EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Wisconsin: The First Stop in An American Uprising?
It took awhile, but Wisconsin shows that the poor and middle class of the U.S. may be ready to push back. Madison may be only the beginning.
The uprising that swept Tunisia, Egypt, and parts of Europe is showing signs of blossoming across the United States.
In Wisconsin, public employees and their supporters are drawing the line at Governor Scott Walker’s plan to eliminate collective bargaining and unilaterally cut benefits. School teachers, university students, firefighters, and others descended on the capital in the tens of thousands, and even the Superbowl champion Green Bay Packers have weighed in against the bill. Protests against similar anti-union measures are ramping up in Ohio.
Meanwhile, another protest movement aimed at protecting the poor and middle class is in the works. Cities around the country are preparing for a February 26 Day of Action, “targeting corporate tax dodgers.”
Learning from the UK
The strategy picks up on the UK Uncut campaign, begun when a group at a London pub—a firefighter, a nurse, a student, and others—came up with an idea that is part flash mob, part sit-in. In an article published in the Nation, reporter Johann Hari tells the story of the group’s frustration about government cutbacks. If Vodafone, one corporation with a huge back-tax bill, paid up, the cutbacks wouldn’t be needed. The group spread the word over social media, and held loud, impolite demonstrations. The idea quickly went viral, and flash mobs/sit-ins materialized at retail outlets across Britain, shutting many of them down.
Now, a US Uncut group has formed and announced a February 26 Day of Action here to coincide with UK Uncut's planned protests on the same day. Already, a dozen local events are planned. Some groups are keeping quiet about their targets, but several are targeting Bank of America. The goal, according to a statement on the US Uncut website, is “to draw attention to the fact that Bank of America received $45 billion in government bailout funds while funneling its tax dollars into 115 offshore tax havens [...] And to highlight the fact that the poor and middle class are now paying for this largess through drastic government cuts.”
The Politics of Class Warfare
Across the country, the poor and middle class have suffered from the economic collapse: jobs disappeared, mortgages sank underneath debt, and opportunities for a college education evaporated. Much of the bailout that was supposed to fix the economy went to the very institutions that caused the collapse. Many of these institutions are now using tax loopholes and offshore tax shelters to avoid paying taxes.
It took some time for a political response to coalesce. The Tea Party movement was able to direct discontent away from the Wall Street titans who brought the economy to its knees. Funding from the Koch brothers’ petro-fortune along with fawning attention from Fox News helped get the libertarian movement off the ground. But progressives remained fragmented and few built active, organized bases. Many waited for President Obama to act.
The tide may now be turning. Inspired by people-power movements around the world, people in the United States are beginning push back. The poor and middle class, those who didn't cause the collapse but have felt the most pain from the poor economy, are now being asked to sacrifice again.
Politicians are scurrying to cut spending, but fewer than one in five Americans say the federal budget deficit is their chief worry about the economy, according to a new poll by the Pew Research Center; 44 percent say they're most worried about jobs. Polls show that Americans also want spending for education, investment in infrastructure, and environmental protection. Yet spending in all these areas is up for drastic cuts in state and federal budgets.
Likewise, on the tax side, 59 percent of Americans opposed extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest, according to a Bloomberg poll. Congress cut the taxes anyway, and the package will cost $800 billion over just two years.
Until now, polls have been one of the few places where anger at government policies that favor the rich while cutting service to the middle-class has been visible. But the crowds in Madison and the momentum of US Uncut tell us that may be about to change.
As a statement on the US Uncut website puts it: “We demand that before the hard-working, tax-paying families of this country are once again forced to sacrifice, the corporations who have so richly profited from our labor, our patronage, and our bailouts be compelled to pay their taxes and contribute their fair share to the continued prosperity of our nation. We will organize, we will mobilize, and we will NOT be quiet!”
Here's a "how-to" from UK Uncut:
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


143 Comments so far
Show AllThe only union that should be broken up is the union between the politicians and their corporate contributors.
I'm not sure if I'd call that a union as much as a criminal conspiracy.
siamese twins
Joined at the head and rectum.
