EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
Popular content
Today's Top News
Now is the Time for a Full Afghanistan Withdrawal
After OBL: McGovern/Jones Push for Real Withdrawal Plan
Following the killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, the floodgates opened in Washington this week for reconsideration of U.S. plans to continue the open-ended war in Afghanistan.![]()
Now Representatives Jim McGovern and Walter Jones have introduced the "Afghanistan Exit and Accountability Act," bipartisan legislation that would require the President present to Congress a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops and a clear end date for the war. It would require the President to submit quarterly reports to Congress on the progress of troop withdrawal, as well as the human and financial costs of continuing the war. The President would also have to report how much money U.S. taxpayers would save if the war were brought to an end in six months, instead of five, ten, or twenty years.
Other Members of Congress have spoken out this week against indefinite continuation of the war, including Senators Dick Durbin , Richard Lugar, and Robert Menendez; (jointly) Representatives Lee, Ellison, Grijalva, Woolsey, and Waters; Representative Barney Frank; and Representative Cliff Stearns.
But among all this, the intervention of McGovern and Jones is unique in that it carries with it the prospect of a roll call, in which every Member of the House will have to choose a side: open-ended war in Afghanistan, or a clear plan for military withdrawal?
The FY 2012 defense authorizations bill is expected to come before the House in late May or June. It is expected that Reps. McGovern and Jones will then offer their bill as an amendment.
Introducing the bill now gives Americans the opportunity to talk to their Representatives about this legislation, and to ask them to co-sponsor it.
In a sense, when you are asking your Representative to co-sponsor the bill, you are asking them to vote for the amendment. But few people know much in advance exactly when legislation is going to be on the floor; often, many interested people find out that an amendment is going to be voted on less than 24 hours before the actual vote takes place. That's not much time to have a meaningful interaction with your Representative, given that for most people most of the time, interacting with your Representative means interacting with a staff person, who then talks to the Representative. You want to allow some time for those conversations, and meaningful consideration, to take place. That's why you want to have a conversation with your Representative's office now, asking them to co-sponsor the bill, rather than waiting for the amendment. Also, getting co-sponsors on the bill allows you to build momentum; it allows Members of Congress to see what other Members of Congress are doing, something that they take into account when they decide their position. If you can say, this bill has 100 co-sponsors, that's going to help you move people who are on the fence.
The current high-water mark in the House for requiring a real timetable for withdrawal is the 162 Members who voted on July 1 last year for the McGovern amendment requiring a timetable for withdrawal.
Much has changed since then.
The President put forward 2014 as a date when a "transition to Afghan lead" - not necessarily a withdrawal of U.S. forces - would take place. Public opinion has further soured on the war, including Republican opinion: before Sunday's news, two-thirds of voters said the war was not worth it, including nearly half of Republicans and the majority of independents, and three-quarters of voters wanted to see a substantial withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from Afghanistan this summer, including the majority of Republicans and independents.
And then came Sunday's news.
Senator Durbin said this week he voted for the 2001 resolution authorizing the war "to go after" al Qaeda and bin Laden:
"Now here we are, 10 years later," Durbin said. "If you asked me if I was signing up for the longest war in U.S. history, with no end in sight, even with the killing of Osama bin Laden, that was not the bargain, that is not what I was signing up for."
Durbin asked:
"If you believe that resolution of this conflict by military means is highly unlikely and not a realistic basis for US policy, how can we send one more American soldier to fight and die in Afghanistan?"
Another significant change is that debate among Republicans about the war is getting more prominent with the start of the Republican presidential primary campaign. Two of the candidates - Gary Johnson and Ron Paul - want to end the war. When the question came up in last night's Republican debate, the Republican audience cheered when Gary Johnson and Ron Paul said that they wanted to end the war
If you look at that roll call from last July, a fact that immediately jumps out at you is that of those 162 who voted for the McGovern amendment, 153 of them were Democrats and 9 of them were Republicans. Pushing Members now to co-sponsor the McGovern bill is an opportunity to test movement in the House in the last year, especially among Republicans, since public opinion, especially Republican public opinion, soured on the war and since Osama bin Laden - for many Americans, the target of the war - has been removed from the scene.
Pressure for a real withdrawal timetable could help end the war much sooner, because while on the one hand the Administration now says it is "seeking to use the killing of Osama bin Laden to accelerate a negotiated settlement with the Taliban and hasten the end of the Afghanistan war," on the other hand, the Administration is pressing the government of Afghanistan for a "Permanent Bases Agreement" that would keep U.S. troops and bases in Afghanistan past 2014. The problem with that demand - in addition to the fact that it keeps U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan much longer than they need to be - is that the demand for an indefinite U.S. military presence in Afghanistan is likely to sabotage the peace talks in Afghanistan necessary to end the war.
