Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
French Left Pioneers a Radical New Tactic: The Picnic Protest
Activists take food off the shelves and invite shoppers to dine with them to highlight the plight of 'Generation Y'
In exactly a week's time, in a supermarket somewhere in or around Paris, a couple of dozen young French activists are going to choose an aisle, unfold tables, put on some music and, taking what they want from the shelves, start a little picnic. The group "L'Appel et la Pioche" (The call and the pick axe) will have struck again - fruit and veg, dairy or the fish counter will have been transformed into a flash protest against global capitalism, rampant consumerism, bank bail-outs, poor housing, expensive food, profit margins and pretty much everything else that is wrong in the world.
Workers enjoy a picnic among shoppers using food taken from the aisles a giant super market in Bagnolet, near Paris, during a protest action October 25, 2008. Several dozen people from a French group, "L'Appel et la Pioche" (a play on words - Shovel and Pick) entered a supermarket, selected food items without paying, and ate a picnic amongst shoppers to protest global capitalism, rampant consumerism, bank bail-outs, poor housing, expensive food, profit margins and pretty much everything else that is wrong in the world. (Reuters Photo) The "supermarket picnic" will go on for as long as it can - before the security guards throw the activists out or the police arrive. Shoppers will be invited to join in, either bringing what they want from the shelves or just taking something lifted lightly from among the crisps, sweets or quality fruit already on the tables.
"L'Appel et la Pioche" have struck four times so far and have no intention of stopping what they claim is a highly effective new way of protesting.
"Everyone is bored of demonstrations. And handing out tracts at 6am at a market is neither effective nor fun," said Leïla Chaïbi, 26, the leader of the group. "This is fun, festive, non-threatening and attracts the media. It's the perfect way of getting our message across."
Linked to a new left-wing political party committed to a renewal of politics and activism, Chaïbi's group represents more than just a radical fringe and has been gaining nationwide attention.
A veteran of fights to get pay and better conditions for young people doing work experience, Chaïbi claims to represent millions of young Frenchmen and women who feel betrayed by the system.
"We played the game and worked hard and got a good education because we were told we would get a flat and a job at the end of it. But it wasn't true," said Victor, 34, another member of the group. "We have huge difficulty getting a proper job and a decent apartment."
Chaïbi, who works on short-term contracts in public relations and is currently looking for work, told the Observer that the group's aspirations were limited. "I am not asking for thousands and thousands of euros a month as a salary or a vast five-room apartment. Just something decent."
In recent years, the problems of France's "Generation Y" or "babylosers" have made headlines. As with many other European societies, after decades of growth, this is the first set of young people for centuries who are likely to have standards of living lower than their parents. According to recent research, in 1973, only 6% of recent university leavers were unemployed, currently the rate is 25-30%; salaries have stagnated for 20 years while property prices have doubled or trebled; in 1970, salaries for 50-year-olds were only 15% higher than those for workers aged 30, the gap now is 40%. The young are also likely to be hard hit by the economic crisis.
New ways of working mean new ways of demonstrating, too. "We are already on precarious short-term contracts, so there's no point in going on strike," said Chaïbi. "But a supermarket is very public and we make sure the media are there to cover our actions."
So far reactions have been good, the group claims. In one supermarket in a suburb of Paris, the activists say they got a spontaneous round of applause from the checkout workers. Elsewhere, security guards have been "friendly". Everywhere in France, the problem of a weakening "pouvoir d'achat" - the buying power of static wages - is a cause for resentment.
The economic crisis is further fueling anger. Though not yet as badly hit as the UK, thanks to tighter regulation and much lower levels of personal borrowing, French businesses have still been laying off staff amid predictions of a massive rise in unemployment this year. Unions have been largely passive in the face of threatened redundancies, accepting go-slows to preserve jobs.
With the French Socialist party in disarray, alternative forms of political protest on the left, particularly a breakaway communist faction led by charismatic postman Olivier Besancenot, have made inroads. Protests about the homeless or against the expulsion of immigrants have largely taken place independently of the Socialist party, which is mired in feuds and ideological incoherence.