Perhaps a marriage. They think have a God-given right to a marriage between a rich-fuck and his tax-cut.
Very good. Actually, the notion of the "rich fuck" is one of NO tax for themselves and it goes back centuries to the European elites. Another criminal idea they brought to this stolen land peopled by egalitarian tribes.
union, criminal conspiracy in restraint of trade, same thing.
Ho ho, Horace-you sound like a friend of mine whose (formerly) wealthy family ,lost all their money in the Depression. Call out the National Guard! That could be interesting in Wisconsin. Bet half of them wouldn't show up.You're so reactionary you're entertaining. Build more Dreadnoughts!
Yup. In your world the Emancipation Proclamation was restraint of trade. Nice try.
Notwithstanding what the ignorant and left-leaning history teachers try to tell us, the Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves only in the Confederacy. not. It did not cover the 800,000 slaves in the slave-holding border states of Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland or Delaware, which were Union states. At the time, The Emancipation Proclamation was ridiculed for freeing only the slaves over which the Union had no power. It was a political stunt to destabilize the South. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Proclamation
Lincoln himself is remembered for saying, in a letter to Horace Greeley dated August 22, 1862:
"I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be 'the Union as it was.' If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views." http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm
So, you ignorant, left-leaning high school teachers (who went to state universities and have never had an independent thought), remember that when you speak of the Emancipation Proclamation. Maybe, someday, you will be worthy of teaching our children, but I doubt it.
Yup, and Churchill said re: Stalin that he'd make an alliance with the devil, if that would help him defeat Germany. So what, exactly, is your point? When the Emancipation Proclamation was issued, it was generally understood by those with their heads screwed on that it could not free the slaves in the South-only defeat of the Confederacy could accomplish that. It was designed to get under the hide of the Confederacy, and give them something else to worry about, and also as a means of inspiring some in the North to fight harder. Funny how those 800,000 slaves you refer to in the border states kind of just wandered away. So is it the intent of the Emancipation Proclamation that upsets you, or is it the underlying idea of freeing the slaves? I believe the CSS Hunley has a page on Facebook. You could become friends with it.
More importantly, is decreed that escaped slaves were to be accepted, aided and assisted by all government officials and employees. This directly and powerfully helped those who actually did free the slaves - the slaves themselves.
More lies. You omit the key passages in both Lincoln's letter, and in the Proclamation. (This is not in defense of Lincoln, but rather in opposition to the racist pro-Confederacy revisionism the right wing is spreading.)
From the letter:
"I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free."
From the Proclamation:
"...the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom."
"...the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons."
"...such persons of suitable condition, will be received into the armed service of the United States to garrison forts, positions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service."
You missed my point. Let me rephrase it, since you seem to want to nitpick instead of grasping the real point. In your world, anything that favors freedom and empowerment could be considered "restraint of trade" and you would therefore be against it; e.g. freeing the slaves, the American Revolution (it restrained trade on the British), child labor laws, antitrust laws, etc, etc.
Still scarfing down those cheeseburgers good ole Murdoch's paying you?
Yeah, something akin to the separation of church and state. Why not divorce from a criminally exploitive economic system altogether?
Yeah, a shotgun divorce!
The only union that should be broken up is the union between the politicians and their corporate contributors.
True. I am listening to a book about trains in the early 1900's. This shit has been going on since congress was created. It is so blatant now and no one does a damn thing. Oh, I forgot. SCOTUS did. They made it legal
Re: "The only union that should be broken up is the union between the politicians and their corporate contributors."
A big 10-4, m60, this is the best one sentence comment I've seen on CD in ages,
and may I suggest a good book for all CDers; The Anti-American Manifesto, by Ted Rall.
"The poor and middle class, those who didn't cause the collapse but have felt the most pain from the poor economy, are now being asked to sacrifice again.....and we will NOT be quiet!”"
That's what I wanna say! That's why I am here.
Sarah noted that "progressives waited for Obama to act".
Obama's actions have included blaming the victims as much as the Republicans have.
Too many working class Americans have bought in to the blame-the-victims strategy.
Hopefully Wisconsin is the turining point where the working class starts blaming the banksters and the blue team and red team politicians the banksters own.