So, if you don't want to see the indefinite continuation of war in Afghanistan, you know what to do. You can write to your Representative here. Or you can call your Representative via the Capitol Switchboard, 202-225-3121. Ask your Representative to stand up for a real exit plan that has an end date, to start an irreversible process of bringing our troops home.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

9 Comments so far
Show AllWe cannot leave until we build the PipeLine that is designed to carry Rich Minerals that Corporate America who is in China needs now.
Yes! Get the grossly able and amazingly stupid US Armed Forces and their buccaneering private operators out.
It still has to be said that if the USA is to retain any honour on this planet it has to fix what it has broken and it will cost a great deal, meaning the operation will be monetarily distinctly unprofitable for a long time. The longer they wait the worse it will get. Eventually of course it will prove to be the only way in which the USA can survive as an entity and in the process become other than the earth threatening monster we have come to know.
US'ns have two choices, a rock and a hard place, and only themselves to blame.
My hopes are great and my expectations tiny.
Because people got duped by another ridiculous, unverifiable psyop, the conclusion to be drawn is that we will see another round of horror and war. Only when people begin to question the 'bs' will we ever see a chance to end the wars. People are gullible and we've seen the entire left get fooled. So expect more wars, more violence--not less.
Very much to the point, particularly the psyop part. A characteristic of the insane is that they only accept the relevance of evidence they produce; of the stories they create. Truth and falsehood consequently become inextricably linked. So, no matter the evidence, an insane murderer is unable to ever accept his guilt. The result is he (and she) obdurately insist the the victim is guilty. It is common.
All the evidence is that the USA does just this.
It seems the USA thinks just this spells justice.
The USA is an insane place.
- "Now here we are, 10 years later," Durbin said. "If you asked me if I was signing up for the longest war in U.S. history, blah blah blah..." -
Well, then, sir, you were incredibly stupid when you enacted into law such a badly-written piece of shit (Public Law 107-40, aka 'AUMF').
What, you thought that declaring war against enemies to be named later was a good idea?
You thought that it was an achievable goal for the US military to 'prevent future terrorism'? America is still 'going after al-Qaeda' in AfPak and Yemen (this past week).
Tell me, when do we get our victory parade? When will 'future terrorism' be finally and forever prevented?
It is your fault, Mr. Senator, for the mess we have been in for the last 10 years, for the loss of civil rights, for the imposition of this national secret security state, for the loss of American prestige and money and lives.
You and the rest of our feckless Congress are Morons (except for Barbara Lee).
Timing aside, we need to end the invasions and bombings of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya (yes Libya because there is always another way), Yemen, Somalia... We need to become responsible about our energy and prepare assiduously for green energy that will not cause wars and pollute the earth bit by bit.
We need to use our wealth for the common good. We need to solve problems in constructive ways that do not involve causing deaths. That includes our budgetary approaches that will certainly cause needless death among the poor, children, the elderly, the sick. Tax breaks for millionaires and corporations that show billions in profits, contracts for war companies are absolutely part of the picture that emphasizes transferring money from the poor and working people to the ridiculously wealthy regardless of the consequences.
May he rest in peace. I'll rejoice at no one killed in an illegal war. Shouldn't his body have been given to his family? Crazy Horses body was...
Now can we focus on the enemy whose fruits caused 911? Corporate American Empire. Minds, blood and souls have been boiling in the Arab World (We still don't understand...) since after WW2 we went into the Middle East for "their oil." (What is our oil doing buried under their sand?)
http://youtu.be/n7Fzm1hEiDQ
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Evolution-Number-Nine-by-Michael-Dewey-110215-430.html
Back to this post with a sudden overwhelming understanding of what has happened.
Given the approval rating of about 75% or 80% it is clear that in this day and age the most wealthy and able nation on earth has reverted to comic book idiocy by delighting in the story of the brutal shooting of an unarmed man in front of his wife and children. Reading through the years it is obvious that this man, the persona Obama the monster, was made in the US media.
That this was or was not the man Osama bin Laden who died is of no consequence here.
The only conclusion we can come to is that the USA and its people are insane.
Robert Naiman is lauding Representatives McGovern and Jones for introducing a bill that would require Obama to present to Congress a timetable for the withdrawal of American soldiers from Afghanistan. This is all well and good but Naiman seems to not be cognizant of the fact that Congress has the very real ability to easily end this idiotic and unnecessary occupation of Afghanistan by simply cutting off the funds which keep the occupation of that country rolling ever onward. This then begs the question why Naiman, while well-intentioned, is not urging members of Congress to do exactly that.