One new group is the Jeudi Noir, which organizes heavily publicized squats of vacant buildings in Paris. Named Black Thursday after the day classified advertisements for flats appear, activists recently took over a clinic that has lain empty at the heart of the Left Bank for nearly five years.
"This is not just about finding myself somewhere to live," said Julien Bayou, 28, who is now living in one of the former clinic's offices. "We are making a political point. We just think it is wrong that a building in perfect condition should be empty for years when so many people need somewhere to live."
Chaïbi sat in the kitchen of the former clinic. "It's not just about the supermarkets," she said. "It's about fighting the system."

24 Comments so far
Show AllThe same thing is happening here for Gen X and Y when it comes to salaries and the high cost of mortgages, food, rent, student loans etc. Why should the baby boomers be the only ones that live well??????????
Back when the system was set up for the baby boomers, no one anticipated all the Reaganomics that would start in the 1980s and lead up to this unfair attitude. The baby boomers and the Gen X and Gen Y folks need to come together and work out some compromises if they are to avoid lopsided treatments and possible economic civil wars among generations.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Correct Terrance it is the 0.5% siphoning off all the money from the economy that robs the young worker and babyboomers.
It interesting how in Militarist America, the French are always labled as cowards and surrender monkeys.
Brave Americans would NEVER have surrendered to easily to Hitlers war machine!!
Yet, when a Citizen of France feels the Government is taking away their rights and liberties, they take to the streets in droves and FORCE the Government to back down.
The difference between US and France is that US have never been invaded or attacked by military forces. France has been in countless and almost constant wars for centuries. They have, like the other nations in Europe reached a higher level of understanding. That wars never decide who is right, only who is left. -And when the gunsmoke settles, nothing is changed- 'cept a lot of ruins and dead corpses.
The american way of thinking is more primitive
Imagine this type of a protest in a U.S. supermarket. I suspect it would only be minutes before security & the police were called in to haul off all of the protesters in a paddywagon. In France, this article says reactions have been good and security guards friendly.
Here is an article from 2007, entitled "Making less than dad did": http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/25/pf/mobility_study/index.htm. It describes a U.S. study showing the same phenomenon described here regarding Generation X & Y in France earning less than their fathers:
"Relying on (U.S.) Census Bureau figures, the study's authors found that after adjusting for inflation, men in their 30s in 2004 had a median income of about $35,000 per year, for a 12 percent drop compared with $40,000 per year for men in the same age group in 1974."
Not only would the demonsrators be quickly hauled off (a few getting tazed in the process), but such supermarket-disobiedience actions would then be renounced as "violent" by many comfortable middle-aged baby boomer peace activists. Such activists seem to have taken to a rather capitulationist view of "nonviolence" which defines ANY lawbreaking - even just trespassing or marching in the streets without a permit, as "violence".
They seriously need to re-read their Thoreau, Gandhi and King.
Full disclosure: I am 52 years of age.
---USAn---
The superstitious reverence given to the police shows that we are a police state. I think of the 'activist' who recently confessed to being a police stooge crowing that he acted out of 'conscience', rather like Elia Kazan offering up "On the Waterfront" as an apologia.
They also need to read Ward Churchill.
Excellent point. Another case of this "nonviolence" in service of power was the reaction of the organizers in Oakland when the protest for justice for Oscar Grant turned angry and the angry youth took their anger out on (mostly corporate) storefronts and police cars. Oakland then finally took the unprecedented step of arresting cop who killed Grant after two such actions. So, it certainly can be argued that only such an escalaton led to justice.
But what did the the head organizer say about it? He tearfully claimed that "his hard work had been destroyed by a group of anarchists." (there were many others there besides anarchists)
The demonstration the next day actually had vest-wearing "peace-cops" headed by a private security cop hired by the activist organizers, the primary job of the peace cops were to keep the marchers from even leaving the sidewalks. I guess imposing any inconvienience to drivers of cars is "violence" too.
go here: http://www.counterpunch.com/maher01162009.html
---USAn---
All those who believe it's primarily about the police need to read my post, above.
Why can no poster summarize the views of Ward Churchill? Reminds me of hemp claims: lots of links, no posted arguments.