..
I am struck by the absence of discussion about the extractive dynamics of capitalism that is dependent on exclusion. This is exercised by privatized capital through 'socialization' of debt and so many other areas of life.
Starting with nature as existing only in terms of something to be researched and used - knowledge held by the dominant societal/economic structure is thus de facto defined as INSUFFICIENT while at the same time engaging exhaustive exploitation - necessary in order to maintain a 'margin' that is profitable.
Socially this means that it is necessary that there be 'marginalization'. There is direct correlation between degree of profitability as reason for being and degree of marginalization of rights, understanding, information, etc - all that comprises life from which value is extracted.
Complete disregard for the accumulated knowledge of indigenous ( in all senses) family, community etc. including biological/botanical systems sustained through ancestrally transmitted systems. We ahve been essentially told to reject, disdain and destroy these. Here in the developed world the dynamic feeds on extracting from all dynamics of everyday life (time, energy, capacity) exhausting the basis of life. We have not seen this because extractive capitalism has gone elsewhere so that that the shibboleth of democracy not interfere - until now.
The financial power of say, the Koch bros. to fund campaigns that serve their profit center, to insure its profit center into the future, was itself accumulated from this dynamic of exhaustive extraction. It hides - externalizes accountability - of its dependency on exclusion of existing forms of knowledge that are the glue of healthy existence.
This is obviously over simplified, but the cohesion of the people of Wisconsin is a prime example of people realizing their existence as a wealth, a resource that MUST NOT be marginalized by privatization as something from which to extract 'value'.
Communities lose their sustainability when their 'gifting' nature (motherhood, family, education, mutual accountability, and numerous other qualities) is corralled by an external proprietor profiting from their losses (extraction) in terms of being free to articulate the dynamics of their existing economy with matters such as fair wage (collective bargaining), maternal leave, and so many plain old common sense human spiritual values...
An insidious aspect of this the distancing that the profit paradigm instills - in all dimensions. As Anne Leonard put it in the story of stuff... it is all just sorta "away". Bring it home!
video from a 2010 international workshop at Duke University on Education, Development, Freedom
http://trinity.duke.edu/globalstudies/education-development-freedom
Yes, LIFE should be the profit motive. Now let's get on with the business of crushing the bastards.
Excellent post, thank you OG!
I gotta good chuckle here today. And I am so very very happy that UNCUT has a protest in Lansing. YEA!!! Haven't been out for awhile. I love making signs.
Come on LA, Las Vegas, Phoenix,
"Uncut" sounds like a gay porn movie.
You would know?
I'm thinking along this Line for sign:
SACRIFICE MY ASS
Excellent idea for a sign. Nice double entendre-'cause it's your ass and mine they intend to sacrifice.
As I said.
Ok, too harsh? How about..
YOU ARE ALL CROOKS AND SHOULD BE IN JAIL
AND OFF THE COVER OF ROLLING STONE
hahhahahahahaaaahhaaaaha
This week Obama flew out to Silicon Valley to dine with billionaires to "brainstorm about creating jobs". I am really sick of this grovelling before pirates. Bet the subject of taxing the bastards fairly never came up.
Rather than protesting in America, hurt their profits. The only power the people have is the power of Boycott! Organized boycott with the internet will bring them to their knees -- one company at a time.
Great idea! Let's vote on which corporation to boycott next, audience participation, and an OpenLeaks reporting of the CEO rich and lavish lifestyles they like to hide.
I've already gotten out of Chase. Looking for prepaid phone to ditch Verizon, and next will be Comcast. The banks are all money laundering whores for drugs, weapons (including MIC), and sex & labor slaves, they are really my biggest enemy #1.
My 401(k) is gutted, my mortgage nearly underwater, and austerity measures are being enacted for poor and middle class while fat cats keep their cadillac untaxed health care bennies. The wool is coming off the eyes of the masses so fast it's getting to be a daily occurrence that a neighbor, co-worker or grocery checker are all talking about resistance in all sorts of ways.
I'll also be in the street protesting B of A whenever one is scheduled in Seattle. How dare they stick our children and grandchildren for the debts for their mistakes and gambling. Make it very hot up in those high rise bankster gangster offices one city at a time, we know who these greedy clowns are.
