raise alarms about the risks of escalating conflict with Iran.
As the administration has begun to chart a course for that conflict, she has become increasingly marginalized from critical decisions. Fox News reports that Gabbard was excluded from a June 8 meeting at Camp David in which Trump "convened senior national security officials to discuss the Middle East."
That revelation shed light on a cryptic video Gabbard released two days later in which she warned that the world is "closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before" and that the "political elite and warmongers are carelessly fermenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers."
According to Politico, Trump was "incensed" by the video, "complaining to associates at the White House that she had spoken out of turn." It also may have spurred conversations about eliminating Gabbard's office entirely, placing it under the purview of the CIA or another agency.
Gabbard's testimony has been bolstered by CNN's Tuesday reporting, which quoted four officials familiar with intelligence assessments of Iran:
Not only was Iran not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, it was also up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver one to a target of its choosing.
Despite this, Gabbard has begun to fall back in with the Trump party line. After Tuesday's tongue-lashing from the president, she falsely asserted that "President Trump was saying the same thing that I said in my annual threat assessment back in March."
Anti-war critics have described Trump and his pro-war allies' fanciful claims that Iran is on the verge of obtaining a nuke as a form of willful ignorance.
"Disregarding the director of national intelligence seems like an odd thing to do unless you really want to go to war," wrote Branko Marcetic in Responsible Statecraft.
Progressive Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), an outspoken critic of American foreign policy, described the administration's lies as eerily similar to those that formed the pretext to the Iraq War, a comparison made starker by the president's threats Tuesday night to "take out" Khamenei.
"We were lied to about 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq that killed millions," Tlaib tweeted.
She urged Congress to invoke the War Powers Resolution to limit the president's capability to deploy troops without congressional authorization.
Trump, meanwhile, continues to hint at direct American involvement. When asked on Wednesday whether he'd launch strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, he played coy with reporters.
"I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do," he said.
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.