Our society very easily chooses the strategy and tactics of war and police violence and more, especially overseas, but also a lot throughout our history. It's good to discuss all of this, and bring it out to get at our collective complicity. There are a lot of dilemmas in all of this.
Our failures to have enough impact are very frustrating and this frustration affects our reasoning. Sometimes we want quick ways out of the dilemmas.
While there is benefit in these debates, (especially in getting ordinary citizens to think this stuff through,) my view is that there are powerful methods that haven't been seriously tried by the movement, methods that avoid the dilemmas related to pushing civil disobedience farther and farther to try to have an impact. Focusing on effective methods is much more important. The movement is really very ineffective in many places. This need not be so, as I've discussed in my other post above.
Previous comments remind us of what a repressive state we still live in.
This picnic idea sounds like a good idea to me. I am tired of standing out in the street with my cardboard sign. This does absolutely nothing to change anything. Nor does marching on a non business day down a route approved by the police. We need to get in their face and upset our ordinary mindless life style. Americans must do something to overcome our apathy. We are so powerless in our belief in HOPE!. Home is just a feel good dose of pablum. Want change? You have to DO SOMETHING!
Maybe a picnic in the market is a good first way to take a step out of our obedient service to the top 2% who run this nation.
If you think you did something by voting, think again. Your choice was between only two corporate candidates put up and funded by that top 2%. It will be years before we get to vote again on the national level. What you have to do now is get in the face of your (so called) Congressional Representative. You know they really represent the folks (the 2% again) who funded their campaigns. But now they need to hear from their constituents. We can't afford to buy them like the 2%ers did---but you don't need to vote for someone who does not vote in Congress on your advice. If you are against the bankster bailout, want bush and cheney put on trial for crimes against humanity, want our tax funds to take care of our people here at home instead of bombing people all over the world, you must not vote for the person who votes in your name but against your advice. Tell your congress representative how you want them to vote and then keep track of how often they vote as directed by their constituents as opposed to how often they vote to please their contributors.
The election is over and NOW YOUR WORK BEGINS!! Democracy means you have to participate!! with out the participation of the people, it is not democracy, it is oligarchy.
In France where eating has been elevated to an art form (just try seriously dining with the French in less than a couple of hours) this is a wonderfully french response which does not easily translate into the American culture. C'est manifique
Poet
I like the idea of the French picnic protest, amidst the frustrations of fighting on the issues. It gets some publicity for a while. "This is fun, festive, non-threatening and attracts the media."
But...
I don't see it as "Pioneer[ing] a Radical New Tactic." It's really a variation on an old, ineffective tactic. It is clearly not "the perfect way of getting our message across." More on how to correct our vast sea of incompetence below. Neither the French nor the Americans know much about how to win.
But the article is good on bringing up this issue of how what most activists do doesn't work. "'Everyone is bored of demonstrations. And handing out tracts at 6am at a market is neither effective nor fun.'"
We see that throughout the comments as well. "I am tired of standing out in the street with my cardboard sign. This does absolutely nothing to change anything. Nor does marching on a non business day down a route approved by the police."
These comments about ineffectiveness are good ones, accurate, the first step of "saying no" against ineffective methods.
And against ineffective leadership. Don't expect your local progressive leaders to easily switch away from ineffective methods. It'll take new activists becoming the leaders and forming their own groups with better methods.
Ok, specifics. First, in criticism, who's decision is the picnic intended to influence. People shopping. "People at a market at 6Am has already been criticized.
Second, What is the demand? Even if you did find a correct "who," is their any semblance of a correct, specific, "what?" I surely don't see one.
Here's my "checklist for organizers" (more at my zspace page, http://www dot zcommunications dot org/zspace/bradwilson:
1. Are we targeting someone who actually makes the decision? Who is the person with the power to decide? ...
2. Are we prepared to force them to communicate with us? ...
3. Are we actually asking the person to do something specific? ...
4. Is it a winnable step? It doesn’t have to have a greater than 50% chance of being won, just a reasonable chance, suggests Roger Fisher in his books. ...