Boycott boycott boycott and protest protest protest. Go Egypt on their corporate asses!
"Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events. It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."
— Robert F. Kennedy
" 59 per cent of people polled were against extending the Bush-era tax cuts, but Congress went ahead anyway..." Congress's variation on Dick Cheney's "So?" And so much for representative democracy. Go good people of Wisconsin! Put some fear in your legislators! Let's spread the uprising to all 50 states, good people.
Has anyone seen, much less read, the bill that is causing the uproar?
Yes.
Yes, I've read it - more people should.
the first 8 pages are the meat and substance.
The remaining 136 pages are redlining existing legislation to do what the first 8 pages state.
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/JR1SB-11.pdf
It is all about union busting. Only 3 paragraphs in the entire 144 pages is about fiscal issues.
Got that now? "It is all about union busting."
If you favor union busting, then have the guts to just come out and say so and stop playing games.
Then there is the arrest of Ray McGovern during Hillary Clinton's danse macabre speech...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0PcPDr1DeA
skeletons are beginning to come out of the closet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcOZmtbLRP0&feature=related
"Congress cut the taxes anyway, and the package will cost $800 billion over just two years." Of course that's just the latest round of tax cuts, on top of many previous rounds. D'ya think this might have something to do with the budget deficits in the states? That and the hollowing out of the economy by outsourcing, Nafta, WTO, deregulation of banks and insurance companies and various other paper- shufflers. It's a system based on greed and the end result is starting to show.
There may be less money to go around right now, but this business of trying to end collective bargaining is simply cruelty and the protesters shouldn't leave until the governor backs down. He should also be recalled (i.e. impeached) at the soonest opportunity.
It is fun to see Wisconsin Democrats, in the name of "the people" and "democracy," prevent the Republican majority in the state legislature from passing new legislation by preventing the presence of a quorum.
To compare the mob scenes in Madison with the recent events in Cairo is absurd. In Madison a new governor, freshly elected by the majority of the voters; in Cairo, an aging dictator, who prevented honest elections for 30 years.
Any injustice is acceptable as long as it is done "legally".
Well NO!
In January Walker gave 140 million in tax giveaways to Corporations.
In Feburary he says there is an 133 million shortfall and the little guy must pay.
When a nation is this dysfinctional and itself habitually ignores laws to Corporate advantage, why should the little guy work within the "system" ? Masochism?
"American democracy." All bright and shiny and special and different, isn't it?
So the Supreme Court in Citizens United makes a radical departure from the text and all reasonable interpretations of the Constitution and rules that corporations have the right to buy elections and that does not bother you. But when corporations use that right to buy the elections in Wisconsin so that they may eviscerate labor unions (with their stooge governor cutting taxes to create the crisis and then blaming it on the unions) and a few Wisconsin legislators apparently summon up the courage to oppose that effort, at least for the time being, that disturbs you. Amazing.
The Supreme Court in Citizens United ruled that corporations and labor unions are protected under the first amendment to engage in electioneering, but they did not consider or decide whether the McCain Feingold prohibition against their contributing to candidates or campaigns contravenes the first amendment.
Corporations have labor unions outgunned by at least 10 to 1 and are headed towards 100 to 1, so the balance is illusory. Citizens United not only allowed the ads by such groups to specifically endorse or oppose candidates, it also did overturn previous rulings on campaign spending limits, as quoted from the NYT, the pro-corporate rag that endorsed the Iraq War and refused to reveal Bush's violation of the FISA laws before the 2004 election in spite of its duty to do so:
... Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205, overruled two precedents: Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, a 1990 decision that upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates, and McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, a 2003 decision that upheld the part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 that restricted campaign spending by corporations and unions...
Look, we can turn on AM radio 24 hours a day and get all of these talking points word for word. You never discuss or debate anything, you just spew talking points from the right wing think tanks. They are not your thoughts, or you could - and most definitely would defend them.
What do you get out of this, out of repeating these talking points here? Some sort of vicarious sense of being powerful, by teaming up with those in power?