5. Have we thoroughly prepared for this? .... Fisher’s book, Getting Ready to Negotiate: The Getting To Yes Workbook has a full packet of additional worksheets, including one right up front for assessing where you should start. ...
6. Do we know what to do after they “say no?” I find that the approach of wanting to be heard is sometimes followed by quitting after they say no. ...
7. Are we monitoring and documenting their responses and using them as teaching tools? ...
8. Are we running our own meetings with them? ...
9. Are we giving our members the chance to “be there” during negotiations? ...
10. Are we using methods that have been proven, that can win victory steps? ...
Ok, for further reading: Roger Fisher, Beyond Machiavelli, but as a group method, with Shel Trapp, Dynamics of Organizing. And Basics of Organizing. Both online. Hey, 2 out of 6 chapters are on the "who" question! Hey, there are people who could go out tomorrow and make all kinds of correct decisions, because they have the power and the authority. But no, they're not likely at the market. Statistically, ... well, your financial investments, your life savings, ... are you mainly investing in the lottery, you know, for a retirement nest egg. Yes, I'm talking about statistical return on effort in action.
Ok, some Fisher online, from an earlier version of this material: MAP diagram on page 48 of Roger Fisher's book, International Conflict for Beginners. The chapter with the MAP can be found as pdf here:
http://www dot pon dot harvard dot edu/hnp/writing/books/international3 dot pdf
There are more eye helpers at:
http://www dot pon dot harvard dot edu/hnp/theory/tools/tools dot shtml
(International Conflict for Beginners was it Basic Negotiating Strategy in Europe, in England? There are translations.) See also the textbook version, Coping with International Conflict. Then add his other books.
More online:
Trapp: http://www dot tenant.net/Organize/orgdyn.html
http://www dot tenant.net/Organize/orgbas.html
Trapp is retired: NTIC: organizer training: http://www dot ntic-us.org/index.php? (continued below) option=com_content&task=view&id=154&Itemid=37
WORC training: http://www dot worc.org/development/pocotraining.html
WORC pdf: http://www dot worc.org/development/howto.html
This can be done. We can win. But you must expect to become the new leader.
Thanks. We usually have good intentions, but I endorse the idea that we have to become more effective. Our efforts should put us in a stronger position and lead somewhere.
This action in France has an Abbie Hoffman flavor. Aside from fun and ridicule, which can be energizing, the goal is not clear. I suppose it has a place as an opening shot to publicize the cost of food. It will appeal to free spirits, but not so much people struggling to live.
Joe
Thanks so much for using Common Dreams to help organize.
This is what a major focus of Common Dreams can be used for..... not people ranting their opinions.
I hope that others like you will starting doing like you have done. In fact you could repost what you said again and again to many of the post on Common Dreams.
I'll copy this info to my organizing docs file.
Take care.
My next push will try to get single payer nationalized health care in the US adapted by the Enviros to build alliances with labor.
sw
You're very welcome. We need to get the job done.
Fisher also has a book, How to Lead When You're Not in Charge, for bringing new ideas into areas where it's needed, ie. local groups. The methods in his other books can do that as well. Just make "yesable propositions," for example, as discussed in the books cited and here: http://www dot pon.harvard.edu/hnp/theory/tools/tools.shtml He has a whole book of examples (in libraries) called Dear Israelis, Dear Arabs. But I always recommend the group approach of organizing.
This is not a new idea. It was first practiced, I believe, several thousand years ago with some fishes and a few loafs of bread. But I'm sure the French add their own flair. Bravo!
And Flavor
Dear 20% of Patriots:
80% of our population has been Indoctrinated, are Uneducated, Fat and Lazy.
What will get them to move? Suffering heralds Redemption. Once the bread lines are long enough they will BEGIN to ask the most basic questions....And then look out Ruling Class!
Viva La France!
My method is to educate, embarrass and threaten (with war crimes tribunals) the coporate media into lessening its propaganda. I do have faith that populations in general will respond favorably when presented with an accurrate in depth account of events and situations. The masses will then give the coporate stooges (our elected officials) enough pressure to cause just outcomes.------- Thanks ---Peace